[Bug fortran/41192] NAMELIST input with just a comment (NAME ! comment \) fails

2009-09-04 Thread jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #10 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-09-04 20:19 --- A side note: there are several places where we should use eat_line but instead we now have explicit loops. I will take a scan through and find those while I am at it. Just code clean-up. --

[Bug tree-optimization/41089] [4.5 Regression] r147980 (New SRA) breaks stdargs

2009-09-04 Thread ubizjak at gmail dot com
--- Comment #8 from ubizjak at gmail dot com 2009-09-04 21:03 --- (In reply to comment #6) For a reference, this is the patch I am testing: Yes, this patch fixes stdarg failures from [1] with preliminary test: FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/stdarg-1.c execution, -O3

[Bug libstdc++/41267] New: vector::resize() from an empty vector calls memmove for 0 bytes, wasting a lot of cpu time in a production PowerDNS

2009-09-04 Thread ahu at ds9a dot nl
This sequence makes no less than 2 calls memmoving 0 bytes: vectorchar content; content.resize(12); From *0x0 no less! On a 64 bit system, the effect is far less pronounced (25%), but on 32 bits, this loop takes 2.3 seconds on a vanilla g++; for(int n=0; n 1000; ++n) {

[Bug libstdc++/41267] vector::resize() from an empty vector calls memmove for 0 bytes (twice), wasting a lot of cpu time in a production PowerDNS

2009-09-04 Thread paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com
--- Comment #1 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com 2009-09-04 22:37 --- Ok, let's do something about this, likely just add a check in __copy_move (and __copy_move_b), as suggested. -- paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed

[Bug fortran/41168] incorrect processing of formatted records in mingw port

2009-09-04 Thread jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #6 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-09-04 23:09 --- I will add this to my list. -- jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug middle-end/41268] New: bootstrap is broken after r151350 (expand from tuples)

2009-09-04 Thread sje at cup dot hp dot com
GCC will not bootstrap after the expand from tuples checkin because the pointer extension code is wrong. If you compile gcc.dg/20020517-1.c you can see the problem. This test compiled and ran before but now core dumps. The difference in the generated assembly code is: addp4 r14 = r12,

[Bug testsuite/41269] New: FAIL: gcc.dg/guality/example.c -O0 (test for excess errors)

2009-09-04 Thread danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org
Executing on host: /home/dave/gnu/gcc-4.5/objdir/gcc/xgcc -B/home/dave/gnu/gcc-4 .5/objdir/gcc/ /home/dave/gnu/gcc-4.5/gcc/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/guality/example.c -O0 -g -lm -o ./example.exe(timeout = 300) /home/dave/gnu/gcc-4.5/gcc/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/guality/example.c: In function '

[Bug testsuite/41270] New: FAIL: gcc.dg/guality/guality.c -O0 (test for excess errors)

2009-09-04 Thread danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org
Executing on host: /home/dave/gnu/gcc-4.5/objdir/gcc/xgcc -B/home/dave/gnu/gcc-4 .5/objdir/gcc/ /home/dave/gnu/gcc-4.5/gcc/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/guality/guality.c -O0 -g -lm -o ./guality.exe(timeout = 300) /home/dave/gnu/gcc-4.5/gcc/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/guality/guality.c: In function '

[Bug tree-optimization/41271] New: FAIL: gcc.dg/matrix/matrix-2.c scan-ipa-dump-times matrix-reorg Flattened 2 dimensions 1

2009-09-04 Thread danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org
Executing on host: /home/dave/gnu/gcc-4.5/objdir/gcc/xgcc -B/home/dave/gnu/gcc-4 .5/objdir/gcc/ /home/dave/gnu/gcc-4.5/gcc/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/matrix/matrix-2.c -O3 -fipa-matrix-reorg -fdump-ipa-matrix-reorg -fwhole-program -combine -lm -o ./matrix-2.exe(timeout = 300) PASS:

[Bug java/41260] major regressions in libjava testsuite between 4.4.1 and gcc trunk

2009-09-04 Thread howarth at nitro dot med dot uc dot edu
--- Comment #4 from howarth at nitro dot med dot uc dot edu 2009-09-05 01:24 --- First round of regression hunting shows that r146781 (4/25/09) passes the libjava like gcc 4.4.1 but r148013 (5/31/09) shows the additional 120+ libjava failures. --

[Bug debug/41272] New: FAIL: gcc.dg/debug/dwarf2/inline2.c scan-assembler-times \(DIE \(.*?\) DW_TAG_in lined_subroutine 6

2009-09-04 Thread danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org
Executing on host: /home/dave/gcc-4.4/objdir/gcc/xgcc -B/home/dave/gcc-4.4/objdi r/gcc/ /home/dave/gcc-4.4/gcc/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/dwarf2/inline2.c -O - g3 -dA -S -o inline2.s(timeout = 300) PASS: gcc.dg/debug/dwarf2/inline2.c (test for excess errors) FAIL:

[Bug debug/41272] FAIL: gcc.dg/debug/dwarf2/inline2.c scan-assembler-times \(DIE \(.*?\) DW_TAG_in lined_subroutine 6

2009-09-04 Thread dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca
--- Comment #1 from dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca 2009-09-05 01:28 --- Subject: Re: New: FAIL: gcc.dg/debug/dwarf2/inline2.c scan-assembler-times \(DIE \(.*?\) DW_TAG_in lined_subroutine 6 Attached inline2.s. Dave --- Comment #2 from dave at hiauly1 dot hia

[Bug bootstrap/41241] [4.5 regression] bootstrap comparison failure

2009-09-04 Thread kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #47 from kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-09-05 05:33 --- (In reply to comment #44) Created an attachment (id=18497) -- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=18497action=view) [edit] gcc45-pr41241.patch New version of the csa bugfix. This patch along with

<    1   2