--- Comment #4 from falk at debian dot org 2006-03-19 09:04 ---
It's still not fixed in 4.0.2-9 (SVN 20060212 gcc-4_0-branch).
http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.php?pkg=swingwtver=0.87-2arch=hppastamp=1140460231file=logas=raw
--
falk at debian dot org changed:
What
The subject says it all:
void foo(void)
{
int a = 0;
void bar(void)
{
a = 1;
}
bar ();
a = a + 1;
}
int main(void)
{
foo ();
}
GNU gdb 6.4
Copyright 2005 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
GDB is free software, covered by the GNU General Public License, and you are
welcome to
--- Comment #5 from debian-gcc at lists dot debian dot org 2006-03-19
10:30 ---
same ICE with 4.1.0
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24221
--- Comment #4 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-03-19 10:36 ---
Subject: Bug 26716
Author: pault
Date: Sun Mar 19 10:36:09 2006
New Revision: 112210
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=112210
Log:
2006-03-19 Paul Thomas [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PR
[ no small test case yet, forwarded from http://bugs.debian.org/356435 ]
Where a base class has a destructor defined inline, g++ may generate
code for a derived class's destructor that calls an non-inline version
of the base class destructor, but without generating code for the
latter. This is
--- Comment #7 from debian-gcc at lists dot debian dot org 2006-03-19
12:21 ---
Created an attachment (id=11068)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=11068action=view)
proposed patch
patch, proposed at http://bugs.debian.org/356316
--
--- Comment #5 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-03-19 12:45 ---
Subject: Bug 26716
Author: pault
Date: Sun Mar 19 12:45:42 2006
New Revision: 112211
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=112211
Log:
2006-03-19 Paul Thomas [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PR
--- Comment #2 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-03-19 12:48 ---
Fixed on trunk and 4.1
Paul
--
pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #6 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-03-19 12:50 ---
Fixed in 4.1 and trunk.
Thanks for reporting it, Martin.
Paul
--
pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
[forwarded from http://bugs.debian.org/356569]
works with 4.0.3, 4.1.0 -O0, 4.1.0 -Ox segfaults.
g++ -O3 -c 3ddeskd.ii
3ddeskd.cpp: In function 'void draw_digit(int, float, float)':
3ddeskd.cpp:634: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault
Please submit a full bug report, with preprocessed
--- Comment #1 from debian-gcc at lists dot debian dot org 2006-03-19
13:02 ---
Created an attachment (id=11069)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=11069action=view)
preprocessed source
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26757
[forwarded from http://bugs.debian.org/354700]
$ cat t.c
int foo(int x;) { }
$ gcc-3.4 -c t.c
t.c:1: error: parameter x has just a forward declaration
$ gcc-4.0 -c t.c
$ echo $?
0
$ gcc-4.1 -c t.c
$ echo $?
0
--
Summary: [4.0/4.1 regression] gcc 4 does not notice C syntax
--- Comment #5 from tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-03-19 15:09 ---
Subject: Bug 26277
Author: tobi
Date: Sun Mar 19 15:09:33 2006
New Revision: 112214
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=112214
Log:
2006-03-19 Tobias Schlueter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
(backport r110993)
--- Comment #6 from tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-03-19 15:10 ---
Recent discussion lead me to backport this to 4.1.
--
tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #3 from tausq at debian dot org 2006-03-19 15:52 ---
I think this is a bit different, the bit of code that causes the problem is:
339796 .loc 1 38663 0
339797 or, %r28,%r0,%r3
339798 b .L25049
339799 copy %r4,%r19
This bit of code is (I
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-03-19 15:54 ---
This is a dup of bug 23144 which was already known.
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 23144 ***
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #3 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-03-19 15:54 ---
*** Bug 26759 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-03-19 16:08 ---
We need a testcase to reproduce this.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-03-19 16:13 ---
Reducing.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
--- Comment #1 from jb at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-03-19 16:18 ---
Confirmed
--
jb at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED
--- Comment #4 from dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca 2006-03-19
17:09 ---
Subject: Re: gcc generates unreachable branch
--- Comment #3 from tausq at debian dot org 2006-03-19 15:52 ---
I think this is a bit different, the bit of code that causes the problem is:
--- Comment #5 from jb at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-03-19 17:15 ---
An even more reduced testcase is
program char_type_len
type foo_t
character ( LEN = 80 ) :: bar (1)
end type foo_t
type(foo_t) :: foo
print *, len (foo%bar)
end program char_type_len
I.e. it's not
To Investor:
nZon Corporation
Trading As: IZON
Last Trade: $0.45
7 Day Proj: $1.10-$1.25
30 Day Proj: $1.75-$2.00
InZon Corp. is the new stock on our watch.
