--- Comment #6 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-03 08:00 ---
Subject: Bug 29054
Author: jakub
Date: Wed Jan 3 08:00:30 2007
New Revision: 120384
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=120384
Log:
PR c++/29054
* g++.dg/template/friend49.C: New
--- Comment #9 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-03 08:03 ---
Subject: Bug 29535
Author: jakub
Date: Wed Jan 3 08:03:26 2007
New Revision: 120385
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=120385
Log:
PR c++/29535
* g++.dg/template/crash66.C: New
--- Comment #3 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-03 08:04 ---
Subject: Bug 30286
Author: jakub
Date: Wed Jan 3 08:04:11 2007
New Revision: 120387
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=120387
Log:
PR middle-end/30286
* gcc.dg/pr30286.c: New test.
--- Comment #7 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-03 08:06 ---
Subject: Bug 29054
Author: jakub
Date: Wed Jan 3 08:05:53 2007
New Revision: 120388
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=120388
Log:
PR c++/29054
* g++.dg/template/friend49.C: New
--- Comment #10 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-03 08:06 ---
Subject: Bug 29535
Author: jakub
Date: Wed Jan 3 08:06:42 2007
New Revision: 120389
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=120389
Log:
PR c++/29535
* g++.dg/template/crash66.C: New
--- Comment #4 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-03 08:07 ---
Subject: Bug 30286
Author: jakub
Date: Wed Jan 3 08:07:33 2007
New Revision: 120390
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=120390
Log:
PR middle-end/30286
* gcc.dg/pr30286.c: New test.
--- Comment #8 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-03 08:11 ---
Subject: Bug 29054
Author: jakub
Date: Wed Jan 3 08:11:02 2007
New Revision: 120391
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=120391
Log:
PR c++/29054
* decl.c (revert_static_member_fn):
--- Comment #6 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-03 08:14 ---
Subject: Bug 28261
Author: jakub
Date: Wed Jan 3 08:13:50 2007
New Revision: 120392
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=120392
Log:
PR c++/29535
Backported from mainline
--- Comment #11 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-03 08:14 ---
Subject: Bug 29535
Author: jakub
Date: Wed Jan 3 08:13:50 2007
New Revision: 120392
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=120392
Log:
PR c++/29535
Backported from mainline
--- Comment #5 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-03 08:15 ---
Subject: Bug 30286
Author: jakub
Date: Wed Jan 3 08:15:24 2007
New Revision: 120393
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=120393
Log:
PR middle-end/30286
* fold-const.c (negate_expr):
--- Comment #9 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-03 08:16 ---
Fixed on gcc-4_1-branch.
--
jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #12 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-03 08:17 ---
Fixed.
--
jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW
--- Comment #7 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-03 08:18 ---
Backported to 4.1.
--
jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #6 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-03 08:19 ---
Fixed.
--
jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
--- Comment #3 from maxim dot yegorushkin at gmail dot com 2007-01-03
12:31 ---
(In reply to comment #2)
I'm having a similar problem on Linux Fedora Core 5. Is there any quick way to
fix it? I am new to autoconf and would appreciate any hints.
Here is the output:
The same
I would appreciate adding the enumeration typecast warnings. I mean:
When I cast one enum to another and the first enum is not a subset of the
second warning will be shown.
Example:
enum EParent
{
EP_VAL0 = 0,
EP_VAL1 = 1,
EP_VAL2 = 2
};
enum EChild
{
EC_VAL0 = 0,
EC_VAL1 = 1
};
int
--- Comment #9 from aph at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-03 14:24 ---
Subject: Bug 28754
Author: aph
Date: Wed Jan 3 14:23:48 2007
New Revision: 120396
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=120396
Log:
2007-01-03 Andrew Haley [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PR java/28754
--
aoliva at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |aoliva at gcc dot gnu dot
|dot org
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-03 16:46 ---
Related to PR 12242.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30357
--- Comment #12 from patchapp at dberlin dot org 2007-01-03 16:50 ---
Subject: Bug number PR27698
A patch for this bug has been added to the patch tracker.
The mailing list url for the patch is
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2007-01/msg00137.html
--
--- Comment #2 from patchapp at dberlin dot org 2007-01-03 17:05 ---
Subject: Bug number PR debug/30189
A patch for this bug has been added to the patch tracker.
The mailing list url for the patch is
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2007-01/msg00140.html
--
These tests passed yesterday early morning, but give me ICEs today:
Running /u01/var/tmp/gcc_trunk_svn/gcc/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/ipa/ipa.exp ...
FAIL: gcc.dg/ipa/ipa-1.c (internal compiler error)
FAIL: gcc.dg/ipa/ipa-1.c (test for excess errors)
FAIL: gcc.dg/ipa/ipa-1.c scan-ipa-dump-times
--- Comment #5 from patchapp at dberlin dot org 2007-01-03 18:05 ---
Subject: Bug number PR20896
A patch for this bug has been added to the patch tracker.
