--- Comment #26 from dannysmith at users dot sourceforge dot net
2008-10-01 01:33 ---
(In reply to comment #14)
> Hi Guys,
>
> I am not able to reproduce the build problems that were reported with the
> first version of my patch, but then again I do not have a native cygwin build
> s
--
rth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |rth at gcc dot gnu dot org
|dot org
--- Comment #6 from reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-09-30 21:55
---
Seems as if this one got fixed on mainline with the tuples merge.
--
reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #3 from reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-09-30 21:44
---
With the patch for PR37649 the testcase doesn't ICE on mainline anymore.
According to Paolo's comment, this is still rejects-valid, though.
--
reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Remov
--- Comment #7 from ro at techfak dot uni-bielefeld dot de 2008-09-30
21:37 ---
Subject: Re: [4.4 regression] Building 64-bit libada fails on Solaris/x86:
alignment error
Patch here:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2008-09/msg01990.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.
--- Comment #2 from reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-09-30 21:33
---
The second (weakref) case has been fixed on mainline and the 4.3 branch
by the patch for PR37645. The attribute is ignored and the code compiled:
bug.c:1: warning: 'weakref' attribute ignored
The first (alias) ca
--
jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
|dot org
--- Comment #5 from simartin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-09-30 20:01
---
Fixed in 4.3.3 and 4.4.0.
--
simartin at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
K
--- Comment #3 from pdemarco at ppg dot com 2008-09-30 20:00 ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> maybe the same bug to 22207?
yeah, probably the same as bug 22207, but that one is only fixed on 4.0.0
We need a fix on 3.x.x
--
pdemarco at ppg dot com changed:
What|Removed
--- Comment #5 from simartin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-09-30 19:59
---
Fixed
--
simartin at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW
--- Comment #4 from simartin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-09-30 19:57
---
Subject: Bug 37555
Author: simartin
Date: Tue Sep 30 19:56:13 2008
New Revision: 140796
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=140796
Log:
gcc/cp/
2008-09-30 Simon Martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- Comment #7 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-09-30 19:41
---
> I'm a bit unsure how to test this right now: what I find is that C objects
> have read-only .eh_frame sections and use .cfi* directives, while C++, Java
> and Ada objects have read-write .eh_frame sections and s
--- Comment #1 from joel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-09-30 19:32 ---
Created an attachment (id=16436)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=16436&action=view)
preprocessed code
/home/joel/work-gnat/svn/m32c-work/b-gcc/./gcc/xgcc
-B/home/joel/work-gnat/svn/m32c-work/b-gcc/
/home/joel/work-gnat/svn/m32c-work/b-gcc/./gcc/xgcc
-B/home/joel/work-gnat/svn/m32c-work/b-gcc/./gcc/ -nostdinc
-B/home/joel/work-gnat/svn/m32c-work/b-gcc/m32c-elf/m32cm/newlib/ -isystem
/home/joel/work-gnat/svn/m32c-work/b-gcc/m32c-elf/m32cm/newlib/targ-include
-isystem /home/joel/work-gnat/svn/gc
--- Comment #3 from simartin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-09-30 19:27
---
Subject: Bug 37555
Author: simartin
Date: Tue Sep 30 19:25:35 2008
New Revision: 140794
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=140794
Log:
gcc/cp/
2008-09-30 Simon Martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- Comment #4 from simartin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-09-30 19:27
---
Subject: Bug 37556
Author: simartin
Date: Tue Sep 30 19:25:35 2008
New Revision: 140794
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=140794
Log:
gcc/cp/
2008-09-30 Simon Martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- Comment #6 from ro at techfak dot uni-bielefeld dot de 2008-09-30
19:22 ---
Subject: Re: [4.4 regression] All Solaris/x86 eh tests fail
ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org writes:
> See http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2008-09/msg00195.html
Thanks for the info.
> Now someone need
--- Comment #6 from bonzini at gnu dot org 2008-09-30 19:06 ---
Are you going to commit my tree-ssa-propagate.c patch separately, or should I
wait for 4.5?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37662
--- Comment #1 from domob at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-09-30 18:49 ---
Confirmed. I'll work this out.
--
domob at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #1 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-09-30 18:49 ---
*** Bug 37687 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
--- Comment #1 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-09-30 18:49 ---
Mark as duplicate of PR 37634.
That libgfortran does not work with GCC_NO_EXECUTABLES is a known, but unfixed
problem. See PR 37634. If you have some time, you could try whether the
suggested fixes there are enough.
This is mostly encountered for bounds of automatic arrays. The following is
invalid, but accepted by most compilers:
subroutine foo(x,n)
implicit none
real:: x(n)
integer :: n
It is also accepted by gfortran (unless -std=f2008 etc. is used). However,
currently gfortran (since 4.4 / sinc
--- Comment #3 from jrenggli at gmail dot com 2008-09-30 18:39 ---
Sorry about that, now that you say it it makes so much sense! I feel a bit
silly, but at least I learned something :)
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37685
--- Comment #5 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-09-30 18:19
---
See http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2008-09/msg00195.html
Now someone needs to write a configure test for the compiler.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37463
--- Comment #4 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-09-30 18:18
---
Yep, same on SPARC.
--
ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #2 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com 2008-09-30 18:13
---
Indeed.
--
paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Stat
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2008-09-30 18:11 ---
Subject: Re: New: C++ over-eager optimization when working with a pointer
Sent from my iPhone
On Sep 30, 2008, at 10:26 AM, "jrenggli at gmail dot com"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> The following code results in a
Sent from my iPhone
On Sep 30, 2008, at 10:26 AM, "jrenggli at gmail dot com" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
The following code results in an error when optimized using -O2 or -
O3 flag,
but works fine with -O1. I've also been able to "confuse" the
optimizer by
adding some code just after or
--- Comment #3 from ro at techfak dot uni-bielefeld dot de 2008-09-30
18:09 ---
Subject: Re: [4.4 regression] All Solaris/x86 eh tests fail
I've done some further debugging: contrary to what gdb suggested, the
reason for the abort is the gcc_assert call in unwind-dw2.c
(uw_init_contex
checking whether symbol versioning is supported... configure: error: Link tests
are not allowed after GCC_NO_EXECUTABLES.
make[2]: *** [configure-target-libgfortran] Error 1
This affects both libgfortran and libssp.
Seen with:
gcc version 4.4.0 20080930 (experimental) [trunk revision 140790] (GCC
After this patch:
http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=140660
Building bzip2 with peak flags AND -mcpu=power4 for ppc (-O3 -mcpu=power4
-ffast-math -funroll-loops -ftree-loop-linear -fpeel-loops) started ICE'ing.
Here is the backtrace:
#0 0x103a2c3c in gimple_bb (g=0x4) at
/home/lu
The following code results in an error when optimized using -O2 or -O3 flag,
but works fine with -O1. I've also been able to "confuse" the optimizer by
adding some code just after or before the line "iX += pA2->iX;" but I'm not
sure how safe that method is.
-- Full code starts
--- Comment #3 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-09-30 17:19 ---
Testing it now.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37568
--- Comment #3 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-09-30 17:03 ---
Fixed.
--
jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
--- Comment #5 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-09-30 17:02 ---
Fixed.
--
jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
--- Comment #2 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-09-30 17:02 ---
Subject: Bug 37663
Author: jakub
Date: Tue Sep 30 17:00:49 2008
New Revision: 140792
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=140792
Log:
PR tree-optimization/37662
PR tree-optimization/3
--- Comment #4 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-09-30 17:02 ---
Subject: Bug 37662
Author: jakub
Date: Tue Sep 30 17:00:49 2008
New Revision: 140792
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=140792
Log:
PR tree-optimization/37662
PR tree-optimization/3
--- Comment #2 from hjagasia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-09-30 16:40
---
Created an attachment (id=16435)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=16435&action=view)
This patch fixes the reduced test case block-3.c
Until graphite can handle scalars and also update dominance
--- Comment #1 from hjagasia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-09-30 16:34
---
Created an attachment (id=16434)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=16434&action=view)
Reduced test case derived from CPU2006 401.bzip2 benchmark
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id
When translate_clast is called for a scop, scalar definitions are optimized out
and hence any subsequent uses of those scalars, outside the scop, represents a
problem. Also as code is generated for a scop, basic blocks in the scop are
moved around such that the block which contains the definition o
--- Comment #11 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-09-30 16:26
---
>Must be darwin specific then, can't reproduce on x86_64-linux
Has anyone tried bootstrapping on i686-linux-gnu with PIC enabled lately? This
might show the same issue.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bu
--- Comment #14 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-09-30 16:24
---
*** Bug 37682 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-09-30 16:24 ---
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 37146 ***
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
--- Comment #4 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2008-09-30 16:10 ---
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2008-08/msg01620.html
makes nested_if uninitialized for g++.dg/warn/Wparentheses-3.C:
--- gcc/cp/parser.c (revision 138452)
+++ gcc/cp/parser.c (working copy)
@@ -7120,7 +7
--- Comment #6 from rrpeter at sandia dot gov 2008-09-30 15:54 ---
Subject: Re: OpenMP thinks that I have 1 processor
on an 8 processor pc
jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
> --- Comment #5 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-09-20 08:22 ---
> No, I didn't mean to ask yo
--- Comment #9 from ro at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-09-30 15:38 ---
Created an attachment (id=16433)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=16433&action=view)
minimized testcase
This minimized version of strstream.ii shows the same bug.
--
ro at gcc dot gnu dot org chang
--- Comment #6 from bonzini at gnu dot org 2008-09-30 15:38 ---
No, there is not yet an extra configure switch for that, but I'll add it. You
can create a PR and assign it to me.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37681
--- Comment #1 from krebbel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-09-30 15:30 ---
The failure can currently be seen bootstrapping ira-merge branch (rev.:
140776).
configure --enable-shared --with-system-zlib --enable-threads=posix
--enable-__cxa_atexit --enable-checking --enable-decimal-float
--e
--- Comment #6 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-09-30 15:22 ---
FIXED on the trunk (4.4).
--
burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #5 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-09-30 15:20 ---
Subject: Bug 36592
Author: burnus
Date: Tue Sep 30 15:19:25 2008
New Revision: 140790
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=140790
Log:
2008-09-30 Janus Weil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
PR fortran
--- Comment #5 from laurent at guerby dot net 2008-09-30 15:15 ---
Adding Paolo as expert on configury. Rainer, let us know when you've tested
your patch (should be very close to what Eric Botcazou did for sparc-solaris).
--
laurent at guerby dot net changed:
What|Rem
--
krebbel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37674
--- Comment #4 from charlet at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-09-30 15:06 ---
I'm assuming the proper --disable switch is either already there, if not,
probably worth opening another PR. Keeping this PR as an enhancement request
to add support for x86_64 solaris for Ada.
--
charlet at gcc
--- Comment #3 from ro at techfak dot uni-bielefeld dot de 2008-09-30
15:06 ---
Subject: Re: [4.4 regression] Building 64-bit libada fails on Solaris/x86:
alignment error
ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org writes:
> Yes, it is, the hitch being that there is no port to x86_64/Solaris ye
--- Comment #2 from charlet at adacore dot com 2008-09-30 15:06 ---
Subject: Re: [4.4 regression] Building 64-bit libada fails
on Solaris/x86: alignment error
> > This happens only for the 64-bit libada, so it's probably due to missing
> > support for the 64-bit multilib.
>
>
--- Comment #3 from bonzini at gnu dot org 2008-09-30 15:05 ---
> Linux/ia32 and --enable-checking=assert may trigger this bug.
Well, your own Linux/x86-64 builds do not have this failure, neither normally
nor for -m32. Either this bug is invalid, or it is a wrong-code somewhere
else.
--- Comment #1 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-09-30 15:01
---
> This happens only for the 64-bit libada, so it's probably due to missing
> support for the 64-bit multilib.
Yes, it is, the hitch being that there is no port to x86_64/Solaris yet.
--
ebotcazou at gcc dot g
--- Comment #7 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-09-30 14:57 ---
If fixed, then it should be closed as fixed.
--
jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #2 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2008-09-30 14:44 ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> Other gcc-testresults don't indicate the failure for revision 140785 or even
> 140781.
>
Are they run on Linux/ia32 and configured with
--enable-checking=assert --enable-clocale=gnu --wi
--- Comment #1 from bonzini at gnu dot org 2008-09-30 14:35 ---
Other gcc-testresults don't indicate the failure for revision 140785 or even
140781.
--
bonzini at gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
On Linux/ia32, I got
Executing on host:
/export/gnu/import/svn/gcc-test/bld/gcc/testsuite/g++/../../g++
-B/export/gnu/import/svn/gcc-test/bld/gcc/testsuite/g++/../../
/export/gnu/import/svn/gcc-test/src-trunk/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/warn/Wparentheses-3.C
-nostdinc++
-I/export/gnu/import/svn/gcc-test
--- Comment #25 from sherpya at netfarm dot it 2008-09-30 14:10 ---
(In reply to comment #24)
> Subject: Re: [cygming] Invalid alignment for SSE store
> to .comm data generated with -O3
>
> > a printf in the code for ff_cos_16 causes the compiler to align the var,
> > but at this poin
--
jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37681
--- Comment #24 from nickc at redhat dot com 2008-09-30 14:05 ---
Subject: Re: [cygming] Invalid alignment for SSE store
to .comm data generated with -O3
> a printf in the code for ff_cos_16 causes the compiler to align the var,
> but at this point it crashes in another place using ss
--- Comment #4 from joel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-09-30 14:03 ---
Arguments to create ICE were "-O2 -mthumb"
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37666
--- Comment #12 from paolo at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-09-30 13:50 ---
Subject: Bug 30085
Author: paolo
Date: Tue Sep 30 13:48:55 2008
New Revision: 140786
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=140786
Log:
2008-09-30 Paolo Carlini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
PR libst
--- Comment #14 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com 2008-09-30 13:52
---
Fixed.
