Re: [Bug ada/37034] /bin/sh: line 1: 26087 Aborted (core dumped) ./xsinfo ../../sinfo.h

2008-08-07 Thread Arnaud Charlet
mkdir -p ada/bldtools/einfo (cd ada/bldtools/sinfo gnatmake -q xsinfo ./xsinfo ../../sinfo.h ) rm -f ada/bldtools/einfo/einfo.ads ada/bldtools/einfo/einfo.adb ada/bldtools/einfo/xeinfo.adb cp -p ../../gcc/gcc/ada/einfo.ads ../../gcc/gcc/ada/einfo.adb

[Bug ada/37034] /bin/sh: line 1: 26087 Aborted (core dumped) ./xsinfo ../../sinfo.h

2008-08-07 Thread charlet at adacore dot com
--- Comment #3 from charlet at adacore dot com 2008-08-07 06:41 --- Subject: Re: /bin/sh: line 1: 26087 Aborted (core dumped) ./xsinfo ../../sinfo.h mkdir -p ada/bldtools/einfo (cd ada/bldtools/sinfo gnatmake -q xsinfo ./xsinfo ../../sinfo.h ) rm -f

[Bug c++/12242] g++ should warn about out-of-range int-enum conversions

2008-08-07 Thread manu at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #16 from manu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-08-07 07:50 --- The expression cannot be very complicated because it needs to be a INTEGER_CST. On the other hand, I agree that it is best to give users as much information as reasonable. I think it is better if you comment in

[Bug c/17336] AVRGCC ignores volatile keyword for register variables

2008-08-07 Thread urjaman at gmail dot com
--- Comment #7 from urjaman at gmail dot com 2008-08-07 07:51 --- I did a simple test on my avr-gcc 4.2.2 and it seems that this bug (i dont think it should be Resolution: INVALID but...) is fixed in 4.2.2 atleast. I changed the register used in the example to r2 to see if the AVR's

[Bug middle-end/36983] Trunk 138207 miscompiles 172.mgrid on x86-64

2008-08-07 Thread Joey dot ye at intel dot com
--- Comment #3 from Joey dot ye at intel dot com 2008-08-07 07:55 --- Although 138318 fixes the compiler ICE, it miscompile with -O3 -ffast-math on x86-64: Running 172.mgrid ref base o3 default *** Miscompare of mgrid.out, see

[Bug middle-end/37042] Strict-aliasing warnings are printed for _mm_load_si128, even though __m128i is __attribute__((__may_alias__)).

2008-08-07 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #1 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-08-07 08:50 --- Confirmed. This is the other machinery. typedef long long __m128i __attribute__ ((__vector_size__ (16), __may_alias__)); extern __inline __m128i __attribute__((__gnu_inline__, __always_inline__, __artificial__))

[Bug middle-end/37042] Strict-aliasing warnings are printed for _mm_load_si128, even though __m128i is __attribute__((__may_alias__)).

2008-08-07 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #2 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-08-07 08:51 --- Mine. -- rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug bootstrap/37045] New: bootstrap fails: dwarf2out.c:13496: error: unrecognizable insn

2008-08-07 Thread jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk
At revision 138835 /data/vondele/gcc_bench/gcc_trunk/gcc/gcc/dwarf2out.c: In function ‘gen_subprogram_die’: /data/vondele/gcc_bench/gcc_trunk/gcc/gcc/dwarf2out.c:13496: error: unrecognizable insn: (insn 1465 2398 1466 235 /data/vondele/gcc_bench/gcc_trunk/gcc/gcc/dwarf2out.c:8357 (parallel [

[Bug middle-end/37042] Strict-aliasing warnings are printed for _mm_load_si128, even though __m128i is __attribute__((__may_alias__)).

2008-08-07 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #3 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-08-07 10:01 --- Subject: Bug 37042 Author: rguenth Date: Thu Aug 7 09:59:58 2008 New Revision: 138836 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=138836 Log: 2008-08-07 Richard Guenther [EMAIL PROTECTED] PR

[Bug middle-end/37042] Strict-aliasing warnings are printed for _mm_load_si128, even though __m128i is __attribute__((__may_alias__)).

