http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47530
Summary: [trans-mem] tail call optimization problem with
_ITM_commitTransaction
Product: gcc
Version: trans-mem
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47531
Summary: SHAPE misses KIND= support
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: rejects-valid
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47532
Summary: valgrind errors while compiling with -flto
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: lto
AssignedTo:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47521
Tony Poppleton tony.poppleton at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Unnecessary usage of edx
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21206
Ralf Wildenhues rwild at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45505
Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47495
--- Comment #4 from Ralf Wildenhues rwild at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-01-29
11:48:04 UTC ---
For starters it would be nice if gfortran would even document its precise
semantics for when module files are created/updated/etc. I'm sure these
semantics
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45505
--- Comment #17 from Gerald Pfeifer gerald at pfeifer dot com 2011-01-29
11:57:55 UTC ---
Thanks, Dominique. I think it'll be great if you can add i386-*-freebsd*.
I'll be happy to test a patch, but I think in this specific case it's just
fine
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47495
--- Comment #5 from Joost VandeVondele Joost.VandeVondele at pci dot uzh.ch
2011-01-29 12:02:01 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #4)
For starters it would be nice if gfortran would even document its precise
semantics for when module files are
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47495
--- Comment #6 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-01-29
12:04:10 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #4)
For starters it would be nice if gfortran would even document its precise
semantics for when module files are created/updated/etc.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47495
--- Comment #7 from Joost VandeVondele Joost.VandeVondele at pci dot uzh.ch
2011-01-29 12:14:26 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #6)
I think it would be useful to give an example Makefile file in the manual.
Joost's solution (comment 2) seems to
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47495
--- Comment #8 from Ralf Wildenhues rwild at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-01-29
12:20:37 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #6)
b) A .mod file is read when a USE statement is encountered; the file must
exist
and is searched for in the include search paths.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47495
--- Comment #9 from Joost VandeVondele Joost.VandeVondele at pci dot uzh.ch
2011-01-29 12:36:01 UTC ---
BTW, there is one thing I would still like to add, but I have not yet tried.
gfortran -fsyntax-only test.f90
will generate all .mod files
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47495
--- Comment #10 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-01-29
13:10:32 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #8)
b) A .mod file is read when a USE statement is encountered; the file
must exist and is searched for in the include search paths.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47495
--- Comment #11 from Ralf Wildenhues rwild at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-01-29
13:28:11 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #10)
If you want one rule to update multiple outputs, see
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47042
Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47523
Paul Thomas pault at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47416
H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42546
Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47533
Summary: [m68k] stack corruption with -Os (probably due to tail
call optimisation)
Product: gcc
Version: 4.4.5
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47478
Mikael Pettersson mikpe at it dot uu.se changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mikpe at it dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47519
Paul Thomas pault at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47042
Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47434
--- Comment #10 from Jerry DeLisle jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-01-29
17:31:07 UTC ---
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Sat Jan 29 17:31:04 2011
New Revision: 169390
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=169390
Log:
2011-01-29 Jerry
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47434
--- Comment #11 from Jerry DeLisle jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-01-29
17:33:39 UTC ---
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Sat Jan 29 17:33:36 2011
New Revision: 169391
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=169391
Log:
2011-01-29 Jerry
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47533
Mikael Pettersson mikpe at it dot uu.se changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mikpe at it dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47531
--- Comment #1 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-01-29
17:36:21 UTC ---
Author: burnus
Date: Sat Jan 29 17:36:18 2011
New Revision: 169392
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=169392
Log:
2011-01-29 Tobias Burnus
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47533
--- Comment #2 from Mikael Pettersson mikpe at it dot uu.se 2011-01-29
17:37:18 UTC ---
Created attachment 23163
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23163
use stdarg.h features in klibc open() and openat(), untested
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47531
Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47533
--- Comment #3 from Thorsten Glaser tg at mirbsd dot org 2011-01-29 17:39:42
UTC ---
You don't really say what the error is. Is it that the number after got2
differs from the one after got1?
Yes, it’s a local variable of foo() and bar() and
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46317
Mikael Pettersson mikpe at it dot uu.se changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mikpe at it dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47533
--- Comment #4 from Thorsten Glaser tg at mirbsd dot org 2011-01-29 17:53:19
UTC ---
I see, now, from the patch. Thanks, will try that. Is it okay with you to
submit this to klibc, if it works?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45505
Ulrich Weigand uweigand at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||uweigand at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47434
Jerry DeLisle jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47533
--- Comment #5 from Thorsten Glaser tg at mirbsd dot org 2011-01-29 18:05:47
UTC ---
Created attachment 23164
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23164
Mikael’s patch, against klibc git
I converted your patch to one against klibc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47533
--- Comment #6 from Mikael Pettersson mikpe at it dot uu.se 2011-01-29
18:27:32 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #4)
I see, now, from the patch. Thanks, will try that. Is it okay with you to
submit this to klibc, if it works?
Sure. BTW, glibc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47533
Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47533
--- Comment #8 from Thorsten Glaser tg at mirbsd dot org 2011-01-29 18:51:23
UTC ---
OK, the patch fixes the problem indeed. Thanks! (Sorry for the noise, too.)
