--- Comment #7 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-04-27 06:55 ---
Fixed.
--
jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED
--- Comment #3 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-04-27 06:54 ---
This doesn't look like a GCC bug, but user error.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39747
--- Comment #5 from dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr 2009-04-27 06:32 ---
The patch in comment #3 works only for a stride equal to one -> some failures
in the test suite.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35732
--- Comment #1 from irar at il dot ibm dot com 2009-04-27 05:55 ---
Sorry.
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 39907 ***
--
irar at il dot ibm dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #2 from irar at il dot ibm dot com 2009-04-27 05:55 ---
*** Bug 39926 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39907
--- Comment #5 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-04-27 05:55 ---
Fixed.
--
jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
--- Comment #4 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-04-27 05:54 ---
Subject: Bug 39875
Author: jakub
Date: Mon Apr 27 05:54:32 2009
New Revision: 146825
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=146825
Log:
PR c++/39875
* cvt.c (convert_to_void) : Only war
The following code (a reduced gcc.target/x86_64/abi/test_struct_returning.c)
fails during execution with segmentation fault when compiled with -O1
-ftree-vectorize -fno-vect-cost-model asm-support.S (in directory
gcc.target/x86_64/abi/):
#include
#include "defines.h"
#include "macros.h"
#include
--- Comment #11 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-04-27 04:10
---
*** Bug 39924 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-04-27 04:10 ---
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 11764 ***
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
--- Comment #5 from tom dot prince at ualberta dot net 2009-04-27 04:01
---
Further consideration seems to indicate that the standard spuriously allows the
second case to be illegal.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39923
The system find(1) command on this Tru64 box does not support the -path option.
As far as I can tell, -path is not POSIX. I think it may be preferable to prune
the output using grep(1).
gmake[4]: Entering directory
`/tmp/gcc-build/alphaev56-dec-osf4.0g/libjava/classpath/tools'
Makefile:839: warnin
When I declare a class A, gcc injects the class name A in this class a little
too strongly.
C++0X explicitly lists this example as invalid (and it is also invalid in
C++03, just not explicitly given as an example):
struct A {};
void f(){ A::A a; }
This is only a failure to emit an error/warning,
--- Comment #4 from tom dot prince at ualberta dot net 2009-04-27 03:16
---
Created an attachment (id=17764)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=17764&action=view)
GCC version details
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39923
--- Comment #3 from tom dot prince at ualberta dot net 2009-04-27 03:15
---
Created an attachment (id=17763)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=17763&action=view)
GCC version details
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39923
--- Comment #2 from tom dot prince at ualberta dot net 2009-04-27 03:13
---
Created an attachment (id=17762)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=17762&action=view)
gcc output
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39923
--- Comment #1 from tom dot prince at ualberta dot net 2009-04-27 03:12
---
Created an attachment (id=17761)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=17761&action=view)
Test Case
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39923
Reference: 2857 section 13.3.3.2
There are some cases where GCC binds or fails to bind properly to rvalue
references: see details in attached test case.
--
Summary: [C++0x] rvalue references
Product: gcc
Version: 4.5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
S
--- Comment #2 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-04-27 03:01 ---
This may be 32bit host related since I didn't see it on Linux/x86-64 with
-m32.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39922
--- Comment #1 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-04-27 02:37 ---
Revision 146817:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2009-04/msg01459.html
is the cause.
--
hjl dot tools at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #5 from sabre at nondot dot org 2009-04-27 01:31 ---
Sorry I can't give a more detailed analysis of what is going on, I have no idea
how the placemarker system works in gcc.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35010
--- Comment #4 from sabre at nondot dot org 2009-04-27 01:31 ---
If the definition is:
#define debug(format, ...) format,## __VA_ARGS__)
Then we should still get:
Z, );
W, );
If the definition is:
#define debug(format,...) format,##__VA_ARGS__)
Then we should get:
Z,);
W,);
(and gcc cu
--- Comment #11 from howarth at nitro dot med dot uc dot edu 2009-04-27
00:31 ---
I can confirm that using the current gcc 4.4 branch and the proposed patch
at...