After recently acquiring SAE Group including all assets and
technologies, IZON has been laying quite while developing a new
technology
--- Comment #3 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-03-19 20:36 ---
DCE is removing some statements:
Marking useful stmt: alarm (D.3630_3);
Marking useful stmt: return;
Processing worklist:
processing: return;
processing: alarm (D.3630_3);
processing: D.3630_3 = (unsigned int)
--- Comment #9 from patchapp at dberlin dot org 2006-03-19 21:01 ---
Subject: Bug number PR17298
A patch for this bug has been added to the patch tracker.
The mailing list url for the patch is
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2006-03/msg01068.html
--
--- Comment #3 from patchapp at dberlin dot org 2006-03-19 21:02 ---
Subject: Bug number PR26661
A patch for this bug has been added to the patch tracker.
The mailing list url for the patch is
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2006-03/msg01100.html
--
--- Comment #7 from patchapp at dberlin dot org 2006-03-19 21:02 ---
Subject: Bug number PR26716
A patch for this bug has been added to the patch tracker.
The mailing list url for the patch is
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2006-03/msg01124.html
--
--- Comment #9 from patchapp at dberlin dot org 2006-03-19 21:03 ---
Subject: Bug number PR 22600
A patch for this bug has been added to the patch tracker.
The mailing list url for the patch is
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2006-03/msg01203.html
--
I'm following the directions here:
http://developer.classpath.org/mediation/ClasspathShowcase#head-7d9a556e8485fc84fd5ce0e52be6104d85e24316
... to compile the .jar files into .so objects for gij, to make
Eclipse faster. During the run, I see this error:
--- Comment #3 from amodra at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-03-19 22:26 ---
Subject: Bug 26453
Author: amodra
Date: Sun Mar 19 22:26:37 2006
New Revision: 112216
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=112216
Log:
PR target/26453
* config/rs6000/rs6000.c
--- Comment #4 from amodra at bigpond dot net dot au 2006-03-19 22:28
---
3.4 branch is closed
--
amodra at bigpond dot net dot au changed:
What|Removed |Added
[ forwarded from http://bugs.debian.org/356896 ]
void abort(void);
__attribute__((noinline))
int *foo(int *start) {
int *tmp;
for (tmp = start + 100; tmp start; --tmp) ;
return tmp;
}
int main() {
int x[100];
if (foo(x) != x)
abort();
return 0;
}
aborts with 4.1.0
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rakdver at gcc dot gnu dot
|
--- Comment #5 from tausq at debian dot org 2006-03-20 02:34 ---
Indeed, as Dave said this is a different and not yet fixed problem.
--
tausq at debian dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
This problem occurs on Solaris 8 when building macro_list.
Here the output of 'make' in the neighborhood:
echo | ./xgcc -B./ -B/opt/reb/lib/gcc/gcc-4.1.0/sparc-sun-solaris2.8/bin/
-isystem /opt/reb/lib/gcc/gcc-4.1.0/sparc-sun-solaris2.8/include -isystem
--- Comment #1 from eggert at gnu dot org 2006-03-20 06:58 ---
Created an attachment (id=11071)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=11071action=view)
Makefile.in patch to avoid garbled sed command
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26764
--- Comment #2 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-03-20 07:12
---
I'll attach a patch.
Would you mind posting it to [EMAIL PROTECTED] I'll apply it if it is
accepted. Thanks in advance.
--
ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-03-20 07:50 ---
I could not get 3.3.3 (or 3.4.0 to get the correct results):
(gdb) b main
Breakpoint 1 at 0x8048374: file t.c, line 16.
(gdb) run
Starting program: /home/peshtigo/pinskia/a.out
Breakpoint 1, main () at t.c:16
16
--- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-03-20 07:54 ---
Confirmed (I thought there was a way to get the variable in the nested function
from gdb but it looks like GCC/gdb does not do that but that is a different
issue).
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.1.1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26741
--- Comment #4 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-03-20 07:57 ---
I could not reduce this to a good point (at least today).
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26757
41 matches
Mail list logo
