http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46916
--- Comment #3 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr 2010-12-13
08:00:52 UTC ---
The failures are gone if I revert revision 167727.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46913
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-12-13
08:19:00 UTC ---
I guess the one with actual/expected is more portable/robust, and it really
doesn't matter that much what is printed into the log file, and actual/expected
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46912
Iain Sandoe iains at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46897
--- Comment #4 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-12-13 09:07:43 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #3)
Actually, I am less and less sure that this is a wrong-code issue.
I'm also a bit skeptical that this really is a bug. One should check the
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46904
Iain Sandoe iains at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|powerpc-apple-darwin9 |*-apple-darwin9
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46897
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46915
Jorn Wolfgang Rennecke amylaar at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46693
Ramana Radhakrishnan ramana at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot |ramana at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46919
Summary: [4.5 Regression] ICE accessed elt 3 of tree_vec with 2
elts in tsubst
Product: gcc
Version: 4.5.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46919
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.5.3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46874
--- Comment #3 from Paul kapinos at rz dot rwth-aachen.de 2010-12-13 10:33:02
UTC ---
Yes, the OpenMP Standard changed from 2.5 to 3.0 an describing reductions:
2.5:
Fortran pointers, Cray pointers, assumed-size arrays and allocatable arrays
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46874
--- Comment #4 from Paul kapinos at rz dot rwth-aachen.de 2010-12-13 10:37:59
UTC ---
Only GCC gfortran compiler has the problem.
There is no problem to compile the attached redukt.f90 file with ifort 11.1 and
12 (2011XE) and also with the PGI
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46693
Ramana Radhakrishnan ramana at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46915
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46879
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45940
Aldy Hernandez aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46884
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-12-13
11:11:26 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Mon Dec 13 11:11:22 2010
New Revision: 167742
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=167742
Log:
PR fortran/46884
*
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46567
--- Comment #4 from Aldy Hernandez aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-12-13
11:12:08 UTC ---
[Comments from Richard.]
There are two possible solutions:
(1) Teach inlining to propagate the in_transaction_p bit
to every call within the
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46567
Aldy Hernandez aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46884
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46654
Aldy Hernandez aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P5
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46480
Aldy Hernandez aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P5
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46300
Aldy Hernandez aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46646
Aldy Hernandez aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46714
Aldy Hernandez aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46729
Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46714
Aldy Hernandez aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P2 |P1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46896
Paul Thomas pault at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot |pault at gcc dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46896
--- Comment #10 from Paul Thomas pault at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-12-13 12:06:52
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #9)
I spoke too soon :-(
I do not believe that
there will be any ere regressions since the patch adds temporaries where there
were
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46920
Summary: suboptimal register allocation with local register
variables
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ra
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46915
--- Comment #9 from dave at hiauly1 dot hia.nrc.ca 2010-12-13 12:44:21 UTC ---
Yeah, the insn count for asm is just a guess. You should never put inline asm
into a delay slot, you really don't know how big it is or if it is suitable
for
the
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46655
--- Comment #14 from Michael Haubenwallner michael.haubenwallner at salomon
dot at 2010-12-13 12:46:25 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #9)
Is the 64K limit really new? Is this really a change in AIX as or did
something else change and start
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46915
--- Comment #10 from dave at hiauly1 dot hia.nrc.ca 2010-12-13 12:51:51 UTC ---
Thanks, I'll look at that. However, I think branch_to_delay_slot_p can
be improved. It probably should also check for asms and return FALSE
if it finds one.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46909
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46875
Alexander Monakov amonakov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44563
--- Comment #11 from Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-12-13
13:22:28 UTC ---
Patched compiler at -O2 now shows:
integration : 166.20 (16%) usr 0.19 ( 1%) sys 166.86 (15%) wall
92691 kB ( 4%) ggc
tree CCP :
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46921
Summary: Dropped side effect with combination of statement
expression and struct initializer
Product: gcc
Version: 4.4.5
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46899
--- Comment #11 from Eskil Steenberg eskil at obsession dot se 2010-12-13
14:09:46 UTC ---
Hi
The execution of an undefined operation produces an undefined value, and
any further operation becomes undefined.
My argument is that, at compile
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46693
--- Comment #10 from Ramana Radhakrishnan ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
2010-12-13 14:11:13 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #4)
Works for me on x86_64-darwin.
Fails for me on x86_64 -linux with trunk as of today.
Ramana
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45940
--- Comment #10 from Aldy Hernandez aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-12-13
14:15:49 UTC ---
[offline rth notes]
In function_attribute_inlinable_p, if fndecl is tm_pure and
current_function_decl is tm_safe, deny the inlining.
This is because
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46909
--- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-12-13
14:22:39 UTC ---
Created attachment 22741
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22741
gcc46-pr46909.patch
Untested fix.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46916
--- Comment #4 from Jack Howarth howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu 2010-12-13
14:30:04 UTC ---
I don't see r167727 in gcc-patches for an approval from a darwin maintainer.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46841
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45940
--- Comment #11 from Aldy Hernandez aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-12-13
14:48:50 UTC ---
Fixed on mainline, but I will leave the PR open until a more thorough fix is
committed.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45940
Aldy Hernandez aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P1 |P4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46922
Summary: Missing exported symbols from libstdc++
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: ada
AssignedTo:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46646
Aldy Hernandez aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46897
--- Comment #6 from Damian Rouson damian at rouson dot net 2010-12-13
15:16:42 UTC ---
Janus,
Thanks for finding the relevant language in the standard.
In case it helps, what I submitted originally was a reduced example of code
written by
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46300
Aldy Hernandez aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46923
Summary: [trans-mem] thread-local memory variable not properly
logged
Product: gcc
Version: trans-mem
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46916
--- Comment #5 from Jack Howarth howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu 2010-12-13
15:32:34 UTC ---
I can confirm that reverting r167727 also eliminates the failures in
gcc.dg/torture/stackalign/non-local-goto-[1,2].c with profiledbootstrap as
well.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46916
--- Comment #6 from Jack Howarth howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu 2010-12-13
15:34:01 UTC ---
The offending change is...
Author: hubicka
Date: Sun Dec 12 19:12:08 2010
New Revision: 167727
URL:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46885
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46815
--- Comment #2 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-12-13
16:03:22 UTC ---
Let's go ahead with this patch.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45084
--- Comment #11 from norak.van at gmail dot com 2010-12-13 16:05:34 UTC ---
Created attachment 22743
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22743
libstdc++-v3\config.log
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45084
--- Comment #12 from norak.van at gmail dot com 2010-12-13 16:07:47 UTC ---
C:\data\gcc\gcc-build\powerpc-ibm-eabi\libstdc++-v3
I am a new user with unix systems,
so It is no easy for me analyze logs,
but I think the problem could be the loose
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46924
Summary: [4.6 Regression] ICE: SIGSEGV in
rewrite_commutative_reductions_out_of_ssa_loop
(graphite-poly.h:450) with -fgraphite-identity
-ffast-math -fno-tree-loop-im
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46841
--- Comment #5 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-12-13 16:16:10 UTC ---
Author: janus
Date: Mon Dec 13 16:16:06 2010
New Revision: 167750
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=167750
Log:
2010-12-13 Janus Weil ja...@gcc.gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46873
Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46841
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46040
--- Comment #10 from Nathan Froyd froydnj at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-12-13
16:23:55 UTC ---
Author: froydnj
Date: Mon Dec 13 16:23:50 2010
New Revision: 167751
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=167751
Log:
gcc/
PR target/46040
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46925
Summary: Can't optimize degenerate table jumps
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: rtl-optimization
AssignedTo:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46897
--- Comment #7 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-12-13
16:36:57 UTC ---
Richard Maine agrees with the assessment of comment 5:
- For INTERFACE-defined defined-ASSIGNMENT(=), the intrinsic assignment
should be used (cf. example
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45084
Ralf Wildenhues rwild at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46891
Ralf Wildenhues rwild at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rwild at gcc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46887
Ralf Wildenhues rwild at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rwild at gcc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46797
Ralf Wildenhues rwild at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rwild at gcc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46607
Ralf Wildenhues rwild at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rwild at gcc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46201
--- Comment #3 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-12-13 16:57:20 UTC ---
Here is an even more compact version of the test case (getting rid of the
INTERFACE statement):
type t
procedure(character), nopass, pointer :: ppc
end type
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46926
Summary: Paired sin() cos() calls optimized to sincos() call.
