http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47774
--- Comment #9 from Adam Butcher dev.lists at jessamine dot co.uk 2011-03-03
08:40:28 UTC ---
Great. That's got rid of the need for the preprocessor hacks to remove
constexpr usage from libstdc++ in c++0x mode. A full build of our tree from
GCC
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47964
Summary: logical || returns false result, optimization level 02
or 03
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: critical
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47950
Adam Butcher dev.lists at jessamine dot co.uk changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47965
Summary: gfortran testsuite failures on mingw32
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: testsuite
AssignedTo:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47964
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47963
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47913
--- Comment #20 from Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com 2011-03-03
09:51:16 UTC ---
Ah, ok then: when I looked a bit into boost::rational it seemed pretty simple,
didn't notice that additional simplification. Thanks for the additional
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47961
--- Comment #1 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-03-03
10:11:21 UTC ---
*** Bug 47962 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47963
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.5.3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47962
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47964
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47966
Summary: GCC 3.4.6 and 4.4.3 generate wrong stabs debugging
information for global variables explicitly
initialized with 0.
Product: gcc
Version: 4.4.3
Status:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47964
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-03-03
10:17:45 UTC ---
bool foo (unsigned int a0)
{
return a0 101U || ~a0 101U;
}
int
main ()
{
__builtin_printf (%d\n, (int) foo (1));
}
certainly prints one, not 0.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47966
--- Comment #1 from Dainis Jonitis jonitis at gmail dot com 2011-03-03
10:21:03 UTC ---
Created attachment 23522
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23522
GCC generated wrong assembler file
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47966
--- Comment #2 from Dainis Jonitis jonitis at gmail dot com 2011-03-03
10:21:44 UTC ---
Created attachment 23523
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23523
nm utility output
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47966
--- Comment #3 from Dainis Jonitis jonitis at gmail dot com 2011-03-03
10:22:33 UTC ---
Created attachment 23524
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23524
objdump utility output with wrong N_LCSYM debugging information
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47966
--- Comment #4 from Dainis Jonitis jonitis at gmail dot com 2011-03-03
10:22:57 UTC ---
Created attachment 23525
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23525
makefile
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47966
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-debug
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47920
Ian Bolton ibolton at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47719
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47899
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47957
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47963
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47799
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hjl.tools at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47941
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47936
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P5
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47679
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=0
--- Comment #3 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-03-03
11:29:36 UTC ---
Can it be a side-effect of turning target macros into target hooks?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47283
--- Comment #22 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-03-03
12:10:44 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Thu Mar 3 12:10:40 2011
New Revision: 170650
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=170650
Log:
2011-03-03 Richard
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47837
Andreas Krebbel krebbel at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|hppa1.1-hp-hpux10.20
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47967
Summary: [4.6 Regression] ICE: verify_stmts failed: conversion
of register to a different size with -fipa-cp on
undefined code
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47968
Summary: ICE: in gen_lowpart_general, at rtlhooks.c:51 when
converting vector of double to vector of float
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47968
Zdenek Sojka zsojka at seznam dot cz changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #23527|0 |1
is
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47967
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47968
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47968
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47968
--- Comment #4 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-03-03
13:34:50 UTC ---
Btw, I wonder since when (and why) we accept
float4 f4 = (float4) d2;
as valid code.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47969
Summary: [C++0x] ICE: SIGSEGV in compute_array_index_type
(cp/decl.c:7522)
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: minor
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47968
--- Comment #5 from Zdenek Sojka zsojka at seznam dot cz 2011-03-03 13:56:06
UTC ---
The testcase is accepted (compiles fine) by 3.3.6, 3.4.6, 4.0.4, 4.1.2, 4.2.4,
4.3.5.
The are files in the testsuite that use that style, at least
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47802
--- Comment #30 from dave at hiauly1 dot hia.nrc.ca 2011-03-03 13:56:25 UTC ---
On Fri, 25 Feb 2011, burnus at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
Please shout loudly if there you still encounter a build failure!
TO BE DONE: The HP-UX (et al.?) compile
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47945
Janne Blomqvist jb at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jb at gcc dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47970
Summary: c99_functions.c:611:5: warning: implicit declaration
of function 'round'
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47970
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47971
Summary: [4.6 Regression] ICE: in tsubst_copy, at cp/pt.c:11725
on valid code
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47966
--- Comment #6 from Dainis Jonitis jonitis at gmail dot com 2011-03-03
14:40:18 UTC ---
Problem is actually only with static file scope variables. Only then the
N_LCSYM and N_STSYM stabs are used. With global variables there is no problem
as
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47972
Summary: error.c:158:7: warning: return makes pointer from
integer without a cast
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47973
Summary: error.c:158:7: warning: return makes pointer from
integer without a cast
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47974
Summary: [4.6 Regression] ICE: tree check: expected tree_vec,
have error_mark in tsubst_template_args, at
cp/pt.c:8969 on invalid code
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47945
--- Comment #16 from Thomas Henlich thenlich at users dot sourceforge.net
2011-03-03 14:58:35 UTC ---
My _mingw.h has the following:
#if defined(_POSIX) !defined(__USE_MINGW_ANSI_STDIO)
/* Enable __USE_MINGW_ANSI_STDIO if _POSIX defined
* and
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47968
--- Comment #6 from Zdenek Sojka zsojka at seznam dot cz 2011-03-03 15:19:55
UTC ---
Created attachment 23532
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23532
testcase using long instead of double
This one fails the same way.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47974
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47975
Summary: ICE: in expand_shift, at expmed.c:2299 when using 256b
vectors without -mavx
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47976
Summary: Recent fortran testsuite regressions
Product: gcc
Version: 4.5.3
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
AssignedTo:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47966
--- Comment #7 from Dainis Jonitis jonitis at gmail dot com 2011-03-03
15:44:04 UTC ---
Everything works fine in Ubuntu GDB, because the Assembler (2.20.1) is smart
enough to ignore wrong debug symbols and still generate correct object file
with
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47971
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47972
--- Comment #1 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-03-03
15:59:49 UTC ---
*** Bug 47973 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47973
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47975
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47283
--- Comment #23 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-03-03
16:06:38 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Thu Mar 3 16:06:33 2011
New Revision: 170654
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=170654
Log:
PR debug/47283
*
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47977
Summary: powerpc (-mcpu=8548) Wrong code for double operations
in little endian mode
Product: gcc
Version: 4.5.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47963
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-03-03
16:09:59 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Thu Mar 3 16:09:55 2011
New Revision: 170655
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=170655
Log:
PR c/47963
*
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47283
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47963
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||4.6.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47975
--- Comment #2 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-03-03
16:19:23 UTC ---
We lower the vector - vector shift to
bb 2:
x.0_1 = x;
x.1_2 = x;
D.2689_4 = BIT_FIELD_REF x.0_1, 128, 0;
D.2690_5 = BIT_FIELD_REF x.1_2, 128, 0;
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47975
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47977
Joseph S. Myers jsm28 at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|c |target
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47978
Summary: [OOP] Invalid INTENT in overriding TBP not detected
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47978
--- Comment #1 from Salvatore Filippone sfilippone at uniroma2 dot it
2011-03-03 16:47:24 UTC ---
Created attachment 23534
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23534
test-case
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47950
--- Comment #6 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-03-03
16:51:23 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Thu Mar 3 16:51:20 2011
New Revision: 170656
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=170656
Log:
PR c++/47950
* pt.c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47977
--- Comment #2 from froydnj at codesourcery dot com froydnj at codesourcery
dot com 2011-03-03 16:51:18 UTC ---
On Thu, Mar 03, 2011 at 04:08:53PM +, m.lazzarotto at robox dot it wrote:
lwz 9,8(1) # What's the
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42240
--- Comment #21 from denisc at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-03-03 16:58:34 UTC ---
Author: denisc
Date: Thu Mar 3 16:58:26 2011
New Revision: 170657
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=170657
Log:
Backport from mainline
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47974
--- Comment #2 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org paolo at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-03-03 17:07:32 UTC ---
