[Bug rtl-optimization/48877] Inline asm for rdtsc generates silly code

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48877 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last

[Bug libfortran/48852] Invalid spaces in list-directed output of complex constants

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48852 --- Comment #4 from Thomas Henlich thenlich at users dot sourceforge.net 2011-05-05 06:50:13 UTC --- (In reply to comment #3) neither 0PFw.d nor 1PEw.dEe allow it). However, AFAICS leading blanks are still allowed as they are part of the real

[Bug c++/48872] [C++0x][noexcept] Placement-new problem with non-empty arguments

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48872 --- Comment #5 from Daniel Krügler daniel.kruegler at googlemail dot com 2011-05-05 07:15:12 UTC --- (In reply to comment #1) More information by a different example: It seems that the problem case reacts very sensitive to minor modifications of

[Bug c++/48873] [C++0x][noexcept] Placement-new problem with deleted destructors

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48873 --- Comment #1 from Daniel Krügler daniel.kruegler at googlemail dot com 2011-05-05 07:31:21 UTC --- More information after some analysis: The problem occurs in other unevaluated contexts as well and it is similarly sensitive to very small

[Bug target/48252] ARM neon: problem with consecutive vzip, vuzp and vtrn

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48252 --- Comment #6 from irar at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-05-05 07:35:03 UTC --- Author: irar Date: Thu May 5 07:34:59 2011 New Revision: 173417 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=173417 Log: Backport from mainline: 2011-04-18

[Bug c/48880] New: regression when performing __builtin_object_size in deep inline chain

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48880 Summary: regression when performing __builtin_object_size in deep inline chain Product: gcc Version: 4.6.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug c/48880] regression when performing __builtin_object_size in deep inline chain

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48880 --- Comment #1 from Witold Baryluk baryluk at smp dot if.uj.edu.pl 2011-05-05 08:16:54 UTC --- In original source a c function have this signature: static inline __attribute__((always_inline)) unsigned long __attribute__((warn_unused_result))

[Bug c++/48879] Compilation cannot find file asm/errno.h

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48879 --- Comment #1 from Blanca Mancilla mancilla at cse dot unsw.edu.au 2011-05-05 08:48:29 UTC --- I succeeded in compiling by serring the following environment variables: export C_INCLUDE_PATH=/usr/include/x86_64-linux-gnu export

[Bug c/48880] regression when performing __builtin_object_size in deep inline chain

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48880 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last

[Bug target/48252] ARM neon: problem with consecutive vzip, vuzp and vtrn

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48252 --- Comment #7 from irar at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-05-05 08:39:47 UTC --- Author: irar Date: Thu May 5 08:39:40 2011 New Revision: 173418 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=173418 Log: Backport from mainline: 2011-04-18

[Bug target/48252] ARM neon: problem with consecutive vzip, vuzp and vtrn

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48252 Ira Rosen irar at il dot ibm.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug c++/48879] Compilation cannot find file asm/errno.h

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48879 --- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-05-05 09:11:44 UTC --- Shouldn't this be Component=bootstrap not c++ ? I assume the linux-libc-dev package is installed? That provides asm/errno.h What compiler are you using to

[Bug libstdc++/48881] New: Dynamic link to libstdc++-6.dll / libgcc_s_sjlj-1.dll produces broken binaries

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48881 Summary: Dynamic link to libstdc++-6.dll / libgcc_s_sjlj-1.dll produces broken binaries Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug pch/45979] precompiled headers breakage on 2.6.36-rc Linux/ARM kernels

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45979 --- Comment #10 from Ramana Radhakrishnan ramana at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-05-05 09:52:18 UTC --- Author: ramana Date: Thu May 5 09:52:12 2011 New Revision: 173421 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=173421 Log: For Michael Hope.

[Bug c/48880] regression when performing __builtin_object_size in deep inline chain

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48880 --- Comment #3 from Witold Baryluk baryluk at smp dot if.uj.edu.pl 2011-05-05 09:55:25 UTC --- In my case it only happens if I have two independent calls with different arguments. I do not understand some aspects, but removing some semingly

[Bug c/42544] Bad codegen with signed short cast to unsigned int, then promoted to unsigned long long

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42544 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug c++/48870] operator== overload of vector types

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48870 Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug c++/48871] gcc doesn't accept null pointer value as a template non-type argument

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48871 Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug c++/10541] [DR 354] Is NULL a valid pointer-type template argument?

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10541 Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||boostcpp at

[Bug debug/48843] ICE in dwarf2out_var_location, at dwarf2out.c:22585 with pragma GCC optimize

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48843 Bernhard Reutner-Fischer aldot at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target|

[Bug c/48197] possible wrong code bug at -O0

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48197 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug libfortran/48602] Invalid F conversion of G descriptor for values close to powers of 10

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48602 --- Comment #51 from Lionel GUEZ ebay.20.tedlap at spamgourmet dot com 2011-05-05 10:46:21 UTC --- It is PR48787 and a patch has been submitted for approval. It is fixed on my development trunk. Hello. I do not understand: you say that there

[Bug c++/48879] Compilation cannot find file asm/errno.h

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48879 Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug libfortran/48602] Invalid F conversion of G descriptor for values close to powers of 10

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48602 --- Comment #50 from Lionel GUEZ ebay.20.tedlap at spamgourmet dot com 2011-05-05 10:42:31 UTC --- Can you please provide a short example program, and what version of GFortran you are using? I cannot reproduce the described bug with GFortran

[Bug libfortran/48511] Implement Steele-White algorithm for numeric output

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48511 --- Comment #13 from Thomas Henlich thenlich at users dot sourceforge.net 2011-05-05 10:57:33 UTC --- G95 is actually using this method for list-directed output. print *, .3, .33, .333, ., .3, .33, .333 g95 = 0.3 0.33 0.333

[Bug tree-optimization/46639] [4.6/4.7 Regression] Missing optimization due to function splitting and redundant conditionals

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46639 --- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-05-05 11:03:23 UTC --- Another testcase: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24188 Richard suggests running pass_vrp_early instead of (or in addition to) pass_ccp with some

[Bug tree-optimization/48880] regression when performing __builtin_object_size in deep inline chain

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48880 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug tree-optimization/46639] [4.6/4.7 Regression] Missing optimization due to function splitting and redundant conditionals

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46639 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||baryluk at smp

[Bug c++/48875] Segmentation fault in maybe_clone_body with -fsyntax-only

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48875 Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last

[Bug c++/48882] New: ?: ternary operator fails in certain contexts - compile error

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48882 Summary: ?: ternary operator fails in certain contexts - compile error Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug c++/48883] New: ?: ternary operator fails in certain contexts - link error

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48883 Summary: ?: ternary operator fails in certain contexts - link error Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug c++/48882] ?: ternary operator fails in certain contexts - compile error

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48882 --- Comment #1 from Adele Schmidt adele.schmidthammer at yahoo dot de 2011-05-05 11:37:33 UTC --- no attachment, because precompiled file (extension .ii) was too big

[Bug debug/48866] gcc hangs when -g is set

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48866 --- Comment #5 from Alexandre Oliva aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-05-05 11:54:12 UTC --- I think the problem is that the debug stmts are being expanded into debug insns *before* the code that should precede them. If we expanded the stmts in the

[Bug c++/48883] ?: ternary operator fails in certain contexts - link error

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48883 --- Comment #1 from Adele Schmidt adele.schmidthammer at yahoo dot de 2011-05-05 11:49:25 UTC --- However if(even) fp = myMaxint; else fp = myMinint; does work as expected.

[Bug c++/48884] New: decltype's operand doesn't consider friend declaration

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48884 Summary: decltype's operand doesn't consider friend declaration Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++

[Bug rtl-optimization/48381] [4.7 Regression] internal compiler error: in check_allocation, at ira.c:2094

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48381 --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-05-05 12:05:48 UTC --- Author: jakub Date: Thu May 5 12:05:42 2011 New Revision: 173427 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=173427 Log: PR

[Bug rtl-optimization/48381] [4.7 Regression] internal compiler error: in check_allocation, at ira.c:2094

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48381 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug c++/48883] ?: ternary operator fails in certain contexts - link error

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48883 Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last

[Bug libfortran/48852] Invalid spaces in list-directed output of complex constants

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48852 --- Comment #5 from Janne Blomqvist jb at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-05-05 12:11:02 UTC --- (In reply to comment #4) (In reply to comment #3) neither 0PFw.d nor 1PEw.dEe allow it). However, AFAICS leading blanks are still allowed as they are

[Bug libfortran/48852] Invalid spaces in list-directed output of complex constants

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48852 --- Comment #6 from jvdelisle at frontier dot com 2011-05-05 12:28:01 UTC --- On 05/05/2011 12:04 AM, thenlich at users dot sourceforge.net wrote: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48852 ---snip--- As much as I'd like to, I cannot

[Bug libfortran/48602] Invalid F conversion of G descriptor for values close to powers of 10

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48602 --- Comment #52 from jvdelisle at frontier dot com 2011-05-05 12:30:38 UTC --- On 05/05/2011 04:01 AM, ebay.20.tedlap at spamgourmet dot com wrote: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48602 --- Comment #51 from Lionel GUEZebay.20.tedlap

[Bug c++/48884] decltype's operand doesn't consider friend declaration

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48884 Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||rejects-valid

[Bug libfortran/48602] Invalid F conversion of G descriptor for values close to powers of 10

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48602 --- Comment #53 from Jerry DeLisle jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-05-05 12:35:46 UTC --- The test: print (1pg7.1), 0.96 end Fails in 4.4 and works in 4.5, so this confirms it was fixed quite a while ago. I strongly suggest you upgrade your

[Bug libfortran/48852] Invalid spaces in list-directed output of complex constants

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48852 --- Comment #7 from Janne Blomqvist jb at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-05-05 12:44:42 UTC --- (In reply to comment #6) On 05/05/2011 12:04 AM, thenlich at users dot sourceforge.net wrote: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48852 ---snip---

[Bug c/48885] New: missed optimization with restrict qualifier?

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48885 Summary: missed optimization with restrict qualifier? Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: trivial Priority: P3 Component: c AssignedTo:

[Bug debug/48886] VTA issues with word size integers

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48886 --- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-05-05 12:58:33 UTC --- s/27/28/ of course, sorry.

[Bug libfortran/48878] Default I/O rounding on output should be round to nearest

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48878 Jerry DeLisle jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jvdelisle at

[Bug debug/48866] gcc hangs when -g is set

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48866 Alexandre Oliva aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug debug/48886] New: VTA issues with word size integers

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48886 Summary: VTA issues with word size integers Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: debug AssignedTo:

[Bug fortran/48887] New: [OOP] SELECT TYPE: Associate name shall not be a pointer/allocatable

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48887 Summary: [OOP] SELECT TYPE: Associate name shall not be a pointer/allocatable Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: accepts-invalid Severity:

[Bug debug/48826] ICE in dwarf2out_var_location, at dwarf2out.c:22013

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48826 --- Comment #4 from Ryan Mansfield rmansfield at qnx dot com 2011-05-05 13:19:43 UTC --- The issue with ARM/SH/S390 backends appears to be there was a literal pool split happening in between a call insn and the NOTE_INSN_CALL_ARG_LOCATION. It

[Bug rtl-optimization/48888] New: Creating a copy variable simplify assembly - i686-pc-linux-gnu

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4 Summary: Creating a copy variable simplify assembly - i686-pc-linux-gnu Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug libfortran/48852] Invalid spaces in list-directed output of complex constants

