--- Comment #2 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-01-16 08:00 ---
(In reply to comment #1)
It is sufficient that BA_T is referenced in tests; eg. by PRINT *, BA_T for the
problem to go away. Thus the problem is that the symbol is not being set as
referenced. I will try to find out
Building the attached file (extracted and reduced from the uclibc) with
-O[1,2,3,s] -fPIC fails :
test.c: In function _start:
test.c:14: error: unable to find a register to spill in class R0_REGS
test.c:14: error: this is the insn:
(insn 16 28 17 0 (set (mem/c/i:SI (plus:SI (reg:SI 12 r12)
--- Comment #1 from chrbr at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-01-16 08:47 ---
Created an attachment (id=14945)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=14945action=view)
Test case
build with sh-superh-elf-gcc -O1 -fPIC test.c -S
--
--- Comment #1 from af804 at bfn dot org 2008-01-16 09:02 ---
tried fresh build with --libexecdir=/usr/lib, problem disappeared, suspect
contamination from previous build
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34748
--- Comment #3 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-01-16 09:14 ---
Subject: Bug 34669
Author: burnus
Date: Wed Jan 16 09:13:39 2008
New Revision: 131567
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=131567
Log:
2008-01-16 Steven Bosscher [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PR
--- Comment #4 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-01-16 09:19 ---
FIXED on the trunk (4.3.0).
--
burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #15 from rguenther at suse dot de 2008-01-16 09:23 ---
Subject: Re: [4.1/4.2/4.3 Regression] templates, enumerations,
overflow, ice
On Tue, 15 Jan 2008, tbptbp at gmail dot com wrote:
--- Comment #14 from tbptbp at gmail dot com 2008-01-15 20:07 ---
I keep
--- Comment #6 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-01-16 09:45 ---
Subject: Bug 34768
Author: rguenth
Date: Wed Jan 16 09:44:23 2008
New Revision: 131568
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=131568
Log:
2008-01-16 Richard Guenther [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PR
--- Comment #7 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-01-16 09:47 ---
Fixed on the trunk.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to
--- Comment #8 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-01-16 09:47 ---
Subject: Bug 33819
Author: rguenth
Date: Wed Jan 16 09:46:29 2008
New Revision: 131569
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=131569
Log:
2008-01-16 Richard Guenther [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PR
--- Comment #9 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-01-16 09:51 ---
Fixed on the trunk. Unassigning.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #1 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-01-16 10:16 ---
On IRC we concluded to XFAIL this warning.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #4 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-01-16 10:28 ---
Looks good on the trunk. Also looks good for 4.2.
Can you provide an executable testcase that abort()s if the miscompile happens?
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed
--- Comment #6 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-01-16 10:33 ---
Confirmed on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #17 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-01-16 10:47
---
So, this is still a P1 regression for 4.3. Ping!
(I expect Linux distributors will deal with this problem, but I also expect
our customers to scream bloody murder at us for this change)
--
--- Comment #9 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-01-16 10:52 ---
Ian, is there any chance you can look at this? Your fix for PR29286 could be
extended to handle this as well, right?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33407
--- Comment #6 from uros at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-01-16 11:11 ---
Subject: Bug 34249
Author: uros
Date: Wed Jan 16 11:10:27 2008
New Revision: 131570
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=131570
Log:
PR debug/34249
* debug.h
--- Comment #7 from ubizjak at gmail dot com 2008-01-16 11:15 ---
Fixed for 4.3.0.
--
ubizjak at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
--- Comment #2 from chrbr at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-01-16 11:15 ---
Created an attachment (id=14946)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=14946action=view)
fails with 4.2.2 and 4.3.0
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34807
Starting program:
/scratch/obj.i686/br2/br.update.sh4/build_sh4/staging_dir/usr/libexec/gcc/sh4-linux-uclibcgnueabi/4.3.0/cc1
-fpreprocessed dbxout.i -quiet -dumpbase dbxout.i -auxbase-strip dbx.o -Os
-version -fno-tree-dominator-opts -o /tmp/ccb7b5R5.s
Failed to read a valid object file image
While building the Loki C++ library (http://loki-lib.sourceforge.net/), an
internal error is generated:
-- quote start --
gmake[2]: Entering directory `/home/duplaina/src/loki-0.1.6/test/ScopeGuard'
g++ -Wall -Wold-style-cast -Wundef -Wsign-compare -Wconversion -Wpointer-arith
-pedantic -g -O2
Hi,
G++ (gcc version 4.3.0 20080104 (experimental) (GCC)) accepts the following
code that Comeau rejects:
template typename T
struct Foo
{
void bar ()
{
typename FooT::Foo ();
}
};
--
Summary: G++ accepts wrong code
Product: gcc
Version: 4.3.0
--- Comment #7 from ubizjak at gmail dot com 2008-01-16 11:58 ---
(In reply to comment #6)
Fixed in mainline
Not yet:
FAIL: g++.dg/cpp0x/vt-34103.C (internal compiler error)
FAIL: g++.dg/cpp0x/vt-34103.C (test for excess errors)
--- Comment #3 from chris dot rimmer at antixlabs dot com 2008-01-16 12:08
---
I've just encountered the same issue. My reading of the standard says that it
is a bug.
15.3 [except.handle] paragraph 3
A handler is a match for an exception object of type E if
- The handler is of
The appeded code does not compile without errors:
(Verified on avr-gcc (gcc version 4.2.2)
$ avr-gcc -Wall c++_trial_1.cpp
c++_trial_1.cpp:29: error: uninitialized const 'sM'
Using Visual Studio 2005 Express the same code compiles on the highest
warninglevel without warnings or errors.
#include
--- Comment #6 from tkiernan at gmail dot com 2008-01-16 12:29 ---
Created an attachment (id=14947)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=14947action=view)
TestCase
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34778
--- Comment #7 from tkiernan at gmail dot com 2008-01-16 12:32 ---
(From update of attachment 14947)
Attached is the source code and binary - issue is on gcc4.1.1 Linux redhat4.5,
IBM ppc64.
It aborts when tries to rethrow exception across shared libs.
Execute ./main
--
--- Comment #22 from manu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-01-16 12:36 ---
(In reply to comment #21)
(In reply to comment #20)
Anyway, if you really want to believe that printf(%s\n,s) and puts(s)
should
not have the same effect for defined behaviour, then we will have to agree
to
--- Comment #23 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-01-16 12:26
---
Not knowing the gcc code in question, I can't comment on how much potential
regression risk this fix will introduce. Assuming it's safe enough to apply
without worry to other releases, I'd hope this would
--- Comment #2 from dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr 2008-01-16 12:56 ---
Subject: Re: [4.3 Regression] FAIL:
gcc.dg/Warray-bounds.c
On IRC we concluded to XFAIL this warning.
Could the relevant parts of the IRC be added to this PR?
--
--- Comment #8 from dgregor at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-01-16 12:58 ---
I'm unable to reproduce this failure now. What platform are you on and what
configure flags did you use?
--
dgregor at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #16 from tbptbp at gmail dot com 2008-01-16 13:04 ---
Much helpful, many thanks.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34774
--- Comment #1 from aldot at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-01-16 13:21 ---
Created an attachment (id=14948)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=14948action=view)
slightly reduced testcase
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34808
--- Comment #1 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-01-16 13:26 ---
EDG rejects this with
t.C(6): error: class template FooT has no member Foo
typename FooT::Foo ();
^
G++ accepts this even if you instantiate Foo. G++ also accepts
template typename T
--- Comment #7 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-01-16 13:28 ---
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 31947 ***
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #9 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-01-16 13:28 ---
*** Bug 33195 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #1 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-01-16 13:30 ---
Probably a dup of PR31947. Hard to say without preprocessed source.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #1 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-01-16 13:32 ---
EDG says:
t.C(27): error: const variable sM requires an initializer -- class
signalManager has no explicitly declared default constructor
} const sM ;
^
compilation aborted for t.C (code 2)
which
Revision 131565 generates:
FAIL: gcc.dg/Warray-bounds.c (test for warnings, line 59)
FAIL: gcc.dg/Warray-bounds.c (test for warnings, line 65)
FAIL: gcc.dg/Warray-bounds.c (test for warnings, line 66)
Revision 131501 is OK.
--
Summary: [4.3 Regression] gcc.dg/Warray-bounds.c
/local
--enable-languages=c,c++,fortran
gcc version 4.3.0 20080116 (experimental) [trunk revision 131569] (GCC)
--
ubizjak at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #10 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-01-16 13:41
---
Fixed.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW
--- Comment #11 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-01-16 13:42
---
Subject: Bug 34668
Author: rguenth
Date: Wed Jan 16 13:41:13 2008
New Revision: 131572
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=131572
Log:
2008-01-16 Jakub Jelinek [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Richard
--- Comment #9 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-01-16 13:17 ---
I also see those two ICEs on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu. P2 as this shows in
testresults on a primary platform.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #3 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-01-16 14:01 ---
*** Bug 34812 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #1 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-01-16 14:01 ---
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 34801 ***
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #6 from kloedej at knmi dot nl 2008-01-16 14:11 ---
Dear people,
this comment is just to let you know that the problem is also solved on my side
now. My software compiles and runs again as expected.
thanks a lot for your effort and fast response.
Jos de Kloe
--
--- Comment #2 from olof dot tangrot at telia dot com 2008-01-16 14:16
---
I know about that. The class don't need a contructor, it does not have anything
that needs to be assigned upon creation. Why should the compiler link in code
that does not do anything? I eats memory. Surely that
--- Comment #6 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-01-16 14:38 ---
Mine.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
GCC target triplet||i?86-*-* (HWI64)
Target Milestone|---
--- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-01-16 14:53 ---
There is a defect report about what is a dependent name. The DR causes some
things to be non dependent and not which were in the original standard and is
weird as it turns somestuff which really should be dependent
--- Comment #8 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-01-16 15:01 ---
This testcase does not work even without shared libraries:
terminate called after throwing an instance of 'char const*'
Abort
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34778
--- Comment #3 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-01-16 15:05 ---
(In reply to comment #2)
I know about that. The class don't need a contructor, it does not have
anything
that needs to be assigned upon creation. Why should the compiler link in code
that does not do anything?
--- Comment #11 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-01-16 15:07
---
I see the failure on i386-apple-darwin8.11.1 also.
(In reply to comment #8)
I'm unable to reproduce this failure now. What platform are you on and what
configure flags did you use?
Make sure you did not turn
--- Comment #12 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-01-16 15:25
---
I still see it on x86_64-linux.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
$ cat ice.f90
MODULE kd_kd_tree_type
TYPE :: kd_tree_node
TYPE(kd_tree_node_private), POINTER :: p
END TYPE
TYPE :: kd_tree_node_private
INTEGER :: dummy
END TYPE
TYPE :: kd_tree
TYPE(kd_tree_node) :: root
END TYPE
CONTAINS
SUBROUTINE kd_tree_init_default(this)
Currently, SDmode (_Decimal32) types are not passed to and returned from
functions in FP registers as mandated by the ABI. Instead, they are passed via
the integer registers. This bugzilla will be used for tracking my work on
fixing this.
--
Summary: SDmode function args not passed
--- Comment #7 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-01-16 16:01 ---
Subject: Bug 34769
Author: rguenth
Date: Wed Jan 16 16:00:17 2008
New Revision: 131573
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=131573
Log:
2008-01-16 Richard Guenther [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PR
--- Comment #8 from hjl at lucon dot org 2008-01-16 16:16 ---
It isn't fixed. The error went from as to ld:
/export/build/gnu/gcc/build-x86_64-linux/gcc/xgcc
-B/export/build/gnu/gcc/build-x86_64-linux/gcc/
/net/gnu-13/export/gnu/src/gcc/gcc/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-prof/bb-reorg.c
--- Comment #10 from hubicka at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-01-16 16:32
---
Subject: Bug 31396
Author: hubicka
Date: Wed Jan 16 16:32:05 2008
New Revision: 131576
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=131576
Log:
PR rtl-optimization/31396
* regstat.c
--- Comment #11 from hubicka at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-01-16 16:33
---
Fixed on mainline.
--
hubicka at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #2 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-01-16 16:34 ---
Found the relevant part in the Fortran standard:
Fortran 2003: 12.4.1.2 Actual arguments associated with dummy data objects
If the actual argument is an array section having a vector subscript, the
dummy argument
--- Comment #11 from hubicka at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-01-16 16:46
---
Last time I looked into it, it was code
alignment affected by inlining in the string matching loop (longest_match).
This code is very atypical, since the internal loop
--- Comment #21 from tsarkov at cs dot man dot ac dot uk 2008-01-16 17:19
---
(In reply to comment #20)
Changing to NEW based on
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2005-11/msg00858.html
Shouldn't the PR be closed now, after committing the patch from
--- Comment #9 from ubizjak at gmail dot com 2008-01-16 17:25 ---
(In reply to comment #8)
It isn't fixed. The error went from as to ld:
Here is my log:
Executing on host: /home/uros/gcc-build-all/gcc/xgcc
-B/home/uros/gcc-build-all/gcc/ /home/uros/gcc-svn/trunk/gcc/
--- Comment #2 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-01-16 17:33 ---
This regression enters between 4.1/20050803 and 4.2/20061221.
gfc_check_constructor_type is applying the wrong type, because the intrinsic
has not been resolved. (This is called from gfc_match_init_expr via
--- Comment #8 from tsarkov at cs dot man dot ac dot uk 2008-01-16 17:39
---
This is fixed in current mainline GCC (as per
http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-4.3/porting_to.html).
--
tsarkov at cs dot man dot ac dot uk changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #10 from ubizjak at gmail dot com 2008-01-16 17:44 ---
(In reply to comment #9)
.LASFDE3:
.long .LASFDE3-.Lframe1
.long .LFB15
- .long .LFE15-.LFB15
+ .long .LHOTB1
+ .long .LHOTE1-.LHOTB1
+ .long .LCOLDB1
+
--- Comment #1 from bergner at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-01-16 17:51 ---
I'll be posting a proposed patch today or tomorrow. The patch will allow us to
be binary compatible with XLC which is producing binaries that follow the ABI.
There have been some reload issues which have made
--- Comment #11 from hjl at lucon dot org 2008-01-16 18:23 ---
(In reply to comment #9)
GNU ld version 2.17.50.0.3-6 20060715
Your linker doesn't issue the error since it is too old. See
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4454
--
hjl at lucon dot org changed:
--- Comment #12 from ubizjak at gmail dot com 2008-01-16 18:25 ---
Created an attachment (id=14949)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=14949action=view)
Patch to fix issue in Comment #8
H.J, could you test if attached patch fixes the problem from Comment #8?
--
[forwarded from http://bugs.debian.org/440287]
seen with current 4.1 and 4.2 branches, not seen on the trunk.
Matthias
While trying to compile the 2.6.23-rc4 snapshots from buildserver.net on hppa,
gcc went in some kind of endless loop over the following command
hppa64-linux-gnu-gcc-4.1
--- Comment #1 from debian-gcc at lists dot debian dot org 2008-01-16
18:38 ---
Created an attachment (id=14950)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=14950action=view)
preprocessed source
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34815
--- Comment #18 from bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-01-16 18:46 ---
The ammount of breakage for this change is IMHO tolerable and will within the
tolerances of other breakages that nobody is talking about reverting, and
furthermore solutions for the API change are well documented.
--- Comment #19 from bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-01-16 18:58 ---
I'm asking for a libstdc++ maintainer vote on this issue.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33831
--- Comment #20 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-01-16 19:06
---
I still see people use the old deprecated headers all over the place, even in
newer bug reports. So it is hard to think they will be removed any time soon.
I am sorry but from a QA point of view, they should be
--- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-01-16 19:18 ---
This sounds like an exact duplicate of PR 31944 which was just fixed.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34815
--- Comment #21 from bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-01-16 19:22 ---
old deprecated headers all over the place
Please give specifics, including what bug reports and what headers. Your
experience is much different from my datapoint, which is Jakub building fedora
with gcc-43. I see 8
--- Comment #22 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-01-16 19:27
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34778 is one example, this example
just came into today. There are many more. A lot of the windows/xbox360 based
games use the deprecated headers also.
--
--- Comment #23 from rguenther at suse dot de 2008-01-16 19:40 ---
Subject: Re: [4.3 Regression] Revision 129442 breaks
libstc++ API
On Wed, 16 Jan 2008, bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
--- Comment #21 from bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-01-16 19:22 ---
old
The patch for PR 34671 created an optimization opportunity that
is currently missed.
