--- Comment #1 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-07-11 06:00 ---
The problem is:
call foo((xx),xx)
gfortran simplifies the (xx) to xx by passing (-fdump-tree-orignal):
foo (xx, xx, 10, 10);
Since the second argument is nullified in foo as it is INTENT(OUT), it is
obvious
The following is invalid as (n) is not definable and thus shall not be passed
to an INTENT(OUT) variable. For scalars or for other types than CHARACTER, one
gets the expected
Error: Actual argument at (1) must be definable as the dummy argument 'x'
is INTENT = OUT/INOUT
The problem
--- Comment #2 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-07-11 06:14 ---
Looking at PR 36803, I think the general algorithm could be correct, however,
it might not trigger for CHARACTER arrays. Maybe a fix for either PRs fixes
both.
--
burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
--- Comment #10 from techrazy dot yang at gmail dot com 2008-07-11 07:41
---
(In reply to comment #1)
From: Christian Ehrhardt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: c++/9381: stdcall attribute ignored in member function pointer
type
Date:
--- Comment #11 from techrazy dot yang at gmail dot com 2008-07-11 07:43
---
Created an attachment (id=15898)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=15898action=view)
The testcase fail g++ 4.3.0
From this bug http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11893, we know the
I've made a small example where a for-loop never exits when it should. I have
tried gcc 4.2.1, 4.2.4 and 4.3.1 with the same result. Gcc 4.1.1 works.
GCC is configured with:
../configure --prefix=/opt/arm-linux/arm --host=i686-linux-gnu
--target=arm-linux-gnu --build=i686-linux-gnu
The following program fails to compile:
templatetypename T void f()
{}
void g1() {}
void g2() {}
typedef void(*ptrType)();
int main(int argc, char** argv)
{
ptrType p = argc == 1 ? fchar : fint; //-- error
ptrType p2 = argc == 1 ? g1 : g2;
ptrType p1;
if
--- Comment #3 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-07-11 10:15 ---
Thanks for reducing this.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Incre asing to 10 cents, and volume continues to rise.
Tick: mpix
Croopration-name: Mind Pix
Per sahre price: 10 cents up .002 cents
The mo-ve is happening.
Tkae your action, before you miss it.
--- Comment #4 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-07-11 10:42 ---
Turns out this is a problem I already have a patch in my queue. Reduced
testcase:
int __attribute__((noinline))
foo(int i)
{
int *p = __builtin_malloc (4 * sizeof(int));
*p = 0;
p[i] = 1;
return *p;
}
Starting from revision 137644 up to 137712 (137615 is working), unformatted IOs
in FORTRAN give hanging executables. For instance, the executable from the
following code
data=-1
! print *, 'before'
write(11) data
! print *, 'after'
end
hangs after creating an
--- Comment #1 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-07-11 10:59 ---
Created an attachment (id=15899)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=15899action=view)
patch
Could be. You can try the attached patch.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36806
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.4.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36806
--- Comment #1 from marion dot deveaud at siemens dot com 2008-07-11 11:00
---
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 35204 ***
--
marion dot deveaud at siemens dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #30 from marion dot deveaud at siemens dot com 2008-07-11
11:00 ---
*** Bug 36650 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
marion dot deveaud at siemens dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
andreast at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||andreast at gcc dot gnu dot
|
--- Comment #1 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com 2008-07-11 11:08
---
Funny, the problem happen very late. in the demangler. A workaround is using
std::is_empty ;)
--
paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #2 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com 2008-07-11 11:12
---
Of course I meant mangling not demangling
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36797
Happens since the PRE rewrite. Seen on x86_64 and ia64 with -O2 and higher.
Not seen for 403.gcc (SPEC 2k6), so might be a 176.gcc bug.