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48852 --- Comment #8 from Thomas Henlich thenlich at users dot sourceforge.net 2011-05-05 13:31:47 UTC --- (In reply to comment #6) Also, See below. Does this give the expected output? print *, (1.0, 0.0) end $ ./a.out

[Bug debug/48866] gcc hangs when -g is set

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48866 --- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-05-05 13:54:18 UTC --- Why are you changing TER for that though? Won't that affect also real code generation rather than just debug insns? I mean there are targets e.g. with MEM

[Bug fortran/48889] New: f951: internal compiler error: in gfc_is_constant_expr, at fortran/expr.c:906

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48889 Summary: f951: internal compiler error: in gfc_is_constant_expr, at fortran/expr.c:906 Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority:

[Bug c/48885] missed optimization with restrict qualifier?

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48885 --- Comment #1 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-05-05 14:50:48 UTC --- Because the standard was interpreted that way when implementing restrict support. And also because otherwise pointers based on a restrict pointer cannot

[Bug c++/48873] [C++0x][noexcept] Placement-new problem with deleted destructors

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48873 --- Comment #2 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-05-05 14:53:44 UTC --- Author: jason Date: Thu May 5 14:53:35 2011 New Revision: 173433 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=173433 Log: PR c++/48873 *

[Bug ada/48844] [4.6/4.7 regression] ICE on assignment of aggregate with discriminated record type

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48844 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4

[Bug middle-end/48668] [4.6/4.7 regression] COMDAT Group signature not emitted in group

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48668 --- Comment #2 from Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-05-05 15:30:32 UTC --- Hi, I am not 100% I understand the problem. For 4.6 we indeed probably should go with reverting to prevous order. We are trying to output both the function

[Bug c++/48749] [4.6/4.7 Regression] internal compiler error: tree check: expected field_decl

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48749 Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug c++/48872] [C++0x][noexcept] Placement-new problem with non-empty arguments

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48872 Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug c++/48873] [C++0x][noexcept] Placement-new problem with deleted destructors

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48873 --- Comment #4 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-05-05 15:29:03 UTC --- *** Bug 48872 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug c++/48873] [C++0x][noexcept] Placement-new problem with deleted destructors

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48873 Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug debug/48853] [4.7 Regression] Wrong DWARF codegen when Pmode != ptr_mode

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48853 --- Comment #16 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-05-05 15:48:22 UTC --- Author: jakub Date: Thu May 5 15:48:18 2011 New Revision: 173436 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=173436 Log: PR debug/48853 *

[Bug fortran/48889] f951: internal compiler error: in gfc_is_constant_expr, at fortran/expr.c:906

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48889 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug ada/48844] [4.6/4.7 regression] ICE on assignment of aggregate with discriminated record type

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48844 --- Comment #5 from Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-05-05 16:27:09 UTC --- Author: ebotcazou Date: Thu May 5 16:27:03 2011 New Revision: 173443 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=173443 Log: PR ada/48844

[Bug ada/48844] [4.6/4.7 regression] ICE on assignment of aggregate with discriminated record type

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48844 Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug ada/48844] [4.6/4.7 regression] ICE on assignment of aggregate with discriminated record type

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48844 --- Comment #4 from Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-05-05 16:22:21 UTC --- Author: ebotcazou Date: Thu May 5 16:22:16 2011 New Revision: 173442 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=173442 Log: PR ada/48844

[Bug c++/31584] [DR502] nested enum not considered dependent

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31584 Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||accepts-invalid

[Bug target/48673] [4.7 Regression] GCC generates WAW and RAW conflicts on IA64.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48673 Bernd Schmidt bernds at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||bernds at gcc

[Bug debug/48159] [4.7 Regression] ICE: SIGSEGV in build2_stat (tree.c:3802) with -O -ftree-loop-distribution -fno-tree-ch -g