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2009-04/msg02070.html
...that the test suite failure is eliminated on x86_64-apple-darwi
On Linux/ia32, revision 146817 gave
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/960416-1.c execution, -O2
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/960416-1.c execution, -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/960416-1.c execution, -O3 -g
FAIL: libgomp.c++/loop-12.C -O2 execution test
FAIL: libgomp.c++/loo
--- Comment #10 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-04-26 23:08
---
(In reply to comment #9)
> Is this one of those bugs that only trigger on -fPIC?
>
I don't think so.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39903
--- Comment #9 from howarth at nitro dot med dot uc dot edu 2009-04-26
22:17 ---
Is this one of those bugs that only trigger on -fPIC?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39903
--- Comment #7 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-04-26 21:48 ---
A patch is posted at
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2009-04/msg02070.html
--
hjl dot tools at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
--- Comment #5 from jwakely dot gcc at gmail dot com 2009-04-26 21:39
---
(In reply to comment #4)
> same patch again, with the new symbols using a new version and testsuite
> changes included
passes all regression tests both with and without tls
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/sh
--- Comment #8 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-04-26 21:52 ---
(In reply to comment #6)
> Confirmed on x86_64-linux, reduced testcase:
>
> --cut here--
> struct S2456
> {
> double a;
> struct {} b[];
> };
>
> struct S2456 s2456;
>
> extern void check2456va (struct S2456);
--- Comment #4 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-04-26 21:51 ---
*** Bug 39872 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35732
--- Comment #4 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-04-26 21:51 ---
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 35732 ***
--
burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #3 from dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr 2009-04-26 21:33 ---
Patch posted in PR35732.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39872
--- Comment #3 from dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr 2009-04-26 21:32 ---
The following patch seems to fix the PR (not fully tested yet):
--- ../_gcc_clean/gcc/fortran/trans-array.c 2009-04-20 13:44:15.0
+0200
+++ gcc/fortran/trans-array.c 2009-04-26 23:24:12.0 +0200
--- Comment #6 from howarth at nitro dot med dot uc dot edu 2009-04-26
21:17 ---
Created an attachment (id=17760)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=17760&action=view)
assembly file for t027_main.c
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39921
--- Comment #5 from howarth at nitro dot med dot uc dot edu 2009-04-26
21:17 ---
Created an attachment (id=17759)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=17759&action=view)
assembly file for t027_y.c
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39921
--- Comment #4 from howarth at nitro dot med dot uc dot edu 2009-04-26
21:17 ---
Created an attachment (id=17758)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=17758&action=view)
assembly file for t027_x.c
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39921
--- Comment #3 from howarth at nitro dot med dot uc dot edu 2009-04-26
21:16 ---
Created an attachment (id=17757)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=17757&action=view)
preprocessed source for t027_main.c
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39921
--- Comment #2 from howarth at nitro dot med dot uc dot edu 2009-04-26
21:16 ---
Created an attachment (id=17756)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=17756&action=view)
preprocessed source for t027_y.c
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39921
--- Comment #1 from howarth at nitro dot med dot uc dot edu 2009-04-26
21:15 ---
Created an attachment (id=17755)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=17755&action=view)
preprocessed source for t027_x.c
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39921
The tmpdir-gcc.dg-struct-layout-1/t027 c_compat_x_tst.o-c_compat_y_tst.o
execute test case fails at -m64 on powerpc-apple-darwin9. The offending lines
in t027_test.h that cause these failures are...
T(2605,struct atal{}a;,)
TXCI(2733,struct atal8,,union{unsigned char b;float c;unsigned short int
d
--- Comment #6 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-04-26 20:35 ---
A patch is posted at
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2009-04/msg02055.html
--
hjl dot tools at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
--- Comment #6 from howarth at nitro dot med dot uc dot edu 2009-04-26
20:32 ---
Created an attachment (id=17754)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=17754&action=view)
assembly file for t026_main.c
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39920
--- Comment #5 from howarth at nitro dot med dot uc dot edu 2009-04-26
20:31 ---
Created an attachment (id=17753)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=17753&action=view)
assembly file for t026_y.c
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39920
--- Comment #4 from howarth at nitro dot med dot uc dot edu 2009-04-26
20:31 ---
Created an attachment (id=17752)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=17752&action=view)
assembly file for t026_x.c
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39920
--- Comment #3 from howarth at nitro dot med dot uc dot edu 2009-04-26
20:30 ---
Created an attachment (id=17751)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=17751&action=view)
preprocessed source for t026_main.c
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39920
--- Comment #2 from howarth at nitro dot med dot uc dot edu 2009-04-26
20:30 ---
Created an attachment (id=17750)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=17750&action=view)
preprocessed source for t026_y.c
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39920
--- Comment #1 from howarth at nitro dot med dot uc dot edu 2009-04-26
20:30 ---
Created an attachment (id=17749)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=17749&action=view)
preprocessed source for t026_x.c
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39920
The tmpdir-gcc.dg-struct-layout-1/t026 c_compat_x_tst.o-c_compat_y_tst.o
execute test case fails at -m64 on powerpc-apple-darwin9. The offending line in
the t026_test.h file causing this failure is...
TX(2411,struct atal,,struct{}a[0];,)
With that line removed, the remainder of the test case pass
--- Comment #6 from howarth at nitro dot med dot uc dot edu 2009-04-26
20:15 ---
Created an attachment (id=17748)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=17748&action=view)
assembly file for t024_main.c
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39919
--- Comment #5 from howarth at nitro dot med dot uc dot edu 2009-04-26
20:14 ---
Created an attachment (id=17747)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=17747&action=view)
assembly file for t024_y.c
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39919
--- Comment #4 from howarth at nitro dot med dot uc dot edu 2009-04-26
20:14 ---
Created an attachment (id=17746)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=17746&action=view)
assembly file for t024_x.c
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39919
--- Comment #3 from howarth at nitro dot med dot uc dot edu 2009-04-26
20:13 ---
Created an attachment (id=17745)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=17745&action=view)
preprocessed source for t024_main.c
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39919
--- Comment #2 from howarth at nitro dot med dot uc dot edu 2009-04-26
20:13 ---
Created an attachment (id=17744)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=17744&action=view)
preprocessed source for t024_y.c
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39919
--- Comment #1 from howarth at nitro dot med dot uc dot edu 2009-04-26
20:13 ---
Created an attachment (id=17743)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=17743&action=view)
preprocessed source for t024_x.c
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39919
The tmpdir-gcc.dg-struct-layout-1/t024 c_compat_x_tst.o-c_compat_y_tst.o
execute test case fails at -m64 on powerpc-apple-darwin9. The offending section
of the test case is the line...
T(2017,union{}a atal16;,)
in t024_test.h. When that line is removed, the remainder of the test case
passes its e
--- Comment #6 from howarth at nitro dot med dot uc dot edu 2009-04-26
19:56 ---
Created an attachment (id=17742)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=17742&action=view)
assembly file for t016_main.c
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39918
--- Comment #5 from howarth at nitro dot med dot uc dot edu 2009-04-26
19:55 ---
Created an attachment (id=17741)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=17741&action=view)
assembly file for t016_y.c
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39918
--- Comment #4 from howarth at nitro dot med dot uc dot edu 2009-04-26
19:55 ---
Created an attachment (id=17740)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=17740&action=view)
assembly file for t016_x.c
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39918
--- Comment #3 from howarth at nitro dot med dot uc dot edu 2009-04-26
19:54 ---
Created an attachment (id=17739)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=17739&action=view)
preprocessed source for t016_main.c
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39918
--- Comment #2 from howarth at nitro dot med dot uc dot edu 2009-04-26
19:54 ---
Created an attachment (id=17738)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=17738&action=view)
preprocessed source for t016_y.c
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39918
--- Comment #1 from howarth at nitro dot med dot uc dot edu 2009-04-26
19:54 ---
Created an attachment (id=17737)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=17737&action=view)
preprocessed source for t016_x.c
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39918
--- Comment #2 from dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr 2009-04-26 19:53 ---
PR39872 is probably a duplicate of this PR.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35732
The tmpdir-gcc.dg-struct-layout-1/t016 c_compat_x_tst.o-c_compat_y_tst.o
execute test case fails at -m64 on powerpc-apple-darwin9. The offending section
of the test case is the line...
T(1604,char a;TE7 b;enum E6 c;unsigned int d;long int e;char f[6];float g;short
int atal16 h;int *
i;,F(1604,a,76
--- Comment #2 from dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr 2009-04-26 19:52 ---
This is probably a duplicate of PR35732.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39872
--- Comment #6 from howarth at nitro dot med dot uc dot edu 2009-04-26
19:37 ---
Created an attachment (id=17736)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=17736&action=view)
assembly file for t008_main.c
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39917
--- Comment #5 from howarth at nitro dot med dot uc dot edu 2009-04-26
19:37 ---
Created an attachment (id=17735)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=17735&action=view)
assembly file for t008_y.c
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39917
--- Comment #4 from howarth at nitro dot med dot uc dot edu 2009-04-26
19:36 ---
Created an attachment (id=17734)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=17734&action=view)
assembly file for t008_x.c
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39917
--- Comment #3 from howarth at nitro dot med dot uc dot edu 2009-04-26
19:36 ---
Created an attachment (id=17733)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=17733&action=view)
preprocessed source for t008_main.c
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39917
--- Comment #3 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-04-26 19:36 ---
Created an attachment (id=17732)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=17732&action=view)
gcc45-pr39875.patch
Actually, convert_to_void knows that, see the implicit argument.
--
jakub at gcc dot gnu
--- Comment #2 from howarth at nitro dot med dot uc dot edu 2009-04-26
19:35 ---
Created an attachment (id=17731)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=17731&action=view)
preprocessed source for t008_y.c
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39917
--- Comment #1 from howarth at nitro dot med dot uc dot edu 2009-04-26
19:35 ---
Created an attachment (id=17730)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=17730&action=view)
preprocessed source for t008_x.c
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39917
The tmpdir-gcc.dg-struct-layout-1/t008 c_compat_x_tst.o-c_compat_y_tst.o
execute testcase fails at -m64 on powerpc-apple-darwin9. The offending section
of the testcase is the single line...
T(1234,double a;signed char atal16 b;union{unsigned int d;struct{}e;}c;short
int f;unsigned char
g;,F(1234,
--- Comment #7 from kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-04-26 19:30 ---
Fixed on trunk.
I'll backport to 4.4. branch in a week.
--
kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #6 from kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-04-26 19:28 ---
Subject: Bug 39893
Author: kargl
Date: Sun Apr 26 19:27:50 2009
New Revision: 146816
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=146816
Log:
2009-04-26 Steven G. Kargl
PR fortran/39893
*
--- Comment #2 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-04-26 19:23 ---
No need for templates:
void foo ()
{
int *i;
(void) *i; // { dg-bogus "value computed is not used" }
}
This was caused by
http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=146132
(PR39551). convert_to_void doesn't
--- Comment #9 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-04-26 19:22 ---
(In reply to comment #8)
> I have an "obvious" (ie. after three hours staring at it:-( ) fix that is
Index: gcc/fortran/resolve.c
===
--- gcc/fortran/re
--- Comment #5 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-04-26 19:15 ---
I agree with H.J. on this, IMHO %zN should stay as it used to always work and
users that want to use something on integer instructions should use the new
%ZN.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39911
--- Comment #16 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-04-26 19:09 ---
Fixed.
--
jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW
--- Comment #4 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-04-26 19:08 ---
This is unrelated to PR39875, which looks like purely C++ FE issue.