--
Summary: [4.4 Regression] 176.gcc miscompares
Product: gcc
Version: 4.4.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.4.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36807
--- Comment #3 from bonzini at gnu dot org 2008-07-11 11:56 ---
Yes, the code produced shows that something (probably fwprop, I trust Andrew
though I'd like to see dumps) is turning the GIMPLE code
temp = a[0];
a[1] = temp;
temp++;
into something harder to optimize. It might be
When I run the program listed below on an Alpha workstation I get the following
output:
ibad1, ibad2, igood1, igood2, loc2, loc1 = -2147483646 -2147483646 2
2 536940884 536940880
On all other platforms the value of ibad1 and ibad2 is 2.
Typing gfortran -v produces the
--- Comment #7 from bonzini at gnu dot org 2008-07-11 11:58 ---
Wonder why nothing in fwprop.c checks modified_between_p
There is code similar to modified_between_p in fwprop.c, that uses def info
from the dataflow pass. Part of the fwprop work was to try using the df-scan.c
info
--- Comment #1 from michael dot a dot richmond at nasa dot gov 2008-07-11
12:22 ---
Please disregard this bug report. It is an error on my part.
--
michael dot a dot richmond at nasa dot gov changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #5 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-07-11 12:45 ---
Fixed.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
--- Comment #6 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-07-11 12:45 ---
Subject: Bug 36765
Author: rguenth
Date: Fri Jul 11 12:44:26 2008
New Revision: 137715
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=137715
Log:
2008-07-11 Richard Guenther [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PR
--- Comment #15 from dodji at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-07-11 12:55 ---
Subject: Bug 31754
Author: dodji
Date: Fri Jul 11 12:54:22 2008
New Revision: 137716
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=137716
Log:
2008-07-11 Dodji Seketeli [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PR c++/31754
--- Comment #2 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-07-11 12:58 ---
Which has now been checked in on the trunk.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36806
--- Comment #1 from jifl-bugzilla at jifvik dot org 2008-07-11 13:03
---
On thinking about this a bit more, I think this would be a regression for the
case where __GTHREAD_MUTEX_INIT is used. In the case of
__GTHREAD_MUTEX_INIT_FUNCTION, I believe the previous implementation was also
--- Comment #3 from dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr 2008-07-11 13:26 ---
Could be. You can try the attached patch.
The patch does not fix the problem.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36806
--- Comment #2 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com 2008-07-11 13:36
---
CCing Benjamin...
By the way, if the patch would be very short, the full Assignment would not be
needed...
--
paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed
--- Comment #4 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-07-11 13:41 ---
I cannot reproduce this on i686-pc-linux-gnu.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36806
--- Comment #5 from dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr 2008-07-11 13:53 ---
I suspect the problem is specific to Darwin (probably also on ppc: the machinr
regress did not test since 2008-07-08 23:54, revision 137630:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2008-07/msg00776.html).
--
--- Comment #3 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com 2008-07-11 13:54
---
Hi again, Mark...
I'm looking into this issue. Does it make sense to you that we need to add a
new operators.def entry? I quickly hacked this addition:
DEF_SIMPLE_OPERATOR (trait, TRAIT_EXPR, xx, 2)
and
--- Comment #6 from andreast at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-07-11 13:57
---
yes, ppc too.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36806
I am unable to compile the JPEG program with the following optimization phases
fixupcfg init_datastructures all_optimizations referenced_vars reset_cc_flags
salias ssa alias retslot copyrename ccp fre dce forwprop copyprop mergephi vrp
dce dom phicprop phiopt alias tailr profile ch cplxlower sra
--- Comment #1 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com 2008-07-11 14:25
---
Please read about the proper way to submit PRs:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs.html
and provide the required information. Thanks in advance!
--
paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What
--- Comment #2 from abidmuslim at gmail dot com 2008-07-11 14:51 ---
(In reply to comment #1)
Please read about the proper way to submit PRs:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs.html
and provide the required information. Thanks in advance!