Product: gcc
Version: 4.4.4
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
AssignedTo:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46895
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46300
Aldy Hernandez aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46927
Summary: flag -fstrict-volatile-bitfields affects volatile
non-bitfields
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46720
Ralf Wildenhues rwild at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rwild at gcc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46926
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-12-13
17:23:05 UTC ---
I think this is invalid as GNU/Linux defaults to including sincos as a builtin.
If you want to disable the builtin then use -fno-builtin-sincos.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46758
Alexander Monakov amonakov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45388
--- Comment #9 from Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-12-13
17:29:17 UTC ---
Author: hubicka
Date: Mon Dec 13 17:29:14 2010
New Revision: 167753
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=167753
Log:
PR middle-end/45388
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45388
Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46371
--- Comment #1 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-12-13
17:32:22 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #0)
type(foo), allocatable :: o_foo[:]
That should be CLASS(foo) - sorry for the typo.
TODO:
a) There is a gfc_is_coindexed()
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46797
--- Comment #3 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-12-13
17:35:24 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #2)
Well, I'd say works as it should: relinking is used to avoid run paths to
in-tree directories. What am I missing here? Thanks.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46867
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-12-13
17:36:31 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Mon Dec 13 17:36:26 2010
New Revision: 167754
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=167754
Log:
PR debug/46867
*
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46879
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-12-13
17:37:27 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Mon Dec 13 17:37:20 2010
New Revision: 167755
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=167755
Log:
PR lto/46879
*
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46201
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46867
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46879
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46895
asharif at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||asharif at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46677
--- Comment #12 from joseph at codesourcery dot com joseph at codesourcery dot
com 2010-12-13 17:58:13 UTC ---
On Sat, 11 Dec 2010, amylaar at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
We don't have any current decimal floating or fixed-point type size macros
to
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45388
Alexander Monakov amonakov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46928
Summary: data dependence analysis fails on constant array
accesses
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46770
--- Comment #48 from joseph at codesourcery dot com joseph at codesourcery dot
com 2010-12-13 18:08:00 UTC ---
On Sat, 11 Dec 2010, hjl.tools at gmail dot com wrote:
We introduced .init_array into gABI 10 years ago so that we can avoid
those
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46928
Sebastian Pop spop at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46902
--- Comment #2 from joseph at codesourcery dot com joseph at codesourcery dot
com 2010-12-13 18:20:16 UTC ---
On Sun, 12 Dec 2010, dominiq at lps dot ens.fr wrote:
The backtrace is
Program received signal EXC_BAD_ACCESS, Could not access
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46916
Iain Sandoe iains at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46908
Joseph S. Myers jsm28 at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4
--- Comment #6 from Rainer Orth ro at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-12-13 18:30:31 UTC
---
Author: ro
Date: Mon Dec 13 18:30:20 2010
New Revision: 167762
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=167762
Log:
Backport from mainline:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46916
m...@gcc.gnu.org mrs at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mrs at gcc dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46650
--- Comment #6 from ian at gcc dot gnu.org ian at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-12-13
18:34:48 UTC ---
Author: ian
Date: Mon Dec 13 18:34:45 2010
New Revision: 167764
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=167764
Log:
PR bootstrap/46650
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46928
davidxl xinliangli at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||xinliangli at gmail
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46607
--- Comment #4 from joseph at codesourcery dot com joseph at codesourcery dot
com 2010-12-13 18:39:47 UTC ---
On Mon, 13 Dec 2010, rwild at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
So is this only about the MinGW case? Because there, we should just fix
libtool
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46926
--- Comment #2 from James Kuyper Jr. jameskuyper at verizon dot net
2010-12-13 18:41:55 UTC ---
info gcc says:
Functions which would normally be built in but do not have
semantics defined by ISO C (such as `alloca' and `ffs') are not
1 - 100 of 168 matches
Mail list logo