[Bug tree-optimization/27742] [4.2 regression] ICE with -ftree-vectorizer-verbose

2006-06-19 Thread micis at gmx dot de
--- Comment #6 from micis at gmx dot de 2006-06-19 07:05 --- I tried to reduce the source, but delta wasn't very successful. After more than 2 days on a fast opteron machine delta deleted only about 30%. With the reduced source in gdb I get: Program received signal SIGSEGV,

mpeg12.c:974: internal compiler error: in extract_insn, at recog.c:2083

2006-06-19 Thread vaLsKi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 cc -I../libvo -I../../libvo -I/usr/X11R6/include -fno-PIC -O -pipe - -funroll-loops -march=pentium3 -fno-force-addr -D_LARGEFILE_SOURCE - -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -I/usr/local/include/freetype2 - -I/usr/local/include -I/usr/X11R6/include/gtk12 -

[Bug tree-optimization/27742] [4.2 regression] ICE with -ftree-vectorizer-verbose

2006-06-19 Thread micis at gmx dot de
--- Comment #7 from micis at gmx dot de 2006-06-19 07:06 --- Created an attachment (id=11693) -- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=11693action=view) preprocessed source -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27742

[Bug libstdc++/28080] New: header dependencies

2006-06-19 Thread Woebbeking at web dot de
Hi, could you clean up the header dependencies? E.g. a simple #include memory int main() { return 0; } produces 250kb preprocessed output. So the usage of STL slows down compilation considerable. Cheers, André -- Summary: header dependencies Product: gcc

[Bug middle-end/26900] Number of iterations not know for simple loop

2006-06-19 Thread sebastian dot pop at cri dot ensmp dot fr
--- Comment #11 from sebastian dot pop at cri dot ensmp dot fr 2006-06-19 07:50 --- Subject: Re: Number of iterations not know for simple loop I thought that this bug should have been fixed by now: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2006-03/msg01749.html what is the status of that

[Bug fortran/20876] Subroutine call in FORALL block not PURE

2006-06-19 Thread paul dot richard dot thomas at cea dot fr
--- Comment #3 from paul dot richard dot thomas at cea dot fr 2006-06-19 08:11 --- Created an attachment (id=11694) -- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=11694action=view) Patch to fix PR The reason for the segfault is that the locus for the assign statement was never

[Bug rtl-optimization/28071] [4.1/4.2 regression] A file that can not be compiled in reasonable time/space

2006-06-19 Thread raffalli at univ-savoie dot fr
--- Comment #7 from raffalli at univ-savoie dot fr 2006-06-19 08:44 --- Just for comparison: on my Intel dual core 3GHz, icc compiles in 15s within 200Mb with -O3 (including cpp) -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28071

[Bug c++/28041] [gomp] ICE in g++.dg/gomp/atomic-[4,5,9].C

2006-06-19 Thread uros at kss-loka dot si
--- Comment #1 from uros at kss-loka dot si 2006-06-19 08:56 --- Works OK with gcc version 4.2.0 20060619 (experimental). -- uros at kss-loka dot si changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug fortran/20874] elemental function ought to be scalar

2006-06-19 Thread paul dot richard dot thomas at cea dot fr
--- Comment #1 from paul dot richard dot thomas at cea dot fr 2006-06-19 09:25 --- Created an attachment (id=11695) -- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=11695action=view) Patch to fix PR I will submit this tonight. Paul --

[Bug middle-end/26900] Number of iterations not know for simple loop

2006-06-19 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #12 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-19 09:25 --- Roger requested this do be done differently by canonicalizing comparisons in fold and using an improved operand_equal_p to do this. Patches for this are done, but need to wait for stage1. --

[Bug libstdc++/28080] header dependencies

2006-06-19 Thread pcarlini at suse dot de
--- Comment #1 from pcarlini at suse dot de 2006-06-19 09:29 --- Ok, let's see what we can do... -- pcarlini at suse dot de changed: What|Removed |Added

The combined tree newlib stuff used with non-newlib targets

2006-06-19 Thread Kai Ruottu
While trying to build a crosscompiler for 'sparc-solaris2.9': configured with: ../configure --build=i686-linux-gnu --host=i686-linux-gnu --target=sparc-solaris2.9 --with-gnu-as --with-gnu-ld --enable-shared --enable-threads --enable-languages=c,c++ the following thing happened :

[Bug java/27025] ICE on simple initializer

2006-06-19 Thread aph at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #7 from aph at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-19 11:13 --- Deferred 'til ecj. -- aph at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|aph

[Bug fortran/28081] New: Undue compile-time error for zero-sized substring

2006-06-19 Thread fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org
The following error should not happen: $ cat substr_3.f implicit none character(len=10) :: s, t integer :: i, j s = abcdefghij t(:10) = s(1:) s(16:15) = foo if (s /= t) call abort end $ gfortran substr_3.f In file substr_3.f:9 s(16:15) =

[Bug fortran/28081] Undue compile-time error for zero-sized substring

2006-06-19 Thread fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #1 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-19 11:39 --- Here is a patch that fixes this problem (and gives a slightly better, IMHO, error message): Index: resolve.c === --- resolve.c (revision 114721)

[Bug bootstrap/28082] New: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault

2006-06-19 Thread info at pion dot xs4all dot nl
GCC Version: /tmp/gcc-4.1.1/host-hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.00/gcc/xgcc -V xgcc: '-V' option must have argument $ /tmp/gcc-4.1.1/host-hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.00/gcc/xgcc -v Using built-in specs. Target: hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.00 Configured with: ./configure --prefix=/opt/OpenSource/gcc-4.1.1 Thread

[Bug bootstrap/28082] internal compiler error: Segmentation fault

2006-06-19 Thread info at pion dot xs4all dot nl
--- Comment #1 from info at pion dot xs4all dot nl 2006-06-19 11:54 --- Created an attachment (id=11700) -- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=11700action=view) Tempory output of the compiler -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28082

[Bug libfortran/27895] problem with SPREAD and zero-sized arrays

2006-06-19 Thread fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #6 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-19 12:03 --- CSHIFT has the same problem: $ cat zero_cshift.f90 real :: tempn(1) tempn = 2.0 print *, cshift(tempn(2:),shift=1) end $ gfortran zero_cshift.f90 ./a.out Floating point exception I believe the

[Bug other/28083] New: fixincludes generates headers not ending with newline

2006-06-19 Thread peb at mppmu dot mpg dot de
Some of the headers produces by fixincludes (e.g., asm/posix_types.h) do not end with a newline. I'm not sure if this is a bug in autogen, or improper use of autogen (the autogen-generated replacement text in fixincl.x ends, e.g., with #endif /* _POSIX_TYPES_H_WRAPPER */ again without

[Bug middle-end/28034] [4.2 Regression] section anchors break -fprofile-generate

2006-06-19 Thread rsandifo at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #2 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-19 12:57 --- In response to comment #1, tmp isn't really the problem. The problem is coverage_counter_alloc(), which initially create an array of 1000 counters, and only supplies the real type at the end of compilation:

[Bug fortran/20867] statement function args not given implicit type early enough

2006-06-19 Thread paul dot richard dot thomas at cea dot fr
--- Comment #2 from paul dot richard dot thomas at cea dot fr 2006-06-19 13:00 --- Created an attachment (id=11702) -- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=11702action=view) Patch to fix this PR Will submit tonight. Paul --

[Bug other/28083] fixincludes generates headers not ending with newline

2006-06-19 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #1 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-19 13:14 --- Please provide a testcase (the unfixed asm/posix_types.h). Also you should check if using gcc 4.x fixes this, as the 3.x series are no longer maintained. -- rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

[Bug libmudflap/28077] [4.1/4.2 regression] pass39-frag.c produces mudflap violation on alpha

2006-06-19 Thread fche at redhat dot com
--- Comment #2 from fche at redhat dot com 2006-06-19 14:01 --- It looks like only the statically linked multithreding test cases trigger the problem. Would you mind trying ot hand-build one of those executables, but adding -rdynamic to LDFLAGS, and run with -backtrace=99 in

[Bug target/28084] New: /usr/include/errno.h:28: error: previous declaration of 'int errno' with 'C++' linkage

2006-06-19 Thread danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org
=/opt/gnu/gcc/gcc-4.2.0 --enable-debug=no --disable-nls --enable-threads=posix --enable-languages=c,c++,objc,fortran,java,ada,obj-c++ Thread model: posix gcc version 4.2.0 20060619 (experimental) -- Summary: /usr/include/errno.h:28: error: previous declaration of 'int

[Bug other/28083] fixincludes generates headers not ending with newline

2006-06-19 Thread peb at mppmu dot mpg dot de
--- Comment #2 from peb at mppmu dot mpg dot de 2006-06-19 14:24 --- Created an attachment (id=11703) -- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=11703action=view) The file asm/posix_typed.h as produced by fixincludes from gcc-3.4.6 I just checked that the same file created by

[Bug middle-end/28034] [4.2 Regression] section anchors break -fprofile-generate

2006-06-19 Thread rsandifo at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #3 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-19 14:31 --- Created an attachment (id=11704) -- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=11704action=view) Candidate patch Janis, can you try this patch? It avoids the use of section anchors for coverage counters.

[Bug tree-optimization/27341] [4.2 Regression] ICE in in add_virtual_operand with complex types

2006-06-19 Thread dberlin at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #13 from dberlin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-19 14:34 --- Subject: Bug 27341 Author: dberlin Date: Mon Jun 19 14:33:46 2006 New Revision: 114771 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=114771 Log: 2006-06-19 Daniel Berlin [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fix PR

[Bug tree-optimization/27341] [4.2 Regression] ICE in in add_virtual_operand with complex types

2006-06-19 Thread dberlin at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #14 from dberlin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-19 14:34 --- Fixed -- dberlin at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW

[Bug c++/28085] New: initialization of zero-sized array causes internal compiler error

2006-06-19 Thread bertrand dot marlier at gmail dot com
Following is the sequence to reproduce this issue and full g++ -v output. $ cat source.cpp int tab[0]={}; main() { } $ g++ source.cpp source.cpp:2: internal compiler error: in tree_low_cst, at tree.c:3255 Please submit a full bug report, with preprocessed source if appropriate. See

[Bug middle-end/28045] [4.0/4.1/4.2 Regression] Bitfield, , and optimization = bad code generation

2006-06-19 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #6 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-19 14:48 --- Subject: Bug 28045 Author: rguenth Date: Mon Jun 19 14:48:47 2006 New Revision: 114772 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=114772 Log: 2006-06-19 Richard Guenther [EMAIL PROTECTED] PR

[Bug middle-end/28045] [4.0/4.1 Regression] Bitfield, , and optimization = bad code generation

2006-06-19 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #7 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-19 14:49 --- Fixed on the mainline. -- rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug target/27861] [4.0/4.1/4.2 regression] ICE in expand_expr_real_1, at expr.c:6916

2006-06-19 Thread sayle at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #5 from sayle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-19 14:57 --- Subject: Bug 27861 Author: sayle Date: Mon Jun 19 14:57:17 2006 New Revision: 114773 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=114773 Log: PR target/27861 * expmed.c (expand_shift): On

[Bug middle-end/26807] [4.2 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/torture/pr24626-1.c -O2 (test for excess errors)

2006-06-19 Thread sje at cup dot hp dot com
--- Comment #18 from sje at cup dot hp dot com 2006-06-19 15:53 --- My PA runs show no failures of the pr24626* tests anymore. I think this problem has been resolved and the defect can be closed. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26807

[Bug middle-end/28045] [4.0/4.1 Regression] Bitfield, , and optimization = bad code generation

2006-06-19 Thread Jerry dot James at usu dot edu
--- Comment #8 from Jerry dot James at usu dot edu 2006-06-19 16:27 --- On behalf of the XEmacs team, I thank you for your amazingly speedy attention to this bug report. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28045

Mainline build problem on FC4

2006-06-19 Thread Andrew MacLeod
OK, so I wasn't just wacko last week. Mainline fails to build on Fedora Core 4 (with all the latest updates, kernel 2111) when built with checking disabled. Diego verified this on a second FC4 box. The compile fails when building crtfastmath during stage2. It doesn't happen when checking

[Bug middle-end/26807] [4.2 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/torture/pr24626-1.c -O2 (test for excess errors)

2006-06-19 Thread danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #19 from danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-19 16:35 --- Fixed by patch. -- danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug c++/28085] initialization of zero-sized array causes internal compiler error

2006-06-19 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #1 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-19 16:40 --- Fixed in 3.4.0. -- rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug c/28073] Type-punned pointer passed as function parameter generates bad assembly sequence

2006-06-19 Thread sorenj at us dot ibm dot com
--- Comment #2 from sorenj at us dot ibm dot com 2006-06-19 16:44 --- Changing just one line of the test program to the (AFAIK) legal C code. By casting through void *, we are addressing Andrew's concerns about violating the C rules. Foo *pFoo = *(Foo **) ((void *)longPtr); /* //

[Bug c/28073] Type-punned pointer passed as function parameter generates bad assembly sequence

2006-06-19 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #3 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-19 16:54 --- (In reply to comment #2) Changing just one line of the test program to the (AFAIK) legal C code. By casting through void *, we are addressing Andrew's concerns about violating the C rules. Foo *pFoo =

[Bug c/21920] alias violating

2006-06-19 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #103 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-19 16:54 --- *** Bug 28073 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug libstdc++/28080] header dependencies

2006-06-19 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-19 16:56 --- Specificly it was fixed by: 2005-11-24 Bruce Korb [EMAIL PROTECTED] * fixincl.c(write_replacement) here strings in AutoGen often/generally don't have a terminating newline. Check the last byte

[Bug libstdc++/28080] header dependencies

2006-06-19 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #3 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-19 16:57 --- Woops wrong bug. -- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug target/28084] /usr/include/errno.h:28: error: previous declaration of 'int errno' with 'C++' linkage

2006-06-19 Thread dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca
--- Comment #1 from dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca 2006-06-19 17:07 --- Subject: Re: New: /usr/include/errno.h:28: error: previous declaration of 'int errno' with 'C++' linkage /usr/include/errno.h:28: error: previous declaration of 'int errno' with 'C++' linkage

[Bug other/28083] fixincludes generates headers not ending with newline

2006-06-19 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #3 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-19 17:22 --- Fixed by: 2005-11-24 Bruce Korb [EMAIL PROTECTED] * fixincl.c(write_replacement) here strings in AutoGen often/generally don't have a terminating newline. Check the last byte for '\n'. --

[Bug target/28084] [4.2 Regression] /usr/include/errno.h:28: error: previous declaration of 'int errno' with 'C++' linkage

2006-06-19 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-19 17:25 --- See commment #6 in PR 27227 for more about this bug http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27227#c6 -- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug java/27908] VMSecureRandom generateSeed infinite loop? (Regression)

2006-06-19 Thread aph at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #15 from aph at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-19 17:38 --- Subject: Bug 27908 Author: aph Date: Mon Jun 19 17:38:08 2006 New Revision: 114778 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=114778 Log: 2006-06-19 Andrew Haley [EMAIL PROTECTED] PR java/1305

[Bug java/1305] [JSR133] GCJ ignores volatile modifier

2006-06-19 Thread aph at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #9 from aph at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-19 17:38 --- Subject: Bug 1305 Author: aph Date: Mon Jun 19 17:38:08 2006 New Revision: 114778 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=114778 Log: 2006-06-19 Andrew Haley [EMAIL PROTECTED] PR java/1305

[Bug c/28086] New: symbols missing on ia64

2006-06-19 Thread konqueror at gmx dot de
When building kaffe 1.1.7 (http://www.kaffe.org/) with GCC 4.1 I get the following error message: ia64-linux-gnu-gcc -g -O2 -Wall -W -Wextra -g -O1 -fno-omit-frame-pointer -o .libs/kaffe-bin main.o version.o .libs/kaffe-binS.o -Wl,--export-dynamic ../../kaffe/kaffevm/.libs/libkaffevm.so -ldl -lm

[Bug target/28086] [4.1/4.2 Regression] symbols missing on ia64

2006-06-19 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Component|c |target Keywords||link-failure

[Bug libstdc++/28080] header dependencies

2006-06-19 Thread Woebbeking at web dot de
--- Comment #4 from Woebbeking at web dot de 2006-06-19 17:58 --- Subject: Re: header dependencies On Monday 19 June 2006 11:29, pcarlini at suse dot de wrote: --- Comment #1 from pcarlini at suse dot de 2006-06-19 09:29 Ok, let's see what we can do... Wow, fast reply! I hope

[Bug libstdc++/28080] header dependencies

2006-06-19 Thread pcarlini at suse dot de
--- Comment #5 from pcarlini at suse dot de 2006-06-19 18:05 --- (In reply to comment #4) Wow, fast reply! I hope you're successful :-) Maybe you could look at STLPort 5.x, AFAIK it's more efficient in this case. It also has other nice features like: Ok, thanks, but certainly we

[Bug c++/28017] lack of guard variables for explicitly instantiated template static data

2006-06-19 Thread hhinnant at apple dot com
--- Comment #10 from hhinnant at apple dot com 2006-06-19 18:11 --- It turns out this still isn't quite right. Looks like we need: #define NEEDS_GUARD_P(decl) (TREE_PUBLIC (decl) (DECL_COMMON (decl) \ || DECL_ONE_ONLY (decl) \

[Bug fortran/25104] [F2003] Non-initialization expr. as case-selector

2006-06-19 Thread fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #6 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-19 18:21 --- Paul Thomas proposed a patch that fixes the F95 problem. We still need to write simplification routines to enable such code (which is valid F2003) to compile with gfortran. I don't have time for that right now.

[Bug fortran/28005] gfortran: mathmul produces wrong result

2006-06-19 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #4 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-19 18:44 --- I forgot to assign this to myself Paul -- pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

Re: [Bug c/28073] Type-punned pointer passed as function parameter generates bad assembly sequence

2006-06-19 Thread Daniel Berlin
sorenj at us dot ibm dot com wrote: --- Comment #2 from sorenj at us dot ibm dot com 2006-06-19 16:44 --- Changing just one line of the test program to the (AFAIK) legal C code. By casting through void *, we are addressing Andrew's concerns about violating the C rules. No you

[Bug c/28073] Type-punned pointer passed as function parameter generates bad assembly sequence

2006-06-19 Thread dberlin at dberlin dot org
--- Comment #4 from dberlin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-19 18:55 --- Subject: Re: Type-punned pointer passed as function parameter generates bad assembly sequence sorenj at us dot ibm dot com wrote: --- Comment #2 from sorenj at us dot ibm dot com 2006-06-19 16:44 ---

[Bug libmudflap/28077] [4.1/4.2 regression] pass39-frag.c produces mudflap violation on alpha

2006-06-19 Thread tbm at cyrius dot com
--- Comment #3 from tbm at cyrius dot com 2006-06-19 19:34 --- Created an attachment (id=11705) -- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=11705action=view) more detailed log This is with the options you specified but it seems it doesn't contain so much more information. Did I

[Bug middle-end/26198] Unfolded comparison after cfg_cleanup

2006-06-19 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #2 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-19 19:40 --- Note that the reason mentioned was fixed recently, but we still have (in .optimized): L18:; p = D.2217-a2.x[0]; D.2237 = D.2217-a2.x[2]; if (p D.2237) goto L19; else goto L21; ... L21:; p =

[Bug tree-optimization/27090] FRE does not look past previous type casts

2006-06-19 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #12 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-19 20:10 --- Subject: Bug 27090 Author: rguenth Date: Mon Jun 19 20:10:02 2006 New Revision: 114786 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=114786 Log: 2006-06-19 Richard Guenther [EMAIL PROTECTED] PR

[Bug target/28086] [4.1/4.2 Regression] symbols missing on ia64

2006-06-19 Thread schwab at suse dot de
--- Comment #1 from schwab at suse dot de 2006-06-19 20:14 --- These symbols were never supposed to be used directly, only via the __sync_val_compare_and_swap and __sync_fetch_and_add macros (which are now builtins). -- schwab at suse dot de changed: What|Removed

[Bug c++/28088] New: Internal compiler error on boost mpl test/apply.cpp

2006-06-19 Thread gcc-bklyn at sneakemail dot com
% g++ -v Using built-in specs. Target: i386-pc-solaris2.10 Configured with: ../configure --cache-file=./config.cache --srcdir=/openpkg/RPM/TMP/gcc-4.1.1/obj/.. --prefix=/openpkg --exec-prefix=/openpkg --includedir=/openpkg/include/gcc --libexecdir=/openpkg/libexec/gcc