2008-08-07 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #4 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-08-07 10:02 --- Fixed. -- rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug middle-end/37042] Strict-aliasing warnings are printed for _mm_load_si128, even though __m128i is __attribute__((__may_alias__)).

2008-08-07 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #5 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-08-07 10:03 --- Subject: Bug 37042 Author: rguenth Date: Thu Aug 7 10:01:48 2008 New Revision: 138837 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=138837 Log: 2008-08-07 Richard Guenther [EMAIL PROTECTED] PR

[Bug middle-end/37046] New: Inlining produces calls which gimple_call_fndecl cannot handle correctly

2008-08-07 Thread jamborm at gcc dot gnu dot org
In the following example, the fucntion hooray() does not get inlined, even though it could. #include stdlib.h #include stdio.h static __attribute__((always_inline)) void hooray () { printf (hooray\n); } static __attribute__((always_inline)) void hiphip (void (*f)()) { printf (hip hip\n);

[Bug middle-end/37046] Inlining produces calls which gimple_call_fndecl cannot handle correctly

2008-08-07 Thread jamborm at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #1 from jamborm at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-08-07 10:11 --- I am testing the patch below which should fix the problem: 2008-08-07 Martin Jambor [EMAIL PROTECTED] * tree-inline.c (remap_gimple_stmt): Remove extraneous addr_expr from call statements.

[Bug c++/36999] Erroneous declaration 'class ...' does not declare anything warnings possible

2008-08-07 Thread manu at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #4 from manu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-08-07 11:22 --- Then this is confirmed and it works in GCC 4.4.0 -- manu at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug c/37041] -Wc++-compat refinements

2008-08-07 Thread manu at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #1 from manu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-08-07 11:54 --- Confirmed as enhancement. To clarify how to implement this, I have some questions: (In reply to comment #0) -Wc++-compat should allow bool, wchar_t, char16_t and char32_t as typedefs defined in system headers,

[Bug c/37041] -Wc++-compat refinements

2008-08-07 Thread joseph at codesourcery dot com
--- Comment #2 from joseph at codesourcery dot com 2008-08-07 12:04 --- Subject: Re: -Wc++-compat refinements On Thu, 7 Aug 2008, manu at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote: To clarify how to implement this, I have some questions: (In reply to comment #0) -Wc++-compat should allow bool,

[Bug bootstrap/37045] bootstrap fails: dwarf2out.c:13496: error: unrecognizable insn

2008-08-07 Thread jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk
--- Comment #1 from jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk 2008-08-07 12:21 --- Just in case this is useful, this is the corresponding command line: /data/vondele/gcc_bench/gcc_trunk/obj/./prev-gcc/xgcc -B/data/vondele/gcc_bench/gcc_trunk/obj/./prev-gcc/

[Bug c++/36999] Erroneous declaration 'class ...' does not declare anything warnings possible

2008-08-07 Thread simonb at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #5 from simonb at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-08-07 12:29 --- Subject: Bug 36999 Author: simonb Date: Thu Aug 7 12:27:48 2008 New Revision: 138838 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=138838 Log: gcc/cp/ChangeLog: Backport from mainline:

[Bug c++/37047] New: Missing warning for deprecated use of static

2008-08-07 Thread gcc-bugzilla at contacts dot eelis dot net
In 7.3.1.1p2, the standard states The use of the static keyword is deprecated when declaring objects in a namespace scope, yet g++ does not warn about such uses. Compiling the following snippet: static int i; int g() { return i; } results in no diagnostics of any kind, not even with

[Bug target/37048] New: [4.4 Regression] Revision 138835 breaks bootstrap

2008-08-07 Thread hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
Revision 138835 breaks bootstrap on Linux/x86-64: [EMAIL PROTECTED] zlib]$ /export/gnu/import/svn/gcc-test/bld/./prev-gcc/xgcc -B/export/gnu/import/svn/gcc-test/bld/./prev-gcc/ -B/usr/local/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/bin/ -DPACKAGE_NAME=\\ -DPACKAGE_TARNAME=\\ -DPACKAGE_VERSION=\\

[Bug target/16894] far/section attributes on function parameters, typedefs, and literals

2008-08-07 Thread manu at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #3 from manu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-08-07 13:11 --- 4 years old, no activity, unconfirmed. Please fill bugs for specific targets with testcases so the target maintainers are aware of this issue. -- manu at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed

[Bug c++/12242] g++ should warn about out-of-range int-enum conversions

2008-08-07 Thread bangerth at dealii dot org
--- Comment #17 from bangerth at dealii dot org 2008-08-07 13:13 --- (In reply to comment #16) The expression cannot be very complicated because it needs to be a INTEGER_CST. Sure, but it can be of the form ~SOME_PREPROCESSOR_MACRO | (MACRO2 ^ MACRO3) What I meant to say is that

[Bug middle-end/37046] Inlining produces calls which gimple_call_fndecl cannot handle correctly

2008-08-07 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #2 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-08-07 13:14 --- Looks good. Similar things may happen with CCP propagation for like void foo(void) {} void bar(void) { void (*fn)(void) = foo; fn(); } can you verify this as well? Thanks. --

[Bug target/36992] Very stange code for _mm_move_epi64

2008-08-07 Thread hjl at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #21 from hjl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-08-07 13:17 --- Subject: Bug 36992 Author: hjl Date: Thu Aug 7 13:16:23 2008 New Revision: 138839 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=138839 Log: gcc/ 2008-08-07 H.J. Lu [EMAIL PROTECTED] PR target/36992

[Bug target/36992] Very stange code for _mm_move_epi64

2008-08-07 Thread hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
--- Comment #22 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2008-08-07 13:18 --- Fixed. -- hjl dot tools at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug bootstrap/37045] bootstrap fails: dwarf2out.c:13496: error: unrecognizable insn

2008-08-07 Thread hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
--- Comment #2 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2008-08-07 13:20 --- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 37048 *** -- hjl dot tools at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug target/37048] [4.4 Regression] Revision 138835 breaks bootstrap

2008-08-07 Thread hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
--- Comment #1 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2008-08-07 13:20 --- *** Bug 37045 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- hjl dot tools at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug target/37048] [4.4 Regression] Revision 138835 breaks bootstrap

2008-08-07 Thread hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
--- Comment #2 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2008-08-07 13:21 --- It also happens on Linux/ia32. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37048

[Bug c++/37043] fails to find operator match when constructing object on the fly

2008-08-07 Thread scott at stg dot net
--- Comment #2 from scott at stg dot net 2008-08-07 13:31 --- Okay, so if I change: FooBar operator (const char *s,FooBar dest) to FooBar operator (const char *s,FooBar dest) It now compiles on both msvc and g++, but required functionality (operation affecting existing object, not

[Bug target/37048] [4.4 Regression] Revision 138835 breaks bootstrap

2008-08-07 Thread hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
--- Comment #3 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2008-08-07 13:47 --- [EMAIL PROTECTED] prev-gcc]$ cat ../zlib/x.c typedef struct gz_stream { char *inbuf; long offset; } gz_stream; void *malloc(__SIZE_TYPE__ size); long foo (void * file, long offset) { gz_stream *s =

[Bug c++/37043] fails to find operator match when constructing object on the fly

2008-08-07 Thread scott at stg dot net
--- Comment #3 from scott at stg dot net 2008-08-07 13:53 --- For clarification, this code compiles runs in gcc msvc: FooBar test1(one); Atest1; And this code compiles runs fine in msvc, but gives compile error in gcc: BFooBar(two); Since it's the same

[Bug target/37048] [4.4 Regression] Revision 138835 breaks bootstrap

2008-08-07 Thread jh at suse dot cz
--- Comment #4 from jh at suse dot cz 2008-08-07 14:30 --- Subject: Re: [4.4 Regression] Revision 138835 breaks bootstrap Hi, thanks for testcase, for some reason it does not reproduce on our testing setup, probably due to ancient glibc that still has memcpy/memset inlines. This

[Bug c++/36999] Erroneous declaration 'class ...' does not declare anything warnings possible

2008-08-07 Thread simon_baldwin at yahoo dot com
--- Comment #6 from simon_baldwin at yahoo dot com 2008-08-07 14:42 --- Fixed for mainline and 4.3 branch -- resolving as FIXED. -- simon_baldwin at yahoo dot com changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug target/37048] [4.4 Regression] Revision 138835 breaks bootstrap

2008-08-07 Thread hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
--- Comment #5 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2008-08-07 14:52 --- (In reply to comment #4) Subject: Re: [4.4 Regression] Revision 138835 breaks bootstrap Hi, thanks for testcase, for some reason it does not reproduce on our testing setup, probably due to ancient glibc that

[Bug target/37048] [4.4 Regression] Revision 138835 breaks bootstrap

2008-08-07 Thread hubicka at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #6 from hubicka at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-08-07 14:56 --- Subject: Bug 37048 Author: hubicka Date: Thu Aug 7 14:55:32 2008 New Revision: 138841 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=138841 Log: PR target/37048 * i386.md (single stringop

[Bug c++/37043] fails to find operator match when constructing object on the fly

2008-08-07 Thread schwab at suse dot de
--- Comment #4 from schwab at suse dot de 2008-08-07 15:19 --- Because the result of FooBar(two) is an rvalue, but test1 is an lvalue. -- schwab at suse dot de changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug java/32247] -Wall enables -Wunused enables -Wunused-parameter

2008-08-07 Thread manu at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #13 from manu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-08-07 15:22 --- Unsubscribing: not sure what is to fix here. -- manu at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug tree-optimization/36631] [4.3/4.4 Regression] attribute always_inline - sorry, unimplemented: recursive inlining

2008-08-07 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #3 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-08-07 15:25 --- Mine. -- rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug middle-end/37046] Inlining produces calls which gimple_call_fndecl cannot handle correctly

2008-08-07 Thread jamborm at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #3 from jamborm at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-08-07 15:49 --- Unfortunately, I got a fortran regression: /abuild/mjambor/iinln/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/char_cast_1.f90:24: internal com piler error: in expand_call_inline, at tree-inline.c:3117 The assert is gcc_assert

[Bug middle-end/37046] Inlining produces calls which gimple_call_fndecl cannot handle correctly

2008-08-07 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #4 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-08-07 16:00 --- Interesting. I may have a look into the CCP problem. -- rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug target/37049] New: Unaligned move used on aligned destination of push insn

2008-08-07 Thread hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
[EMAIL PROTECTED] gcc]$ cat /tmp/push-1.c /* { dg-do compile { target { { i?86-*-* x86_64-*-* } ilp32 } } } */ /* { dg-options -w -msse2 -Os } */ typedef float __m128 __attribute__ ((__vector_size__ (16), __may_alias__)); extern void foo (__m128 x, __m128 y ,__m128 z ,__m128 a, int size);

[Bug target/37049] Unaligned move used on aligned destination of push insn

2008-08-07 Thread hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
--- Comment #1 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2008-08-07 16:38 --- A patch is posted at http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2008-08/msg00204.html -- hjl dot tools at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug debug/37020] [4.4 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/debug/dwarf2/dwarf-die3.c scan-assembler-not DW_AT_inline

2008-08-07 Thread aesok at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #1 from aesok at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-08-07 16:53 --- The gcc.dg/debug/dwarf2/dwarf-die3.c testcase FALL on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu also. Anatoliy -- aesok at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug ada/37034] /bin/sh: line 1: 26087 Aborted (core dumped) ./xsinfo ../../sinfo.h

2008-08-07 Thread dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca
--- Comment #4 from dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca 2008-08-07 17:12 --- Subject: Re: /bin/sh: line 1: 26087 Aborted (core dumped) ./xsinfo ../../sinfo.h Right, and xeinfo is built with your base compiler. I'd try with an older or more recent base GNAT version. It's more

[Bug target/37048] [4.4 Regression] Revision 138835 breaks bootstrap

2008-08-07 Thread hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
--- Comment #7 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2008-08-07 17:23 --- Fixed. -- hjl dot tools at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug debug/37033] [4.4 Regression] Revision 138733 breaks PCH

2008-08-07 Thread hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
--- Comment #1 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2008-08-07 18:58 --- Created an attachment (id=16037) -- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=16037action=view) A testcase /export/build/gnu/gcc-work/build-x86_64-linux/gcc/xgcc

[Bug libfortran/18985] opening unit 6 messes up print

2008-08-07 Thread schilds at sun dot ac dot za
--- Comment #6 from schilds at sun dot ac dot za 2008-08-07 19:07 --- This is a serious bug, make no mistake. It causes existing Fortran 77 code to fail. It's wasted a lot of my time and, no doubt, a lot of other, good peoples' too. The print*, (or write(*,*)) statement certainly _IS_

[Bug debug/37033] [4.4 Regression] Revision 138733 breaks PCH

2008-08-07 Thread hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
--- Comment #2 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2008-08-07 19:09 --- The problem is -E never generates any debug info. So __GCC_HAVE_DWARF2_CFI_ASM won't be defined for -E and PCH gets a mismatch. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37033

[Bug c/37050] New: gcc-4.3.1 bootstrap failure on sparc Solaris 10

2008-08-07 Thread Jay dot St dot Pierre at Colorado dot EDU
Since I am unable to bootstrap gcc-4.3.1 using the Sun cc compiler (see bug Bug#: 33304), I attempted to compile using Sun's version of gcc (http://cooltools.sunsource.net/gcc/). This does not work either. The configure fails in the sparc-sun-solaris2.10/libgcc directory. The version of gcc

[Bug libfortran/18985] opening unit 6 messes up print

2008-08-07 Thread burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #7 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-08-07 19:48 --- The print*, (or write(*,*)) statement certainly _IS_ standard Fortran 77 and its ubiquitousness should make fixing this bug a priority. The * is standard Fortran 66 to 2008, however, its interpretation was not

[Bug debug/37033] [4.4 Regression] Revision 138733 breaks PCH

2008-08-07 Thread rth at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #3 from rth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-08-07 20:07 --- Subject: Bug 37033 Author: rth Date: Thu Aug 7 20:06:36 2008 New Revision: 138850 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=138850 Log: PR debug/37033 * gcc.c (cpp_options): Pass along -g*.

[Bug debug/37033] [4.4 Regression] Revision 138733 breaks PCH

2008-08-07 Thread rth at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #4 from rth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-08-07 20:11 --- Fixed. -- rth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c/21759] Implement warning for codes at the intersection of C and C++

2008-08-07 Thread tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #9 from tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-08-07 20:28 --- See this note for some details on the semantics of this warning, with respect to keywords: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2008-07/msg00808.html -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21759

[Bug fortran/37011] F2003, type extension: multiple inheritence not rejected

2008-08-07 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #1 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-08-07 21:23 --- Daniel, By golly, I never even thought of that possibility. Thanks! I'll fix it as obvious as soon as I can. Paul PS Could you please CC me next time? I do not have ove much time for hacking right now. I either

[Bug debug/20403] dwarf-3: DW_MACINFO_define - wrong lineno fields for predefined macros

2008-08-07 Thread tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #2 from tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-08-07 21:33 --- This works in 4.3, probably due to the switch to mapped locations. I didn't try anything earlier. -- tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug fortran/37011] F2003, type extension: multiple inheritence not rejected

2008-08-07 Thread dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #2 from dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-08-07 21:40 --- Could you please CC me next time? Thought I did, I Surely wanted to?! Please excuse the oversight :) -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37011

[Bug java/37051] New: Random failures running ECJ 3.4 (threading problem?)

2008-08-07 Thread chewi at aura-online dot co dot uk
I have been encountering random failures when running ECJ 3.4. ECJ 3.3 works fine and I did also encounter random failures with Sun's VM so I initially filed a bug at eclipse.org. However, further tests have indicated that there are two different issues here, one affecting GCJ and one affecting

[Bug c/37052] New: ICE in find_reloads, at reload.c:3744

2008-08-07 Thread stephen at marenka dot net
gcc -save-temps -v -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -c testreloads.c Dropping optimization from -O2 to -O1 or dropping -fomit-frame-pointer allows this to succeed. Using built-in specs. Target: m68k-linux-gnu Configured with: ../src/configure -v --with-pkgversion='Debian 4.3.1-8'

[Bug c/37052] ICE in find_reloads, at reload.c:3744

2008-08-07 Thread stephen at marenka dot net
--- Comment #1 from stephen at marenka dot net 2008-08-08 00:46 --- Created an attachment (id=16038) -- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=16038action=view) Preprocessed file -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37052

[Bug c/37052] ICE in find_reloads, at reload.c:3744

2008-08-07 Thread stephen at marenka dot net
--- Comment #2 from stephen at marenka dot net 2008-08-08 00:47 --- Created an attachment (id=16039) -- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=16039action=view) reduced source from hdf5 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37052

[Bug c/37053] New: ICE in reload_cse_simplify_operands, at postreload.c:395

2008-08-07 Thread stephen at marenka dot net
gcc -fpic -O1 -c postreload.c Dropping optimization from -O1 to -O0 or dropping -fpic allows this to succeed. Using built-in specs. Target: m68k-linux-gnu Configured with: ../src/configure -v --with-pkgversion='Debian 4.3.1-8' --with-bugurl=file:///usr/share/doc/gcc-4.3/README.Bugs

[Bug c/37053] ICE in reload_cse_simplify_operands, at postreload.c:395

2008-08-07 Thread stephen at marenka dot net
--- Comment #1 from stephen at marenka dot net 2008-08-08 01:02 --- Created an attachment (id=16040) -- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=16040action=view) Preprocessed file -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37053

[Bug c/37053] ICE in reload_cse_simplify_operands, at postreload.c:395

2008-08-07 Thread stephen at marenka dot net
--- Comment #2 from stephen at marenka dot net 2008-08-08 01:02 --- Created an attachment (id=16041) -- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=16041action=view) reduced source from r-base -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37053

[Bug libobjc/37054] New: undefined reference to `objc_exception_throw'

2008-08-07 Thread jcarthew at gmail dot com
When I try to build gnustep-base I get undefined reference to `objc_exception_throw' apparently it is missing in libobjc.def -- Summary: undefined reference to `objc_exception_throw' Product: gcc Version: 4.3.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug c/37044] Heisenbug: SVN of gcc throws internal compiler error on PPC

2008-08-07 Thread contact at multimedia dot cx
--- Comment #3 from contact at multimedia dot cx 2008-08-08 03:25 --- Created an attachment (id=16042) -- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=16042action=view) Preprocessor output for file that is crashing compiler As requested, this is the preprocessed output when adding

[Bug c/37055] New: internal compiler error: in emit_unop_insn, at optabs.c:3806

2008-08-07 Thread howarth at nitro dot med dot uc dot edu
-Os (test for excess errors) WARNING: gcc.dg/torture/fp-int-convert-timode.c -Os compilation failed to produce executable These all fail with errors of the form... Executing on host: /sw/src/fink.build/gcc44-4.3.999-20080807/darwin_objdir/gcc/xgcc -B/sw/src/fink.build/gcc44-4.3.999-20080807

[Bug c/37055] internal compiler error: in emit_unop_insn, at optabs.c:3806

2008-08-07 Thread hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
--- Comment #1 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2008-08-08 05:13 --- bash-3.2$ cat /tmp/x.i unsigned foo (double d) { return d; } bash-3.2$ ./xgcc -B./ -msse2 -mfpmath=sse -S /tmp/x.i -Os -m32 /tmp/x.i: In function ‘foo’: /tmp/x.i:3: internal compiler error: in emit_unop_insn,