--
paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Stat
With current trunk (rev. 140784) I get following internal error (g++ only).
The error message is similar to bug 37418.
Maybe it's the same problem, but maybe it's not.
$ /holger/gcc/gnu/trunk/install/bin/g++ -c t.c
t.c: In function unsigned int bar(unsigned int, const void*, RefId):
t.c:9: error:
--- Comment #13 from paolo at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-09-30 13:50 ---
Subject: Bug 30085
Author: paolo
Date: Tue Sep 30 13:49:15 2008
New Revision: 140787
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=140787
Log:
2008-09-30 Paolo Carlini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
PR libst
--- Comment #3 from joel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-09-30 13:06 ---
Created an attachment (id=16432)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=16432&action=view)
preprocessed code
Prepropcessed output -- untrimmed
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37666
--- Comment #3 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-09-30 13:01 ---
Fixed in 4.2.0.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.4.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37681
--- Comment #7 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-09-30 12:46 ---
IMHO force_fit_type_double is correct. We also set TREE_OVERFLOW on
truncations which are implementation defined.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Adde
--- Comment #2 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-09-30 12:41 ---
And w/o preprocessed source we cannot do anything.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
--
jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
|dot org
--
jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
|dot org
As of 20080929 (rev 140759), libada fails to build on Solaris 10/x86:
/vol/gccsrc/obj/gcc-4.4.0-20080929/10-gcc/./gcc/xgcc
-B/vol/gccsrc/obj/gcc-4.4.0-20080929/10-gcc/./gcc/
-B/vol/gcc/i386-pc-solaris2.10/bin/ -B/vol/gcc/i386-pc-solaris2.10/lib/
-isystem /vol/gcc/i386-pc-solaris2.10/include -isyst
--- Comment #21 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-09-30 10:37
---
Subject: Bug 37491
Author: rguenth
Date: Tue Sep 30 10:36:22 2008
New Revision: 140781
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=140781
Log:
2008-09-30 Richard Guenther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot
|dot org
--- Comment #15 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-09-30 10:29 ---
(In reply to comment #14)
> Created an attachment (id=16429)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=16429&action=view) [edit]
> Reduced test case which is failing with the patch
>
OK - I'll get onto it!
--- Comment #1 from aldot at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-09-30 10:24 ---
Created an attachment (id=16431)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=16431&action=view)
reduced from linux-2.6.26.5/fs/ocfs2/alloc.c
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37680
Using built-in specs.
Target: m68k-linux-uclibc
Configured with: /there/toolchain_build_m68k/gcc-4.3.2/configure --prefix=/usr
--build=i386-pc-linux-gnu --host=i386-pc-linux-gnu --target=m68k-linux-uclibc
--enable-languages=c,fortran --with-sysroot=/there/build_m68k/staging_dir
--with-build-time-to
--- Comment #9 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com 2008-09-30 10:21
---
(In reply to comment #8)
> So this isn't a "blocker" bug, but there is still a bug with wcin.imbue() and
> wcout.imbue() when they are used alone without a
>
> "locale::global(locale("en_US"));"
>
> or
>
>
--- Comment #13 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com 2008-09-30 10:21
---
*** Bug 37673 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35353
--- Comment #6 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-09-30 10:03 ---
For -fwrapv I wonder why we add TREE_OVERFLOW at all.
force_fit_type_double does:
/* Size types *are* sign extended. */
sign_extended_type = (!TYPE_UNSIGNED (type)
|| (TREE_CODE (type) ==
--- Comment #8 from ivranos at freemail dot gr 2008-09-30 09:51 ---
Note: Change the encoding of your browser and email client to Greek-ISO or
Unicode, so as to see the messages correctly.
locale -a displays the following:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/Desktop/download/extract$ locale -a
C
el_
--- Comment #2 from bonzini at gnu dot org 2008-09-30 09:33 ---
fixed.
--
bonzini at gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
--- Comment #8 from bonzini at gnu dot org 2008-09-30 09:27 ---
Subject: Bug 36891
Author: bonzini
Date: Tue Sep 30 09:26:22 2008
New Revision: 140779
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=140779
Log:
2008-09-30 Paolo Bonzini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
PR testsuite/
--- Comment #1 from bonzini at gnu dot org 2008-09-30 09:27 ---
Subject: Bug 37675
Author: bonzini
Date: Tue Sep 30 09:26:22 2008
New Revision: 140779
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=140779
Log:
2008-09-30 Paolo Bonzini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
PR testsuite/
--- Comment #10 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-09-30 09:26 ---
Must be darwin specific then, can't reproduce on x86_64-linux and from quick
skim of gcc-testresults nobody else that supplied test summary recently managed
to reproduced it.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_b
--
bonzini at gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |bonzini at gnu dot org
|dot org |
91 matches
Mail list logo