http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48860
--- Comment #4 from Uros Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com 2011-05-04 06:17:47
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #2)
Created attachment 24174 [details]
assembly file for libgcc/../gcc/config/soft-fp/extenddftf2.c
Can you please add -dp to compile
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48860
--- Comment #5 from Uros Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com 2011-05-04 07:04:50
UTC ---
Created attachment 24176
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24176
Band-aid patch for broken assemblers
You have broken assembler, see Intel
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48863
Summary: A Bug When Assembler Instructions with C Expression
Operands in arm-elf-gcc 4.5
Product: gcc
Version: 4.5.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48853
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-05-04
07:42:55 UTC ---
Does it fix (at least some of) the x32 issues as well? If some (e.g. ICEs) are
left, please post backtraces and other relevant details.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48858
Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||rejects-valid
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48834
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48837
--- Comment #8 from Zdenek Dvorak rakdver at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-05-04
08:33:51 UTC ---
Created attachment 24177
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24177
Fix for the issue
Indeed, once the accumulator transformation is
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48863
Mikael Pettersson mikpe at it dot uu.se changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mikpe at it dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48864
Summary: -Ofast should imply -fno-protect-parens
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: missed-optimization
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48866
Summary: gcc hangs when -g is set
Product: gcc
Version: 4.4.4
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: major
Priority: P3
Component: debug
AssignedTo: unassig...@gcc.gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48749
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48865
Summary: It would be useful to have a way to check the value of
a #define at preprocessing time
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: enhancement
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48597
--- Comment #13 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-05-04
09:14:07 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Wed May 4 09:14:00 2011
New Revision: 173357
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=173357
Log:
Backport from mainline
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48774
--- Comment #15 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-05-04
09:21:15 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Wed May 4 09:21:09 2011
New Revision: 173359
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=173359
Log:
Backported from
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48809
--- Comment #11 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-05-04
09:19:10 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Wed May 4 09:19:07 2011
New Revision: 173358
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=173358
Log:
Backport from mainline
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48865
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48867
Summary: Using the compilation flag -mfpmath=sse breaks Snes9x
build.
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48809
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48574
--- Comment #13 from vincenzo Innocente vincenzo.innocente at cern dot ch
2011-05-04 10:00:02 UTC ---
is this really fixed?
with gcc version 4.6.1 20110422 (prerelease) (GCC)
the reduced test do compile but
I still get
g++ -c produceICE.ii
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48860
--- Comment #6 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-05-04 10:05:23 UTC ---
Author: uros
Date: Wed May 4 10:05:20 2011
New Revision: 173361
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=173361
Log:
PR target/48860
* config/i386/i386.md
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48574
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48866
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48574
--- Comment #15 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-05-04
10:54:48 UTC ---
Indeed, unlike the reduced testcase, for the original one it triggers during
fold_non_dependent_expr_sfinae which means that processing_template_decl is 0
and
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48851
--- Comment #8 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-05-04
11:04:28 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #7)
0 is a valid null pointer constant in C. If you want to use NULL as a
sentinel
you must always cast it.
I'm sure that is
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48842
--- Comment #3 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ro at CeBiTec dot
Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2011-05-04 11:13:24 UTC ---
--- Comment #1 from Jan Hubicka hubicka at ucw dot cz 2011-05-02 11:54:47
UTC ---
I've fixed identical falure happening on
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48865
--- Comment #2 from bero at arklinux dot org 2011-05-04 11:16:01 UTC ---
It does - if you know how to read it.
It's easy to tell a student who has never used a compiler outside of an IDE how
to add a #warning -- teaching him how to read the
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48842
Rainer Orth ro at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48864
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48856
--- Comment #8 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-05-04
11:08:30 UTC ---
Works for me with 4.6.0 and on the tip of the branch on x86_64 with -m32.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48866
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||aoliva at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48866
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-05-04
12:07:42 UTC ---
cselib actually. Shorter testcase:
struct S { struct S *d[2]; };
struct S *
foo (struct S *x)
{
struct S *y, *z;
y =
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38634
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|error-recovery, |diagnostic
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48851
--- Comment #9 from Michael Matz matz at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-05-04 12:02:44
UTC ---
Also defining NULL as 0 creates problems when passing it to varargs
functions on LP64 platforms, not just for sentinels. As Andreas says, it's a
valid null
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48602
Lionel GUEZ ebay.20.tedlap at spamgourmet dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48865
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-05-04
12:11:04 UTC ---
Teach them to how to pipe the output of gcc -E -dD to grep, it'll do them good
in the long run.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48859
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-05-04
12:33:38 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #0)
The workaround, of course, is to define the empty default constructor in
ConstMember.
Or simply add an empty new-initializer,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48859
Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||rejects-valid
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39055
--- Comment #14 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-05-04
12:38:03 UTC ---
It was discussed on the reflector in messages 15450-3 and 80, but seems never
to have made it into the issues list...
