[Bug ada/49084] [4.7 regression] bootstrap failure with Ada enabled

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49084 --- Comment #2 from Anh Vo anhvofrcaus at gmail dot com 2011-05-23 18:49:10 UTC --- It will be fine if the fix goes into the latest snapshot.

[Bug rtl-optimization/49007] ICE in extract_true_false_edges_from_block at tree-cfg.c:7379

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49007 --- Comment #20 from dave at hiauly1 dot hia.nrc.ca 2011-05-23 18:52:27 UTC --- On Mon, 23 May 2011, ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: This code fails to handle the case where there already is a use. This should have been fixed in 4.5 and

[Bug target/47110] mips-openbsd mips.o build fails for lack of ASM_OUTPUT_DEF definition

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47110 rsand...@gcc.gnu.org rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug libfortran/48906] Wrong rounding results with -m32

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48906 --- Comment #8 from Jerry DeLisle jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-05-23 19:00:54 UTC --- Status: I am down to about 5 testsuite failures on the patch for this. There is a lot if interplay going on, so i will be factoring the code some as part

[Bug c++/48884] decltype's operand doesn't consider friend declaration

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48884 Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug rtl-optimization/49007] ICE in extract_true_false_edges_from_block at tree-cfg.c:7379

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49007 --- Comment #21 from Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-05-23 19:33:36 UTC --- Ok to backport this fix after testing to 4.3 and 4.4? I would also like to backport this fix PR rtl-optimization/42775 * cfgrtl.c

[Bug fortran/48955] [4.6/4.7 Regression] Wrong result for array assignment due to missing temporary

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48955 --- Comment #10 from Thomas Koenig tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-05-23 20:01:10 UTC --- Hi Paul, just two questions, for my understanding: With your patch, what is the difference between GFC_CAN_REVERSE and GFC_REVERSE_NOT_SET? And why do

[Bug libfortran/49024] REAL*16 ERFC_SCALED inaccuracy

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49024 --- Comment #2 from Francois-Xavier Coudert fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-05-23 19:53:31 UTC --- The 128-bit code for scaled erfc in Cephes is terrible. For ERFC_SCALED(1), it gives: 0.427592... instead of: 0.427583... I don't see any

[Bug lto/49123] [4.6 Regression] FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/pr48973-[12].c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49123 --- Comment #10 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-05-23 20:38:19 UTC --- Author: jakub Date: Mon May 23 20:38:17 2011 New Revision: 174088 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=174088 Log: PR lto/49123 *

[Bug lto/49123] [4.6 Regression] FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/pr48973-[12].c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49123 --- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-05-23 20:37:22 UTC --- Author: jakub Date: Mon May 23 20:37:18 2011 New Revision: 174087 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=174087 Log: PR lto/49123 *

[Bug lto/49123] [4.6 Regression] FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/pr48973-[12].c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49123 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug c/49128] -mtune=native generates unsupported instructions

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49128 --- Comment #3 from natchouf nathanael.schaeffer+ml at gmail dot com 2011-05-23 20:32:14 UTC --- Oups, I'm sorry. -mtune should be replaced by -march everywhere in my report... Thanks for the patch.

[Bug c/49128] -mtune=native generates unsupported instructions

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49128 --- Comment #4 from natchouf nathanael.schaeffer+ml at gmail dot com 2011-05-23 20:36:15 UTC --- (In reply to comment #2) A patch is posted at http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-05/msg01664.html in the patch you linked to, I think there

[Bug debug/49130] New: discrepancies between DW_AT_name and demangler

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49130 Summary: discrepancies between DW_AT_name and demangler Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: debug AssignedTo:

[Bug libfortran/49024] REAL*16 ERFC_SCALED inaccuracy

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49024 Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||burnus at gcc

[Bug c++/49132] New: [C++0x] Aggregate-initialization rejected for class with const data member

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49132 Summary: [C++0x] Aggregate-initialization rejected for class with const data member Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug debug/49131] New: destructors missing DW_AT_vtable_elem_location

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49131 Summary: destructors missing DW_AT_vtable_elem_location Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: debug AssignedTo:

[Bug libfortran/49024] REAL*16 ERFC_SCALED inaccuracy

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49024 Francois-Xavier Coudert fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|fxcoudert at gcc dot

[Bug target/44618] [4.4/4.5/4.6/4.7 regression] wrong code with -frename-registers

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44618 --- Comment #22 from Edmar Wienskoski edmar at freescale dot com 2011-05-23 21:57:08 UTC --- I completed re-testing everything. It turns out I cannot reproduce the original error on gcc-4.4 (rev 173968) So, I am submitting only the patch that I