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48159 --- Comment #5 from Zdenek Sojka zsojka at seznam dot cz 2011-05-05 18:43:43 UTC --- Created attachment 24191 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24191 reduced testcase from comment #2 $ gcc -O3 -g pr48159-2.c

[Bug fortran/48890] New: length of a character derived-type component

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48890 Summary: length of a character derived-type component Product: gcc Version: 4.6.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: fortran AssignedTo:

[Bug c++/48574] [4.6/4.7 Regression] ICE

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48574 --- Comment #17 from Dodji Seketeli dodji at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-05-05 20:14:09 UTC --- I think the reduced test case below reflects the ICE of the original test case. It needs the -std=c++0x option. struct A { virtual int foo(); }; void

[Bug c++/40975] [4.3/4.4/4.5/4.6 Regression] ICE in copy_tree_r on array new

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40975 --- Comment #11 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-05-05 20:51:00 UTC --- Author: jason Date: Thu May 5 20:50:57 2011 New Revision: 173451 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=173451 Log: PR c++/40975 *

[Bug c++/40975] [4.3/4.4/4.5/4.6 Regression] ICE in copy_tree_r on array new

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40975 --- Comment #12 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-05-05 21:02:09 UTC --- Author: jason Date: Thu May 5 21:02:06 2011 New Revision: 173452 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=173452 Log: PR c++/40975 *

[Bug c++/40975] [4.3/4.4/4.5/4.6 Regression] ICE in copy_tree_r on array new

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40975 --- Comment #14 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-05-05 21:02:53 UTC --- Author: jason Date: Thu May 5 21:02:51 2011 New Revision: 173454 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=173454 Log: PR c++/40975 *

[Bug c++/40975] [4.3/4.4/4.5/4.6 Regression] ICE in copy_tree_r on array new

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40975 --- Comment #13 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-05-05 21:02:48 UTC --- Author: jason Date: Thu May 5 21:02:45 2011 New Revision: 173453 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=173453 Log: PR c++/40975 *

[Bug c++/40975] [4.3/4.4/4.5/4.6 Regression] ICE in copy_tree_r on array new

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40975 Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug c/48885] missed optimization with restrict qualifier?

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48885 Marc Glisse marc.glisse at normalesup dot org changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Bug libstdc++/13631] Problems in messages

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13631 --- Comment #31 from Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com 2011-05-05 21:34:01 UTC --- Created attachment 24194 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24194 Last patch re-diffed vs current mainline

[Bug libstdc++/48891] std functions conflicts with C functions when building with c++0x support.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48891 --- Comment #1 from Alexis Menard alexis.menard at openbossa dot org 2011-05-05 21:35:55 UTC --- glibc 2.13-5. binutils 2.21-7 Archlinux.

[Bug libstdc++/48891] New: std functions conflicts with C functions when building with c++0x support.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48891 Summary: std functions conflicts with C functions when building with c++0x support. Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug libstdc++/48891] std functions conflicts with C functions when building with c++0x support (and using namespace std)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48891 --- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-05-05 22:03:55 UTC --- (In reply to comment #0) and build it with : g++ main.cpp -std=c++0x -std=gnu++0x -o test There's no point specifying two -std options, only the last one

[Bug bootstrap/48879] Compilation cannot find file asm/errno.h

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48879 Blanca Mancilla mancilla at cse dot unsw.edu.au changed: What|Removed |Added Component|c++

[Bug c++/48892] New: [C++0x] XFAILed bogus errors in constexpr-48089.C

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48892 Summary: [C++0x] XFAILed bogus errors in constexpr-48089.C Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: rejects-valid Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug libstdc++/48891] std functions conflicts with C functions when building with c++0x support (and using namespace std)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48891 --- Comment #3 from Alexis Menard alexis.menard at openbossa dot org 2011-05-05 22:17:36 UTC --- (In reply to comment #2) (In reply to comment #0) and build it with : g++ main.cpp -std=c++0x -std=gnu++0x -o test There's no point