--
jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
--- Comment #6 from howarth at nitro dot med dot uc dot edu 2009-04-26
19:07 ---
Created an attachment (id=17729)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=17729&action=view)
assembly file for t006_main.c
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39916
--- Comment #5 from howarth at nitro dot med dot uc dot edu 2009-04-26
19:07 ---
Created an attachment (id=17728)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=17728&action=view)
assembly file for t006_y.c
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39916
--- Comment #4 from howarth at nitro dot med dot uc dot edu 2009-04-26
19:06 ---
Created an attachment (id=17727)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=17727&action=view)
assembly file for t006_x.c
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39916
--- Comment #3 from howarth at nitro dot med dot uc dot edu 2009-04-26
19:05 ---
Created an attachment (id=17726)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=17726&action=view)
preprocessed source for t006_main.c
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39916
--- Comment #2 from howarth at nitro dot med dot uc dot edu 2009-04-26
19:05 ---
Created an attachment (id=17725)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=17725&action=view)
preprocessed source for t006_y.c
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39916
--- Comment #1 from howarth at nitro dot med dot uc dot edu 2009-04-26
19:04 ---
Created an attachment (id=17724)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=17724&action=view)
preprocessed source for t006_x.c
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39916
The tmpdir-gcc.dg-struct-layout-1/t006 c_compat_x_tst.o-c_compat_y_tst.o
execute testcase fails at -m64 on powerpc-apple-darwin9. The offending line in
t006_test.h causing this failure is...
T(1082,struct{char b;TE0 c[7];char * d[20];long double e atal16;long long int
f;}a[0];,)
With that line d
--- Comment #4 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-04-26 19:03 ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> (In reply to comment #1)
> > Created an attachment (id=17716)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=17716&action=view) [edit]
> > A patch
> >
> > Since "%z' never really work
--- Comment #15 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-04-26 18:58 ---
Subject: Bug 39543
Author: jakub
Date: Sun Apr 26 18:58:04 2009
New Revision: 146814
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=146814
Log:
PR inline-asm/39543
* fwprop.c (forward_propagat
--- Comment #14 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-04-26 18:56 ---
Subject: Bug 39543
Author: jakub
Date: Sun Apr 26 18:56:14 2009
New Revision: 146813
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=146813
Log:
PR inline-asm/39543
* fwprop.c (forward_propagat
--- Comment #3 from ubizjak at gmail dot com 2009-04-26 18:55 ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> Created an attachment (id=17716)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=17716&action=view) [edit]
> A patch
>
> Since "%z' never really worked on integer instructions, this
> patch
--- Comment #3 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-04-26 18:53 ---
Subject: Bug 39889
Author: jakub
Date: Sun Apr 26 18:53:41 2009
New Revision: 146812
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=146812
Log:
PR c/39889
* stmt.c (warn_if_unused_value): Look
--- Comment #2 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-04-26 18:51 ---
Subject: Bug 39889
Author: jakub
Date: Sun Apr 26 18:51:07 2009
New Revision: 146811
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=146811
Log:
PR c/39889
* stmt.c (warn_if_unused_value): Look
--- Comment #6 from howarth at nitro dot med dot uc dot edu 2009-04-26
18:47 ---
Created an attachment (id=17723)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=17723&action=view)
assembly file for t005_main.c
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39915
--- Comment #5 from howarth at nitro dot med dot uc dot edu 2009-04-26
18:47 ---
Created an attachment (id=17722)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=17722&action=view)
assembly file for t005_y.c
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39915
--- Comment #4 from howarth at nitro dot med dot uc dot edu 2009-04-26
18:46 ---
Created an attachment (id=17721)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=17721&action=view)
assembly file for t005_x.c
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39915
--- Comment #3 from howarth at nitro dot med dot uc dot edu 2009-04-26
18:46 ---
Created an attachment (id=17720)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=17720&action=view)
preprocessed source for t005_main.c
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39915
--- Comment #2 from howarth at nitro dot med dot uc dot edu 2009-04-26
18:45 ---
Created an attachment (id=17719)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=17719&action=view)
preprocessed source for t005_y.c
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39915
--- Comment #1 from howarth at nitro dot med dot uc dot edu 2009-04-26
18:45 ---
Created an attachment (id=17718)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=17718&action=view)
preprocessed source for t005_x.c
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39915
--- Comment #2 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-04-26 18:45 ---
Created an attachment (id=17717)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=17717&action=view)
A patch
The updated patch.
--
hjl dot tools at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed
--- Comment #6 from rguenther at suse dot de 2009-04-26 18:44 ---
Subject: Re: [4.3/4.4/4.5 Regression] LIM
inserts loads from uninitialized local memory
On Sun, 26 Apr 2009, rakdver at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
> --- Comment #5 from rakdver at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-04-26 18
1 - 100 of 170 matches
Mail list logo