: unassig...@gcc.gnu.org
ReportedBy: j...@gcc.gnu.org
4.6.0 20110129 (experimental) [trunk revision 169388]
/users/joel/test-gcc/b-gcc1-avr/./gcc/xgcc
-B/users/joel/test-gcc/b-gcc1-avr/./gcc/ -nostdinc
-B/users/joel/test-gcc/b-gcc1-avr/avr-rtems4.11/newlib/ -isystem
/users/joel/test-gcc/b-gcc1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47495
--- Comment #12 from Joost VandeVondele Joost.VandeVondele at pci dot uzh.ch
2011-01-29 19:31:14 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #9)
test.mod: test.f90
gfortran -fsyntax-only test.f90
test.o: test.f90 test.mod
gfortran -c -O3
--host=i486-linux-gnu --target=arm-linux-gnueabi CC=gcc
build_alias=i486-linux-gnu host_alias=i486-linux-gnu
target_alias=arm-linux-gnueabi --enable-languages=c,c++,fortran,objc,obj-c++
Thread model: posix
gcc version 4.6.0 20110129 (experimental) (GCC)
COLLECT_GCC_OPTIONS='-v' '-mno-thumb' '-c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47477
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-01-29
19:40:25 UTC ---
forwprop is a forward walk, for this kind of optimization we want to walk
backwards, from the narrowing integer conversion to the operations and whenever
we
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47529
Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46713
Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||yuri at tsoft
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46713
Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46713
--- Comment #6 from Yuri yuri at tsoft dot com 2011-01-29 20:07:34 UTC ---
Thanks!
You can change the warning message to be a bit more proactive:
visibility attribute not supported in this configuration (as during
configuration wasn't from
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34544
--- Comment #23 from John David Anglin danglin at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-01-29
20:36:41 UTC ---
Author: danglin
Date: Sat Jan 29 20:36:39 2011
New Revision: 169394
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=169394
Log:
Backport from
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43062
--- Comment #28 from Xavier zazzou at gmail dot com 2011-01-29 21:47:19 UTC
---
I tried again to build gcc 4.6 (from svn) and i succeeded. The patch works
fine.
Thanks.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47536
Summary: gcc-4.5.2 fails to build on Solaris 10 i386
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
AssignedTo:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47536
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-01-29
21:51:08 UTC ---
Its strange that there is an option -m64 that appears in the command line.
Not really because i386-solaris is a multi-arch target which includes amd64
too.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47536
--- Comment #2 from Yuri yuri at tsoft dot com 2011-01-29 22:15:45 UTC ---
Created attachment 23165
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23165
Requested config.log
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47147
--- Comment #13 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-01-29
22:15:55 UTC ---
Author: redi
Date: Sat Jan 29 22:15:52 2011
New Revision: 169395
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=169395
Log:
2011-01-29 Jonathan Wakely
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47147
Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47537
Summary: [x32] internal compiler error: in copy_to_mode_reg, at
explow.c:635
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47537
--- Comment #1 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org hjl at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-01-29
22:36:32 UTC ---
Author: hjl
Date: Sat Jan 29 22:36:26 2011
New Revision: 169396
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=169396
Log:
Convert to Pmode if
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47536
--- Comment #3 from Yuri yuri at tsoft dot com 2011-01-29 22:40:09 UTC ---
Assembler complains on -xarch option.
/opt/local/bin/as: unrecognized option `-xarch=generic64'
But '/opt/local/bin/as --help' doeasn't list -xarch as the valid option. It
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46713
--- Comment #7 from River Tarnell r.tarnell at IEEE dot ORG 2011-01-29
23:09:23 UTC ---
I don't agree that this is invalid. If objdump is not found, GCC should either
generate an error and fail during build, or continue to build but generate
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47499
--- Comment #2 from Daniel S. Wilkerson daniel.wilkerson at gmail dot com
2011-01-29 23:27:18 UTC ---
So I have tried this. Frankly, Apple makes it too hard to report bugs to them
as I have to register as an Apple developer and I'm just not
-darwin10.7.0
Configured with: ../gcc-4.6-20110129/configure --prefix=/sw
--prefix=/sw/lib/gcc4.6 --mandir=/sw/share/man --infodir=/sw/lib/gcc4.6/info
--with-build-config=bootstrap-lto --enable-stage1-languages=c,lto
--enable-languages=c,c++,fortran,lto,objc,obj-c++,java --with-gmp=/sw
--with-libiconv
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47538
Jack Howarth howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47499
Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47490
--- Comment #2 from Mikael Pettersson mikpe at it dot uu.se 2011-01-30
01:23:33 UTC ---
Fixed on trunk for 4.5 by r146570:
Author: uweigand
Date: Wed Apr 22 11:31:56 2009
New Revision: 146570
URL:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47538
--- Comment #2 from Jack Howarth howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu 2011-01-30
01:49:49 UTC ---
Same wrong code generation seen with gcc trunk on x86_64 linux at -O2. On both
x86_64-apple-darwin10 and x86_64 linux, compiling gsl-1.14/cheb/integ.c at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47538
--- Comment #3 from Jack Howarth howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu 2011-01-30
02:03:17 UTC ---
On x86_64 linux, gsl-1.14/eigen/herm.c is also miscompiled at optimizations
above -O0.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47538
--- Comment #4 from Jack Howarth howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu 2011-01-30
02:07:23 UTC ---
On x86_64-apple-darwin10, the cheb test fails when integ.c is compiled at -O1
at...
gdb ./test
Reason: KERN_INVALID_ADDRESS at address:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47539
Summary: Compile fail at 0x0E+ procedure
Product: gcc
Version: 3.4.4
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
AssignedTo:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47539
Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3885
Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||yaxi1984 at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47499
Daniel S. Wilkerson daniel.wilkerson at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47538
--- Comment #5 from Jack Howarth howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu 2011-01-30
03:10:37 UTC ---
Interestingly adding all of the options enabled at -O1 to -O0...
-O0 -fcombine-stack-adjustments -fcompare-elim -fcprop-registers -fdefer-pop
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47540
Summary: ARM THUMB crash with complex numbers
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47540
--- Comment #1 from Ian Lance Taylor ian at airs dot com 2011-01-30 07:57:23
UTC ---
Created attachment 23166
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23166
Possible patch
This is a possible patch for this bug. It fixes what appears
72 matches
Mail list logo