[Bug testsuite/35621] gcc.target/i386/ssse3-psignw.c fails at -O3

--- Comment #6 from ubizjak at gmail dot com 2008-03-18 06:54 --- The test works OK for 32bit x86 target with -O3 and gcc version 4.4.0 20080318 (experimental) [trunk revision 133304] (GCC) -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35621

[Bug libstdc++/35622] Cannot declare vector of unordered_maps

--- Comment #1 from bangerth at dealii dot org 2008-03-18 05:12 --- What happens when you do this? And what are the header files you use? -- bangerth at dealii dot org changed: What|Removed |Added ---

US $ 129.95 100mg x 60 pills

100mg x 90 pills $159.95 buy now http://dorthysparanop990.blogspot.com

[Bug target/35623] New: RTL check failure in arm_const_double_rtx

/home/ryan/crosstool-0.43/build/arm-unknown-linux-gnu/4.2-20080312-glibc-2.3.6/tmp/./gcc/xgcc -B/home/ryan/crosstool-0.43/build/arm-unknown-linux-gnu/4.2-20080312-glibc-2.3.6/tmp/./gcc/ -B//home/ryan/crosstool/4.2-20080312-glibc-2.3.6/arm-unknown-linux-gnu/arm-unknown-linux-gnu/bin/ -B//home/ryan/c

[Bug fortran/35617] [4.3 Regression] read namelist error

--- Comment #7 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-03-18 04:35 --- Fixed in trunk, will back port to 4.3 -- jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added --

[Bug fortran/35617] [4.3, 4.4 Regression] read namelist error

--- Comment #6 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-03-18 04:31 --- Subject: Bug 35617 Author: jvdelisle Date: Tue Mar 18 04:30:37 2008 New Revision: 133303 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=133303 Log: 2008-03-17 Jerry DeLisle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

[Bug fortran/35617] [4.3, 4.4 Regression] read namelist error

--- Comment #5 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-03-18 04:28 --- Subject: Bug 35617 Author: jvdelisle Date: Tue Mar 18 04:27:56 2008 New Revision: 133302 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=133302 Log: 2008-03-17 Jerry DeLisle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

[Bug fortran/35617] [4.3, 4.4 Regression] read namelist error

--- Comment #4 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-03-18 04:25 --- Naturally, the patch in comment #2 breaks namelist_44.f90 (I say that because, after all, we are up to 44 namelist test cases, and about to go to 45 :) ) Nevertheless, this fixes it and passes regression. Index

[Bug testsuite/35512] [4.4 Regression]: gcc.target/ia64/visibility-1.c

--- Comment #4 from wilson at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-03-18 04:06 --- Fixed. -- wilson at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug testsuite/35512] [4.4 Regression]: gcc.target/ia64/visibility-1.c

--- Comment #3 from wilson at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-03-18 04:06 --- Mine. IA-64. -- wilson at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|unas

[Bug testsuite/35512] [4.4 Regression]: gcc.target/ia64/visibility-1.c

--- Comment #2 from wilson at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-03-18 04:02 --- Subject: Bug 35512 Author: wilson Date: Tue Mar 18 04:01:21 2008 New Revision: 133301 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=133301 Log: PR testsuite/35512 * gcc.target/ia64/visibility-1.c (foo): Chan

[Bug c++/35548] [4.3/4.4 Regression] g++ 4.3 miscompile this simple program

--- Comment #7 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-03-18 02:57 --- Fixed in 4.3 and 4.4. -- jason at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Statu

[Bug c++/35548] [4.3/4.4 Regression] g++ 4.3 miscompile this simple program

--- Comment #6 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-03-18 02:57 --- Subject: Bug 35548 Author: jason Date: Tue Mar 18 02:56:52 2008 New Revision: 133300 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=133300 Log: PR c++/35548 * call.c (reference_binding): Check

[Bug c++/35548] [4.3/4.4 Regression] g++ 4.3 miscompile this simple program

--- Comment #5 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-03-18 02:53 --- Subject: Bug 35548 Author: jason Date: Tue Mar 18 02:52:34 2008 New Revision: 133299 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=133299 Log: PR c++/35548 * call.c (reference_binding): Check

[Bug testsuite/35621] gcc.target/i386/ssse3-psignw.c fails at -O3

--- Comment #5 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-03-18 02:45 --- (In reply to comment #4) > I don't think alias is the cause. With this patch: How does that change aliasing? Hint it does not. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35621

[Bug testsuite/35621] gcc.target/i386/ssse3-psignw.c fails at -O3

--- Comment #4 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2008-03-18 02:43 --- I don't think alias is the cause. With this patch: --- ./ssse3-psignw.c.foo2007-08-23 09:44:31.0 -0700 +++ ./ssse3-psignw.c2008-03-17 19:40:53.0 -0700 @@ -9,7 +9,7 @@ /* Test the 64-bit

