[Bug fortran/45629] libgfortran/io/list_read.c:1872:10: warning: variable 'elem' might be clobbered by 'longjmp' or 'vfork' [-Wclobbered]

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45629 Janne Blomqvist jb at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last

[Bug target/45250] [4.6 Regression] FAIL: tr1/5_numerical_facilities/special_functions/01_assoc_laguerre/check_nan.cc

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45250 --- Comment #13 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-11-01 07:58:51 UTC --- Author: jakub Date: Mon Nov 1 07:58:46 2010 New Revision: 166126 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=166126 Log: PR target/45250 *

[Bug target/45250] [4.6 Regression] FAIL: tr1/5_numerical_facilities/special_functions/01_assoc_laguerre/check_nan.cc

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45250 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug rtl-optimization/46248] [4.6 regression] crash+infinite recursion in combine

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46248 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ebotcazou at gcc

[Bug c++/20710] g++ should warn when hiding non-virtual method in base class

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20710 --- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-11-01 11:22:26 UTC --- This would also be solved by the override control features coming in C++0x c.f. PR 17920, PR 31397, PR 36848

[Bug rtl-optimization/46248] [4.6 regression] crash+infinite recursion in combine

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46248 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot |jakub at gcc dot

[Bug rtl-optimization/46212] [4.6 regression] segfault in reg_nonzero_bits_for_combine

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46212 --- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-11-01 11:24:12 UTC --- Created attachment 22217 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22217 gcc46-pr46034.patch Untested fix.

[Bug rtl-optimization/46034] [4.6 regression] internal compiler error: segmentation fault

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46034 --- Comment #11 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-11-01 11:25:04 UTC --- Created attachment 22218 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22218 gcc46-pr46034.patch Untested fix.

[Bug c++/20710] g++ should warn when hiding non-virtual method in base class

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20710 --- Comment #3 from loose at astron dot nl 2010-11-01 12:29:27 UTC --- As far as I know attributes were removed from the C0x Final Draft. Besides, if GCC were to provide a compiler flag to warn for this, you would also be able to catch potential

[Bug c++/20710] g++ should warn when hiding non-virtual method in base class

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20710 --- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-11-01 12:36:45 UTC --- Attributes were still in the FCD, and are still in the current draft, but might be removed. Override control may not be done by attributes, but will be

[Bug c++/20710] g++ should warn when hiding non-virtual method in base class

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20710 --- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-11-01 12:39:48 UTC --- also, GNU-style attributes are not being removed from GCC, even if C++0x attributes get dropped my point was just that there are several similar bugs and

[Bug c++/20710] g++ should warn when hiding non-virtual method in base class

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20710 --- Comment #6 from loose at astron dot nl 2010-11-01 12:54:25 UTC --- OK, fair enough. However, I reported this bug, because I would like GCC to produce a warning when hiding a non-virtual method in *existing* code; an option similar to

[Bug c++/20710] g++ should warn when hiding non-virtual method in base class

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20710 --- Comment #7 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-11-01 13:01:43 UTC --- Yup, that's why I haven't closed this as a duplicate. The C++0x override control works for virtual and non-virtual names, so is relevant to this PR *and*

[Bug debug/46255] [4.6 Regression] -fcompare-debug failure with -fprofile-generate

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46255 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug target/45359] poor -march=native choices for VIA C7 Esther processors

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45359 --- Comment #3 from Dzianis Kahanovich mahatma at eu dot by 2010-11-01 13:21:40 UTC --- Created attachment 0 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=0 native VIA/CentaurHauls (In reply to comment #1) Why do you think it's a

[Bug target/44046] Intel Core i5 M520 CPU detected as atom with -march=native

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44046 Dzianis Kahanovich mahatma at eu dot by changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mahatma at eu

[Bug c++/46246] [C++0x] Move constructor required when passing a temporary by copy, but not actually used

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46246 Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug tree-optimization/46259] New: [4.6 Regression] Revision 166102 failed 416.gamess in SPEC CPU 2006

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46259 Summary: [4.6 Regression] Revision 166102 failed 416.gamess in SPEC CPU 2006 Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug tree-optimization/46259] [4.6 Regression] Revision 166102 failed 416.gamess in SPEC CPU 2006

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46259 H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.6.0

[Bug tree-optimization/46259] [4.6 Regression] Revision 166102 failed 416.gamess in SPEC CPU 2006

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46259 --- Comment #1 from froydnj at codesourcery dot com froydnj at codesourcery dot com 2010-11-01 14:40:58 UTC --- A backtrace and/or a reduced testcase would be helpful. I don't have a copy of SPEC 2006.

[Bug tree-optimization/46259] [4.6 Regression] Revision 166102 failed 416.gamess in SPEC CPU 2006

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46259 --- Comment #2 from H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com 2010-11-01 14:48:00 UTC --- #0 internal_error (gmsgid=0x12a2830 tree check: %s, have %s in %s, at %s:%d) at ../../src/gcc/diagnostic.c:825 #1 0x00ccb556 in tree_check_failed

[Bug tree-optimization/46259] [4.6 Regression] Revision 166102 failed 416.gamess in SPEC CPU 2006

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46259 --- Comment #3 from H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com 2010-11-01 14:49:15 UTC --- (gdb) f 3 #3 0x0076db8b in const_vector_from_tree (exp=0x703f5880) at ../../src/gcc/expr.c:10253 10253RTVEC_ELT (v, i) =

[Bug tree-optimization/46259] [4.6 Regression] Revision 166102 failed 416.gamess in SPEC CPU 2006

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46259 --- Comment #4 from H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com 2010-11-01 14:50:25 UTC --- (gdb) f 3 #3 0x0076db8b in const_vector_from_tree (exp=0x703f5880) at ../../src/gcc/expr.c:10253 10253RTVEC_ELT (v, i) =

[Bug tree-optimization/46259] [4.6 Regression] Revision 166102 failed 416.gamess in SPEC CPU 2006

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46259 --- Comment #5 from froydnj at codesourcery dot com froydnj at codesourcery dot com 2010-11-01 14:57:32 UTC --- If I had to guess, one of these two hunks is probably responsible: --- trunk/gcc/tree-vect-loop.c2010/10/31 01:58:12166101

[Bug debug/46252] [4.6 Regression] -fcompare-debug failure (length) with -O -frerun-cse-after-loop -fno-tree-loop-optimize -funroll-loops

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46252 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug middle-end/46234] [4.6 Regression] ICE in expand_expr_real_2 for va-arg-XXX tescases

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46234 Pat Haugen pthaugen at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|ICE in expand_expr_real_2 |[4.6 Regression]

[Bug tree-optimization/45875] [4.6 Regression] ice in gimple_fold_obj_type_ref_known_binfo with -O2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45875 Martin Jambor jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED

[Bug middle-end/46120] [4.6 regression] g++.dg/ipa/ivinline-?.C

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46120 --- Comment #5 from Martin Jambor jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-11-01 16:01:19 UTC --- I have submitted a patch for this PR: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2010-11/msg00044.html

[Bug target/46179] Codegen/TLS: invalid assembler syntax

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46179 --- Comment #8 from Thorsten Glaser tg at mirbsd dot org 2010-11-01 16:08:18 UTC --- I can confirm that attachment 22191 fixes the original problem, namely that one source file from util-linux, for me. No testsuite run, though ☹ Built on

[Bug middle-end/37053] [4.3/4.4 regression] ICE in reload_cse_simplify_operands, at postreload.c:395

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37053 Thorsten Glaser tg at mirbsd dot org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||tg at mirbsd dot

[Bug tree-optimization/46259] [4.6 Regression] Revision 166102 failed 416.gamess in SPEC CPU 2006

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46259 --- Comment #6 from H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com 2010-11-01 16:21:11 UTC --- (In reply to comment #5) If I had to guess, one of these two hunks is probably responsible: --- trunk/gcc/tree-vect-stmts.c2010/10/31 01:58:12166101

[Bug tree-optimization/46259] [4.6 Regression] Revision 166102 failed 416.gamess in SPEC CPU 2006

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46259 H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last

[Bug web/45803] bugzilla: Invalid HTML

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45803 Frédéric Buclin LpSolit at netscape dot net changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED

[Bug middle-end/37053] [4.3/4.4 regression] ICE in reload_cse_simplify_operands, at postreload.c:395

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37053 --- Comment #24 from Paolo Bonzini bonzini at gnu dot org 2010-11-01 16:38:53 UTC --- You'd need also the patch for bug 41064.

[Bug middle-end/37053] [4.3/4.4 regression] ICE in reload_cse_simplify_operands, at postreload.c:395

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37053 Paolo Bonzini bonzini at gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||nospamname at web

[Bug target/40414] gcc 4.4.0 error at postreload.c:396

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40414 Paolo Bonzini bonzini at gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug other/46202] Makefile doesn't support install-strip

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46202 Ralf Wildenhues rwild at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED

[Bug c++/46203] constexpr weirdness w/ default ctors

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46203 Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug web/45803] bugzilla: Invalid HTML

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45803 Frédéric Buclin LpSolit at netscape dot net changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|WAITING ---

[Bug middle-end/37053] [4.3/4.4 regression] ICE in reload_cse_simplify_operands, at postreload.c:395

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37053 --- Comment #26 from Thorsten Glaser tg at mirbsd dot org 2010-11-01 16:53:18 UTC --- Probably, but not on m68k ;-)

[Bug middle-end/37053] [4.3/4.4 regression] ICE in reload_cse_simplify_operands, at postreload.c:395

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37053 --- Comment #27 from Paolo Bonzini bonzini at gnu dot org 2010-11-01 16:58:20 UTC --- Better: not for this testcase. We found it on CRIS, but the bug could really happen on any target.

[Bug web/46260] New: Upgrade GCC and Sources Bugzilla from 3.6.2 to 3.6.3

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46260 Summary: Upgrade GCC and Sources Bugzilla from 3.6.2 to 3.6.3 Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: web

[Bug web/46260] Upgrade GCC and Sources Bugzilla from 3.6.2 to 3.6.3

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46260 Frédéric Buclin LpSolit at netscape dot net changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED

[Bug c/46261] New: avr-gcc: Segfaults when compiled with the -mint8 option

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46261 Summary: avr-gcc: Segfaults when compiled with the -mint8 option Product: gcc Version: 4.5.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug tree-optimization/46259] [4.6 Regression] Revision 166102 failed 416.gamess in SPEC CPU 2006

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46259 --- Comment #8 from Nathan Froyd froydnj at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-11-01 18:58:35 UTC --- Author: froydnj Date: Mon Nov 1 18:58:30 2010 New Revision: 166139 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=166139 Log: gcc/ 2010-11-01 Nathan

[Bug c++/46221] huge number of c++ testsuite failures, libstdc++.so alias missing

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46221 Michael Meissner meissner at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1

[Bug fortran/46152] [F03] ALLOCATE with type-spec fails for intrinsic types

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46152 --- Comment #18 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-11-01 19:30:01 UTC --- Author: kargl Date: Mon Nov 1 19:29:57 2010 New Revision: 166140 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=166140 Log: 2010-10-30 Steven G. Kargl

[Bug fortran/46262] New: [4.6 Regression] [OOP] tree check: expected function_type or method_type, have pointer_type

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46262 Summary: [4.6 Regression] [OOP] tree check: expected function_type or method_type, have pointer_type Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug fortran/46262] [4.6 Regression] [OOP] tree check: expected function_type or method_type, have pointer_type

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46262 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-on-valid-code --- Comment

[Bug fortran/46262] [4.6 Regression] [OOP] tree check: expected function_type or method_type, have pointer_type

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46262 --- Comment #2 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-11-01 19:45:12 UTC --- The following variant: module integrable_model_module implicit none type :: integrable_model contains procedure :: multiply generic :: operator(*) =

[Bug fortran/46262] [4.6 Regression] [OOP] tree check: expected function_type or method_type, have pointer_type

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46262 --- Comment #3 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-11-01 19:49:28 UTC --- Created attachment 2 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=2 full test case When fixing, one should make sure that the full code from

[Bug tree-optimization/46259] [4.6 Regression] Revision 166102 failed 416.gamess in SPEC CPU 2006

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46259 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug c/45062] [4.6 Regression] Revision 162223 caused ICE at c-decl.c:4064

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45062 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||bonzini at gnu

[Bug c/46243] [4.6 Regression] expected tree that contains ‘decl minimal’ structure, have ‘tree_list’ in start_decl, at c-decl.c:4049

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46243 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug c++/46170] [4.4/4.5/4.6 Regression] g++ wrongly rejects pointer-to-member in template arguments

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46170 --- Comment #10 from David Fang fang at csl dot cornell.edu 2010-11-01 20:40:17 UTC --- Thanks for working on this, Dodji! Meanwhile, I've been trying to find some source workaround for my example until this is patched and the next release is

[Bug c++/45095] internal compiler error: Segmentation fault compiling p7zip

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45095 Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|

[Bug libgcj/46263] New: without zip in system, gcc with --enable-languages=....,java bootstraps, but no libgcj in result

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46263 Summary: without zip in system, gcc with --enable-languages=,java bootstraps, but no libgcj in result Product: gcc Version: 4.5.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/46264] New: Trunk [4.6.0 20101028] - An overloaded operator returning rvalue reference invalidates stack.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46264 Summary: Trunk [4.6.0 20101028] - An overloaded operator returning rvalue reference invalidates stack. Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: major

[Bug debug/46252] [4.6 Regression] -fcompare-debug failure (length) with -O -frerun-cse-after-loop -fno-tree-loop-optimize -funroll-loops

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46252 Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC|ebotcazou at gcc dot|

[Bug rtl-optimization/46034] [4.6 regression] internal compiler error: segmentation fault

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46034 Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|NEW

[Bug rtl-optimization/46212] [4.6 regression] segfault in reg_nonzero_bits_for_combine

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46212 Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|NEW

[Bug libstdc++/45999] runtime error in std::vector python pretty printer.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45999 --- Comment #7 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-11-01 21:28:48 UTC --- Author: redi Date: Mon Nov 1 21:28:44 2010 New Revision: 166150 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=166150 Log: 2010-11-01 Jonathan Wakely

[Bug libstdc++/45999] runtime error in std::vector python pretty printer.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45999 --- Comment #8 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-11-01 21:32:05 UTC --- Author: redi Date: Mon Nov 1 21:32:01 2010 New Revision: 166151 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=166151 Log: 2010-11-01 Jonathan Wakely

[Bug libstdc++/45999] runtime error in std::vector python pretty printer.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45999 --- Comment #9 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-11-01 21:33:44 UTC --- trunk and 4.5.2 should work with python 2.4 now

[Bug c++/46264] Trunk [4.6.0 20101028] - An overloaded operator returning rvalue reference invalidates stack.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46264 --- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-11-01 21:49:56 UTC --- foo::operator* returns a reference to a local variable which goes out of scope, causing c.data to contain garbage. operator* should return by value instead

[Bug c++/46264] Trunk [4.6.0 20101028] - An overloaded operator returning rvalue reference invalidates stack.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46264 Mirza mirza.husadzic at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug middle-end/46251] ICE: in expand_expr_real_2, at expr.c:7276 with -funsafe-math-optimizations -mbionic and __builtin_sincosl()

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46251 Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug tree-optimization/45022] No prefetch for the vectorized loop

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45022 Changpeng Fang changpeng.fang at amd dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug fortran/41219] libgfortran build warnings

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41219 Jerry DeLisle jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug testsuite/46249] gcc.dg/tree-ssa/ssa-ccp-32.c: dubious test

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46249 Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED

[Bug fortran/45629] libgfortran/io/list_read.c:1872:10: warning: variable 'elem' might be clobbered by 'longjmp' or 'vfork' [-Wclobbered]

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45629 Janne Blomqvist jb at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added URL|

[Bug libstdc++/12110] ICE building 64-bit strstream.o

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12110 --- Comment #3 from Alan Modra amodra at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-11-02 00:20:38 UTC --- Author: amodra Date: Tue Nov 2 00:20:35 2010 New Revision: 166162 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=166162 Log: PR binutils/12110 *

[Bug rtl-optimization/46265] New: Missing ifcvt

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46265 Summary: Missing ifcvt Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: rtl-optimization AssignedTo: unassig...@gcc.gnu.org

[Bug c++/46133] constexpr needed for C99 complex type creation from ctor with two floating point types

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46133 --- Comment #2 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-11-02 02:35:33 UTC --- Author: jason Date: Tue Nov 2 02:35:28 2010 New Revision: 166171 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=166171 Log: * include/std/chrono:

[Bug c++/46134] constexpr vs. defaulted ctor

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46134 --- Comment #3 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-11-02 02:35:33 UTC --- Author: jason Date: Tue Nov 2 02:35:28 2010 New Revision: 166171 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=166171 Log: * include/std/chrono:

[Bug fortran/46262] [4.6 Regression] [OOP] tree check: expected function_type or method_type, have pointer_type

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46262 Jerry DeLisle jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jvdelisle at

[Bug fortran/46262] [4.6 Regression] [OOP] tree check: expected function_type or method_type, have pointer_type

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46262 --- Comment #5 from Jerry DeLisle jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-11-02 05:22:42 UTC --- Passes at r162312 and fails at r162313.

[Bug target/46195] r165965 regresses i386 darwin

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46195 Dave Korn davek at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||davek at gcc dot