http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47299
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47338
Summary: [4.5 Regression][C++] cc1plus returns exist code 5
Product: gcc
Version: 4.5.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: major
Priority: P3
Component: c++
AssignedTo:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46856
--- Comment #5 from Mikael Pettersson mikpe at it dot uu.se 2011-01-18
08:29:42 UTC ---
If I hack reload_combine_recognize_const_pattern to bail out early if HAVE_cc0,
then the test case doesn't ICE a cross to m68k-linux, and native bootstrap on
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47291
Dodji Seketeli dodji at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47337
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47337
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47339
Summary: Fortran 95: Reject namelist objects of non-constant
size
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: diagnostic
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47337
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-01-18
09:58:04 UTC ---
Created attachment 23016
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23016
gcc46-pr47337.patch
Untested fix. Thanks for the report.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47067
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47329
Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47290
--- Comment #4 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-01-18
10:31:32 UTC ---
How about
Index: tree-eh.c
===
--- tree-eh.c (revision 168906)
+++ tree-eh.c (working
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47290
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hubicka at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47340
Summary: [trans-mem] problem with declaration of new operator
Product: gcc
Version: trans-mem
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47341
Summary: unnecessary versioning in the vectorizer.
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: middle-end
AssignedTo:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47341
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47338
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.5.3
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47333
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.6.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47333
Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47341
Mikael Morin mikael at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mikael at gcc dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46170
--- Comment #25 from Dodji Seketeli dodji at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-01-18
12:44:28 UTC ---
Hi again, any chance Dodji's patches could be pushed to the 4.5 and/or 4.4
branches, before it gets too close to release time again? Thanks.
It's in my
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45586
--- Comment #30 from Mikael Morin mikael at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-01-18
12:48:41 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #28)
One way would be to keep for data types all the time the two versions around:
One with restrict and one without restrict;
makes
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47339
Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||rejects-valid
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47342
Summary: misleading diagnostic for member of undeclared class
template partial specialization
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: diagnostic
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43062
--- Comment #19 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-01-18
12:57:11 UTC ---
Related: PR 47339
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47339
--- Comment #2 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-01-18
12:57:20 UTC ---
Related: PR 43062
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47343
Summary: incorrect location for declaration of class template
partial specialization
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: diagnostic
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47342
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-01-18
13:00:26 UTC ---
Oops, the g++ diagnostics I showed were from 4.4 not 4.6, but they're the same
except 4.6 adds column numbers
I've created PR 47343 for the incorrect line
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47290
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-01-18
13:07:06 UTC ---
Created attachment 23017
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23017
gcc46-pr47290.patch
Another possible untested patch that should handle any
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47290
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-01-18
13:10:19 UTC ---
We could also limit the number of iterations:
int i;
- for (i = 1; VEC_iterate (eh_landing_pad, cfun-eh-lp_array, i, lp); ++i)
+ int len = VEC_length
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43062
--- Comment #20 from Xavier zazzou at gmail dot com 2011-01-18 13:14:38 UTC
---
Hi,
so, I am bit lost, bug is resolved or not ?
Correction available with next version of gcc ?
Thanks,
Xavier
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43062
--- Comment #21 from Jerry DeLisle jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-01-18
13:27:48 UTC ---
It is not resolved because we are waiting for an interpretation from the
Fortran standards committee on whether the test case is valid or invalid
Fortran.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47339
--- Comment #3 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-01-18
13:31:48 UTC ---
Created attachment 23018
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23018
Draft patch
Draft patch; handles most of the items - except that
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45586
--- Comment #31 from rguenther at suse dot de rguenther at suse dot de
2011-01-18 13:37:42 UTC ---
On Tue, 18 Jan 2011, mikael at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45586
--- Comment #30 from Mikael Morin
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47290
--- Comment #8 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-01-18
13:39:47 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #7)
We could also limit the number of iterations:
int i;
- for (i = 1; VEC_iterate (eh_landing_pad, cfun-eh-lp_array, i,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47230
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46878
Jeffrey A. Law law at redhat dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||law at redhat dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46878
Jeffrey A. Law law at redhat dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47340
--- Comment #1 from Patrick Marlier patrick.marlier at gmail dot com
2011-01-18 13:47:21 UTC ---
Created attachment 23019
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23019
testcase
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47290
--- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-01-18
13:49:18 UTC ---
cleanup_all_empty_eh is called just once per ehcleanup pass, doesn't iterate.
If we don't want to iterate on the new pads, we could just use len = VEC_length
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47290
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rth at gcc dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45586
--- Comment #32 from Michael Matz matz at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-01-18 13:56:01
UTC ---
Yes, but it's possible I was going up the wrong tree. My idea was to
build the no-restrict variants of types on demand, as necessary, basically
from
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47326
H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |NEW
Target
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47289
H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47344
Summary: [4.3/4.4/4.5/4.6 Regression][meta-bug] GCC gets slower
and uses more memory
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: compile-time-hog, memory-hog
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47344
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47311
--- Comment #21 from H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com 2011-01-18 14:20:40
UTC ---
Please note that valgrind also complaints search_line_acc_char
which doesn't use SSE2/SSE4.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18687
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.3.6 |---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26854
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.3.6 |---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47311
--- Comment #22 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-01-18
14:23:32 UTC ---
That's because even that routines operates on (aligned) word_type sized chunks.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37448
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||47344
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47345
Summary: [4.6 Regression] LTO failed to bootstrap-profiled
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: bootstrap
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47345
Jack Howarth howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||howarth at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36861
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||
Known
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26854
Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hubicka at gcc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37448
--- Comment #43 from Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-01-18
14:53:46 UTC ---
Now at -O2 the main inliner seems to degenerate ;(
168767 78.4974 cc1 cgraph_edge_badness
9426 4.3842 cc1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26854
--- Comment #123 from Daniel Berlin dberlin at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-01-18
14:54:33 UTC ---
On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 9:49 AM, hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
gcc-bugzi...@gcc.gnu.org wrote:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26854
Jan
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37448
--- Comment #44 from Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-01-18
14:58:04 UTC ---
and later IRA
samples %app name symbol name
2582656.8667 cc1 allocno_spill_priority_compare
6812
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40901
Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||accepts-invalid
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40901
--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-01-18
15:11:05 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #3)
access control isn't done for a nested-name-specifier
sorry, should be ... for arguments in a template-id in a
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47346
Summary: access control for nested type is ignored in class
template
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: accepts-invalid
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26854
--- Comment #124 from Jan Hubicka hubicka at ucw dot cz 2011-01-18 15:15:01
UTC ---
This looks suspiciously like it's not using the DFS numbers
It seems that they are used, just we do a lot of queries from
register_new_assert_for
according to
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26854
--- Comment #125 from Daniel Berlin dberlin at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-01-18
15:18:25 UTC ---
--- Comment #124 from Jan Hubicka hubicka at ucw dot cz 2011-01-18 15:15:01
UTC ---
This looks suspiciously like it's not using the DFS numbers
It
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36861
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47345
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.6.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47216
--- Comment #5 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-01-18
15:50:59 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Tue Jan 18 15:50:55 2011
New Revision: 168951
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=168951
Log:
2011-01-18 Richard
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47216
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
/lib/gcc4.6/libexec/gcc/x86_64-apple-darwin10.6.0/4.6.0/lto-wrapper
Target: x86_64-apple-darwin10.6.0
Configured with: ../gcc-4.6-20110118/configure --prefix=/sw
--prefix=/sw/lib/gcc4.6 --mandir=/sw/share/man --infodir=/sw/lib/gcc4.6/info
--with-build-config=bootstrap-lto --enable-stage1-languages=c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47290
--- Comment #11 from Richard Henderson rth at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-01-18
16:45:09 UTC ---
Jakub, I'm fine with your second patch to detect infinite loops, with
the proviso that you break out the test into a separate function.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47347
Summary: pragma GCC diagnostic ignored has no effect
sometimes
Product: gcc
Version: 4.5.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46886
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rakdver at gcc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47290
--- Comment #12 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-01-18
17:20:56 UTC ---
Created attachment 23020
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23020
gcc46-pr47290.patch
Like this (still untested but on this testcase)?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45586
--- Comment #33 from Mikael Morin mikael at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-01-18