[Bug c++/28088] Internal compiler error on boost mpl test/apply.cpp

2006-06-19 Thread gcc-bklyn at sneakemail dot com
--- Comment #1 from gcc-bklyn at sneakemail dot com 2006-06-19 21:05 --- Created an attachment (id=11707) -- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=11707action=view) PReprocessed source to boost/mpl/test/apply.cpp -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28088

[Bug c/28073] Type-punned pointer passed as function parameter generates bad assembly sequence

2006-06-19 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #5 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-19 21:04 --- Created an attachment (id=11706) -- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=11706action=view) warn for bad casts hiding type-punning At suse we used the attached patch to teach packagers not fix strict

[Bug middle-end/28034] [4.2 Regression] section anchors break -fprofile-generate

2006-06-19 Thread janis at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #4 from janis at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-19 21:08 --- I tried the patch with a C-only bootstrap for biarch powerpc64-linux and ran the three CPU2000 tests that had failed with profile generate/use; with the patch they work. --

[Bug c++/28088] Internal compiler error on boost mpl test/apply.cpp

2006-06-19 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-19 22:10 --- Reducing. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28088

[Bug fortran/20874] elemental function ought to be scalar

2006-06-19 Thread fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #2 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-19 22:11 --- Regarding your patch: + /* An elemental function is required to return a scalar 12.7.1 */ + if (sym-attr.elemental sym-attr.function +sym-as sym-as-rank) I'm not sure why the condition sym-as-rank

[Bug libfortran/27784] [4.1 only] Comparison of strings with char(0)

2006-06-19 Thread fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #4 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-19 22:16 --- This was fixed on mainline by: r114175 | tkoenig | 2006-05-28 22:25:15 +0200 (Sun, 28 May 2006) | 11 lines 2006-05-28 Thomas Koenig [EMAIL PROTECTED] * intrinsics/string_intrinsics.c

[Bug fortran/27715] [4.1 only] Extented ASCII characters lead to wrong CASE selection

2006-06-19 Thread fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #16 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-19 22:27 --- (In reply to comment #15) If you want to, please go ahead and commit the fixes for PR 27980, PR 27715 and PR 27784 to 4.1. As I can't find sleep tonight, I'll be backporting those patches. I spent some time

[Bug fortran/27980] [4.1 only] Wrong allocation for zero-sized function result

2006-06-19 Thread fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #4 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-19 22:29 --- Was fixed on mainline by r114677 | tkoenig | 2006-06-15 12:30:09 +0200 (Thu, 15 Jun 2006) | 23 lines 2006-06-15 Thomas Koenig [EMAIL PROTECTED] * trans-array.h (gfc_trans_create_temp_array): Add bool

[Bug java/28089] New: jc1 miscompilation with fields inherited from interfaces

2006-06-19 Thread tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org
Look at initfield.java or PR162.java from the test suite. From initfield: interface iface { final value x = new value(); } public class initfield implements iface { public static void main(String[] args) { System.out.println(x.field); ... When compiled with a correct java compiler

[Bug fortran/27980] [4.1 only] Wrong allocation for zero-sized function result

2006-06-19 Thread fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #5 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-19 22:45 --- The backport of that patch is not trivial, since the mainline patch depends on Erik E.'s allocatable function result patch, which was never included in 4.1. I don't think it's difficult to backport either, but

[Bug java/28090] New: incorrect implementation of expand_java_arraystore

2006-06-19 Thread tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org
According to the ArrayStore.java test case, bounds checks should take precedence over array store checks. However, expand_java_arraystore clearly does it in the wrong order: if (TREE_CODE (rhs_type_node) == POINTER_TYPE) { tree check = build_java_arraystore_check (array, rhs_node);

Re: Mainline build problem on FC4

2006-06-19 Thread Andrew MacLeod
On Mon, 2006-06-19 at 12:31 -0400, Andrew MacLeod wrote: OK, so I wasn't just wacko last week. Mainline fails to build on Fedora Core 4 (with all the latest updates, kernel 2111) when built with checking disabled. Diego verified this on a second FC4 box. I've narrowed this down to the

