--- Comment #1 from kai dot germaschewski at gmail dot com 2010-02-20
00:03 ---
I think I should include this:
[...@fishercat linear_algebra]$ gcc -v
Using built-in specs.
Target: x86_64-redhat-linux
Configured with: ../configure --prefix=/usr --mandir=/usr/share/man
--- Comment #10 from manu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-02-20 00:19 ---
Reduced testcase:
extern int strlen (__const char *__s);
int echo (int);
int main(int argc, char **argv)
{
echo (({ int __s1_len, __s2_len;
(__builtin_constant_p (argv[0]) __builtin_constant_p (AA)
(__s1_len
--- Comment #2 from manu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-02-20 00:36 ---
This is a different case than 9335.
Comeau does not handle this well either, so I am not sure how this case could
be solved.
--
manu at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed
--- Comment #3 from manu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-02-20 00:36 ---
But this is confirmed in GCC 4.5
--
manu at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #5 from davek at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-02-20 00:40 ---
Created an attachment (id=19928)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=19928action=view)
patch respin
So, after much single-stepping in the debugger, and some discussion on the
mailing list:
On Linux/ia32, revision 156910 gave:
FAIL: gcc.dg/attr-used.c scan-assembler function_declaration_before
Revision 156906 is OK. Revision 156907:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2010-02/msg00490.html
is the cause.
--
Summary: [4.5 Regression] Revision 156907 failed gcc.dg/attr-
--
hjl dot tools at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.5.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43125
--- Comment #13 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2010-02-20 01:05
---
*** Bug 43124 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
hjl dot tools at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #2 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2010-02-20 01:05 ---
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 39315 ***
--
hjl dot tools at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #1 from mikestump at comcast dot net 2010-02-20 01:21 ---
I'm building up a linux cross compiler now.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43125
--- Comment #3 from manu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-02-20 01:48 ---
REOPENING and refining. Let's leave bug 9335 for the repeated error problem.
--
manu at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #12 from manu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-02-20 01:55 ---
The reason why this testcase cannot be solved like bug 23510 is that this
testcase produces many repeated:
error: template instantiation depth exceeds maximum of 500 (use
-ftemplate-depth-NN to increase the
--- Comment #4 from manu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-02-20 01:56 ---
I have a patch.
--
manu at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-02-20 02:24 ---
Did you download gcc-4.4.3-core.tar only? Or the full gcc-4.4.3?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43073
--- Comment #15 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-02-20 03:50 ---
Subject: Bug 40332
Author: jason
Date: Sat Feb 20 03:50:13 2010
New Revision: 156918
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=156918
Log:
PR target/40332
* configure.ac
--- Comment #16 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-02-20 03:50 ---
Fixed.
--
jason at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
--- Comment #7 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-02-20 05:16 ---
Created an attachment (id=19929)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=19929action=view)
patch
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42800
--- Comment #11 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-02-20 05:19 ---
Created an attachment (id=19930)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=19930action=view)
patch for x86 failure
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42837
These warnings have driven me insane for years:
blah.cc:1: error: too many arguments to function void a(int)
blah.cc:7: error: at this point in file
I always end up jumping to line 1 in the file. I glance at the message and
line number in the first line, and I'm jumping to that line number
--- Comment #10 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-02-20 05:42 ---
That patch seems like too big a hammer; it basically undoes the effect of
-fwhole-program. I think we want to limit the change to the functions created
by cgraph_build_static_cdtor.
--
jason at gcc dot gnu dot
--- Comment #2 from mikestump at comcast dot net 2010-02-20 06:16 ---
Patch submitted http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2010-02/msg00812.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43125
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-02-20 06:25 ---
Confirmed.
The C front-end just emits:
t.c: In function g:
t.c:4:3: error: too many arguments to function f
While the C++ front-end emits:
t.c:1:5: error: too many arguments to function int f(int)
t.c:4:16:
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-02-20 06:27 ---
Can you provide the source which reproduces this issue?
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-02-20 06:27 ---
I should say the simple example was:
int f(int);
int g(int a, int b)
{
return f(a, b);
}
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43126
auto_ptr is not the best class to use, it's functional. To correct for
constant correctness issues, I wrote the following:
template typename type
class auto_ptr
{
protected:
type* p;
operator type() {return *p;}
operator type() {return *p;}
--- Comment #3 from glenn at zewt dot org 2010-02-20 06:51 ---
(4:16? I havn't seen that before. I hope gcc isn't going to start
outputting character offsets by default; that's a lot of noise.)
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43126
On Linux/ia32, I got
FAIL: c-c++-common/pr41779.c -Wc++-compat (test for warnings, line 30)
FAIL: c-c++-common/pr41779.c -Wc++-compat (test for excess errors)
--
Summary: c-c++-common/pr41779.c doesn't work
Product: gcc
Version: 4.5.0
Status:
101 - 127 of 127 matches
Mail list logo