17:21:54 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #32)
Yes, but it's possible I was going up the wrong tree. My idea was to
build the no-restrict variants of types on demand, as
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47338
--- Comment #2 from daniel.f.starke at freenet dot de 2011-01-18 17:30:54 UTC
---
What do you mean by debug? I can't even compile it because cc1plus exists half
the way.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47347
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-01-18
17:32:39 UTC ---
reduced:
#pragma GCC diagnostic ignored -Wunused-parameter
template class
struct KeyValue
{
virtual void serialize(int a) const
{
}
};
void f()
{
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47338
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-01-18
17:35:34 UTC ---
debug cc1plus to see where/why it exits, not debug your application
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46911
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47318
H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47348
Summary: substring with len_trim in array constructor
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: wrong-code
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47290
--- Comment #13 from Richard Henderson rth at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-01-18
18:20:49 UTC ---
Looks good. Ok if it passes tests.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47349
Summary: missing warning: Actual argument contains too few
elements
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47348
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47271
--- Comment #5 from Sebastian Pop spop at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-01-18 18:45:27
UTC ---
In this loop:
for (i=0, nops=0 ; icodelen ; i += ((codestr[i] = 90) ? 3 : 1))
{
addrmap[i] = i - nops;
if (codestr[i] == 9)
nops++;
}
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36104
--- Comment #11 from Benjamin Kosnik bkoz at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-01-18
19:01:01 UTC ---
yes. debug mode + versioning still in progress. expect to wrap that up asap
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47349
--- Comment #1 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-01-18 19:08:00 UTC ---
Here's a first patch, not regtested yet:
Index: gcc/fortran/interface.c
===
--- gcc/fortran/interface.c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36861
--- Comment #38 from Ion Gaztañaga igaztanaga at gmail dot com 2011-01-18
19:15:22 UTC ---
Thanks Richard for the detailed report. The fact is that the next standard is
trying to support relative pointers for container implementations (much like
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47348
Thomas Koenig tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||47065
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41146
--- Comment #4 from mrs at gcc dot gnu.org mrs at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-01-18
20:06:17 UTC ---
Author: mrs
Date: Tue Jan 18 20:06:13 2011
New Revision: 168960
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=168960
Log:
2011-01-18 Dominique
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47179
--- Comment #4 from Ulrich Weigand uweigand at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-01-18
20:13:59 UTC ---
Author: uweigand
Date: Tue Jan 18 20:13:56 2011
New Revision: 168961
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=168961
Log:
PR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47179
Ulrich Weigand uweigand at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47350
Summary: Deferred string length: ALLOCATE should allow MOLD=
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: rejects-valid
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43567
--- Comment #5 from Sebastian Pop spop at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-01-18 20:47:10
UTC ---
*** Bug 43568 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43568
Sebastian Pop spop at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47338
--- Comment #4 from Daniel Starke daniel.f.starke at freenet dot de
2011-01-18 20:48:34 UTC ---
Here is the debugging output. I can attach the whole back-trace if needed.
GNU gdb (GDB) 7.2
Copyright (C) 2010 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43567
--- Comment #6 from Sebastian Pop spop at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-01-18 20:54:23
UTC ---
Author: spop
Date: Tue Jan 18 20:54:18 2011
New Revision: 168962
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=168962
Log:
Add testcase for PR43567.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29832
--- Comment #8 from Sebastian Pop spop at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-01-18 20:54:30
UTC ---
Author: spop
Date: Tue Jan 18 20:54:26 2011
New Revision: 168963
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=168963
Log:
Add testcase for PR29832.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43657
--- Comment #7 from Sebastian Pop spop at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-01-18 20:54:38
UTC ---
Author: spop
Date: Tue Jan 18 20:54:34 2011
New Revision: 168964
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=168964
Log:
Add testcase for PR43657.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46168
--- Comment #3 from Sebastian Pop spop at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-01-18 20:54:43
UTC ---
Author: spop
Date: Tue Jan 18 20:54:40 2011
New Revision: 168965
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=168965
Log:
Add testcase for PR46168.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46215
--- Comment #1 from Sebastian Pop spop at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-01-18 20:54:50
UTC ---
Author: spop
Date: Tue Jan 18 20:54:46 2011
New Revision: 168966
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=168966
Log:
Add testcase for PR46215.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46970
--- Comment #6 from Sebastian Pop spop at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-01-18 20:54:55
UTC ---
Author: spop
Date: Tue Jan 18 20:54:52 2011
New Revision: 168967
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=168967
Log:
Add testcase for PR46970.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43657
Sebastian Pop spop at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org |spop at gcc dot
1 - 100 of 146 matches
Mail list logo