In continuation of the last report. Here are
--- Comment #3 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com 2008-07-11 14:54
---
The PR is still largely incomplete.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36809
--- Comment #4 from abidmuslim at gmail dot com 2008-07-11 15:11 ---
Subject: Re: Optimization Sequence
I have reported what I am getting using -save-temps option. What else
I need to report?
Thanks
On Fri, Jul 11, 2008 at 4:54 PM, paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com
[EMAIL
--- Comment #5 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-07-11 15:14 ---
/home/ammalik/Desktop/MilePost/milepost_gcc_1.0/gcc-4.2.2-ici-1.0-ml-feat-x86/examples/prepared/MiBench-with-MiDataSets/consumer_jpeg_c/src-ccc-ml/../../../../../install/bin/gcc
this is not an FSF gcc version.
300% increase to .10, and buys are epxloding.
mipx
Company Nam'e: M indPix Corpoartion
Mra,ket: 0.098 up .002
We called it and it is good.
Buy it, and ride the wave priority Friday- morning.
--- Comment #16 from dodji at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-07-11 16:33 ---
Subject: Bug 31754
Author: dodji
Date: Fri Jul 11 16:32:29 2008
New Revision: 137721
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=137721
Log:
2008-07-11 Dodji Seketeli [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PR
--- Comment #2 from rwild at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-07-11 16:34 ---
I'm curious: what makes you certain that this bug actually is a duplicate of
PR35204? If you're not sure, and I'm not, then let's reopen the bug.
Someone who is sure can still mark it as dupe.
Thanks,
Ralf
--
--- Comment #17 from dodji at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-07-11 16:36 ---
(From update of attachment 15835)
This has been committed to trunk.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31754
--- Comment #18 from dodji at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-07-11 16:37 ---
(From update of attachment 15836)
This has been committed to trunk
--
dodji at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #19 from dodji at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-07-11 16:50 ---
Okay, so the two patches are now committed to trunk in changesets
r137716 and r137721.
However, given the nature of this enhancement request, I think it will take
some on going work to have perfect column number
--- Comment #7 from andreast at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-07-11 18:09
---
r137631 seems to be the commit where the hanging starts. I have successful
results from 137630
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36806
--- Comment #3 from dodji at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-07-11 18:13 ---
Subject: Bug 13101
Author: dodji
Date: Fri Jul 11 18:12:37 2008
New Revision: 137723
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=137723
Log:
2008-07-11 Dodji Seketeli [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PR
--- Comment #2 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2008-07-11 18:19 ---
Some of regressions are run-time failures. As of revision 137717,
there are still:
FAIL: Array_3 -O3 execution - source compiled test
FAIL: Array_3 -O3 -findirect-dispatch execution - source compiled test
FAIL:
--
dodji at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |dodji at gcc dot gnu dot org
|dot org
--- Comment #3 from andreast at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-07-11 18:29
---
Created an attachment (id=15900)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=15900action=view)
natGC.ii
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36766
--- Comment #4 from andreast at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-07-11 18:31
---
The previously attached natGC.ii is from powerpc-apple-darwin9.3.0.
--
andreast at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #4 from dodji at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-07-11 18:32 ---
A fix for this bug has been committed to trunk in changeset r137723.
--
dodji at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #8 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-07-11 18:44 ---
That's the PRE rewrite. I think Danny has access to i686-darwin, but reducing
this would be helpful I guess.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Sorry but I don't quite know what you want by triplet. I guessed. I
currently have gcc 4.1.1 and I'm trying to build 4.3.1. If that isn't what you
wanted, and if the included file doesn't answer, let me know.
I suspect the problem is that I haven't installed some needed set of headers or
--- Comment #3 from dberlin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-07-11 19:15 ---
Subject: Re: [4.4 Regression] Revision 137631 causes many failures
I am working on the one x86_64 specific failure first :)
On Fri, Jul 11, 2008 at 2:19 PM, hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- Comment #4 from gfan at sta dot samsung dot com 2008-07-11 20:37
---
Created an attachment (id=15901)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=15901action=view)
.i file cased error of reduced file
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36798
--- Comment #5 from gfan at sta dot samsung dot com 2008-07-11 20:38
---
Created an attachment (id=15902)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=15902action=view)
.c file caused same error of reduced file
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36798
--
gfan at sta dot samsung dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |blocker
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36798
--- Comment #3 from bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-07-11 20:53 ---
Hey Jonathan.