The mailing list url for the patch is
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2007-01/msg00145.html
--
--- Comment #13 from tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-03 19:17 ---
I'm not sure whether the updated patch can be committed without
another review. I'll try to find out.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13676
/* { dg-options -O0 -std=gnu99 } */
int
main (void)
{
_Complex double d;
__real__ d = 1.0;
__imag__ d = 1.0;
d = d / 0.0;
if (!__builtin_isinf (__real__ d) || !__builtin_isinf (__imag__ d))
__builtin_abort ();
return 0;
}
fails when compiled with -O0 -std=c99 but succeeds when
--- Comment #8 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-03 21:27 ---
Subject: Bug 30084
Author: pault
Date: Wed Jan 3 21:27:17 2007
New Revision: 120399
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=120399
Log:
2007-01-03 Paul Thomas [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Backport from
--- Comment #22 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-03 21:27 ---
Subject: Bug 25818
Author: pault
Date: Wed Jan 3 21:27:17 2007
New Revision: 120399
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=120399
Log:
2007-01-03 Paul Thomas [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Backport from
--- Comment #23 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-03 21:29 ---
Fixed on trunk and 4.2
Paul
--
pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #9 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-03 21:30 ---
Fixed on trunk and 4.2
Paul
--
pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #1 from joseph at codesourcery dot com 2007-01-03 21:31 ---
Subject: Re: New: Complex divide bug
On Wed, 3 Jan 2007, jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
fails when compiled with -O0 -std=c99 but succeeds when compiled with -O2
-std=c99. ISO C99 says it should be (inf,
The documentation for the visibility attribute shown by the info gcc 'c
extension' function command is misleading. It says:
`visibility (VISIBILITY_TYPE)'
The `visibility' attribute on ELF targets causes the declaration
to be emitted with default, hidden, protected or internal
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-03 21:43 ---
Note that the attribute is attached to the return type of the function f,
not
the function declaration itself. I think this means that the hidden visibility
is applied to the type, not the function, which is
--- Comment #2 from rich at phekda dot gotadsl dot co dot uk 2007-01-03
21:45 ---
Created an attachment (id=12853)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12853action=view)
A test case
When I compile the attached test case, I get:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] test-cases]$ make
g++ -W
--- Comment #3 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-03 21:45 ---
Read:
http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc-4.1.1/gcc/Attribute-Syntax.html
Which describes the syntax.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30361
--- Comment #4 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-03 21:46 ---
gcc (GCC) 4.1.1 20061011 (Red Hat 4.1.1-30)
This should also tell you, that you are using a modified version of the
compiler and the bug report should have been filed up with redhat first.
--
Folks,
Not sure what if youc an help. By way of background, I'm running FreeBSD
6.1-RELEASE #0: Sun May 7 04:42:56 UTC 2006. Very nice indeed. AFter some
littel experience usign Linus (RH9, FC4 FC5), I have ventured into less
chartered waters. What better way to learn to plunge int the deep
--- Comment #5 from rich at phekda dot gotadsl dot co dot uk 2007-01-03
21:55 ---
Thanks for the quick response and the reference to the attribute documentation.
I agree my comment about the documentation being incorrect is wrong. But it
doesn't look to me like the visibility is
--- Comment #9 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-03 23:00 ---
Subject: Bug 20353
Author: pinskia
Date: Wed Jan 3 23:00:40 2007
New Revision: 120404
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=120404
Log:
2007-01-03 Andrew Pinski [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PR
--- Comment #3 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-03 23:00 ---
Subject: Bug 30353
Author: pinskia
Date: Wed Jan 3 23:00:40 2007
New Revision: 120404
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=120404
Log:
2007-01-03 Andrew Pinski [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PR
--- Comment #4 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-03 23:00 ---
Fixed.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
--- Comment #17 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-03 23:53 ---
Subject: Bug 28217
Author: jakub
Date: Wed Jan 3 23:53:18 2007
New Revision: 120410
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=120410
Log:
PR c++/28217
* g++.dg/pch/template-1.C: New test.
--- Comment #18 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-03 23:54 ---
Subject: Bug 28217
Author: jakub
Date: Wed Jan 3 23:54:24 2007
New Revision: 120411
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=120411
Log:
PR c++/28217
* g++.dg/pch/template-1.C: New test.
--- Comment #19 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-03 23:56 ---
Subject: Bug 28217
Author: jakub
Date: Wed Jan 3 23:56:44 2007
New Revision: 120412
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=120412
Log:
Backported from mainline
2006-07-12 Jason
--- Comment #20 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-04 00:01 ---
Fixed in 4.1 as well.
--
jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to
--- Comment #6 from pbrook at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-04 00:09 ---
Subject: Bug 16634
Author: pbrook
Date: Thu Jan 4 00:09:48 2007
New Revision: 120413
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=120413
Log:
2007-01-03 Paul Brook [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PR
--- Comment #3 from jconner at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-04 01:37 ---
Subject: Bug 29683
Author: jconner
Date: Thu Jan 4 01:37:15 2007
New Revision: 120425
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=120425
Log:
2007-03-01 Josh Conner [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PR
Given the following test case:
#define f(x, y) x y
extern void abort (void);
int main ()
{
const char *str1 = f(a, \a\);
const char *str2 = f( \t, \t);
if (strcmp (str1, \a\ a))
abort ();
if (strcmp (str2, \t \ \\t\))
abort ();
return 0;
Given the following test case:
#define f(x, y) x y
extern void abort (void);
int main ()
{
const char *str1 = f(a, \a\);
const char *str2 = f( \t, \t);
if (strcmp (str1, \a\ a))
abort ();
if (strcmp (str2, \t \ \\t\))
abort ();
return 0;
}
48 matches
Mail list logo