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48602
--- Comment #49 from Thomas Henlich thenlich at users dot sourceforge.net
2011-05-04 12:48:28 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #47)
(In reply to comment #46)
I have started on the second phase of this effort which is to get rid of the
floating
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48860
--- Comment #8 from Jack Howarth howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu 2011-05-04
12:52:02 UTC ---
The assembler is from...
Xcode 4.0.2
Build version 4A2002a
but the assembler from...
Xcode 3.2.6
Component versions: DevToolsCore-1809.0;
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48860
--- Comment #7 from Jack Howarth howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu 2011-05-04
12:49:27 UTC ---
Created attachment 24180
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24180
assembly file for libgcc/../gcc/config/soft-fp/extenddftf2.c with -dp
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48860
--- Comment #9 from Jack Howarth howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu 2011-05-04
12:58:41 UTC ---
Opened radr://9381460 with extenddftf2.s generated with -dp as the testcase.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48826
--- Comment #1 from Ryan Mansfield rmansfield at qnx dot com 2011-05-04
13:01:31 UTC ---
The change that introduced this ICE is rev171033.
http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?view=revisionrevision=171033
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48869
Summary: OpenMP task construct fails to instantiate copy
constructor(same as Bug 36523)
Product: gcc
Version: 4.5.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48602
--- Comment #48 from jvdelisle at frontier dot com 2011-05-04 12:30:59 UTC ---
On 05/04/2011 05:15 AM, ebay.20.tedlap at spamgourmet dot com wrote:
--- Comment #47 from Lionel GUEZebay.20.tedlap at spamgourmet dot com
2011-05-04 12:15:16 UTC
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48869
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48868
Summary: There are no -mtls-dialect=gnu2 run-time tests
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
AssignedTo:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39055
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48860
--- Comment #10 from Jack Howarth howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu 2011-05-04
13:10:23 UTC ---
Could this be similar to the required change from...
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2010-08/msg01024.html
to adapt to the darwin assembler's usage
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48860
--- Comment #11 from Uros Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com 2011-05-04 13:25:28
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #10)
Could this be similar to the required change from...
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2010-08/msg01024.html
to adapt to the
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48853
--- Comment #8 from H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com 2011-05-04 13:33:57
UTC ---
I still got
FAIL: gcc.dg/torture/stackalign/alloca-1.c -O1 (internal compiler error)
FAIL: gcc.dg/torture/stackalign/alloca-1.c -O1 (test for excess errors)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48859
fabien at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||fabien at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47723
--- Comment #14 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-05-04
13:42:19 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #10)
struct S { };
S* p = new S::S();
EDG 4.0-4.3 all reject this as well.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48853
--- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-05-04
14:06:56 UTC ---
Can you track down on which mem_loc_descriptor call these new
DW_OP_GNU_*_type/DW_OP_GNU_{convert,reinterpret}
locs have been added, and for that post a
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48870
Summary: operator== overload of vector types
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P3
Component: c++
AssignedTo:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48826
Ryan Mansfield rmansfield at qnx dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48871
Summary: gcc doesn't accept null pointer value as a template
non-type argument
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48866
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-05-04
14:21:28 UTC ---
The problem is the MEMs nested in other MEM addresses, cselib isn't prepared to
handle it efficiently.
So, either we should break very deep MEM nests using
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48818
--- Comment #2 from Melanie Cappelaere melaniec at enfocus dot com 2011-05-04
14:19:01 UTC ---
Created attachment 24181
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24181
Example with custom allocator
Thank you for the workaround.
Little
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48860
--- Comment #12 from Jack Howarth howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu 2011-05-04
14:13:04 UTC ---
This looks similar to this bug...
http://www.mail-archive.com/mpir-devel@googlegroups.com/msg04286.html
where is claimed these are bugs in the older
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48871
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-05-04
14:37:05 UTC ---
I think this is a dup of PR 10541
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48826
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-05-04
14:10:20 UTC ---
Most probably the backend is reordering insns after var-tracking, it shouldn't
be doing that. ARM/SH/S390 backends all have fixed similar bugs very quickly
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48860
Jack Howarth howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48868
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-05-04
15:31:21 UTC ---
Can't you run the testsuite with -mtls-dialect=gnu2 to see if there are any
failures?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48872
Summary: [C++0x][noexcept] Placement-new problem with non-empty
arguments
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48869
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48853
--- Comment #10 from H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com 2011-05-04 15:37:43
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #9)
Can you track down on which mem_loc_descriptor call these new
DW_OP_GNU_*_type/DW_OP_GNU_{convert,reinterpret}
locs have been added,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48873
Summary: [C++0x][noexcept] Placement-new problem with deleted
destructors
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48868
--- Comment #2 from H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com 2011-05-04 15:42:11
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
Can't you run the testsuite with -mtls-dialect=gnu2 to see if there are any
failures?
90% of gcc testsuites don't use TLS. Run the
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48869
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||4.4.6
Target
part of c is lost already in the
frontend.
Version of the compiler:
gcc version 4.7.0 20110504 (experimental) (GCC)
Target: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48869
--- Comment #3 from rguenther at suse dot de rguenther at suse dot de
2011-05-04 15:46:47 UTC ---
On Wed, 4 May 2011, jakub at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48869
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48636
--- Comment #12 from Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-05-04
16:09:19 UTC ---
Hi,
I discussed some of the issues today with Martin. For the array descriptor
testcase, we really want ipa-cp to be propagate the constant array bounds
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48773
--- Comment #6 from Matthew Fortune mfortune at gmail dot com 2011-05-04
16:19:32 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #5)
This is a known issue introduced by the DF merge. I think that the current
state of affairs is that the passes consuming
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48874
--- Comment #1 from joseph at codesourcery dot com joseph at codesourcery dot
com 2011-05-04 16:17:12 UTC ---
On Wed, 4 May 2011, jb at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
#include stdio.h
#include complex.h
int main()
{
double _Complex a = 0.0 +
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48869
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-05-04
16:25:46 UTC ---
Not sure if it would be ok to request instantiation of say copy ctor when we
are unsure if the var will be firstprivate or not. The copy ctor can be marked
as
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47913
--- Comment #21 from Marc Glisse marc.glisse at normalesup dot org 2011-05-04
16:27:28 UTC ---
Created attachment 24182
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24182
first iteration in patch format
Inserted in ratio, with some cleanup
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48869
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-05-04
16:37:40 UTC ---
Say:
templatetypename T
struct B
{
B () {}
B (const B) = delete;
~B () {}
};
templatetypename T
struct A
{
A () {}
A (const A) { BT b; BT c = b; }
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48773
--- Comment #7 from Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-05-04
16:38:54 UTC ---
Can anyone speculate as to which passes consume REG_DEAD notes or is it a case
of trawling the source? invoking df_note_add_problem in the final pass
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48773
--- Comment #8 from froydnj at codesourcery dot com froydnj at codesourcery
dot com 2011-05-04 16:47:52 UTC ---
On Wed, May 04, 2011 at 04:25:19PM +, mfortune at gmail dot com wrote:
Can anyone speculate as to which passes consume REG_DEAD
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48787
--- Comment #18 from Jerry DeLisle jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-05-04
16:49:17 UTC ---
Ne patch submitted to list for approval.
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2011-05/msg00022.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47913
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48865
--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-05-04
17:10:49 UTC ---
Or, as I've just done, learn how to do it in your favourite editor. For mine
(vim) it's [i to display the value and [^i to jump to the definition, which
seems
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48864
--- Comment #2 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-05-04
17:10:20 UTC ---
Author: burnus
Date: Wed May 4 17:10:15 2011
New Revision: 173385
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=173385
Log:
gcc/
2011-05-04 Tobias
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48874
Janne Blomqvist jb at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48853
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #24170|0 |1
is
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48874
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48636
--- Comment #13 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-05-04
17:30:31 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #12)
Perhaps frontend could help us here since the descriptors are probably
constant after they are initialized, or is there way to
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48853
--- Comment #12 from H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com 2011-05-04 17:24:24
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #11)
Created attachment 24183 [details]
gcc47-pr48853.patch
Is this better?
No, it doesn't handle DW_OP_GNU_const_type:
(gdb) f 0
#0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40315
--- Comment #10 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-05-04
17:38:37 UTC ---
http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/cwg_closed.html#1001 is NAD so I
think we can close this bug as INVALID
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48872
--- Comment #1 from Daniel Krügler daniel.kruegler at googlemail dot com
2011-05-04 17:38:16 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #0)
sigh an error happended when I tryied to transform my original example (using
std::declval) to a form with a minimum of
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48872
--- Comment #2 from Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com 2011-05-04
17:53:25 UTC ---
As I side remark, I'm not sure to understand why your testcases often include
an 'int main { }' line, I don't think are about link-time problems, no? If
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48869
--- Comment #6 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-05-04
17:46:33 UTC ---
I think it would be fine to mark_used the copy ctor in cases where it might or
might not be used.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42616
Charles Wilson gcc.20.cwilson at spamgourmet dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47913
--- Comment #23 from Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com 2011-05-04
17:56:19 UTC ---
Nit (for the future): library patches are diffed from where the library
ChangeLog is.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48853
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #24183|0 |1
is
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48872
--- Comment #3 from Daniel Krügler daniel.kruegler at googlemail dot com
2011-05-04 17:59:21 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #2)
As I side remark, I'm not sure to understand why your testcases often include
an 'int main { }' line, I don't think
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48853
--- Comment #14 from H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com 2011-05-04 18:10:24
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #13)
Created attachment 24184 [details]
gcc47-pr48853.patch
So like this? CONST_DOUBLEs really shouldn't appear in the addresses...
It
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48749
Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40315
Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|SUSPENDED |RESOLVED
1 - 100 of 131 matches
Mail list logo