[Bug libstdc++/13631] Problems in messages

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13631 --- Comment #32 from Sam Varshavchik mr...@courier-mta.com 2011-05-05 22:25:50 UTC --- Created attachment 24196 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24196 Sample test program Here's a simple test program that I threw together. It

[Bug c++/48879] Compilation cannot find file asm/errno.h

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48879 --- Comment #4 from Blanca Mancilla mancilla at cse dot unsw.edu.au 2011-05-05 22:05:53 UTC --- Created attachment 24195 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24195 output of gcc -v -x c /dev/null -c

[Bug libstdc++/48891] std functions conflicts with C functions when building with c++0x support (and using namespace std)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48891 --- Comment #4 from Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com 2011-05-05 22:46:39 UTC --- Just wanted to add that the real reason the issue is more subtle now in C++0x mode than it used to be (and still is) in C++03 mode as an extension, is

[Bug middle-end/48893] New: [4.7 Regression] ICE in evaulate_conditions_for_edge at ipa-inline-analysis.c:477

++ Thread model: posix gcc version 4.7.0 20110505 (experimental) [trunk revision 173407] (GCC) Seems to be HP-UX 11.00 specific.

[Bug libstdc++/48891] std functions conflicts with C functions when building with c++0x support (and using namespace std)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48891 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at

[Bug fortran/48894] New: generic omp_get_ancestor_thread_num(l(i)) produces incorrect output

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48894 Summary: generic omp_get_ancestor_thread_num(l(i)) produces incorrect output Product: gcc Version: 4.5.3 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: minor Priority: P3

[Bug target/48895] New: config/vms/vms-ar.c:main: variable ‘cwd’ set but not used

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48895 Summary: config/vms/vms-ar.c:main: variable ‘cwd’ set but not used Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: build Severity: normal

[Bug middle-end/48893] [4.7 Regression] ICE in evaulate_conditions_for_edge at ipa-inline-analysis.c:477

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48893 --- Comment #1 from dave at hiauly1 dot hia.nrc.ca 2011-05-05 23:33:46 UTC --- Attached .i. cc1 compile args are: -fpreprocessed pex-unix.i -quiet -dumpbase pex-unix.c -auxbase-strip pic/pex-unix.o -g -O2 -Wextra -Wall -Wwrite-strings

[Bug target/48896] New: avr.o warnings

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48896 Summary: avr.o warnings Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: build Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: target AssignedTo:

[Bug target/48897] New: mn10300.c:extract_bundle’: error: variable ‘s’ set but not used

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48897 Summary: mn10300.c:extract_bundle’: error: variable ‘s’ set but not used Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: build Severity: normal

[Bug middle-end/48893] [4.7 Regression] ICE in evaulate_conditions_for_edge at ipa-inline-analysis.c:477

/gnu/gcc/objdir.1/gcc/cc1 -fpreprocessed pex-unix.i -quiet -dumpbase pex-unix.c -auxbase-strip pic/pex-unix.o -g -O2 -Wextra -Wall -Wwrite-strings -Wc++-compat -Wstrict-prototypes -pedantic -version -fPIC -o pex-unix.s Reading symbols for shared libraries . done GNU C (GCC) version 4.7.0 20110505

[Bug target/48898] New: i386/netware.c:i386_nlm_maybe_mangle_decl_assembler_name: ‘cvt’ undeclared

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48898 Summary: i386/netware.c:i386_nlm_maybe_mangle_decl_assembler_na me: ‘cvt’ undeclared Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: build Severity:

[Bug target/48900] New: unnecessary duplicate __tls_get_addr calls

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48900 Summary: unnecessary duplicate __tls_get_addr calls Product: gcc Version: 4.5.3 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: target AssignedTo:

[Bug target/48899] New: enum conversion initializing global_options_init.x_iq2000_tune

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48899 Summary: enum conversion initializing global_options_init.x_iq2000_tune Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: build Severity: normal

  1   2   >