[Bug fortran/35617] [4.3, 4.4 Regression] read namelist error

--- Comment #3 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-03-18 02:29 --- I will test and fix. -- jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added A

[Bug libstdc++/35622] New: Cannot declare vector of unordered_maps

Cannot declare this: using namespace std; vector< tr1::unordered_map > dsfdsfds; -- Summary: Cannot declare vector of unordered_maps Product: gcc Version: 4.0.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug fortran/35612] testsuite ISO_C_BIND code error

--- Comment #3 from danp57 at optonline dot net 2008-03-18 01:22 --- Subject: Re: testsuite ISO_C_BIND code error FPTR finally should POINT at that string (same thing CSTR points at) with the correct type info/structure/array-shape set up correctly. My primary reason to send this in

[Bug testsuite/35621] gcc.target/i386/ssse3-psignw.c fails at -O3

--- Comment #3 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-03-18 01:08 --- Actually it looks like all the ssse3-*.c testcase violate C aliasing rules. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35621

[Bug testsuite/35621] gcc.target/i386/ssse3-psignw.c fails at -O3

--- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-03-18 01:07 --- (In reply to comment #1) > The problem seems MMX register related. Actually the testcase violates C aliasing rules. Way violating them. compute_correct_result (&vals[i + 0], &vals[i + 4], ck); compute_corr

[Bug target/35621] gcc.target/i386/ssse3-psignw.c fails at -O3

--- Comment #1 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2008-03-18 00:52 --- The problem seems MMX register related. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35621

[Bug target/35621] New: gcc.target/i386/ssse3-psignw.c fails at -O3

[EMAIL PROTECTED] gcc]$ /export/build/gnu/gcc/build-x86_64-linux/gcc/xgcc -B/export/build/gnu/gcc/build-x86_64-linux/gcc/ /net/gnu-13/export/gnu/src/gcc/gcc/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/ssse3-psignw.c -O3 -mssse3 -fno-show-column -lm -o ./ssse3-psignw.exe [EMAIL PROTECTED] gcc]$ ./ssse3-psig

[Bug libgomp/35611] [4.3/4.4 Regression] FAIL: libgomp.c/omp-nested-1.c execution test

-- danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at redhat dot com Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug target/35620] New: ICE passing dereferenced pointer to _Decimal32

This source code, compiled on powerpc-linux with -O1, results in an internal compiler error since Peter Bergner's change to pass SDmode arguments in floating point registers: extern void bar (_Decimal32); _Decimal32 *p; void foo (void) { bar (*p); } The error message

[Bug target/35619] gcc-4.3.0 build fails in gfortran section centos-4.6

--- Comment #8 from bill at cse dot ucdavis dot edu 2008-03-18 00:02 --- (In reply to comment #6) > Looks like the reason why it was not being fixed because of: > __NTH (feof_unlocked (FILE *__stream)) > So how would I fix it?(In reply to comment #6) > Looks like the reason why it was

[Bug target/35619] gcc-4.3.0 build fails in gfortran section centos-4.6

--- Comment #7 from bill at cse dot ucdavis dot edu 2008-03-17 23:44 --- (In reply to comment #6) > Looks like the reason why it was not being fixed because of: > __NTH (feof_unlocked (FILE *__stream)) > So how would I fix it? -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35619

[Bug fortran/35612] testsuite ISO_C_BIND code error

--- Comment #2 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-03-17 23:37 --- > The line: > TYPE(C_PTR), INTENT(IN) :: CPTR ! The C address > should be:C_F_STRING(CPTR) > TYPE(C_PTR), VALUE, TARGET:: CPTR ! the C address You are right. The call to strlen is OK in either case, however, the

[Bug debug/35615] Debug information for .debug_loc section incorrect

--- Comment #4 from wilson at tuliptree dot org 2008-03-17 23:32 --- Subject: Re: Debug information for .debug_loc section incorrect deuling at de dot ibm dot com wrote: > objdump -W says: > objdump: Error: Location lists in .debug_info section aren't in ascending > order! > As seen i

[Bug fortran/35617] [4.3, 4.4 Regression] read namelist error

--- Comment #2 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-03-17 23:20 --- Confirmed. This is a regression. Personal candidate for this is PR 34530. I think the following patch is correct. Jerry what do you think? (I currently have no time to submit the patch.) Index: libgfortran/io/list_re

[Bug target/30243] [4.1/4.2/4.3/4.4 Regression][avr] signbit() causes an internal compiler error

--- Comment #8 from hutchinsonandy at aim dot com 2008-03-17 23:10 --- Fails 4.3 on recently added testcase for same bug. /cygdrive/e/gcc/gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/execute/pr35456.c:17: internal compiler error: in gen_lowpart_general, at rtlhooks.c:53 Please submit a full bug report

