[Bug c++/2288] Variable declared in for-loop-header is in wrong scope

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2288 Nathan Froyd changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug c++/18770] g++ accepts invalid code with scopes on ifs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18770 Nathan Froyd changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug regression/49285] [4.7 Regression]: build fails on mmix in libgcc2.c:__powisf2: ICE in emit_unop_insn

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49285 Hans-Peter Nilsson changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug regression/49285] New: [4.7 Regression]: build fails on mmix in libgcc2.c:__powisf2: ICE in emit_unop_insn

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49285 Summary: [4.7 Regression]: build fails on mmix in libgcc2.c:__powisf2: ICE in emit_unop_insn Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: build, ice-on-valid-co

[Bug c++/49266] [C++0x] Another incomplete type regression with noexcept

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49266 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug c++/49107] [C++0x][4.7 Regression] incomplete type regression with std::pair

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49107 --- Comment #16 from Jason Merrill 2011-06-04 23:42:03 UTC --- *** Bug 49266 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug c++/49107] [C++0x][4.7 Regression] incomplete type regression with std::pair

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49107 --- Comment #15 from Jason Merrill 2011-06-04 23:35:38 UTC --- Created attachment 24433 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24433 Patch to generalize the copy hack in the compiler Here's the patch I was working with, if you're in

[Bug bootstrap/49275] --enable-build-with-cxx profiledbootstrap BOOT_CFLAGS="-g -O3" CFLAGS_FOR_TARGET="-g -O3" CXXFLAGS_FOR_TARGET="-g -O3" failure

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49275 --- Comment #3 from Jack Howarth 2011-06-04 23:20:14 UTC --- This problem no longer exists at r174648 with http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-05/msg02301.html installed. A profiledbootstrap BOOT_CFLAGS="-g -O3" CFLAGS_FOR_TARGET="-g -O3" CXXF

[Bug other/49284] -fdump-ipa-cgraph leads to ICE in generate_canonical_option, at opts-common.c:303

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49284 --- Comment #1 from Andi Kleen 2011-06-04 22:13:34 UTC --- Some investigation: This depends heavily on the command line used. A simple test with a hello world works. On my kernel build when I strip the lto link command line down I get the erro

[Bug middle-end/49282] malloc corruption in large lto1-wpa run during inline edge heap resize

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49282 --- Comment #2 from Andi Kleen 2011-06-04 20:57:59 UTC --- I found a workaround: disabling -fcoverage-arcs (gcov) makes it go away.

[Bug middle-end/49282] malloc corruption in large lto1-wpa run during inline edge heap resize

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49282 --- Comment #1 from Andi Kleen 2011-06-04 19:56:15 UTC --- Some updates: I tried with a fresh compiler (20110604). Same malloc assert I also checked with a somewhat older compiler (from around May 11) It segfaulted eventually too, so I suspect

[Bug other/49284] New: -fdump-ipa-cgraph leads to ICE in generate_canonical_option, at opts-common.c:303

Priority: P3 Component: other AssignedTo: unassig...@gcc.gnu.org ReportedBy: andi-...@firstfloor.org gcc version 4.7.0 20110604 (experimental) (GCC) Passing -fdump-ipa-cgraph to a IPA final build gives: lto1: internal compiler error: in generate_canonical_option, at opts

[Bug tree-optimization/48929] [4.7 Regression] ICE: in estimate_size_after_inlining, at ipa-inline-analysis.c:1961 with -findirect-inlining

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48929 Jan Hubicka changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug c/49091] ice in evaluate_conditions_for_known_args

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49091 Jan Hubicka changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug fortran/48636] Enable more inlining with -O2 and higher

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48636 --- Comment #14 from Jan Hubicka 2011-06-04 18:06:01 UTC --- Yeah, the fnspec issue is something we ought to solve. ipa-cp should be effective on fortran so it should not disable itself there ;)

[Bug middle-end/49179] [4.7 Regression] ICE: in evaluate_conditions_for_known_args at ipa-inline-analysis.c:558 with -O -findirect-inlining

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49179 Jan Hubicka changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug middle-end/48893] [4.7 Regression] ICE in evaulate_conditions_for_edge at ipa-inline-analysis.c:477

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48893 Jan Hubicka changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug middle-end/49179] [4.7 Regression] ICE: in evaluate_conditions_for_known_args at ipa-inline-analysis.c:558 with -O -findirect-inlining

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49179 --- Comment #2 from Jan Hubicka 2011-06-04 18:00:51 UTC --- Author: hubicka Date: Sat Jun 4 18:00:47 2011 New Revision: 174648 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=174648 Log: PR tree-optimization/48893 PR tree-optimiza

[Bug c/49091] ice in evaluate_conditions_for_known_args

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49091 --- Comment #3 from Jan Hubicka 2011-06-04 18:00:51 UTC --- Author: hubicka Date: Sat Jun 4 18:00:47 2011 New Revision: 174648 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=174648 Log: PR tree-optimization/48893 PR tree-optimiza

[Bug middle-end/48893] [4.7 Regression] ICE in evaulate_conditions_for_edge at ipa-inline-analysis.c:477

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48893 --- Comment #5 from Jan Hubicka 2011-06-04 18:00:51 UTC --- Author: hubicka Date: Sat Jun 4 18:00:47 2011 New Revision: 174648 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=174648 Log: PR tree-optimization/48893 PR tree-optimiza

[Bug lto/48952] ICE in inline_merge_summary during linux kernel LTO build

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48952 Jan Hubicka changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug c++/49279] Optimization incorrectly presuming constant variable inside loop in g++ 4.5 and 4.6 with -O2 and -O3 for x86_64 targets

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49279 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/7302] -Wnon-virtual-dtor should't complain of protected dtor

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7302 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug c++/33840] bit-field size accepted for struct

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33840 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug fortran/49271] Compiler crashed and asked me to submit a report

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49271 --- Comment #10 from Dominique d'Humieres 2011-06-04 16:22:18 UTC --- > I don't use Mac OS X ... I do;-) The simplest ways are to build it either with fink ( http://www.finkproject.org/ : gcc4.5.2) or macports ( http://www.macports.org/ : gcc4.5

[Bug c++/33840] bit-field size accepted for struct

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33840 --- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely 2011-06-04 16:21:00 UTC --- Author: redi Date: Sat Jun 4 16:20:55 2011 New Revision: 174645 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=174645 Log: 2011-06-04 Jonathan Wakely PR c++/3384

[Bug lto/48954] [4.7 Regression] ICE: SIGSEGV in bitmap_count_bits (bitmap.c:719) with -O2 -flto -fno-early-inlining -fkeep-inline-functions

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48954 --- Comment #5 from Jan Hubicka 2011-06-04 16:20:42 UTC --- Author: hubicka Date: Sat Jun 4 16:20:36 2011 New Revision: 174644 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=174644 Log: PR lto/48954 * lto-cgraph.c (output_node_o

[Bug c++/33840] bit-field size accepted for struct

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33840 --- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely 2011-06-04 16:11:47 UTC --- Author: redi Date: Sat Jun 4 16:11:41 2011 New Revision: 174642 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=174642 Log: 2011-06-04 Jonathan Wakely PR c++/33840

[Bug target/49281] lea_general_4 is wrong

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49281 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug target/48688] [x64]: shift/or instead of lea

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48688 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug fortran/49271] Compiler crashed and asked me to submit a report

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49271 --- Comment #9 from Steve Kargl 2011-06-04 15:56:35 UTC --- On Sat, Jun 04, 2011 at 01:09:06AM +, coml4 at san dot rr.com wrote: > I will be happy to update the compiler. I very recently downloaded the latest > one that was labeled "Stable R

[Bug target/49281] lea_general_4 is wrong

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49281 --- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-06-04 15:38:39 UTC --- Author: jakub Date: Sat Jun 4 15:38:36 2011 New Revision: 174641 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=174641 Log: PR target/49281 * config/i386/i386.md (*lea

[Bug target/49281] lea_general_4 is wrong

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49281 --- Comment #5 from H.J. Lu 2011-06-04 15:31:29 UTC --- (In reply to comment #4) > Created attachment 24432 [details] > gcc47-pr49281.patch > > Yeah, I think it should have be < instead of <=. > Will try to write some testcase... This seems to

[Bug target/49281] lea_general_4 is wrong

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49281 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/48688] [x64]: shift/or instead of lea

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48688 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED Blocks|

[Bug target/49281] lea_general_4 is wrong

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49281 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.7.0 Summary|lea_general_4 doesn't

[Bug target/49281] lea_general_4 doesn't work for x32

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49281 --- Comment #2 from H.J. Lu 2011-06-04 14:57:08 UTC --- Created attachment 24431 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24431 A testcase I got (gdb) r -d foreman_ref_encoder_main.cfg Starting program: /export/home/hjl/bugs/gcc/pr49

[Bug target/48542] mmix code which calls setjmp/longjmp may not work.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48542 Hans-Peter Nilsson changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/48929] [4.7 Regression] ICE: in estimate_size_after_inlining, at ipa-inline-analysis.c:1961 with -findirect-inlining

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48929 --- Comment #3 from Jan Hubicka 2011-06-04 14:24:24 UTC --- Author: hubicka Date: Sat Jun 4 14:24:20 2011 New Revision: 174638 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=174638 Log: PR tree-optimize/48929 * gcc.c-torture/comp

[Bug c/49091] ice in evaluate_conditions_for_known_args

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49091 --- Comment #2 from Jan Hubicka 2011-06-04 13:56:00 UTC --- OK, the problem is K&R style definition: int ssetup(in, out, port) int *in, *out; int *port; { struct hostent *hp; struct servent *sp; struct sockaddr_in myaddr_

[Bug lto/48954] [4.7 Regression] ICE: SIGSEGV in bitmap_count_bits (bitmap.c:719) with -O2 -flto -fno-early-inlining -fkeep-inline-functions

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48954 --- Comment #4 from Jan Hubicka 2011-06-04 13:37:03 UTC --- Created attachment 24430 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24430 patch I am testing Hi, this patch fixes ICE in counting bits of bitmap that is NULL. I am not sure ho

[Bug c/49283] New: pointless warning with -Wstrict-overflow

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49283 Summary: pointless warning with -Wstrict-overflow Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c AssignedTo: unassig...@gc

[Bug lto/48954] [4.7 Regression] ICE: SIGSEGV in bitmap_count_bits (bitmap.c:719) with -O2 -flto -fno-early-inlining -fkeep-inline-functions

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48954 --- Comment #3 from Jan Hubicka 2011-06-04 13:15:35 UTC --- Hmm, updating the tree however gets me to count bits error. The bug above is alsomost probably inconsistency in cgraph encoder, so it seems like a random memory corruption shooting into

[Bug lto/48954] [4.7 Regression] ICE: SIGSEGV in bitmap_count_bits (bitmap.c:719) with -O2 -flto -fno-early-inlining -fkeep-inline-functions

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48954 --- Comment #2 from Jan Hubicka 2011-06-04 13:11:40 UTC --- Hmm, I don't really get the uninitialized access, instead I now get an ice: lto1: internal compiler error: vector VEC(cgraph_node_ptr,base) index domain error, in lto_cgraph_encoder_dere

[Bug tree-optimization/48929] [4.7 Regression] ICE: in estimate_size_after_inlining, at ipa-inline-analysis.c:1961 with -findirect-inlining

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48929 --- Comment #2 from Jan Hubicka 2011-06-04 13:02:28 UTC --- Created attachment 24428 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24428 Pack I am testing The problem is that the code assumes transitivity in edge predicates, while this is

[Bug c++/33840] bit-field size accepted for struct

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33840 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||patch Known to work|

[Bug c++/49266] [C++0x] Another incomplete type regression with noexcept

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49266 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug c++/49107] [C++0x][4.7 Regression] incomplete type regression with std::pair

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49107 --- Comment #14 from Jonathan Wakely 2011-06-04 12:27:50 UTC --- (In reply to comment #9) > But doing this breaks auto_ptr. And v3 future as well, for some reason. I can take care of any necessary changes to future if you let me know what break