[Bug c++/28088] Internal compiler error on boost mpl test/apply.cpp

2006-06-19 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #3 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-19 23:37 --- Reduced testcase, this might be already fixed in 4.1.2 but I have not tried: template typename T struct type_wrapper{}; int arity_helper(...); template template typename P1 class F, typename T1 int

[Bug target/28084] [4.2 Regression] /usr/include/errno.h:28: error: previous declaration of 'int errno' with 'C++' linkage

2006-06-19 Thread sje at cup dot hp dot com
--- Comment #3 from sje at cup dot hp dot com 2006-06-19 23:48 --- There was nothing intentional about the different linkages, in unreleased HP-UX sources, they fixed it to be in 'extern C' in both places. Here is a patch to inclhack.def that I have tested. I haven't submitted it

[Bug target/27082] segfault with virtual class and visibility (hidden)

2006-06-19 Thread roger at eyesopen dot com
--- Comment #14 from roger at eyesopen dot com 2006-06-19 23:50 --- Unfortunately, I'm unable to reproduce this failure with a cross-compiler to alphaev68-unknown-linux-gnu. However, examination of the tracebacks attached to this PR and the relevant source code reveals there is a

[Bug target/28084] [4.2 Regression] /usr/include/errno.h:28: error: previous declaration of 'int errno' with 'C++' linkage

2006-06-19 Thread dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca
--- Comment #4 from dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca 2006-06-20 00:07 --- Subject: Re: [4.2 Regression] /usr/include/errno.h:28: error: previous declaration of 'int errno' with 'C++' linkage mach = *-hp-hpux11.[0-2]*; I believe that we also need the fix for hpux10.

[Bug c/27149] English in warning not grammatical: the address of x, will always evaluate

2006-06-19 Thread sayle at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #2 from sayle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-20 00:22 --- Subject: Bug 27149 Author: sayle Date: Tue Jun 20 00:22:21 2006 New Revision: 114800 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=114800 Log: PR c/27149 * c-common.c

[Bug bootstrap/28082] internal compiler error: Segmentation fault

2006-06-19 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-20 00:33 --- We have reports of this working. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28082

[Bug target/27861] [4.0/4.1 regression] ICE in expand_expr_real_1, at expr.c:6916

2006-06-19 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #6 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-20 00:39 --- Fixed at least on the mainline. -- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug c/27184] [4.0/4.1/4.2 Regression] Wrong code with pointers to arrays and types and strict aliasing

2006-06-19 Thread patchapp at dberlin dot org
--- Comment #6 from patchapp at dberlin dot org 2006-06-20 01:31 --- Subject: Bug number PR c/27184 A patch for this bug has been added to the patch tracker. The mailing list url for the patch is http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2006-05/msg01507.html --

[Bug fortran/28091] New: ICE compiling array variables with input size.

2006-06-19 Thread 3dw4rd at verizon dot net
Compile this test case with -fno-automatic: MacOSX:~ ed$ /Users/ed/bin-4.1.1/bin/gfortran -fno-automatic ARRAY_BADNESS.FOR ARRAY_BADNESS.FOR: In function 'bad': ARRAY_BADNESS.FOR:8: internal compiler error: in gfc_trans_auto_array_allocation, at fortran/trans-array.c:3321 Please submit a full bug

[Bug middle-end/28075] [4.1/4.2 Regression] inliner introduces unnecessary type conversions

2006-06-19 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #5 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-20 02:10 --- Subject: Bug 28075 Author: pinskia Date: Tue Jun 20 02:09:57 2006 New Revision: 114801 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=114801 Log: 2006-06-19 Andrew Pinski [EMAIL PROTECTED] PR

[Bug middle-end/28075] [4.1 Regression] inliner introduces unnecessary type conversions

2006-06-19 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #6 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-20 02:11 --- Fixed on the mainline and will commit on the 4.1 after two weeks (unless I get some time during the summit to commit it, I will). -- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed

[Bug rtl-optimization/26244] [4.2 Regression] FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/builtin-bitops-1.c execution, -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -funroll-loops

2006-06-19 Thread dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca
--- Comment #12 from dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca 2006-06-20 03:43 --- Subject: Re: [4.2 Regression] FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/builtin-bitops-1.c execution, -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -funroll-loops could you please try to simplify the testcase, ideally to separate just

[Bug rtl-optimization/26244] [4.2 Regression] FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/builtin-bitops-1.c execution, -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -funroll-loops

2006-06-19 Thread danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #14 from danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-20 03:51 --- The original attachment still fails. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26244

[Bug fortran/23091] ICE in gfc_trans_auto_array_allocation

2006-06-19 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.1.2 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23091

[Bug fortran/28091] ICE compiling array variables with input size.

