C++ template bugs in gcc 4.6

2011-05-21 Thread Ruben Safir
I've been working with gcc 4.6 with C++ doing some templates exercises I seem to have some unexplained behavior which might be a bug, or maybe I'm ignorant. First - let me give you a link for my code http://www.nylxs.com/docs/linklist.tgz gcc version ruben@www2:~> g++ -v Using built-in specs.

[Bug c++/48780] [C++0x] scoped enumerations and va_arg (default argument promotions)

2011-05-21 Thread jason at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48780 --- Comment #2 from Jason Merrill 2011-05-22 00:28:47 UTC --- Author: jason Date: Sun May 22 00:28:44 2011 New Revision: 174022 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=174022 Log: PR c++/48780 * cvt.c (type_promotes_to): Wa

[Bug c++/48945] [C++0x] static constexpr member function cannot be defined out-of class

2011-05-21 Thread jason at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48945 --- Comment #3 from Jason Merrill 2011-05-22 00:29:06 UTC --- Author: jason Date: Sun May 22 00:29:03 2011 New Revision: 174023 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=174023 Log: PR c++/48945 * decl.c (revert_static_member

[Bug c/49096] internal compiler error: in calc_dfs_tree, at dominance.c:394

2011-05-21 Thread steven at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49096 Steven Bosscher changed: What|Removed |Added CC||steven at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #

[Bug tree-optimization/48988] [4.7 regression] ICE at pred_chain_length_cmp at tree-ssa-uninit.c:1624

2011-05-21 Thread xinliangli at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48988 --- Comment #7 from davidxl 2011-05-22 00:01:13 UTC --- (In reply to comment #6) > Created attachment 24323 [details] > fix Please verify. Davdi

[Bug fortran/48699] [4.6/4.7 Regression] [OOP] MOVE_ALLOC inside SELECT TYPE

2011-05-21 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48699 --- Comment #12 from Dominique d'Humieres 2011-05-21 23:32:58 UTC --- The patch in comment #11 fixes the runtime for the tests in comments #0 and #9. However the other tests give a backtrace on x86_64-apple-darwin10. and valgrind reports errors o

[Bug tree-optimization/48988] [4.7 regression] ICE at pred_chain_length_cmp at tree-ssa-uninit.c:1624

2011-05-21 Thread xinliangli at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48988 --- Comment #6 from davidxl 2011-05-21 23:30:34 UTC --- Created attachment 24323 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24323 fix

[Bug c++/49105] New: [C++0x][SFINAE] ICE during list-initialization of rvalue-references to const

2011-05-21 Thread daniel.kruegler at googlemail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49105 Summary: [C++0x][SFINAE] ICE during list-initialization of rvalue-references to const Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug fortran/49103] [4.6/4.7 Regression] local variables exchange values / wrong code with -O3

2011-05-21 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49103 --- Comment #4 from Dominique d'Humieres 2011-05-21 23:11:01 UTC --- Reverting revision 169083 on trunk fixes this pr (see http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-01/msg01442.html for its motivation). Further reduced test: !--

[Bug rtl-optimization/49007] ICE in extract_true_false_edges_from_block at tree-cfg.c:7379

2011-05-21 Thread danglin at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49007 --- Comment #10 from John David Anglin 2011-05-21 22:47:34 UTC --- This PR seems similar to PR rtl-optimization/40710. It seems opposite_needed is incorrectly calculated after the first delay slot iteration in fill_slots_from_thread: mark_t

[Bug c++/48780] [C++0x] scoped enumerations and va_arg (default argument promotions)

2011-05-21 Thread jason at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48780 --- Comment #1 from Jason Merrill 2011-05-21 22:01:32 UTC --- Author: jason Date: Sat May 21 22:01:29 2011 New Revision: 174005 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=174005 Log: PR c++/48780 * cvt.c (type_promotes_to): Do

[Bug c++/48945] [C++0x] static constexpr member function cannot be defined out-of class

2011-05-21 Thread jason at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48945 --- Comment #2 from Jason Merrill 2011-05-21 22:01:48 UTC --- Author: jason Date: Sat May 21 22:01:45 2011 New Revision: 174007 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=174007 Log: PR c++/48945 * decl.c (grokdeclarator): Don

[Bug c++/48945] [C++0x] static constexpr member function cannot be defined out-of class

2011-05-21 Thread jason at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48945 --- Comment #1 from Jason Merrill 2011-05-21 22:01:40 UTC --- Author: jason Date: Sat May 21 22:01:38 2011 New Revision: 174006 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=174006 Log: PR c++/48945 * decl.c (revert_static_member

[Bug c++/49066] [C++0x] Non-defining declaration of deleted function suppresses usage validation

2011-05-21 Thread jason at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49066 --- Comment #3 from Jason Merrill 2011-05-21 21:35:53 UTC --- Author: jason Date: Sat May 21 21:35:50 2011 New Revision: 174003 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=174003 Log: PR c++/49066 * decl.c (duplicate_decls): Pr

[Bug fortran/49103] [4.6/4.7 Regression] local variables exchange values / wrong code with -O3

2011-05-21 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49103 --- Comment #3 from Dominique d'Humieres 2011-05-21 21:21:09 UTC --- Created attachment 24322 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24322 reduced test

[Bug fortran/49103] [4.6/4.7 Regression] local variables exchange values / wrong code with -O3

2011-05-21 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49103 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug rtl-optimization/49095] Horrible code generation for trivial decrement with test

2011-05-21 Thread torva...@linux-foundation.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49095 --- Comment #3 from Linus Torvalds 2011-05-21 20:42:26 UTC --- Hmm. Looking at that code generation, it strikes me that even with the odd load store situation, why do we have that "test" instruction? c:8b 10mov(%ea

[Bug fortran/48699] [4.6/4.7 Regression] [OOP] MOVE_ALLOC inside SELECT TYPE

2011-05-21 Thread janus at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48699 --- Comment #11 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-05-21 20:09:07 UTC --- (In reply to comment #9) > program testmv1 > > type bar > end type > > type, extends(bar) :: bar2 > end type > > class(bar), allocatable :: sm > type(bar2), a

[Bug c++/49102] [C++0x] Use of deleted copy constructor not diagnosed

2011-05-21 Thread schaub.johannes at googlemail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49102 --- Comment #1 from Johannes Schaub 2011-05-21 20:04:16 UTC --- (In reply to comment #0) > The following program should be diagnosed at the call to "f" for using a > deleted copy constructor in an lvalue to rvalue conversion > I'm sorry. I mean

[Bug ada/49097] gnatbind link fails to find version_string, potential ranlib concurrency problem

2011-05-21 Thread jsm28 at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49097 Joseph S. Myers changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug ada/49097] gnatbind link fails to find version_string, potential ranlib concurrency problem

2011-05-21 Thread jsm28 at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49097 --- Comment #3 from Joseph S. Myers 2011-05-21 19:45:31 UTC --- Author: jsm28 Date: Sat May 21 19:45:27 2011 New Revision: 174002 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=174002 Log: PR ada/49097 * gcc-interface/Make-lang.in

[Bug fortran/48699] [4.6/4.7 Regression] [OOP] MOVE_ALLOC inside SELECT TYPE

2011-05-21 Thread janus at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48699 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[OOP] MOVE_ALLOC inside |[4.6/4.7 Regression] [OOP]

[Bug fortran/48699] [OOP] MOVE_ALLOC inside SELECT TYPE

2011-05-21 Thread janus at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48699 --- Comment #9 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-05-21 19:33:32 UTC --- r174001 fixes the test cases in comment #1 and #4. The test case in comment #0 still fails. Reduced version: program testmv1 type bar end type type, extends(bar) ::

[Bug ada/49097] gnatbind link fails to find version_string, potential ranlib concurrency problem

2011-05-21 Thread amylaar at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49097 --- Comment #2 from Jorn Wolfgang Rennecke 2011-05-21 19:23:15 UTC --- (In reply to comment #1) > Created attachment 24317 [details] > untested patch Looking at the patch, I agree that it should fix the problem. > Please see if this patch (unte

[Bug fortran/48699] [OOP] MOVE_ALLOC inside SELECT TYPE

2011-05-21 Thread janus at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48699 --- Comment #8 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-05-21 19:12:56 UTC --- Author: janus Date: Sat May 21 19:12:51 2011 New Revision: 174001 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=174001 Log: 2011-05-21 Janus Weil PR fortran/4

[Bug tree-optimization/48988] [4.7 regression] ICE at pred_chain_length_cmp at tree-ssa-uninit.c:1624

2011-05-21 Thread ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48988 --- Comment #5 from Eric Botcazou 2011-05-21 19:05:36 UTC --- > On x86_linux, I can not reproduce the problem: Try to increase your ulimit settings.

