[Bug testsuite/40244] [4.5 Regression] Revision 147829 caused extra failures

2009-05-31 Thread irar at il dot ibm dot com
-- irar at il dot ibm dot com changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |irar at il dot ibm dot com |dot org

[Bug testsuite/40244] [4.5 Regression] Revision 147829 caused extra failures

2009-05-31 Thread irar at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #7 from irar at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-05-31 06:55 --- Subject: Bug 40244 Author: irar Date: Sun May 31 06:55:37 2009 New Revision: 148010 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=148010 Log: PR testsuite/40244 * gcc.dg/vect/bb-slp-4.c: Change

[Bug rtl-optimization/40314] inefficient address calculation of fields of large struct

2009-05-31 Thread ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #3 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-05-31 07:22 --- I think we have enough passes already and should try to stuff this in cse.c and fwprop.c. See PR middle-end/33699 for related issues. -- ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed

[Bug rtl-optimization/40314] inefficient address calculation of fields of large struct

2009-05-31 Thread carrot at google dot com
--- Comment #4 from carrot at google dot com 2009-05-31 08:05 --- (In reply to comment #3) I think we have enough passes already and should try to stuff this in cse.c and fwprop.c. See PR middle-end/33699 for related issues. It looks that patch solved some similar issues. But

[Bug c/40312] Compiling with O2 flag lead to wrong binary code (X86 system 32bit)

2009-05-31 Thread mikpe at it dot uu dot se
--- Comment #2 from mikpe at it dot uu dot se 2009-05-31 08:10 --- (In reply to comment #1) The one compiled with O2 has wrong binary code. The problem occurs when GCC compiles the following lines with O2 flag. if (pdw memcmp(a1, a2, pdw 2)) return 0;

[Bug testsuite/40244] [4.5 Regression] Revision 147829 caused extra failures

2009-05-31 Thread irar at il dot ibm dot com
--- Comment #8 from irar at il dot ibm dot com 2009-05-31 09:04 --- Fixed. -- irar at il dot ibm dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug bootstrap/22479] Use of --prefix and --exec-prefix breaks compiler build with --with-headers

2009-05-31 Thread joachim dot zaers at web dot de
--- Comment #2 from joachim dot zaers at web dot de 2009-05-31 09:29 --- Subject: Re: Use of --prefix and --exec-prefix breaks compiler build with --with-headers Hi Ramana! I'm sorry I'm no longer hacking but just consulting. So I have no longer all the infrastructure to verify

[Bug middle-end/40304] [4.5 Regression] Revision 147995 breaks stack unwind

2009-05-31 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #2 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-05-31 09:36 --- Subject: Bug 40304 Author: jakub Date: Sun May 31 09:36:17 2009 New Revision: 148011 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=148011 Log: PR middle-end/40304 * config/i386/i386.c

[Bug middle-end/40317] New: verify_flow_info ICE with nested functions

2009-05-31 Thread ian at airs dot com
When I compile this C code with an i686-unknown-linux-gnu native mainline compiler, I get an ICE. int main () { int f1 () { __label__ lab; int f2 () { goto lab; } return f2 () + f2 (); lab: return 2; } if (f1 () != 2) abort (); exit (0); } foo.c: