[Bug bootstrap/49270] make BOOT_CFLAGS=-g -O3 CFLAGS_FOR_TARGET=-g -O3 CXXFLAGS_FOR_TARGET=-g -O3 failure

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49270 --- Comment #7 from Uros Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com 2011-06-03 06:41:02 UTC --- (In reply to comment #3) gcc_assert (k = MAX_CLAUSES); - clause = out.clause[k++] = lto_input_uleb128 (ib); + out.clause[k++] =

[Bug c++/49264] [4.6/4.7 Regression] Internal compiler error: segmentation fault

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49264 --- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-06-03 06:50:50 UTC --- Reduced testcase: // PR c++/49264 // { dg-do compile } // { dg-options -O2 } struct B { }; struct A { char a[sizeof (B) + 1]; } a; static inline void foo

[Bug debug/47597] ICE: call frame debugging information is not handled when case is post_dec

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47597 --- Comment #2 from Anitha Boyapati anitha.boyapati at atmel dot com 2011-06-03 07:20:44 UTC --- Patch in trunk revision 171296 http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs/trunk/gcc/dwarf2out.c?r1=171150r2=171296diff_format=h

[Bug c++/49264] [4.6/4.7 Regression] Internal compiler error: segmentation fault

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49264 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug libstdc++/49274] Regression: unique_ptr needs full definition of map type

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49274 Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||paolo.carlini at

[Bug libstdc++/49274] Regression: unique_ptr needs full definition of map type

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49274 --- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-06-03 08:50:23 UTC --- I'm not sure why default_deleteT needs to instantiate T, it doesn't need a complete type except in operator()

[Bug libstdc++/49274] Regression: unique_ptr needs full definition of map type

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49274 --- Comment #4 from Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com 2011-06-03 09:32:34 UTC --- Jon, I'm traveling, I cannot investigate this in detail, but I'm wondering if this isn't a duplicate of the recent issue failed by Marc Glisse, about

[Bug other/2222] option enable-target-optspace disables _GNU_SOURCE

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id= Oliver Metz oliver.metz at gmx dot de changed: What|Removed |Added CC||oliver.metz at gmx

[Bug libstdc++/49274] Regression: unique_ptr needs full definition of map type

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49274 --- Comment #5 from Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com 2011-06-03 09:37:00 UTC --- PR49107

[Bug tree-optimization/48377] [4.6/4.7 regression] miscompilation at -O3

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48377 Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ebotcazou at

[Bug tree-optimization/48377] [4.6/4.7 regression] miscompilation at -O3

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48377 --- Comment #40 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-06-03 10:06:26 UTC --- (In reply to comment #39) Fixed (the testcase with aligned(1)). The original is INVALID. The testcase with aligned(1) cannot pass on strict-alignment

[Bug libstdc++/49274] Regression: unique_ptr needs full definition of map type

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49274 Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last

[Bug tree-optimization/48377] [4.6/4.7 regression] miscompilation at -O3

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48377 --- Comment #41 from Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-06-03 10:41:55 UTC --- Can you explain why it cannot pass on strict-alignment targets? The read is done through a type with explicit low alignment, so strict alignment

[Bug debug/47858] [4.5/4.6/4.7 Regression] IPA-SRA decreases quality of debug info

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47858 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #24416|0 |1 is

[Bug c++/46003] cond5.C fails for ARM EABI tests.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46003 Yufeng Zhang yufeng at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug tree-optimization/48377] [4.6/4.7 regression] miscompilation at -O3

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48377 --- Comment #42 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-06-03 10:54:54 UTC --- It surprises me it doesn't handle it, that is clearly a bug. Conceptually it is no different from struct A { char c; unsigned int d; }

[Bug tree-optimization/48377] [4.6/4.7 regression] miscompilation at -O3

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48377 --- Comment #43 from Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-06-03 11:10:35 UTC --- Conceptually it is no different from struct A { char c; unsigned int d; } __attribute__((packed)); unsigned int id (struct A *p) { return p-d;

[Bug c++/49274] [4.6/4.7 Regression] unique_ptr needs full definition of map type

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49274 Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jason at gcc dot

[Bug tree-optimization/48377] [4.6/4.7 regression] miscompilation at -O3

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48377 --- Comment #44 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-06-03 11:24:27 UTC --- Created attachment 24423 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24423 gcc46-pr48377.patch I don't see why mode should be relevant, the MEM_REF

[Bug c++/49274] [4.6/4.7 Regression] unique_ptr needs full definition of map type

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49274 --- Comment #8 from Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com 2011-06-03 11:40:20 UTC --- Thanks Jon.

[Bug c++/49274] [4.6/4.7 Regression] unique_ptr needs full definition of map type

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49274 Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work|4.5.0 |4.1.2

[Bug c++/49274] [4.6/4.7 Regression] unique_ptr needs full definition of map type

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49274 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot

[Bug libfortran/48906] Wrong rounding results with -m32

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48906 --- Comment #23 from Jerry DeLisle jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-06-03 12:55:21 UTC --- Patch submitted to list for approval.

[Bug tree-optimization/48377] [4.6/4.7 regression] miscompilation at -O3

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48377 --- Comment #45 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-06-03 12:55:18 UTC --- (In reply to comment #44) Created attachment 24423 [details] gcc46-pr48377.patch I don't see why mode should be relevant, the MEM_REF should have

[Bug middle-end/49261] [4.7 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/forwprop-9.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49261 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug bootstrap/49270] make BOOT_CFLAGS=-g -O3 CFLAGS_FOR_TARGET=-g -O3 CXXFLAGS_FOR_TARGET=-g -O3 failure

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49270 --- Comment #8 from Dmitry Gorbachev d.g.gorbachev at gmail dot com 2011-06-03 13:19:39 UTC --- See also PR49116.

[Bug c++/49276] New: Segmentation fault with default lambda parameter in member function

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49276 Summary: Segmentation fault with default lambda parameter in member function Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug c++/49276] [C++0x] Segmentation fault with default lambda parameter in member function

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49276 Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|

[Bug middle-end/49277] New: [4.7 Regression] 456.hmmer in SPEC CPU 2006 failed to build

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49277 Summary: [4.7 Regression] 456.hmmer in SPEC CPU 2006 failed to build Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug c++/49276] [C++0x] Segmentation fault with default lambda parameter in member function

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49276 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot

[Bug c++/49274] [4.6/4.7 Regression] unique_ptr needs full definition of map type

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49274 --- Comment #11 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-06-03 14:03:59 UTC --- Yes, contincomplete is an associated type for argument-dependent lookup, so we instantiate it to get any friend declarations. I think G++ is correct. Clang

[Bug c++/49274] [4.6/4.7 Regression] unique_ptr needs full definition of map type

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49274 Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug c++/49274] [4.6/4.7 Regression] unique_ptr needs full definition of map type

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49274 --- Comment #13 from Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com 2011-06-03 14:14:14 UTC --- Ah, thus exactly like the issue we discussed a few days ago. I suspected that and indeed Intel was accepting the code. By the way, PR49107 is

[Bug c++/49274] [4.6/4.7 Regression] unique_ptr needs full definition of map type

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49274 --- Comment #14 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-06-03 14:37:17 UTC --- Thanks, Jason. So to respond to the OP, although unique_ptrT allows T to be incomplete it might instantiate T, and unlike unique_ptr most templates in the

[Bug lto/49277] [4.7 Regression] 456.hmmer in SPEC CPU 2006 failed to build

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49277 H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rguenth at gcc dot

[Bug c++/49276] [C++0x] Segmentation fault with default lambda parameter in member function

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49276 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug fortran/49278] New: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49278 Summary: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault Product: gcc Version: 4.6.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: fortran AssignedTo:

[Bug java/49036] gcj-mp-4.5: Internal error: Abort trap (program ecj1) on Mac OS X 10.5.8

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49036 Martin von Gagern Martin.vGagern at gmx dot net changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Bug fortran/49278] internal compiler error: Segmentation fault

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49278 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/49271] Compiler crashed and asked me to submit a report

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49271 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug fortran/49271] Compiler crashed and asked me to submit a report

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49271 Asher Langton langton at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||langton at gcc

[Bug fortran/49271] Compiler crashed and asked me to submit a report

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49271 --- Comment #3 from Hugh coml4 at san dot rr.com 2011-06-03 17:33:03 UTC --- I apologize for omitting the OS. 27 iMac with i7 processor running OS X 10.6.7. I know the code is bad. It is just that the compiler crashed and requested a bug

[Bug fortran/49271] Compiler crashed and asked me to submit a report

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49271 --- Comment #4 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr 2011-06-03 17:38:13 UTC --- Compiling the code gives the error without crash for me too on x86_64-apple-darwin10.7.0 (trunk and 4.4.4).

[Bug fortran/49278] internal compiler error: Segmentation fault

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49278 --- Comment #2 from Steve Kargl sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu 2011-06-03 18:10:40 UTC --- On Fri, Jun 03, 2011 at 04:08:05PM +, kargl at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49278 Reduced testcase.