It would be most helpful if you could come up with a test case. I know, it will
be a pain and difficult, etc etc etc yadda yadda yadda, but really this would
be enormously helpful.
Instead of putting
--- Comment #5 from bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-07-11 20:56 ---
Isn't this the kind of thing that -Wstrict-aliasing or -Wstrict-aliasing=n
should warn about?
I will start to experiment with this, in the thought that we should not
actually have stuff in the library with aliasing
--- Comment #7 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-07-11 21:20
---
I think it's actually the same problem, the patch that has fixed it on other
platforms probably doesn't behave the same everywhere.
Yep, PE-COFF has a custom binds_local_p hook that doesn't reject
--- Comment #6 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com 2008-07-11 21:21
---
(In reply to comment #5)
Isn't this the kind of thing that -Wstrict-aliasing or -Wstrict-aliasing=n
should warn about?
Hi Benjamin. My guess is that any possible problem can only have to do with
some long
--- Comment #1 from brian at dessent dot net 2008-07-11 21:28 ---
Subject: Re: New: make asked me to report this error [GNU
Fortran is not working]
lachele at gmail dot com wrote:
configure:13398: /usr/local/gcc/./gcc/gfortran -B/usr/local/gcc/./gcc/
--- Comment #15 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com 2008-07-11 21:36
---
I'm tentatively recategorizing as middle-end, if I'm missing something just
override me...
--
paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #2 from dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-07-11 21:38 ---
As Brian says, get or update GMP.
http://gcc.gnu.org/install/prerequisites.html:
GNU Multiple Precision Library (GMP) version 4.1 (or later)
Necessary to build GCC. If you do not have it installed in your library
--- Comment #4 from dje at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-07-11 21:54 ---
Yes, this will substitute _ for $, but most programs do not use dollar
signs in symbol names, except Java. GNU Java is not supported on AIX, so
building libjava does not accomplish much.
This is a large patch and
--- Comment #3 from dje at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-07-11 21:56 ---
This patch needs an assignment.
--
dje at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #2 from dje at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-07-11 21:57 ---
Why build libjava if Java does not work on AIX?
--
dje at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #3 from dje at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-07-11 22:01 ---
Have you tried bootstrapping with a more recent version of GCC than gcc-3.3.3?
How did you configure GCC itself?
I do not have any problem bootstrapping with GCC 4.0, GCC 4.1, and GCC 4.2.
--
dje at gcc dot gnu
--- Comment #9 from dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr 2008-07-11 22:10 ---
The executable for the following code
open(unit=11,form='unformatted')
! print *, 'open'
end
also hangs. Stepping with gdb gives:
Breakpoint 1, main (argc=1, argv=0xbfffdb98) at
--- Comment #30 from dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr 2008-07-11 22:18 ---
From pr36806 I think the mutex behavior on Darwin needs to be better understood
(handled).
To answer comment #28, this bug has been resolved as invalid and not as
undefined!
--
dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr
--- Comment #31 from dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr 2008-07-11 22:21 ---
Forgot to say that the problem is still there for ppc/intel Darwin9.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30617
--- Comment #3 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-07-12 01:22
---
I think maybe this is the right fix, in keeping with what we do now other
places. But the error message is not as clear.
Index: io.c
===
--- io.c
--- Comment #4 from jifl-bugzilla at jifvik dot org 2008-07-12 01:53
---
I can't really work out how to provide a testcase as such. To reproduce it all
I'm doing is:
#include cstdio
#include iostream
int
main(int argc, char *argv[])
{
std::cout Hello world std::endl;
return
76 matches
Mail list logo