[Bug rtl-optimization/49095] Horrible code generation for trivial decrement with test

2011-05-21 Thread torva...@linux-foundation.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49095 --- Comment #2 from Linus Torvalds 2011-05-21 18:41:15 UTC --- (In reply to comment #1) > > On the RTL side combine tries to do > > Trying 7, 8 -> 9: > Failed to match this instruction: > (parallel [ > (set (mem/f:DI (reg/v/f:DI 63 [ arg

[Bug fortran/49103] local variables exchange values / wrong code with -O3

2011-05-21 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49103 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug inline-asm/48637] %c in ARM inline asm leads to ICE (in arm_print_operand)

2011-05-21 Thread rearnsha at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48637 Richard Earnshaw changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/49092] [4.7 Regression] ice in tree_add_const_value_attribute

2011-05-21 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49092 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug bootstrap/49104] New: bootstrap failure on AMD K6-2 with illegal instruction (cmove) in stage2

2011-05-21 Thread rfo at gmx dot de
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49104 Summary: bootstrap failure on AMD K6-2 with illegal instruction (cmove) in stage2 Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug fortran/49103] New: local variables exchange values / wrong code with -O3

2011-05-21 Thread thomas.orgis at awi dot de
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49103 Summary: local variables exchange values / wrong code with -O3 Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: fortran Assign

[Bug tree-optimization/48988] [4.7 regression] ICE at pred_chain_length_cmp at tree-ssa-uninit.c:1624

2011-05-21 Thread xinliangli at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48988 davidxl changed: What|Removed |Added CC||xinliangli at gmail dot com --- Comment #4 from

[Bug c++/49102] New: Use of deleted copy constructor not diagnosed

2011-05-21 Thread schaub.johannes at googlemail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49102 Summary: Use of deleted copy constructor not diagnosed Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++ AssignedTo: unassi

[Bug fortran/48955] [4.6/4.7 Regression] Wrong result for array assignment due to missing temporary

2011-05-21 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48955 --- Comment #8 from Thomas Koenig 2011-05-21 15:12:47 UTC --- Created attachment 24320 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24320 Tentative patch Paul, what do you think of this approach? It fixes the test case, and passes regre

[Bug target/49098] unused parameters in rx.c:rx_memory_move_cost

2011-05-21 Thread nickc at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49098 --- Comment #1 from Nick Clifton 2011-05-21 16:35:41 UTC --- Author: nickc Date: Sat May 21 16:35:38 2011 New Revision: 173999 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=173999 Log: PR target/49098 * config/rx/rx.c (rx_memory_

[Bug tree-optimization/49093] [4.6/4.7 Regression] ICE in vect_enhance_data_refs_alignment() with volatile inside peeled loop

2011-05-21 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49093 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #2 from

[Bug rtl-optimization/49007] ICE in extract_true_false_edges_from_block at tree-cfg.c:7379

2011-05-21 Thread dave at hiauly1 dot hia.nrc.ca
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49007 --- Comment #9 from dave at hiauly1 dot hia.nrc.ca 2011-05-21 14:57:02 UTC --- > Could this have been fixed by PR 42775 which does not change reorg but rather > free_cfg? No. I have tried it on hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.11 and just tried it with darwin

[Bug target/41894] wrong code with -fno-split-wide-types

2011-05-21 Thread ilya.lesokhin at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41894 --- Comment #12 from Ilya Lesokhin 2011-05-21 14:47:33 UTC --- Created attachment 24319 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24319 simple test case i belive this is the same bug. the problem occurs when using r28,r29 and accesing

[Bug target/48529] [x32] Testsuite failures

2011-05-21 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48529 --- Comment #7 from H.J. Lu 2011-05-21 13:57:01 UTC --- Objective C failures: FAIL: objc.dg/torture/forward-1.m -O0 -fgnu-runtime execution test FAIL: objc.dg/torture/forward-1.m -O1 -fgnu-runtime execution test FAIL: objc.dg/torture/forward

[Bug target/49101] New: [x32] Extra instruction in compare

2011-05-21 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
6(%rsp), %rdi movl$0, %eax movq$-1, %rcx repnz scasb notq%rcx cmpl$6, %ecx je.L2 callabort .L2: movl$0, %eax addq$72, %rsp .cfi_def_cfa_offset 8 ret .cfi_endproc .LFE0: .sizemain, .-main .ident"GCC:

[Bug rtl-optimization/49088] Combine fails to properly handle zero-extension and signed int constant

2011-05-21 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49088 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #24315|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug c/49096] internal compiler error: in calc_dfs_tree, at dominance.c:394

2011-05-21 Thread engrwahidmemon at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49096 --- Comment #2 from engrwahidmemon at gmail dot com 2011-05-21 11:52:13 UTC --- Thanks alot. Can you please tell me who is the author of plugin? May be I misunderstood, the plugin that I am using is written by me. Regards Abdul On Sat, May 21, 2

[Bug c++/49100] [OpenMP]: Compiler error when inline method defined within OpenMP loop

2011-05-21 Thread bisqwit at iki dot fi
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49100 --- Comment #1 from Joel Yliluoma 2011-05-21 11:31:46 UTC --- It also does not happen with C's nested functions. This for instance compiles and works just fine (to my surprise). #include int main() { int a; #pragma omp parallel for

[Bug ada/49097] gnatbind link fails to find version_string, potential ranlib concurrency problem

2011-05-21 Thread jsm28 at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49097 --- Comment #1 from Joseph S. Myers 2011-05-21 11:24:11 UTC --- Created attachment 24317 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24317 untested patch Please see if this patch (untested) fixes the problem for you. If so I'll commit i

[Bug c++/49100] New: [OpenMP]: Compiler error when inline method defined within OpenMP loop

2011-05-21 Thread bisqwit at iki dot fi
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49100 Summary: [OpenMP]: Compiler error when inline method defined within OpenMP loop Product: gcc Version: 4.6.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug target/49099] New: sparc.c:‘sparc_solaris_elf_asm_named_section’ declared ‘static’ but never defined

2011-05-21 Thread amylaar at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49099 Summary: sparc.c:‘sparc_solaris_elf_asm_named_section’ declared ‘static’ but never defined Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: build Severity

[Bug target/49098] New: unused parameters in rx.c:rx_memory_move_cost

2011-05-21 Thread amylaar at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49098 Summary: unused parameters in rx.c:rx_memory_move_cost Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: build Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: targ

[Bug ada/49097] New: gnatbind link fails to find version_string, potential ranlib concurrency problem

2011-05-21 Thread amylaar at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49097 Summary: gnatbind link fails to find version_string, potential ranlib concurrency problem Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: build Severity:

[Bug c/49096] internal compiler error: in calc_dfs_tree, at dominance.c:394

2011-05-21 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49096 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug rtl-optimization/49095] Horrible code generation for trivial decrement with test

2011-05-21 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49095 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Target||x86_64-*-*, i?86-*-* Statu

[Bug tree-optimization/48988] [4.7 regression] ICE at pred_chain_length_cmp at tree-ssa-uninit.c:1624

2011-05-21 Thread doko at ubuntu dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48988 Matthias Klose changed: What|Removed |Added CC||doko at ubuntu dot com --- Comment #2 fr

[Bug target/49089] Regression on CFP2006 on Bulldozer From Splitting AVX 32-byte Unaligned Loads

2011-05-21 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49089 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||missed-optimization Status

[Bug c++/49092] [4.7 Regression] ice in tree_add_const_value_attribute

2011-05-21 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49092 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.7.0 Summary|ice in

[Bug tree-optimization/49093] [4.6/4.7 Regression] ICE in vect_enhance_data_refs_alignment() with volatile inside peeled loop

2011-05-21 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49093 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/48988] [4.7 regression] ICE at pred_chain_length_cmp at tree-ssa-uninit.c:1624

2011-05-21 Thread ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48988 --- Comment #3 from Eric Botcazou 2011-05-21 09:27:39 UTC --- To reproduce on Linux, in the build dir: cp gcc/ada/rts/system.ads . chmod a+w system.ads edit system.ads and change ZCX_By_Default to False gcc/gnat1 gcc/ada/rts/g-catiio.adb

[Bug c++/49085] Crash with SIGSEGV during compilation.

2011-05-21 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49085 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #

[Bug c/49096] New: internal compiler error: in calc_dfs_tree, at dominance.c:394

2011-05-21 Thread dietwo at hotmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49096 Summary: internal compiler error: in calc_dfs_tree, at dominance.c:394 Product: gcc Version: 4.5.3 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: blocker Priority: P3 Comp