[Bug debug/49167] dwarf marker for function return instruction

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49167 Josh Stone jistone at redhat dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jistone at redhat

[Bug debug/49167] dwarf marker for function return instruction

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49167 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot

[Bug target/48250] ICE in reload_cse_simplify_operands, at postreload.c:403

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48250 Ramana Radhakrishnan ramana at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ramana at

[Bug c++/49276] [C++0x] Segmentation fault with default lambda parameter in member function

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49276 --- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-06-03 20:19:46 UTC --- Author: jakub Date: Fri Jun 3 20:19:42 2011 New Revision: 174619 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=174619 Log: PR c++/49276 *

[Bug c++/49276] [C++0x] Segmentation fault with default lambda parameter in member function

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49276 --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-06-03 20:21:41 UTC --- Author: jakub Date: Fri Jun 3 20:21:38 2011 New Revision: 174620 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=174620 Log: PR c++/49276 *

[Bug c++/49276] [C++0x] Segmentation fault with default lambda parameter in member function

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49276 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug target/48250] ICE in reload_cse_simplify_operands, at postreload.c:403

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48250 Ramana Radhakrishnan ramana at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug target/48792] ICE in failed_reload, at reload1.c:6000

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48792 Ramana Radhakrishnan ramana at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug rtl-optimization/48808] ICE in spill_failure, at reload1.c:2113

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48808 Ramana Radhakrishnan ramana at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ramana at

[Bug rtl-optimization/48792] ICE in failed_reload, at reload1.c:6000

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48792 Ramana Radhakrishnan ramana at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ramana at

[Bug fortran/49271] Compiler crashed and asked me to submit a report

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49271 --- Comment #5 from Asher Langton langton at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-06-03 21:18:20 UTC --- (In reply to comment #3) I apologize for omitting the OS. 27 iMac with i7 processor running OS X 10.6.7. I know the code is bad. It is just that the

[Bug c++/49279] New: Optimization incorrectly presuming constant variable inside loop in g++ 4.5 and 4.6 with -O2 and -O3 for x86_64 targets

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49279 Summary: Optimization incorrectly presuming constant variable inside loop in g++ 4.5 and 4.6 with -O2 and -O3 for x86_64 targets Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0

[Bug target/46329] ICE on ARM for __attribute__ ((vector_size (8 * sizeof(int)))) operations

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46329 Ramana Radhakrishnan ramana at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||4.7.0

[Bug fortran/49271] Compiler crashed and asked me to submit a report

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49271 --- Comment #6 from Hugh coml4 at san dot rr.com 2011-06-03 21:50:43 UTC --- oz-2:gert_library hugh$ gfortran -v Using built-in specs. Target: i386-apple-darwin8.10.1 Configured with: /tmp/gfortran-20090604/ibin/../gcc/configure

[Bug fortran/49271] Compiler crashed and asked me to submit a report

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49271 --- Comment #7 from Steve Kargl sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu 2011-06-03 21:59:43 UTC --- On Fri, Jun 03, 2011 at 09:50:46PM +, coml4 at san dot rr.com wrote: gcc version 4.5.0 20090604 (experimental) [trunk revision 148180] (GCC)

[Bug tree-optimization/49135] ICE in gcc.c-torture/execute/920302-1.c on arm

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49135 --- Comment #6 from Ramana Radhakrishnan ramana at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-06-03 22:18:04 UTC --- combine puts 2 and 2 together . (insn 11 10 12 (set (reg/f:SI 154) (mem/u/c/i:SI (symbol_ref/u:SI (*.LC0) [flags 0x2]) [4 S4 A32]))

[Bug target/44290] [4.5 regression] __naked attribute is broken

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44290 Ramana Radhakrishnan ramana at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ramana at

[Bug fortran/49280] New: Misinterpretation of -static-libgfortran switch

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49280 Summary: Misinterpretation of -static-libgfortran switch Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: fortran AssignedTo:

[Bug fortran/49280] Misinterpretation of -static-libgfortran switch

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49280 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug fortran/49280] Misinterpretation of -static-libgfortran switch

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49280 Jerry DeLisle jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jvdelisle at

[Bug target/49281] New: lea_general_4 doesn't work for x32

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49281 Summary: lea_general_4 doesn't work for x32 Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: target AssignedTo:

[Bug fortran/49271] Compiler crashed and asked me to submit a report

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49271 --- Comment #8 from Hugh coml4 at san dot rr.com 2011-06-04 01:08:47 UTC --- I will be happy to update the compiler. I very recently downloaded the latest one that was labeled Stable Release for Mac OS X. Which version do you recommend? Thanks,

[Bug middle-end/49282] New: malloc corruption in large lto1-wpa run during inline edge heap resize

Component: middle-end AssignedTo: unassig...@gcc.gnu.org ReportedBy: andi-...@firstfloor.org A large lto1-wpa run with 20110603 results now in malloc.c:3551: munmap_chunk: Assertion `ret == 0' failed. on x86-64-linux. When I run with MALLOC_CHECK_=2 it seems to get a bit

[Bug target/49281] lea_general_4 doesn't work for x32

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49281 --- Comment #1 from H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com 2011-06-04 03:18:48 UTC --- When the SImode pattern is enabled, SPEC CPU 2006 is miscompiled.

[Bug c++/49107] [C++0x][4.7 Regression] incomplete type regression with std::pair

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49107 Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jason at gcc dot