[Bug middle-end/49147] graphite branch ICEs with -fgraphite-opencl-ignore-dep

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49147 Alexey Kravets mr.kayrick at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mr.kayrick at

[Bug c++/49165] [4.3/4.4/4.5/4.6/4.7 Regression] ICE on for-loop/throw combination

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49165 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug fortran/49159] OpenMP compilation errors

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49159 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug tree-optimization/49038] [4.5/4.6/4.7 Regression] -ftree-vectorise introduces reads past end of array

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49038 --- Comment #4 from irar at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-05-26 07:50:14 UTC --- Author: irar Date: Thu May 26 07:50:09 2011 New Revision: 174265 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=174265 Log: PR tree-optimization/49038 *

[Bug rtl-optimization/49169] ARM: optimisations strip the Thumb/ARM mode bit off function pointers

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49169 Mikael Pettersson mikpe at it dot uu.se changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mikpe at it dot

[Bug middle-end/49168] [4.7 Regression] Aligned store used with unaligned address

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49168 --- Comment #1 from rguenther at suse dot de rguenther at suse dot de 2011-05-26 07:58:45 UTC --- On Wed, 25 May 2011, hjl.tools at gmail dot com wrote: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49168 Summary: [4.7 Regression]

[Bug target/49168] [4.7 Regression] Aligned store used with unaligned address

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49168 Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target||x86_64-*-*,

[Bug rtl-optimization/49169] ARM: optimisations strip the Thumb/ARM mode bit off function pointers

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49169 --- Comment #2 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-05-26 08:20:22 UTC --- There are several places in the compiler where we assume DECL_ALIGN constraints the lower bits of the address of the DECL. See several similar bugs in

[Bug libobjc/49166] [4.7 Regression] Many objc failures

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49166 Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.7.0

[Bug c++/49165] [4.3/4.4/4.5/4.6/4.7 Regression] ICE on for-loop/throw combination

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49165 --- Comment #6 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-05-26 08:25:26 UTC --- !VOID_TYPE_P (TREE_TYPE (TREE_OPERAND (pred, 1))) 2578 !VOID_TYPE_P (TREE_TYPE (TREE_OPERAND (pred, 2 shouldn't either none or both

[Bug rtl-optimization/49169] ARM: optimisations strip the Thumb/ARM mode bit off function pointers

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49169 --- Comment #3 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-05-26 08:30:21 UTC --- Btw, we finally should introduce a target hook for this I think.

[Bug c++/49165] [4.3/4.4/4.5/4.6/4.7 Regression] ICE on for-loop/throw combination

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49165 --- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-05-26 08:47:36 UTC --- No. Both arms shouldn't be VOID_TYPE_P, otherwise the COND_EXPR would be VOID_TYPE_P too and we really shouldn't be using the COND_EXPR's value. The problem is

[Bug libstdc++/49141] 26_numerics/complex/cons/48760.cc FAILs on Tru64 UNIX V5.1B, Solaris 8 and 9

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49141 --- Comment #9 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2011-05-26 09:26:13 UTC --- --- Comment #6 from Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com 2011-05-24 15:00:21 UTC --- Rainer, please confirm that

[Bug libstdc++/49141] 26_numerics/complex/cons/48760.cc FAILs on Tru64 UNIX V5.1B, Solaris 8 and 9

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49141 --- Comment #10 from Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com 2011-05-26 09:37:55 UTC --- (In reply to comment #9) that passed before. I don't believe this is related and probably warrants a new PR. For sure isn't related to my tweak,

[Bug c++/49118] Endless operator- chain causes infinite loop

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49118 --- Comment #6 from Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com 2011-05-26 09:41:10 UTC --- Maybe Jason can give you some tips, better sending the patch to the mailing list for that, though, Bugzilla isn't meant for patches. CC Jason.

[Bug libobjc/49166] [4.7 Regression] Many objc failures

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49166 --- Comment #2 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr 2011-05-26 09:53:00 UTC --- On x86_64-apple-darwin10, this PR is fixed by revision 174268 (I have tested objc and obj-c++ with -m32 and -m64 without failure after an update and a

[Bug libstdc++/49141] 26_numerics/complex/cons/48760.cc FAILs on Tru64 UNIX V5.1B, Solaris 8 and 9

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49141 --- Comment #11 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2011-05-26 09:57:17 UTC --- --- Comment #10 from Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com 2011-05-26 09:37:55 UTC --- (In reply to comment #9)

[Bug libstdc++/49141] 26_numerics/complex/cons/48760.cc FAILs on Tru64 UNIX V5.1B, Solaris 8 and 9

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49141 --- Comment #12 from Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com 2011-05-26 10:01:48 UTC --- (In reply to comment #11) They passed on 20110520. Then I'm relieved ;) Really, nothing changed in the complex code of the library and 13450.cc

[Bug tree-optimization/48702] [4.6/4.7 Regression] optimization regression with gcc-4.6 on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48702 --- Comment #25 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-05-26 10:01:33 UTC --- I have benchmarked SPEC2k6 on the 4.6 branch with the patch (and required backports) with -O3 -ffast-math -funroll-loops, Base is unpatched, Peak is

[Bug tree-optimization/49161] [4.5/4.6/4.7 Regression] Fix VRP on switch stmts

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49161 --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-05-26 10:05:08 UTC --- Author: jakub Date: Thu May 26 10:05:05 2011 New Revision: 174270 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=174270 Log: PR

[Bug libobjc/49166] [4.7 Regression] Many objc failures

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49166 Nicola Pero nicola at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug tree-optimization/49161] [4.5/4.6/4.7 Regression] Fix VRP on switch stmts

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49161 --- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-05-26 10:20:37 UTC --- Author: jakub Date: Thu May 26 10:20:34 2011 New Revision: 174272 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=174272 Log: PR

[Bug c++/49165] [4.3/4.4/4.5/4.6/4.7 Regression] ICE on for-loop/throw combination

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49165 --- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-05-26 10:25:23 UTC --- Author: jakub Date: Thu May 26 10:25:21 2011 New Revision: 174273 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=174273 Log: PR c++/49165 *

[Bug c++/49165] [4.3/4.4/4.5/4.6/4.7 Regression] ICE on for-loop/throw combination

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49165 --- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-05-26 10:27:59 UTC --- Author: jakub Date: Thu May 26 10:27:57 2011 New Revision: 174274 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=174274 Log: PR c++/49165 *

[Bug tree-optimization/49161] [4.5 Regression] Fix VRP on switch stmts

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49161 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||4.6.1, 4.7.0

[Bug c++/49165] [4.3/4.4/4.5 Regression] ICE on for-loop/throw combination

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49165 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.3.6

[Bug c++/49118] Endless operator- chain causes infinite loop

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49118 --- Comment #7 from David Krauss potswa at mac dot com 2011-05-26 11:05:12 UTC --- Yes, I'll likely do that in a few days… just wanted to put the code in safe holding, just in case.

[Bug tree-optimization/48702] [4.6/4.7 Regression] optimization regression with gcc-4.6 on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48702 Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #24354|0 |1 is

[Bug target/49099] sparc.c:‘sparc_solaris_elf_asm_named_section’ declared ‘static’ but never defined

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49099 Rainer Orth ro at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED

[Bug gcov-profile/48845] [4.7 regression] All g++.dg/tree-prof and gcc.dg/{matrix, tree-prof} executions tests fail on Solaris 8/9

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48845 Rainer Orth ro at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug libstdc++/49141] 26_numerics/complex/cons/48760.cc FAILs on Tru64 UNIX V5.1B, Solaris 8 and 9

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49141 --- Comment #13 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2011-05-26 11:25:27 UTC --- --- Comment #12 from Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com 2011-05-26 10:01:48 UTC --- (In reply to comment #11)

[Bug libstdc++/49141] 26_numerics/complex/cons/48760.cc FAILs on Tru64 UNIX V5.1B, Solaris 8 and 9

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49141 --- Comment #14 from Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com 2011-05-26 11:32:20 UTC --- Thanks Rainer. Let me know if I can be otherwise useful.