The any and all functions with dim=1 now accept an argument that
can be any logical type. Only the lowest-order byte is used for
evaluation.
Now consider the following:
program main
logical(kind=1),
--- Comment #8 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-01-16 20:01 ---
Fixed.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
Seems I missed a case in my patch for PR 34671:
program main
real, dimension(2,2) :: a
logical, dimension(2) :: b
integer, dimension(2) :: i
equivalence (b,i)
data a /1.0, 2.0, -0.1, -0.2 /
i = 16843009 ! Initialize i to put junk into b
call random_number(a)
b = any(a0.5,dim=1)
--
tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
Last
--- Comment #3 from dick dot hendrickson at gmail dot com 2008-01-16 20:07
---
Subject: Re: defined assignment not allowed to vector subscripted array
Why not put this one on hold for a while. I'll check some more.
There never was a
formal interpretation request. It's kind of odd,
--- Comment #13 from hjl at lucon dot org 2008-01-16 20:17 ---
(In reply to comment #12)
Created an attachment (id=14949)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=14949action=view) [edit]
Patch to fix issue in Comment #8
H.J, could you test if attached patch fixes the
--- Comment #1 from dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-01-16 20:29 ---
Could you also add an exemplary code snippet, please?
--
dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
From fink, I have gmp 4.1 in /sw/{lib,include}, but mpfr is ancient. I put a
new mpfr in $HOME, and tried to build with:
../gcc-4.3-20080111/configure --with-gmp=/sw --with-mpfr=$HOME
Unfortunately, that tells me that my mpfr is too old.
The order of the flags does not matter; I always get, in
--- Comment #1 from dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-01-16 20:36 ---
function func2()
type(bar) func2
allocate(func1%baz(1))
end function
Here, func1 needs to be func2 to be correct. Confirmed.
Backtrace:
(gdb) bt
#0 fancy_abort (file=0x87d843c
$ cat t.c
enum e ve;
void f0 (int i)
{
ve + i;
}
$ gcc -c t.c
enum.c: In function f0:
enum.c:6: internal compiler error: in create_tmp_var, at gimplify.c:368
Please submit a full bug report,
with preprocessed source if appropriate.
Works in c++:
/tmp/t.c:1: error: use of enum e without
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-01-16 20:45 ---
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 32295 ***
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #10 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-01-16 20:45
---
*** Bug 34819 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-01-16 20:46 ---
Also fails in 4.3.0 20070713.
that 4.3 is way old, over 6 months old now.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34819
--- Comment #8 from amacleod at redhat dot com 2008-01-16 20:53 ---
Created an attachment (id=14951)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=14951action=view)
proposed patch for sccvn
I did some analysis, and then verified with dberlin that I was on the right
track.
The
--- Comment #9 from rguenther at suse dot de 2008-01-16 21:18 ---
Subject: Re: [4.3 Regression] ICE in
find_or_generate_expression
On Wed, 16 Jan 2008, amacleod at redhat dot com wrote:
--- Comment #8 from amacleod at redhat dot com 2008-01-16 20:53 ---
Created an
--- Comment #1 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-01-16 21:20 ---
See also
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.lang.fortran/browse_thread/thread/f014195ccf7b93e6/
for some other possible diagnostic issues.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34547
--- Comment #14 from uros at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-01-16 21:21 ---
Subject: Bug 34249
Author: uros
Date: Wed Jan 16 21:20:39 2008
New Revision: 131578
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=131578
Log:
PR debug/34249
* dwarf2out.c
--- Comment #10 from amacleod at redhat dot com 2008-01-16 21:27 ---
Sure, if that the case, then the bug is in tree_could_throw_p() and we can fix
it there :-)
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34648
--- Comment #6 from amit dot mitkar at gmail dot com 2008-01-16 21:28
---
Am seeing the same problem. I understand that its not a bug with g++ but what
about the resolution. How should one get around the issue ?
In yanliu's second comment the said program doesn't directly reference
--- Comment #2 from reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-01-16 21:35
---
Fixed. Probably by the patch for PR34751.
--
reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.3.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34752
1 - 100 of 161 matches
Mail list logo