2006-06-19 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-20 04:13 --- This was just fixed 8 days ago for both 4.1.2 and the mainline (4.2.0). *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 23091 *** -- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed

[Bug fortran/23091] ICE in gfc_trans_auto_array_allocation

2006-06-19 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #14 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-20 04:13 --- *** Bug 28091 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug rtl-optimization/26244] [4.2 Regression] FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/builtin-bitops-1.c execution, -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -funroll-loops

2006-06-19 Thread danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #15 from danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-20 04:14 --- The second attachment doesn't fail if -fno-inline-functions is added to the compile command, or if 0x0001ULL is changed to 0x00010001ULL. --

[Bug c/27149] English in warning not grammatical: the address of x, will always evaluate

2006-06-19 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #3 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-20 04:15 --- Fixed. -- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW

[Bug fortran/25050] CSHIFT not allowed in initialization expression

2006-06-19 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #2 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-20 04:31 --- Subject: Bug 25050 Author: pault Date: Tue Jun 20 04:30:48 2006 New Revision: 114802 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=114802 Log: 2006-06-20 Paul Thomas [EMAIL PROTECTED] PR

[Bug fortran/20876] Subroutine call in FORALL block not PURE

2006-06-19 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #4 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-20 04:31 --- Subject: Bug 20876 Author: pault Date: Tue Jun 20 04:30:48 2006 New Revision: 114802 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=114802 Log: 2006-06-20 Paul Thomas [EMAIL PROTECTED] PR

[Bug fortran/16206] rejects valid array initialization expression

2006-06-19 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #10 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-20 04:31 --- Subject: Bug 16206 Author: pault Date: Tue Jun 20 04:30:48 2006 New Revision: 114802 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=114802 Log: 2006-06-20 Paul Thomas [EMAIL PROTECTED] PR

[Bug fortran/25049] TRANSPOSE not allowed in initialisation expression

2006-06-19 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #2 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-20 04:31 --- Subject: Bug 25049 Author: pault Date: Tue Jun 20 04:30:48 2006 New Revision: 114802 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=114802 Log: 2006-06-20 Paul Thomas [EMAIL PROTECTED] PR

[Bug fortran/28005] gfortran: mathmul produces wrong result

2006-06-19 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #5 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-20 04:31 --- Subject: Bug 28005 Author: pault Date: Tue Jun 20 04:30:48 2006 New Revision: 114802 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=114802 Log: 2006-06-20 Paul Thomas [EMAIL PROTECTED] PR

[Bug fortran/18769] ICE in gfc_conv_array_initializer with array initialization with transfer

2006-06-19 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #8 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-20 04:31 --- Subject: Bug 18769 Author: pault Date: Tue Jun 20 04:30:48 2006 New Revision: 114802 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=114802 Log: 2006-06-20 Paul Thomas [EMAIL PROTECTED] PR

[Bug c/28092] New: ICE while building glibc

2006-06-19 Thread ft01 at webmastery dot com dot au
The problem occurs with 4.0.3. I haven't tested newer compilers, but 3.4.6 and 3.3.6 work. Problem can be avoided by reducing -O2 to -O0. $ m68k-linux-gcc -O2 -c iso-2022-cn-ext.i In file included from iso-2022-cn-ext.c:654: ../iconv/loop.c: In function 'to_iso2022cn_ext_loop':

[Bug c/28092] ICE while building glibc

2006-06-19 Thread ft01 at webmastery dot com dot au
--- Comment #1 from ft01 at webmastery dot com dot au 2006-06-20 05:12 --- Created an attachment (id=11709) -- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=11709action=view) preprocessed source -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28092

[Bug target/28092] ICE while building glibc

2006-06-19 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|major |normal Component|c |target

  1   2   >