[Bug tree-optimization/49170] New: [4.7 regression] Several libstdc++ tests fail to link on Solaris 8/9: cexp missing

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49170 Summary: [4.7 regression] Several libstdc++ tests fail to link on Solaris 8/9: cexp missing Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug libstdc++/49141] 26_numerics/complex/cons/48760.cc FAILs on Tru64 UNIX V5.1B, Solaris 8 and 9

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49141 --- Comment #15 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2011-05-26 11:35:05 UTC --- --- Comment #14 from Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com 2011-05-26 11:32:20 UTC --- Thanks Rainer. Let me know

[Bug lto/48508] ICE in output_die, at dwarf2out.c:11409

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48508 --- Comment #5 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-05-26 11:51:37 UTC --- Created attachment 24363 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24363 reduced testcase Reduced to two files, delta-reduced, independend on

[Bug c++/10634] in-class initialization of static data members no longer allowed

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10634 Daniel Krügler daniel.kruegler at googlemail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Bug c++/49171] New: [C++0x][constexpr] Constant expressions support reinterpret_cast

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49171 Summary: [C++0x][constexpr] Constant expressions support reinterpret_cast Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug java/20215] gcj does not accept classes with same name fields

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20215 licheng.1...@gmail.com licheng.1212 at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Bug c++/49171] [C++0x][constexpr] Constant expressions support reinterpret_cast

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49171 --- Comment #1 from Daniel Krügler daniel.kruegler at googlemail dot com 2011-05-26 12:10:59 UTC --- Additional remark: I'm speaking of potential code breakages that did rely on non-portable behaviour, because there is no evidence for me that

[Bug tree-optimization/49170] [4.7 regression] Several libstdc++ tests fail to link on Solaris 8/9: cexp missing

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49170 --- Comment #1 from William J. Schmidt wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-05-26 12:12:00 UTC --- I'll take a look.

[Bug tree-optimization/49170] [4.7 regression] Several libstdc++ tests fail to link on Solaris 8/9: cexp missing

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49170 --- Comment #2 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-05-26 12:13:35 UTC --- I think the TARGET_HAS_SINCOS || TARGET_C99_FUNCTIONS has to be moved somewhere else.

[Bug c++/49172] New: [C++0x][constexpr] References should be declarable with constexpr

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49172 Summary: [C++0x][constexpr] References should be declarable with constexpr Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug rtl-optimization/41619] [4.4/4.5/4.6 regression] ICE in insert_save (caller-save.c) for SPEC CPU2000's 252.eon

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41619 --- Comment #12 from Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-05-26 12:43:10 UTC --- Author: ebotcazou Date: Thu May 26 12:43:06 2011 New Revision: 174278 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=174278 Log: Backport from

[Bug target/49099] sparc.c:‘sparc_solaris_elf_asm_named_section’ declared ‘static’ but never defined

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49099 --- Comment #2 from Rainer Orth ro at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-05-26 12:44:19 UTC --- Author: ro Date: Thu May 26 12:44:16 2011 New Revision: 174279 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=174279 Log: PR target/49099 *

[Bug java/20215] gcj does not accept classes with same name fields

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20215 --- Comment #6 from licheng.1212 at gmail dot com licheng.1212 at gmail dot com 2011-05-26 12:44:09 UTC --- the Testcase attachments can't donwload

[Bug libgcj/46575] relocation overflow when compile libgcj_tools_la-tools.o

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46575 licheng.1...@gmail.com licheng.1212 at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug target/49099] sparc.c:‘sparc_solaris_elf_asm_named_section’ declared ‘static’ but never defined

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49099 Rainer Orth ro at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug c++/10634] in-class initialization of static data members no longer allowed

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10634 --- Comment #14 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-05-26 12:50:33 UTC --- Ah! Well you can still initialize a static data member of non-integral type, you just need a valid initializer.

[Bug target/44643] ice in c-typeck.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44643 --- Comment #12 from Georg-Johann Lay gjl at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-05-26 12:52:10 UTC --- Author: gjl Date: Thu May 26 12:52:03 2011 New Revision: 174281 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=174281 Log: PR target/44643 *

[Bug libfortran/48906] Wrong rounding results with -m32

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48906 --- Comment #9 from Jerry DeLisle jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-05-26 12:53:30 UTC --- Created attachment 24364 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24364 Preliminary patch I am getting two testsuite regressions with this

[Bug tree-optimization/48702] [4.6/4.7 Regression] optimization regression with gcc-4.6 on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48702 --- Comment #27 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-05-26 13:01:50 UTC --- Author: rguenth Date: Thu May 26 13:01:48 2011 New Revision: 174282 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=174282 Log: 2011-05-26 Richard

[Bug c++/10634] in-class initialization of static data members no longer allowed

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10634 --- Comment #15 from Daniel Krügler daniel.kruegler at googlemail dot com 2011-05-26 13:01:54 UTC --- (In reply to comment #14) Yes, of-course. I opened bug 49171 to ensure that the compiler will diagnose the cast-situation.

[Bug tree-optimization/48702] [4.6 Regression] optimization regression with gcc-4.6 on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48702 Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||4.7.0

[Bug c++/48424] C++0x parameter packs expansion problem

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48424 --- Comment #5 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-05-26 13:22:54 UTC --- Author: jason Date: Thu May 26 13:22:51 2011 New Revision: 174285 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=174285 Log: PR c++/48424 *

[Bug tree-optimization/49170] [4.7 regression] Several libstdc++ tests fail to link on Solaris 8/9: cexp missing

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49170 --- Comment #3 from William J. Schmidt wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-05-26 13:24:31 UTC --- Rainer, please try: Index: tree-ssa-math-opts.c === --- tree-ssa-math-opts.c

[Bug c++/48424] C++0x parameter packs expansion problem

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48424 Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug c++/48424] C++0x parameter packs expansion problem

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48424 --- Comment #7 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-05-26 13:44:26 UTC --- Author: jason Date: Thu May 26 13:44:20 2011 New Revision: 174287 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=174287 Log: PR c++/48424 *

[Bug c++/46696] [C++0x] Implicit copy constructor can't construct array of subtype with user-defined copy constructor.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46696 Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug c++/47184] [C++0x] initialization construct interpreted as function declaration‏‏

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47184 Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.6.1 ---

[Bug c++/46245] [C++0x] rejects function with late-specified return type as a non-type template parameter

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46245 Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug c++/46005] [C++0x] Don't allow auto as the simple-type-specifier of a typedef

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46005 Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug c++/47184] [C++0x] initialization construct interpreted as function declaration‏‏

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47184 Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug bootstrap/49173] New: [4.7 Regression] No rule to make target `../../../../work/libgcc/../gcc/libgcc-std.ver', needed by `libgcc.map'.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49173 Summary: [4.7 Regression] No rule to make target `../../../../work/libgcc/../gcc/libgcc-std.ver', needed by `libgcc.map'. Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status:

[Bug target/49168] [4.7 Regression] Aligned store used with unaligned address

flt128_va, .-flt128_va .identGCC: (GNU) 4.7.0 20110526 (experimental) .section.note.GNU-stack,,@progbits [hjl@gnu-6 pr49168]$

[Bug rtl-optimization/48826] ICE in dwarf2out_var_location, at dwarf2out.c:22013

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48826 --- Comment #9 from Ryan Mansfield rmansfield at qnx dot com 2011-05-26 14:20:54 UTC --- Richard, thanks for your patch. It fixed most of the failures I saw but there are still cases where the note doesn't get moved after call split. The

[Bug bootstrap/49173] [4.7 Regression] No rule to make target `../../../../work/libgcc/../gcc/libgcc-std.ver', needed by `libgcc.map'.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49173 Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr changed: What|Removed |Added Target|

[Bug libstdc++/49174] New: numeric_limitsT template is a struct not a class

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49174 Summary: numeric_limitsT template is a struct not a class Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: minor Priority: P3 Component: libstdc++

[Bug libstdc++/49174] numeric_limitsT template is a struct not a class

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49174 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug java/20215] gcj does not accept classes with same name fields

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20215 --- Comment #7 from licheng.1212 at gmail dot com licheng.1212 at gmail dot com 2011-05-26 15:06:37 UTC --- (In reply to comment #6) the Testcase attachments can't donwload I have got the Testcase,but it still hava problem [lee@localhost

[Bug middle-end/49147] graphite branch ICEs with -fgraphite-opencl-ignore-dep

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49147 --- Comment #2 from Sebastian Pop spop at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-05-26 15:11:52 UTC --- Author: spop Date: Thu May 26 15:11:48 2011 New Revision: 174293 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=174293 Log: Fix PR49147: ICE with

[Bug bootstrap/49173] [4.7 Regression] No rule to make target `../../../../work/libgcc/../gcc/libgcc-std.ver', needed by `libgcc.map'.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49173 --- Comment #2 from Bernd Schmidt bernds at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-05-26 15:12:56 UTC --- Argh, the stupid half-transition again. I grepped only in gcc/config. I seem to fail getting a cross-build to that point, so could you try changing

[Bug middle-end/49147] graphite branch ICEs with -fgraphite-opencl-ignore-dep

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49147 Sebastian Pop spop at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug bootstrap/49173] [4.7 Regression] No rule to make target `../../../../work/libgcc/../gcc/libgcc-std.ver', needed by `libgcc.map'.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49173 --- Comment #3 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr 2011-05-26 15:23:24 UTC --- The same problem may happen for s390 and sh: [macbook] f90/bug% grep -r libgcc-std.ver /opt/gcc/work/libgcc/*

[Bug bootstrap/49173] [4.7 Regression] No rule to make target `../../../../work/libgcc/../gcc/libgcc-std.ver', needed by `libgcc.map'.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49173 --- Comment #4 from Bernd Schmidt bernds at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-05-26 15:33:18 UTC --- (In reply to comment #3) In which file should I do the change(s)? In the one you quoted, libgcc/config/t-slibgcc-darwin. How could it work if there is no

[Bug c++/42056] ICE with invalid use of auto in template

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42056 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jason at

[Bug c++/42056] ICE with invalid use of auto in template

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42056 Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last

[Bug target/47719] [4.6 regression] ICE compiling libavcodec/adxdec.c (FFmpeg) for ARM

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47719 --- Comment #11 from Nitin Kamble nitin.a.kamble at intel dot com 2011-05-26 16:26:45 UTC --- I am not able to reopen this bug, can somebody reopen the bug? Thanks, Nitin

[Bug tree-optimization/49175] New: vect/pr48172.c execution failure for ARM GNU/Linux

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49175 Summary: vect/pr48172.c execution failure for ARM GNU/Linux Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: tree-optimization

[Bug c++/42056] ICE with invalid use of auto in template

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42056 --- Comment #4 from Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com 2011-05-26 16:48:01 UTC --- Eh, I decided to ask when I saw your fix for 48599 involving type_uses_auto ;) Anyway, the below indeed appears to work pretty well. Is the error

[Bug c++/48211] [4.7 Regression] [C++0x] Segment Fault When Compiling

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48211 Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug c++/46145] [C++0x] Should defaulted copy constructor imply default move constructor?

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46145 --- Comment #6 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-05-26 17:02:14 UTC --- Oops, those patches were really for bug 46005.

[Bug c++/42056] ICE with invalid use of auto in template

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42056 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug tree-optimization/49175] vect/pr48172.c execution failure for ARM GNU/Linux

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49175 Mikael Pettersson mikpe at it dot uu.se changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mikpe at it dot

[Bug target/49168] [4.7 Regression] Aligned store used with unaligned address

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49168 H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added URL|

[Bug fortran/18918] Eventually support Fortran 2008's coarrays [co-arrays]

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18918 --- Comment #50 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-05-26 17:41:37 UTC --- Author: burnus Date: Thu May 26 17:41:34 2011 New Revision: 174301 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=174301 Log: 2011-05-26 Tobias Burnus

[Bug c++/42056] ICE with invalid use of auto in template

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42056 --- Comment #5 from Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com 2011-05-26 18:01:42 UTC --- Actually, I can do better.