[Bug target/49133] New: [4.6 Regression] modification of aliased __m128d miscompiles

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49133 Summary: [4.6 Regression] modification of aliased __m128d miscompiles Product: gcc Version: 4.6.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug target/44618] [4.4/4.5/4.6/4.7 regression] wrong code with -frename-registers

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44618 --- Comment #23 from Edmar Wienskoski edmar at freescale dot com 2011-05-23 21:58:28 UTC --- Created attachment 24337 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24337 This patch was tested against 4.5/4.6/4.7

[Bug c++/49132] [C++0x] Aggregate-initialization rejected for class with const data member

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49132 --- Comment #2 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-05-23 22:08:46 UTC --- It's annoying how GCC bugzilla tends not to send mail to people when I add them to CC even if I also add a comment. Anyway, Fabien, please take a look at this

[Bug c++/49132] [DR 178] Aggregate-initialization rejected for class with const data member

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49132 Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|Aggregate-initialization|[DR 178]

[Bug c++/49132] [4.6/4.7 regression] Aggregate-initialization rejected for class with const data member

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49132 Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||4.5.1

[Bug c++/49132] [C++0x] Aggregate-initialization rejected for class with const data member

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49132 Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last

[Bug c++/49132] Aggregate-initialization rejected for class with const data member

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49132 Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||rejects-valid

[Bug rtl-optimization/40086] [4.5 Regression]: cris-elf gfortran.dg/forall_1.f90 -O1 execution

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40086 --- Comment #20 from John David Anglin danglin at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-05-23 22:31:59 UTC --- Author: danglin Date: Mon May 23 22:31:55 2011 New Revision: 174090 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=174090 Log: PR

[Bug rtl-optimization/49007] ICE in extract_true_false_edges_from_block at tree-cfg.c:7379

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49007 --- Comment #22 from John David Anglin danglin at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-05-23 22:31:59 UTC --- Author: danglin Date: Mon May 23 22:31:55 2011 New Revision: 174090 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=174090 Log: PR

[Bug c++/49105] [C++0x][SFINAE] ICE during list-initialization of rvalue-references to const

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49105 --- Comment #2 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-05-23 22:56:08 UTC --- Author: jason Date: Mon May 23 22:56:04 2011 New Revision: 174093 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=174093 Log: PR c++/49105 *

[Bug c++/49105] [C++0x][SFINAE] ICE during list-initialization of rvalue-references to const

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49105 --- Comment #1 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-05-23 22:56:00 UTC --- Author: jason Date: Mon May 23 22:55:56 2011 New Revision: 174092 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=174092 Log: PR c++/49105 *

[Bug c++/48106] [C++0x] ICE with scoped enum with fixed underlying type

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48106 --- Comment #2 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-05-23 22:55:51 UTC --- Author: jason Date: Mon May 23 22:55:46 2011 New Revision: 174091 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=174091 Log: PR c++/48106 *

[Bug c++/49132] [DR 178] Aggregate-initialization rejected for class with const data member

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49132 --- Comment #6 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-05-23 23:16:02 UTC --- (In reply to comment #2) It's annoying how GCC bugzilla tends not to send mail to people when I add them to CC even if I also add a comment. Anyway,

[Bug c++/49134] New: ICE in g++.dg/cpp0x/constexpr tests for arm

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49134 Summary: ICE in g++.dg/cpp0x/constexpr tests for arm Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++ AssignedTo:

[Bug tree-optimization/49135] New: ICE in gcc.c-torture/execute/920302-1.c on arm

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49135 Summary: ICE in gcc.c-torture/execute/920302-1.c on arm Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: tree-optimization

[Bug c++/49102] [C++0x] Use of deleted copy constructor not diagnosed

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49102 --- Comment #2 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-05-24 03:49:07 UTC --- Author: jason Date: Tue May 24 03:49:03 2011 New Revision: 174101 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=174101 Log: PR c++/49102 *

[Bug target/49114] [x32] 454.calculix in SPEC CPU 2006 failed

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49114 --- Comment #1 from H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com 2011-05-24 04:40:08 UTC --- gen_reload generates wrong code for (gdb) call debug_rtx (out) (reg:SI 1 dx) (gdb) call debug_rtx (in) (plus:SI (subreg:SI (reg/v/f:DI 182 [ b ]) 0)

[Bug target/49114] [x32] 454.calculix in SPEC CPU 2006 failed

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49114 --- Comment #2 from H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com 2011-05-24 05:12:46 UTC --- For (insn 588 587 589 28 (set (mem:DF (zero_extend:DI (plus:SI (subreg:SI (reg/v/f:DI 182 [ b ]) 0) (const_int 8 [0x8]))) [4 MEM[base:

<    1   2