--- Comment #11 from amodra at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-08-30 06:09 ---
Subject: Bug 41081
Author: amodra
Date: Sun Aug 30 06:09:42 2009
New Revision: 151221
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=151221
Log:
PR target/41081
* fwprop.c (get_reg_use_in):
--- Comment #7 from dodji at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-08-30 07:26 ---
Subject: Bug 41187
Author: dodji
Date: Sun Aug 30 07:26:29 2009
New Revision: 151223
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=151223
Log:
Fix c++/41187
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
PR c++/41187
--- Comment #8 from dodji at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-08-30 07:44 ---
Fixed in trunk.
--
dodji at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #5 from domob at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-08-30 08:26 ---
Subject: Bug 37425
Author: domob
Date: Sun Aug 30 08:26:38 2009
New Revision: 151224
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=151224
Log:
2009-08-30 Daniel Kraft d...@domob.eu
PR fortran/37425
--- Comment #8 from ktietz at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-08-30 08:27 ---
(In reply to comment #7)
x86_64-pc-mingw32 is not a primary or secondary platform, moving to P4.
Please restore to P3 if this also appears on i686-mingw32 or another
primary or secondary platform.
Could you
--- Comment #6 from domob at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-08-30 08:30 ---
This is fully implemented now (except some side-issues which have their own
PRs, like PR 41177 and PR 41178), closing.
--
domob at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed
--- Comment #11 from ktietz at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-08-30 08:33 ---
(In reply to comment #8)
(In reply to comment #7)
AFAICT DW2 unwind has never worked on x86_64-mingw32, which is why Kai made
sjlj the default EH model for that target.
--- Comment #17 from ktietz at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-08-30 08:35 ---
(In reply to comment #16)
(In reply to comment #15)
Is there a chance that we get this fixed soon?
Rainer
Well, I would like to fix this. Better now then later. But I couldn't find the
real reason for
--- Comment #3 from t7 at gmail dot com 2009-08-30 09:43 ---
Only encountered with c++ code.
--
t7 at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
GCC build
--- Comment #2 from domob at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-08-30 10:00 ---
I'm not sure it needs really that much changes... After all, the semantics can
probably be simulated completely via replacing the BLOCK-constructs with
contained procedures that are called where the BLOCK originally
This bug was discovered while adapting MSP430 port for GCC 4.x and is
persistent at least in both GCC 4.2.4 and 4.3.4.
This description consists of a problem description, a detailed reason analysis
pointing out exact GCC functions, and a proposed solution.
--- Comment #1 from shcherbakov at daad-alumni dot de 2009-08-30 10:10
---
A misprint in the description:
After move_invariant_reg() the insn_invalid_p(insn) returns 1 meaning that the
INSN is no longer valid.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41188
This bug was discovered while adapting MSP430 port for GCC 4.x and is
persistent at least in both GCC 4.2.4 and 4.3.4.
This description consists of a problem description, a detailed reason analysis
pointing out exact GCC functions, and a proposed solution.
This bug was discovered while adapting MSP430 port for GCC 4.x and is
persistent at least in both GCC 4.2.4 and 4.3.4.
This description consists of a problem description, a detailed reason analysis
pointing out exact GCC functions, and a proposed solution.
This bug was discovered while adapting MSP430 port for GCC 4.x and is
persistent at least in both GCC 4.2.4 and 4.3.4.
This description consists of a problem description, a detailed reason analysis
pointing out exact GCC functions, and a proposed solution.
--- Comment #1 from shcherbakov at daad-alumni dot de 2009-08-30 10:13
---
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 41188 ***
--
shcherbakov at daad-alumni dot de changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #2 from shcherbakov at daad-alumni dot de 2009-08-30 10:13
---
*** Bug 41191 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41188
--- Comment #3 from shcherbakov at daad-alumni dot de 2009-08-30 10:14
---
*** Bug 41190 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41188
--- Comment #1 from shcherbakov at daad-alumni dot de 2009-08-30 10:14
---
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 41188 ***
--
shcherbakov at daad-alumni dot de changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #4 from shcherbakov at daad-alumni dot de 2009-08-30 10:14
---
*** Bug 41189 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41188
--- Comment #1 from shcherbakov at daad-alumni dot de 2009-08-30 10:14
---
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 41188 ***
--
shcherbakov at daad-alumni dot de changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #20 from rguenther at suse dot de 2009-08-30 11:25 ---
Subject: Re: FAIL:
ext/pb_ds/regression/hash_data_map_rand.cc
On Sat, 29 Aug 2009, ubizjak at gmail dot com wrote:
--- Comment #19 from ubizjak at gmail dot com 2009-08-29 19:52 ---
Sigh, the patch doesn't
--- Comment #2 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-08-30 11:52 ---
Subject: Bug 41186
Author: rguenth
Date: Sun Aug 30 11:52:13 2009
New Revision: 151226
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=151226
Log:
2009-08-30 Richard Guenther rguent...@suse.de
PR
--- Comment #9 from drangon dot mail at gmail dot com 2009-08-30 13:53
---
yes, the issue should be fixed, wxWidgets works fine now.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39832
--- Comment #5 from bonzini at gnu dot org 2009-08-30 14:26 ---
Subject: Bug 41122
Author: bonzini
Date: Sun Aug 30 14:26:37 2009
New Revision: 151227
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=151227
Log:
2009-08-30 Paolo Bonzini bonz...@gnu.org
PR ada/41122
--- Comment #6 from bonzini at gnu dot org 2009-08-30 14:35 ---
committed to trunk, 4.4 will follow.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41122
If just a comment is in the NAMELIST input the READ fails
VERSION:
gfortran -dumpversion
GNU Fortran (GCC) 4.3.2 20080827 (beta) 2
--- Comment #2 from ami_stuff at o2 dot pl 2009-08-30 16:57 ---
With -m68060 -O1 -fomit-frame-pointer:
GCC 4.1.2/GCC 4.2.5:
#NO_APP
.text
.even
.globl _MUL64
_MUL64:
movm.l #0x3e00,-(sp)
move.l 28(sp),a1
move.l 24(sp),a0
#APP
|
--- Comment #3 from sgk at troutmask dot apl dot washington dot edu
2009-08-30 17:58 ---
Subject: Re: NAMELIST input with just a comment (NAME ! comment \) fails
On Sun, Aug 30, 2009 at 05:48:15PM -, kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
--- Comment #2 from kargl at gcc
--- Comment #4 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-08-30 18:15
---
Strictly speaking, Steve, I think you are correct.
I have not finished my review of the standard. This is the first time I have
seen namelist used like this for command line input. I suspect because it
allows
--- Comment #1 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-08-30 17:32
---
Thanks for report , I will fix this.
--
jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
=c,c++,fortran
--disable-multilib --with-ppl=/data03/vondele/gcc_trunk/build/
--with-cloog=/data03/vondele/gcc_trunk/build/
Thread model: posix
gcc version 4.5.0 20090830 (experimental) [trunk revision 151229] (GCC)
COLLECT_GCC_OPTIONS='-c' '-O2' '-ffast-math' '-funroll-loops'
'-ftree-vectorize
--- Comment #1 from jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk 2009-08-30 18:38 ---
Created an attachment (id=18451)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=18451action=view)
testcase
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41193
--- Comment #5 from sgk at troutmask dot apl dot washington dot edu
2009-08-30 18:54 ---
Subject: Re: NAMELIST input with just a comment (NAME ! comment \) fails
On Sun, Aug 30, 2009 at 06:15:07PM -, jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org
wrote:
Strictly speaking, Steve, I think you
Error messages:
/tmp/ccgtrVyI.o: In function `Color':
/home/chromium/chromium/src/third_party/WebKit/WebCore/platform/ColorData.gperf:254:
undefined reference to `findColor(char const*, unsigned int)'
/home/chromium/chromium/src/third_party/WebKit/WebCore/platform/ColorData.gperf:254:
undefined
--- Comment #1 from hdasch at gmail dot com 2009-08-30 20:25 ---
Created an attachment (id=18452)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=18452action=view)
Preprocessed test case.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41194
--- Comment #6 from urbanjost at comcast dot net 2009-08-31 00:07 ---
Subject: Re: NAMELIST input with just a comment (NAME ! comment \) fails
Because of 10.11.3.3-4 I believe (1) of 10.10.1 is intended to mean
throughout and not preceding; and that
10.10.1 (2) through (5) should
--- Comment #2 from justineuro at yahoo dot com 2009-08-31 00:09 ---
(In reply to comment #1)
This is a bug in your installation of GCC and cygwin.
Thanks for the reply. I have since re-installed and subsequently got an
undefined reference to _winm...@16' error. It turns out I had to
--- Comment #7 from sgk at troutmask dot apl dot washington dot edu
2009-08-31 00:30 ---
Subject: Re: NAMELIST input with just a comment (NAME ! comment \) fails
On Mon, Aug 31, 2009 at 12:07:34AM -, urbanjost at comcast dot net wrote:
--- Comment #6 from urbanjost at
--- Comment #8 from urbanjost at comcast dot net 2009-08-31 01:12 ---
Subject: Re: NAMELIST input with just a comment (NAME ! comment \) fails
Oops. That was 2008;
ISO/IEC SC22/WG5/N1723 CD 1539-1 08-007r2:2008/03/11; even though the
statements still appear in it
that you
--- Comment #3 from justineuro at yahoo dot com 2009-08-31 01:16 ---
(In reply to comment #2)
(In reply to comment #1)
This is a bug in your installation of GCC and cygwin.
Thanks for the reply. I have since re-installed and subsequently got an
undefined reference to _winm...@16'
--- Comment #9 from ghazi at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-08-31 03:05 ---
Patch for remaining issues posted here:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2009-08/msg01614.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30789
A simple sequence of floating point calculations gives different results on
optimized builds and unoptimized builds. I have seen some bug reports, but this
one is different as the error is reproduced only when the floating point
calculation in question is called from a library. If i create a
--- Comment #1 from mehta at roguewave dot com 2009-08-31 03:55 ---
Created an attachment (id=18453)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=18453action=view)
test case
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41195
44 matches
Mail list logo