[Bug c++/49176] New: [4.6 Regression][c++0x] valid code rejected with error: uninitialized const

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49176 Summary: [4.6 Regression][c++0x] valid code rejected with error: uninitialized const Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority:

[Bug bootstrap/49173] [4.7 Regression] No rule to make target `../../../../work/libgcc/../gcc/libgcc-std.ver', needed by `libgcc.map'.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49173 --- Comment #5 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr 2011-05-26 18:04:06 UTC --- With the following patch --- ../_clean/libgcc/config/t-slibgcc-darwin2010-02-02 11:25:59.0 +0100 +++ libgcc/config/t-slibgcc-darwin

[Bug fortran/47601] [OOP] Internal Error: mio_component_ref(): Component not found

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47601 --- Comment #12 from Rich Townsend townsend at astro dot wisc.edu 2011-05-26 18:05:35 UTC --- Do we have any progress in fixing this one? It's become a showstopper for me, alas! (Serves me right for starting a number of new, large projects in

[Bug middle-end/49177] New: [4.7 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/fast-math-ifcvt-1.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49177 Summary: [4.7 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/fast-math-ifcvt-1.c Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: middle-end

[Bug fortran/48955] [4.6/4.7 Regression] Wrong result for array assignment due to missing temporary

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48955 --- Comment #12 from Paul Thomas pault at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-05-26 18:19:40 UTC --- Author: pault Date: Thu May 26 18:19:36 2011 New Revision: 174302 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=174302 Log: 2011-05-26 Paul Thomas

[Bug driver/49178] New: Space between linker option and library in gfortran

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49178 Summary: Space between linker option and library in gfortran Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: driver

[Bug libstdc++/49174] numeric_limitsT template is a struct not a class

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49174 --- Comment #2 from fr...@kingswood-consulting.co.uk 2011-05-26 18:25:03 UTC --- I realize struct and class are interchangeable. llvm with -Wextra finds the difference worth warning about.

[Bug bootstrap/49173] [4.7 Regression] No rule to make target `../../../../work/libgcc/../gcc/libgcc-std.ver', needed by `libgcc.map'.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49173 --- Comment #6 from Bernd Schmidt bernds at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-05-26 18:25:30 UTC --- Did that work before revision 174284? I'm not sure whether this looks related or not.

[Bug c++/42056] ICE with invalid use of auto in template

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42056 --- Comment #6 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-05-26 18:25:40 UTC --- (In reply to comment #4) + error (expected an expression); That sounds like a parse error, when the real issue is a semantic constraint violation: it

[Bug c++/47635] ICE on invalid code in constructor_name_p, at cp/name-lookup.c:1809

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47635 Pawel Sikora pluto at agmk dot net changed: What|Removed |Added Known to fail|4.5.3, 4.6.0|4.5.4, 4.6.1, 4.7.0

[Bug c++/48211] [4.7 Regression] [C++0x] Segment Fault When Compiling

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48211 --- Comment #5 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-05-26 18:30:17 UTC --- Author: jason Date: Thu May 26 18:30:13 2011 New Revision: 174303 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=174303 Log: PR c++/48211 *

[Bug c++/48211] [4.7 Regression] [C++0x] Segment Fault When Compiling

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48211 Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug c++/47956] [C++0x] gcc accepts static data member declaration with initializer for non-const literal type if type-specifier is auto

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47956 Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug c++/47635] ICE on invalid code in constructor_name_p, at cp/name-lookup.c:1809

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47635 --- Comment #3 from Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com 2011-05-26 18:35:28 UTC --- Is this a C++0x issue? Should be marked as such.

  1   2   >