[Bug target/35619] gcc-4.3.0 build fails in gfortran section centos-4.6

--- Comment #6 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-03-17 22:58 --- Looks like the reason why it was not being fixed because of: __NTH (feof_unlocked (FILE *__stream)) -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35619

[Bug target/35619] gcc-4.3.0 build fails in gfortran section centos-4.6

--- Comment #5 from bill at cse dot ucdavis dot edu 2008-03-17 22:13 --- Created an attachment (id=15340) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=15340&action=view) bits/stdio.h This is the correct file as requested, I'll attempt to delete the previous wrong version. --

[Bug target/35619] gcc-4.3.0 build fails in gfortran section centos-4.6

--- Comment #4 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-03-17 22:08 --- (In reply to comment #2) > Created an attachment (id=15339) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=15339&action=view) [edit] > stdio.h as requested. That is /usr/include/stdio.h, not the one I requested

[Bug target/35619] gcc-4.3.0 build fails in gfortran section centos-4.6

--- Comment #3 from bill at cse dot ucdavis dot edu 2008-03-17 22:06 --- rpm claims: glibc-2.3.4-2.39 glibc-headers-2.3.4-2.39 glibc-devel-2.3.4-2.39 compat-glibc-headers-2.3.2-95.30 ls -al /lib/libc-2.3.4.so -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 1516768 Nov 16 08:37 /lib/libc-2.3.4.so -- htt

[Bug target/35619] gcc-4.3.0 build fails in gfortran section centos-4.6

--- Comment #2 from bill at cse dot ucdavis dot edu 2008-03-17 22:05 --- Created an attachment (id=15339) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=15339&action=view) stdio.h as requested. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35619

[Bug target/35619] gcc-4.3.0 build fails in gfortran section centos-4.6

--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-03-17 22:00 --- This is a bug in the glibc headers. We should fixincludes them though. Can you attach /usr/include/bits/stdio.h ? And also mention which glibc version you are using. -- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

[Bug fortran/35619] New: gcc-4.3.0 build fails in gfortran section centos-4.6

Attempting to build gcc-4.3.0 with a centos-4.6 (fully patched) using the centos compiler: Exact version of gcc used to build gcc-4.3.0: gcc version 4.1.2 20070626 (Red Hat 4.1.2-14) Options when GCC was configured/built: export CC=gcc4 ./configure --prefix=/opt/pkg/gcc-4.3.0 --with-gmp=/opt/pk

[Bug c++/35548] [4.3/4.4 Regression] g++ 4.3 miscompile this simple program

-- jason at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |jason at gcc dot gnu dot org |dot org

[Bug debug/35615] Debug information for .debug_loc section incorrect

--- Comment #3 from deuling at de dot ibm dot com 2008-03-17 19:28 --- Hi Andrew, attached is my little test program I use. The error is seen both on x86 and PowerPC: * i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux * ppc64 ppc64 ppc64 GNU/Linux following versions of binutils: x86: binutils-2.17.50.0.6-5

[Bug other/35618] [4.3/4.4 regression] ICE in cgraph_estimate_size_after_inlining, at ipa-inline.c:188

--- Comment #3 from bunk at stusta dot de 2008-03-17 19:23 --- That's the UML kernel, and it was added there quite some time ago. I do not know whether that might be dropped or whether it might still result in increased stack usage with gcc 4.3, but IMHO as long as gcc offers this optio

[Bug debug/35615] Debug information for .debug_loc section incorrect

--- Comment #2 from deuling at de dot ibm dot com 2008-03-17 19:20 --- Created an attachment (id=15338) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=15338&action=view) Fortran test program Fortran test program -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35615

[Bug other/35618] [4.3/4.4 regression] ICE in cgraph_estimate_size_after_inlining, at ipa-inline.c:188

--- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-03-17 19:14 --- First -fno-unit-at-a-time seems wrong. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35618

[Bug other/35618] [4.3/4.4 regression] ICE in cgraph_estimate_size_after_inlining, at ipa-inline.c:188

--- Comment #1 from bunk at stusta dot de 2008-03-17 19:11 --- Created an attachment (id=15337) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=15337&action=view) preprocessed source -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35618

[Bug other/35618] New: [4.3/4.4 regression] ICE in cgraph_estimate_size_after_inlining, at ipa-inline.c:188

$ gcc -Wp,-MD,kernel/.sched.o.d -nostdinc -isystem /usr/lib/gcc/i486-linux-gnu/4.3.1/include -D__KERNEL__ -Iinclude -Iinclude2 -I/home/bunk/linux/kernel-2.6/git/linux-2.6/include -include include/linux/autoconf.h -I/home/bunk/linux/kernel-2.6/git/linux-2.6/kernel -Ikernel -Wall -Wundef -Wstrict-pr

[Bug middle-end/34572] program that built with 4.1.2 fails with 4.2.2

--- Comment #10 from galtgendo at o2 dot pl 2008-03-17 18:34 --- Well, gcc 4.3.0 seems to work fine. A clean compilation. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34572

[Bug fortran/35617] read namelist error

--- Comment #1 from pletzer at txcorp dot com 2008-03-17 18:32 --- (In reply to comment #0) Oops, the failing namelist was: &nbdrive_naml !nstep_stop = 2 ! uncomment to save restart data and halt after 1st step !nstep_start = 2 ! uncomment to restart on 2nd step using saved restart d

[Bug fortran/35617] New: read namelist error

Hi: It seems that gfortran can get confused about namelists that include 2 ! on the same line. The following code fails to execute properly with gfortran 4.3.0: cat > t.nml < t.f90

[Bug middle-end/35616] Incorrect code while O2 compling

--- Comment #2 from J dot Gorka at osmosys dot tv 2008-03-17 17:12 --- The same problem on that version. I don't think that is Red Hat specific problem... Using built-in specs. Target: i486-linux-gnu Configured with: ../src/configure -v --enable-languages=c,c++,fortran,objc,obj-c++,tree

[Bug debug/35615] Debug information for .debug_loc section incorrect

--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-03-17 16:49 --- Do you have an example source which causes this issue? Also what target is this on (I figure it is either powerpc-linux-gnu or powerpc64-linux-gnu)? Also what version of gdb are you trying this with (it could be a

[Bug middle-end/35616] Incorrect code while O2 compling

--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-03-17 16:40 --- > gcc (GCC) 4.1.2 20070626 (Red Hat 4.1.2-13) Please try 4.2.3 or 4.3.0. Also you should have reported this to RedHat first as it is their modified compiler. -- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

[Bug c/35616] New: Incorrect code while O2 compling

While compling program below (3 files) with O2 or O3 option, code is generated not properly (SF). /**/ file 1: gcc_bug.c #include #include "function.h" static void my_listener( int a, int b, in

[Bug fortran/35613] testsuite ISO_C_BIND code error

--- Comment #1 from toon at moene dot indiv dot nluug dot nl 2008-03-17 16:00 --- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 35612 *** -- toon at moene dot indiv dot nluug dot nl changed: What|Removed |Added -

[Bug fortran/35612] testsuite ISO_C_BIND code error

--- Comment #1 from toon at moene dot indiv dot nluug dot nl 2008-03-17 16:00 --- *** Bug 35613 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35612

[Bug tree-optimization/19637] Missed VRP and FRE opportunities in the presence of casts

--- Comment #13 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-03-17 15:03 --- Fixed. -- rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW

[Bug tree-optimization/19637] Missed VRP and FRE opportunities in the presence of casts

--- Comment #12 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-03-17 14:35 --- Subject: Bug 19637 Author: rguenth Date: Mon Mar 17 14:34:21 2008 New Revision: 133291 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=133291 Log: 2008-03-17 Richard Guenther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

[Bug c/35587] -Warray-bounds does not work at all or does not find all trivial cases, and :works only with -O2 or -O3

--- Comment #3 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-03-17 14:05 --- Hm, with gcc 4.2 I get gcc-4.2 -c t.c -O2 -Wall t.c: In function 'main': t.c:5: warning: array subscript is below array bounds t.c:7: warning: array subscript is above array bounds t.c:8: warning: array subscript is

[Bug fortran/35615] New: Debug information for .debug_loc section incorrect

I compiled a test program with gcc 4.3 DW_AT_producer: (indirect string, offset: 0x41): GNU F95 4.3.0 I think this is a bug in gfortran's DWARF code. [EMAIL PROTECTED] fortran]$ readelf --debug-dump=loc ./neg_array readelf: Error: Location lists in .debug_info section aren't in ascending

[Bug libgomp/35611] [4.3/4.4 Regression] FAIL: libgomp.c/omp-nested-1.c execution test

--- Comment #3 from kkojima at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-03-17 13:32 --- Same on sh4-unknown-linux-gnu. It seems that they started to fail after r133162 | jakub | 2008-03-13 18:26:25 +0900 (Thu, 13 Mar 2008) | 7 lines PR middle-end/35185 * omp-low.c (lower_regimplify, i

[Bug c/35587] -Warray-bounds does not work at all or does not find all trivial cases, and :works only with -O2 or -O3

-- karsten_burger at gmx dot de changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |major http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35587

Publisher 2007

Microsoft Office Enterprise 2007 includes: • Access 2007 • Communicator 2007 • Excel 2007 • Groove 2007 • InfoPath 2007 • OneNote 2007 • Outlook 2007 • PowerPoint 2007 • Publisher 2007 • Word 2007 http://marjorieeastburn821.blogspot.com System Requirements • Intel® Pentium® or AMD® 500 MHz proc