[Bug tree-optimization/41012] Missing inlining after indirect call promotion

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41012 Jan Hubicka changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rguenther at suse dot de --- Comment #2 fro

[Bug debug/47590] var tracking produces wrong debug in code where optimization is turned off using pragma

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47590 Alexandre Oliva changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug debug/48333] -fcompare-debug failure (length) - "memmove" x "__builtin_memmove"

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48333 Alexandre Oliva changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug debug/47590] var tracking produces wrong debug in code where optimization is turned off using pragma

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47590 --- Comment #6 from Alexandre Oliva 2011-06-04 10:15:51 UTC --- Author: aoliva Date: Sat Jun 4 10:15:48 2011 New Revision: 174637 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=174637 Log: PR debug/47590 * target.def (delay_sched2, delay

[Bug debug/48333] -fcompare-debug failure (length) - "memmove" x "__builtin_memmove"

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48333 --- Comment #5 from Alexandre Oliva 2011-06-04 10:08:12 UTC --- Author: aoliva Date: Sat Jun 4 10:08:09 2011 New Revision: 174636 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=174636 Log: PR debug/48333 * calls.c (emit_call_1): Prefer t

[Bug c++/49107] [C++0x][4.7 Regression] incomplete type regression with std::pair

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49107 --- Comment #13 from Marc Glisse 2011-06-04 09:31:40 UTC --- (In reply to comment #8) > Here, instantiating > std::pair> involves evaluating > noexcept(ploum>::value), Hello, I am far from a specialist. Is it necessary to evaluate the noexcept

[Bug tree-optimization/49038] [4.5/4.6/4.7 Regression] -ftree-vectorise introduces reads past end of array

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49038 Ira Rosen changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug tree-optimization/49038] [4.5/4.6/4.7 Regression] -ftree-vectorise introduces reads past end of array

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49038 --- Comment #6 from irar at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-06-04 09:20:04 UTC --- Author: irar Date: Sat Jun 4 09:20:00 2011 New Revision: 174635 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=174635 Log: PR tree-optimization/49038

[Bug tree-optimization/49038] [4.5/4.6/4.7 Regression] -ftree-vectorise introduces reads past end of array

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49038 --- Comment #5 from irar at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-06-04 09:12:58 UTC --- Author: irar Date: Sat Jun 4 09:12:55 2011 New Revision: 174634 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=174634 Log: PR tree-optimization/49038 * tree-v

[Bug c++/33840] bit-field size accepted for struct

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33840 Volker Reichelt changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.6.0 --- Comment #2 from Volker Reiche

[Bug middle-end/45098] Missed induction variable optimization

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45098 --- Comment #13 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-06-04 08:42:29 UTC --- > Tom can this now be marked as being fixed for 4.7.0 ? I'm still discussing one patch with Zdenek. Latest gcc-patches mail on this is http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011

[Bug target/48250] ICE in reload_cse_simplify_operands, at postreload.c:403

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48250 --- Comment #4 from Ramana Radhakrishnan 2011-06-04 08:22:32 UTC --- A backport to 4.6 shows the following failures - arm-sim: gcc.c-torture/execute/loop-ivopts-2.c compilation, -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -funroll-all-loops -finline-functions (i

[Bug middle-end/45098] Missed induction variable optimization

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45098 Ramana Radhakrishnan changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ramana at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug c++/49107] [C++0x][4.7 Regression] incomplete type regression with std::pair

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49107 --- Comment #12 from Paolo Carlini 2011-06-04 07:33:15 UTC --- I'd like to understand as soon as possible if this type of issue means that these traits cannot really be implemented with sfinae or not. Actually, as usual, the library is just an ex

[Bug c++/49107] [C++0x][4.7 Regression] incomplete type regression with std::pair

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49107 --- Comment #11 from Paolo Carlini 2011-06-04 07:05:34 UTC --- I'm sorry, now I see that typedef. Hum, I'm worried, I have no idea how I coul possibly simplify or workaround this type of issue in the library, among other things.