Author: paolo
Date: Thu Mar 3 17:07:28 2011
New Revision: 170658
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=170658
Log:
/cp
2011-03-03
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47974
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47837
--- Comment #2 from davidxl xinliangli at gmail dot com 2011-03-03 17:32:06
UTC ---
Please attach two dump files:
-fdump-tree-cddce2-blocks
-fdump-tree-uninit-details
David
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47837
--- Comment #3 from Andreas Krebbel krebbel at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-03-03
17:38:48 UTC ---
Created attachment 23535
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23535
uninit-pred-7_a.c.126t.cddce2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47837
--- Comment #4 from Andreas Krebbel krebbel at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-03-03
17:39:12 UTC ---
Created attachment 23536
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23536
uninit-pred-7_a.c.128t.uninit
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47966
--- Comment #8 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-03-03
17:42:53 UTC ---
IIRC a.out format support for freebsd has just been depercated. Why use stabs
at all? Elf and dwarf2 have been around for at least 10 years now and
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47968
--- Comment #7 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-03-03
17:47:42 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #3)
Patch:
Index: gcc/expmed.c
IIRC this is the patch which I had applied to the PS3 toolchain while at Sony.
I don't have access
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47968
--- Comment #8 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-03-03
17:50:38 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #4)
Btw, I wonder since when (and why) we accept
float4 f4 = (float4) d2;
as valid code.
Because it is documented as being
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47972
Janne Blomqvist jb at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47971
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47837
--- Comment #5 from davidxl xinliangli at gmail dot com 2011-03-03 18:06:33
UTC ---
While this exposes a limitation in uninit analysis, the cause of the warning is
that C FE behaves differently. On x86, the expression n || l is converted to
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47972
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47964
--- Comment #4 from rob.bob.301 at hotmail dot com 2011-03-03 18:26:00 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
You need to provide self-contained testcase, this is not self-contained.
Thank you for running your simple experiment. Unfortunately, all my
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47837
--- Comment #6 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-03-03
18:36:58 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #5)
While this exposes a limitation in uninit analysis, the cause of the warning
is
that C FE behaves differently. On x86, the
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47964
Manuel López-Ibáñez manu at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||manu at gcc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47979
Summary: Problem in comparing integers
Product: gcc
Version: 4.4.3
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: rtl-optimization
AssignedTo:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47979
--- Comment #1 from Xiaofeng Guo xiaofengguo at google dot com 2011-03-03
20:36:32 UTC ---
Because I can't find the attachment in the thread, add the text below for
debugging easily.
==
#include
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47979
Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46220
Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47980
Summary: Inefficient code for local const char arrays
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
AssignedTo:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47980
Kai Tietz ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47980
--- Comment #2 from Rafael Avila de Espindola rafael.espindola at gmail dot
com 2011-03-03 21:50:07 UTC ---
I agree that the code is correct. The bug is because of a missing optimization,
not about wrong behavior.
The only use of foo is passing
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47980
Kai Tietz ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47980
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-03-03
21:59:50 UTC ---
I believe f could do:
assert (arg != aoeuaoeuaeouaeouaoeuaoeaoxbxod);
which would then fail with the proposed optimization. It is unspecified if
two string
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47980
Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47947
--- Comment #10 from Pat Haugen pthaugen at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-03-03
22:12:12 UTC ---
This is looking like a dup of PR47862, note the following snippet of assembler.
stfd 0,360(1) #,
stfd 12,344(1) #,
stfd 13,352(1) #,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47958
--- Comment #1 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org hjl at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-03-03
22:15:29 UTC ---
Author: hjl
Date: Thu Mar 3 22:15:26 2011
New Revision: 170664
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=170664
Log:
Put symbol reference in
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44499
Ryan Hill dirtyepic at gentoo dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dirtyepic at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47980
Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|INVALID |DUPLICATE
---
1 - 100 of 120 matches
Mail list logo
