[Bug ada/48293] New: Legal program rejected, empty discriminant blocks object allocation with built-in-place

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48293 Summary: Legal program rejected, empty discriminant blocks object allocation with built-in-place Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug middle-end/39333] gcc 4.3.3 miscompiles when -finline-small-functions is used

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39333 Ryan Hill dirtyepic at gentoo dot org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||dirtyepic at

[Bug ada/48293] Legal program rejected, empty discriminant blocks object allocation with built-in-place

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48293 --- Comment #1 from yuta tomino demoonlit at panathenaia dot halfmoon.jp 2011-03-26 07:31:35 UTC --- I'm sorry about wrong attachments. I deleted limited of P1.T by mistake, please add limited or look the code in the report.

[Bug middle-end/39333] gcc 4.3.3 miscompiles when -finline-small-functions is used

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39333 --- Comment #25 from Ryan Hill dirtyepic at gentoo dot org 2011-03-26 08:04:14 UTC --- -fno-inline-small-functions works with -O2, not -Os.

[Bug objc++/48275] getter=namespace failing with .mm

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48275 Nicola Pero nicola at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last

[Bug lto/48259] Internal compiler errors in lto1

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48259 --- Comment #3 from Dmitry Gorbachev d.g.gorbachev at gmail dot com 2011-03-26 08:24:27 UTC --- Created attachment 23775 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23775 Backtrace #1 Reproduced with i686-pc-linux-gnu-gcc-4.6.1 (GCC)

[Bug lto/48259] Internal compiler errors in lto1

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48259 --- Comment #4 from Dmitry Gorbachev d.g.gorbachev at gmail dot com 2011-03-26 08:25:10 UTC --- Created attachment 23776 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23776 Backtrace #2

[Bug lto/48259] Internal compiler errors in lto1

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48259 --- Comment #5 from Dmitry Gorbachev d.g.gorbachev at gmail dot com 2011-03-26 08:28:41 UTC --- Created attachment 23777 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23777 Output of gcc -v -O2 -flto Maybe show -v output of a failing

[Bug lto/48259] Internal compiler errors in lto1

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48259 --- Comment #6 from Dmitry Gorbachev d.g.gorbachev at gmail dot com 2011-03-26 08:29:23 UTC --- Created attachment 23778 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23778 Output of gcc -v -flto

[Bug rtl-optimization/48141] [4.4/4.5/4.6 Regression] DSE compile time hog

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48141 --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-03-26 09:19:39 UTC --- Author: jakub Date: Sat Mar 26 09:19:36 2011 New Revision: 171545 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=171545 Log: Backport from mainline

[Bug rtl-optimization/48141] [4.4/4.5/4.6 Regression] DSE compile time hog

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48141 --- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-03-26 09:20:36 UTC --- Author: jakub Date: Sat Mar 26 09:20:34 2011 New Revision: 171546 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=171546 Log: Backport from mainline

[Bug rtl-optimization/48156] [4.6 Regression] wrong code with -fcrossjumping

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48156 --- Comment #11 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-03-26 09:21:36 UTC --- Author: jakub Date: Sat Mar 26 09:21:34 2011 New Revision: 171547 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=171547 Log: Backport from mainline

[Bug c/42544] Bad codegen with signed short cast to unsigned int, then promoted to unsigned long long

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42544 --- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-03-26 09:23:03 UTC --- Author: jakub Date: Sat Mar 26 09:23:01 2011 New Revision: 171548 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=171548 Log: Backport from mainline

[Bug c/48197] possible wrong code bug at -O0

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48197 --- Comment #12 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-03-26 09:23:03 UTC --- Author: jakub Date: Sat Mar 26 09:23:01 2011 New Revision: 171548 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=171548 Log: Backport from mainline

[Bug debug/48204] [4.5/4.6 Regression] ICE: in decimal_to_decnumber, at dfp.c:115 with -fno-tree-ccp -fno-tree-dominator-opts -fno-tree-fre -g

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48204 --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-03-26 09:24:08 UTC --- Author: jakub Date: Sat Mar 26 09:24:06 2011 New Revision: 171549 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=171549 Log: Backport from mainline

[Bug rtl-optimization/48156] [4.6 Regression] wrong code with -fcrossjumping

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48156 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug c++/48294] New: internal compiler error: in build_noexcept_spec, at cp/except.c:1217

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48294 Summary: internal compiler error: in build_noexcept_spec, at cp/except.c:1217 Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug c++/48294] internal compiler error: in build_noexcept_spec, at cp/except.c:1217

: in build_noexcept_spec, at cp/except.c:1217 Please submit a full bug report, with preprocessed source if appropriate. See http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs.html for instructions. [kkloepper@pan scratch]$ g++ --version g++ (GCC) 4.7.0 20110326 (experimental) Copyright (C) 2011 Free Software Foundation, Inc

[Bug rtl-optimization/48144] ICE: in code_motion_path_driver, at sel-sched.c:6575 with -fselective-scheduling2 and custom flags

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48144 --- Comment #5 from Andrey Belevantsev abel at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-03-26 11:40:54 UTC --- Author: abel Date: Sat Mar 26 11:40:51 2011 New Revision: 171555 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=171555 Log: PR

[Bug fortran/48291] [OOP] internal compiler error, new_symbol(): Symbol name too long

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48291 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/48291] [4.6/4.7 Regression] [OOP] internal compiler error, new_symbol(): Symbol name too long

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48291 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[OOP] internal compiler |[4.6/4.7 Regression] [OOP]

[Bug fortran/48291] [4.6/4.7 Regression] [OOP] internal compiler error, new_symbol(): Symbol name too long

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48291 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|critical|normal

[Bug rtl-optimization/47612] RTL crash when cc0 setter moved away from cc0 user

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47612 Vincent Riviere vincent.riviere at freesbee dot fr changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Bug fortran/48291] [4.6/4.7 Regression] [OOP] internal compiler error, new_symbol(): Symbol name too long

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48291 --- Comment #7 from Jerry DeLisle jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-03-26 15:23:05 UTC --- Your patch is approved after regression testing and thanks for getting on it so quickly. Maybe the release managers might want to sneak it in to 4.6.0 but

[Bug c++/47444] False warning: array subscript is above array bounds

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47444 AJ aj664 at hotmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||aj664 at hotmail dot com

[Bug c++/46759] incorrect array bounds warning?

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46759 AJ aj664 at hotmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||aj664 at hotmail dot com

[Bug tree-optimization/43270] array-bounds false negative

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43270 AJ aj664 at hotmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||aj664 at hotmail dot com

[Bug target/47855] missed cbnz optimization

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47855 Steven Bosscher steven at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||steven at gcc

[Bug tree-optimization/48295] New: Incorrect code generated with dynamic floating point rounding mode switches

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48295 Summary: Incorrect code generated with dynamic floating point rounding mode switches Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug tree-optimization/48295] Incorrect code generated with dynamic floating point rounding mode switches

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48295 --- Comment #1 from Frederic Riss frederic.riss at gmail dot com 2011-03-26 16:15:22 UTC --- Created attachment 23779 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23779 Failing code

[Bug c++/46759] incorrect array bounds warning?

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46759 --- Comment #6 from AJ aj664 at hotmail dot com 2011-03-26 16:56:19 UTC --- (In reply to comment #5) ignore my comments. i can't confirm it sufficiently. i might be wrong.

[Bug tree-optimization/43270] array-bounds false negative

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43270 --- Comment #20 from AJ aj664 at hotmail dot com 2011-03-26 16:56:37 UTC --- (In reply to comment #19) ignore my comments. i can't confirm it sufficiently. i might be wrong.

[Bug c++/47444] False warning: array subscript is above array bounds

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47444 --- Comment #12 from AJ aj664 at hotmail dot com 2011-03-26 16:56:52 UTC --- (In reply to comment #11) ignore my comments. i can't confirm it sufficiently. i might be wrong.

[Bug target/47855] missed cbnz optimization

: 100 @ basic block 19 101 007a 3EBD pop{r1, r2, r3, r4, r5, pc} 102 .sizepnm_gethdr, .-pnm_gethdr 103 .identGCC: (GNU) 4.7.0 20110326 (experimental) [trunk revision 171556] ARM GAS /tmp/ccLnp6gX.s

[Bug fortran/48291] [4.6/4.7 Regression] [OOP] internal compiler error, new_symbol(): Symbol name too long

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48291 --- Comment #8 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-03-26 17:34:40 UTC --- (In reply to comment #7) Your patch is approved after regression testing and thanks for getting on it so quickly. Thanks. Regtest was successful. Will commit shortly.

[Bug c++/47444] False warning: array subscript is above array bounds

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47444 --- Comment #13 from Manuel López-Ibáñez manu at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-03-26 17:49:00 UTC --- (In reply to comment #11) not sure if this will help. but i found this problem with -O2 optimzed code in GCC 4.5.1 (and 4.4.1) AJ, if you are unsure

[Bug target/48288] [4.7 Regression] ld: Unsatisfied symbol __iordi3 in file /test/gnu/gcc/objdir/./gcc/libgcc_eh.a

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48288 John David Anglin danglin at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug fortran/48291] [4.6/4.7 Regression] [OOP] internal compiler error, new_symbol(): Symbol name too long

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48291 --- Comment #9 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-03-26 18:39:19 UTC --- Author: janus Date: Sat Mar 26 18:39:14 2011 New Revision: 171559 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=171559 Log: 2011-03-26 Janus Weil ja...@gcc.gnu.org

[Bug target/48237] [4.6/4.7 Regression] ICE: in final_scan_insn, at final.c:2651 with -fselective-scheduling2 -mtune=core2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48237 --- Comment #3 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-03-26 18:41:05 UTC --- Author: uros Date: Sat Mar 26 18:41:02 2011 New Revision: 171560 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=171560 Log: Backport from mainline: 2011-03-24

[Bug target/48237] [4.6/4.7 Regression] ICE: in final_scan_insn, at final.c:2651 with -fselective-scheduling2 -mtune=core2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48237 Uros Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug fortran/48095] [OOP] Invalid assignment to procedure pointer component not rejected

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48095 --- Comment #2 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-03-26 21:07:42 UTC --- The following variant is correctly being rejected: implicit none type :: rectangle real :: width, height procedure(get_area), pointer, pass(this) ::

[Bug c++/48296] New: constexpr member function cannot use the class type it belongs as parameter type or return type

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48296 Summary: constexpr member function cannot use the class type it belongs as parameter type or return type Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal