[Bug libfortran/48906] Wrong rounding results with -m32

2011-06-07 Thread thenlich at users dot sourceforge.net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48906 --- Comment #30 from Thomas Henlich thenlich at users dot sourceforge.net 2011-06-07 06:56:13 UTC --- Created attachment 24454 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24454 Patch for scale factor. PUBLIC DOMAIN

[Bug libfortran/48906] Wrong rounding results with -m32

2011-06-07 Thread thenlich at users dot sourceforge.net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48906 --- Comment #31 from Thomas Henlich thenlich at users dot sourceforge.net 2011-06-07 06:56:54 UTC --- (In reply to comment #30) Created attachment 24454 [details] Patch for scale factor. PUBLIC DOMAIN A had a go at this. Feel free to improve.

[Bug middle-end/49308] New: [4.7 Regression] segfault in rest_of_handle_ud_dce () at gcc/gcc/dce.c:518

2011-06-07 Thread Joost.VandeVondele at pci dot uzh.ch
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49308 Summary: [4.7 Regression] segfault in rest_of_handle_ud_dce () at gcc/gcc/dce.c:518 Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug middle-end/49308] [4.7 Regression] segfault in rest_of_handle_ud_dce () at gcc/gcc/dce.c:518

2011-06-07 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49308 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||aoliva at gcc dot

[Bug middle-end/49308] [4.7 Regression] segfault in rest_of_handle_ud_dce () at gcc/gcc/dce.c:518

2011-06-07 Thread Joost.VandeVondele at pci dot uzh.ch
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49308 --- Comment #2 from Joost VandeVondele Joost.VandeVondele at pci dot uzh.ch 2011-06-07 07:12:14 UTC --- (In reply to comment #1) http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=174699 then. What does: p *defs p *defs-ref say? strangely

[Bug middle-end/49308] [4.7 Regression] segfault in rest_of_handle_ud_dce () at gcc/gcc/dce.c:518

2011-06-07 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49308 --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-06-07 07:16:50 UTC --- So p (*use_rec)-base.chain p (*use_rec)-base.chain-ref p *(*use_rec)-base.chain-ref p (*use_rec)-base.chain-next p (*use_rec)-base.chain-next-ref p

[Bug tree-optimization/49309] New: [4.6/4.7 Regression] ICE with -fmudflap: verify_stmts failed: type mismatch in pointer plus expression

2011-06-07 Thread reichelt at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49309 Summary: [4.6/4.7 Regression] ICE with -fmudflap: verify_stmts failed: type mismatch in pointer plus expression Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug tree-optimization/49309] [4.6/4.7 Regression] ICE with -fmudflap: verify_stmts failed: type mismatch in pointer plus expression

2011-06-07 Thread reichelt at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49309 Volker Reichelt reichelt at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.6.1

[Bug rtl-optimization/49169] ARM: optimisations strip the Thumb/ARM mode bit off function pointers

2011-06-07 Thread rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49169 rsand...@gcc.gnu.org rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Bug middle-end/49308] [4.7 Regression] segfault in rest_of_handle_ud_dce () at gcc/gcc/dce.c:518

2011-06-07 Thread Joost.VandeVondele at pci dot uzh.ch
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49308 --- Comment #4 from Joost VandeVondele Joost.VandeVondele at pci dot uzh.ch 2011-06-07 07:33:29 UTC --- (In reply to comment #3) So p (*use_rec)-base.chain ? Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. rest_of_handle_ud_dce () at

[Bug middle-end/49308] [4.7 Regression] segfault in rest_of_handle_ud_dce () at gcc/gcc/dce.c:518

2011-06-07 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49308 --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-06-07 07:35:40 UTC --- Your gdb is very old. Then rm dce.o; make CFLAGS=-g -O0 cc1 cc1plus f951 and retry.

[Bug middle-end/49308] [4.7 Regression] segfault in rest_of_handle_ud_dce () at gcc/gcc/dce.c:518

2011-06-07 Thread Joost.VandeVondele at pci dot uzh.ch
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49308 --- Comment #6 from Joost VandeVondele Joost.VandeVondele at pci dot uzh.ch 2011-06-07 07:45:53 UTC --- (In reply to comment #5) Your gdb is very old. Then rm dce.o; make CFLAGS=-g -O0 cc1 cc1plus f951 and retry. upgraded gdb instead (7.2).

[Bug middle-end/49282] malloc corruption in large lto1-wpa run during inline edge heap resize

2011-06-07 Thread andi-gcc at firstfloor dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49282 --- Comment #5 from Andi Kleen andi-gcc at firstfloor dot org 2011-06-07 08:15:35 UTC --- It seems GCOV is not the only cause. I just got the malloc corruption again when building for 32bit (instead of 64bit), but still with gcov disabled. So

[Bug middle-end/49308] [4.7 Regression] segfault in rest_of_handle_ud_dce () at gcc/gcc/dce.c:518

2011-06-07 Thread Joost.VandeVondele at pci dot uzh.ch
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49308 --- Comment #7 from Joost VandeVondele Joost.VandeVondele at pci dot uzh.ch 2011-06-07 08:27:13 UTC --- reduced testcase: gfortran-trunk -c -O2 -funroll-loops -g bug.f90 bug.f90: In function ‘calculate_first_density_matrix’: bug.f90:29:0:

[Bug bootstrap/49306] 4.6.0 fails to build on Solaris 11 (i386)

2011-06-07 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49306 --- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-06-07 08:31:46 UTC --- http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/FAQ#configure_suffix Read the docs for --with-gmp, if linking dynamically you need to reconfigure your dynamic linker to look in

[Bug target/49257] -mfpmath=sse generates x87 instructions on 32 bits OS

2011-06-07 Thread ubizjak at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49257 --- Comment #11 from Uros Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com 2011-06-07 08:38:45 UTC --- Patched gcc fails following testcase: --cut here-- #include stdio.h float __attribute__((noinline)) ll2f (long long i) { return i; } long long

[Bug libstdc++/49293] 22_locale/time_get/get_weekday/char/38081-[12].cc fail with glibc 2.14

2011-06-07 Thread paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49293 --- Comment #5 from Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com 2011-06-07 08:46:17 UTC --- I guess I'm going to commit my patchlet, in case issues remain should be just matter of tweaking a few chars in the strings, patch preapproved.

[Bug libstdc++/49293] 22_locale/time_get/get_weekday/char/38081-[12].cc fail with glibc 2.14

2011-06-07 Thread paolo at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49293 --- Comment #6 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org paolo at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-06-07 08:50:08 UTC --- Author: paolo Date: Tue Jun 7 08:50:04 2011 New Revision: 174737 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=174737 Log: 2011-06-07 Paolo

[Bug libstdc++/49293] 22_locale/time_get/get_weekday/char/38081-[12].cc fail with glibc 2.14

2011-06-07 Thread paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49293 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug lto/49277] [4.7 Regression] 456.hmmer in SPEC CPU 2006 failed to build

2011-06-07 Thread rguenther at suse dot de
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49277 --- Comment #5 from rguenther at suse dot de rguenther at suse dot de 2011-06-07 09:00:06 UTC --- On Mon, 6 Jun 2011, hjl.tools at gmail dot com wrote: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49277 H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com

[Bug middle-end/49308] [4.7 Regression] segfault in rest_of_handle_ud_dce () at gcc/gcc/dce.c:518

2011-06-07 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49308 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last

[Bug fortran/49278] ICE (segfault) when combining DATA with default initialization

2011-06-07 Thread burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49278 --- Comment #4 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-06-07 09:17:05 UTC --- (In reply to comment #3) (In reply to comment #2) The following aborts. Note sure if it is conforming. Hence, it seems to be valid, but I wouldn't mind

[Bug rtl-optimization/49304] ICE: code_motion_path_driver, at sel-sched.c:6573 w/ -O3 on ia64 in r174558

2011-06-07 Thread amonakov at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49304 Alexander Monakov amonakov at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug rtl-optimization/49303] ICE: vinsn_detach, at sel-sched-ir.c:1277 w/ -O3 on ia64 in r174558

2011-06-07 Thread amonakov at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49303 --- Comment #2 from Alexander Monakov amonakov at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-06-07 09:28:30 UTC --- *** Bug 49304 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug rtl-optimization/49303] ICE: vinsn_detach, at sel-sched-ir.c:1277 w/ -O3 on ia64 in r174558

2011-06-07 Thread amonakov at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49303 Alexander Monakov amonakov at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED

[Bug middle-end/49308] [4.7 Regression] segfault in rest_of_handle_ud_dce () at gcc/gcc/dce.c:518

2011-06-07 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49308 --- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-06-07 09:44:03 UTC --- Created attachment 24455 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24455 gcc47-pr49308.patch Untested fix.

[Bug gcov-profile/49299] ICE in gimple_ic on profile feedback build

2011-06-07 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49299 --- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-06-07 09:48:57 UTC --- Author: jakub Date: Tue Jun 7 09:48:53 2011 New Revision: 174738 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=174738 Log: PR gcov-profile/49299

[Bug gcov-profile/49299] ICE in gimple_ic on profile feedback build

2011-06-07 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49299 --- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-06-07 09:53:20 UTC --- Author: jakub Date: Tue Jun 7 09:53:17 2011 New Revision: 174739 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=174739 Log: PR gcov-profile/49299

[Bug gcov-profile/49299] ICE in gimple_ic on profile feedback build

2011-06-07 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49299 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug middle-end/49310] New: [4.7 Regression] Compile time hog

2011-06-07 Thread Joost.VandeVondele at pci dot uzh.ch
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49310 Summary: [4.7 Regression] Compile time hog Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: middle-end AssignedTo:

[Bug debug/49130] discrepancies between DW_AT_name and demangler

2011-06-07 Thread dodji at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49130 --- Comment #8 from Dodji Seketeli dodji at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-06-07 11:12:55 UTC --- Author: dodji Date: Tue Jun 7 11:12:50 2011 New Revision: 174742 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=174742 Log: Fix PR debug/49130

[Bug fortran/49297] ICE gfc_conv_component_ref, at fortran/trans-expr.c:268 when compiling molcas7.6

2011-06-07 Thread shekhar88 at chem dot iitb.ac.in
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49297 --- Comment #2 from Shekhar shekhar88 at chem dot iitb.ac.in 2011-06-07 11:35:12 UTC --- We are glad that you answered for our problem. Thanks for your help. But we have new version of gcc. It is gcc 4.6. Even after this, we are not able to

[Bug lto/49302] [4.7 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/lto/20110201-1 c_lto_20110201-1_0.o-c_lto_20110201-1_0.o

2011-06-07 Thread wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49302 --- Comment #2 from William J. Schmidt wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-06-07 11:51:56 UTC --- I'll have a look. With -ffast-math, cabs is converted to sqrt(pow(rpart,2.0),pow(ipart,2.0)). Not sure yet why the pow calls aren't converted back to

[Bug lto/49302] [4.7 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/lto/20110201-1 c_lto_20110201-1_0.o-c_lto_20110201-1_0.o

2011-06-07 Thread wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49302 --- Comment #3 from William J. Schmidt wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-06-07 12:08:17 UTC --- (In reply to comment #2) I'll have a look. With -ffast-math, cabs is converted to sqrt(pow(rpart,2.0),pow(ipart,2.0)). Not sure yet why the pow

[Bug middle-end/49310] [4.7 Regression] Compile time hog

2011-06-07 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49310 Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.7.0

[Bug middle-end/49308] [4.7 Regression] segfault in rest_of_handle_ud_dce () at gcc/gcc/dce.c:518

2011-06-07 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49308 Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.7.0

[Bug lto/49302] [4.7 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/lto/20110201-1 c_lto_20110201-1_0.o-c_lto_20110201-1_0.o

2011-06-07 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49302 Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last

[Bug target/49307] [4.5/4.6/4.7 Regression] ICE in spill_failure, at reload1.c:2113

2011-06-07 Thread rmansfield at qnx dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49307 Ryan Mansfield rmansfield at qnx dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|ICE in spill_failure, at|[4.5/4.6/4.7

[Bug middle-end/49191] gcc.dg/memcpy-3.c FAILs on SPARC

2011-06-07 Thread ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49191 Ramana Radhakrishnan ramana at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ramana at

[Bug middle-end/49191] gcc.dg/memcpy-3.c FAILs on SPARC

2011-06-07 Thread ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49191 --- Comment #5 from Ramana Radhakrishnan ramana at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-06-07 13:13:59 UTC --- (In reply to comment #4) And arm-linux-gnueabi. Though on ARM I would expect this to pass once we can support unaligned memcpy's for certain

[Bug lto/49302] [4.7 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/lto/20110201-1 c_lto_20110201-1_0.o-c_lto_20110201-1_0.o

2011-06-07 Thread wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49302 William J. Schmidt wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||bergner

[Bug target/49257] -mfpmath=sse generates x87 instructions on 32 bits OS

2011-06-07 Thread ubizjak at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49257 --- Comment #12 from Uros Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com 2011-06-07 13:16:37 UTC --- (In reply to comment #11) A bit has been lost... ... due to additional cvtsd2ss conversion. Any help would be appreciated here.

[Bug lto/49302] [4.7 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/lto/20110201-1 c_lto_20110201-1_0.o-c_lto_20110201-1_0.o

2011-06-07 Thread wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49302 --- Comment #6 from William J. Schmidt wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-06-07 13:23:06 UTC --- (In reply to comment #5) Please ignore that. It leaked in when I was trying to CC somebody.

[Bug lto/49302] [4.7 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/lto/20110201-1 c_lto_20110201-1_0.o-c_lto_20110201-1_0.o

2011-06-07 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49302 --- Comment #7 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-06-07 13:47:00 UTC --- The original failure only occured with -O0 compile and -O2 -ffast-math link. The linker-plugin use was already a workaround for the -O0 link by collect2,

[Bug target/49305] SH Target: internal compiler error: in reload_cse_simplify_operands, at postreload.c:403

2011-06-07 Thread kkojima at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49305 Kazumoto Kojima kkojima at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|

[Bug fortran/49297] ICE gfc_conv_component_ref, at fortran/trans-expr.c:268 when compiling molcas7.6

2011-06-07 Thread burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49297 --- Comment #3 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-06-07 14:04:59 UTC --- (In reply to comment #2) we have new version of gcc. It is gcc 4.6. Are you sure? I am asking because the error message: | fmm_aux_qlm_builder.f90:154:

[Bug target/49305] SH Target: internal compiler error: in reload_cse_simplify_operands, at postreload.c:403

2011-06-07 Thread kkojima at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49305 --- Comment #2 from Kazumoto Kojima kkojima at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-06-07 14:05:50 UTC --- Created attachment 24457 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24457 A reduced testcase

[Bug c++/49311] New: Missing static const symbol with -O0

2011-06-07 Thread hartmut.schirmer at arcormail dot de
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49311 Summary: Missing static const symbol with -O0 Product: gcc Version: 4.3.4 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++ AssignedTo:

[Bug c++/49311] Missing static const symbol with -O0

2011-06-07 Thread hartmut.schirmer at arcormail dot de
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49311 --- Comment #1 from Hartmut Schirmer hartmut.schirmer at arcormail dot de 2011-06-07 14:11:17 UTC --- Created attachment 24458 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24458 Small test case Note bar() doesn't fail Simple changes like

[Bug c++/49311] Missing static const symbol with -O0

2011-06-07 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49311 Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug fortran/49297] ICE gfc_conv_component_ref, at fortran/trans-expr.c:268 when compiling molcas7.6

2011-06-07 Thread kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49297 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug lto/49277] [4.7 Regression] 456.hmmer in SPEC CPU 2006 failed to build

2011-06-07 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49277 --- Comment #6 from H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com 2011-06-07 15:01:48 UTC --- (In reply to comment #5) On Mon, 6 Jun 2011, hjl.tools at gmail dot com wrote: Can you bisect the set of object files (adding -r -nostdlib to the link) and

[Bug c++/48780] [C++0x] scoped enumerations and va_arg (default argument promotions)

2011-06-07 Thread jason at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48780 --- Comment #5 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-06-07 15:09:34 UTC --- Author: jason Date: Tue Jun 7 15:09:29 2011 New Revision: 174751 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=174751 Log: PR c++/48780 *

[Bug middle-end/49310] [4.7 Regression] Compile time hog in var-tracking emit

2011-06-07 Thread Joost.VandeVondele at pci dot uzh.ch
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49310 Joost VandeVondele Joost.VandeVondele at pci dot uzh.ch changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[4.7 Regression] Compile

[Bug tree-optimization/46728] GCC does not generate fmadd for pow (x, 0.75)+y on powerpc

2011-06-07 Thread wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46728 --- Comment #12 from William J. Schmidt wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-06-07 15:12:07 UTC --- Author: wschmidt Date: Tue Jun 7 15:12:04 2011 New Revision: 174752 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=174752 Log: 2011-06-07 Bill

[Bug c++/48780] [C++0x] scoped enumerations and va_arg (default argument promotions)

2011-06-07 Thread jason at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48780 --- Comment #6 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-06-07 15:12:18 UTC --- Author: jason Date: Tue Jun 7 15:12:15 2011 New Revision: 174753 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=174753 Log: PR c++/48780 *

[Bug lto/49277] [4.7 Regression] 456.hmmer in SPEC CPU 2006 failed to build

2011-06-07 Thread rguenther at suse dot de
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49277 --- Comment #7 from rguenther at suse dot de rguenther at suse dot de 2011-06-07 15:20:37 UTC --- On Tue, 7 Jun 2011, hjl.tools at gmail dot com wrote: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49277 --- Comment #6 from H.J. Lu hjl.tools

[Bug tree-optimization/46728] GCC does not generate fmadd for pow (x, 0.75)+y on powerpc

2011-06-07 Thread wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46728 --- Comment #13 from William J. Schmidt wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-06-07 15:24:29 UTC --- Work is complete on the planned changes. Note there is an open regression PR49302 that has yet to be addressed.

[Bug debug/47858] [4.5/4.6/4.7 Regression] IPA-SRA decreases quality of debug info

2011-06-07 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47858 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #24422|0 |1 is

[Bug c++/49311] Missing static const symbol with -O0

2011-06-07 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49311 --- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-06-07 15:57:43 UTC --- This is a dup of PR 10483 PR 13795 PR 13332 PR 13259 PR 44673 PR 42101

[Bug preprocessor/48532] Wrong location of namespaced pragma involving macros

2011-06-07 Thread dodji at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48532 Dodji Seketeli dodji at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug tree-optimization/48497] gfortran.dg/graphite/vect-pr40979.f90 FAILs without -march=pentium4

2011-06-07 Thread ro at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48497 --- Comment #2 from Rainer Orth ro at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-06-07 16:43:33 UTC --- Author: ro Date: Tue Jun 7 16:43:29 2011 New Revision: 174759 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=174759 Log: gcc: PR

[Bug tree-optimization/48497] gfortran.dg/graphite/vect-pr40979.f90 FAILs without -march=pentium4

2011-06-07 Thread ro at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48497 Rainer Orth ro at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug debug/49312] New: Make DW_AT_name contain only simple name, no template-id

2011-06-07 Thread dodji at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49312 Summary: Make DW_AT_name contain only simple name, no template-id Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug debug/49312] Make DW_AT_name contain only simple name, no template-id

2011-06-07 Thread dodji at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49312 Dodji Seketeli dodji at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last

[Bug libfortran/48906] Wrong rounding results with -m32

2011-06-07 Thread jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48906 --- Comment #32 from Jerry DeLisle jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-06-07 17:06:03 UTC --- I managed to get pr20755.f fixed last night with only a minor change and I found a problem elsewhere for fmt_g0_6.f08 which I am still working on. I will

[Bug target/49313] New: Inefficient libgcc implementations for avr

2011-06-07 Thread gjl at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49313 Summary: Inefficient libgcc implementations for avr Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: missed-optimization Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug libgcj/49314] New: md5test, shatest output FAILs on Tru64 UNIX

2011-06-07 Thread ro at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49314 Summary: md5test, shatest output FAILs on Tru64 UNIX Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: libgcj AssignedTo:

[Bug other/48007] Unwind library doesn't work with UNITS_PER_WORD sizeof (void *)

2011-06-07 Thread hjl at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48007 --- Comment #4 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org hjl at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-06-07 17:33:08 UTC --- Author: hjl Date: Tue Jun 7 17:33:05 2011 New Revision: 174760 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=174760 Log: Support

[Bug libgcj/49315] New: Throw_2 SEGVs on Tru64 UNIX

2011-06-07 Thread ro at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49315 Summary: Throw_2 SEGVs on Tru64 UNIX Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: libgcj AssignedTo:

[Bug target/49313] Inefficient libgcc implementations for avr

2011-06-07 Thread gjl at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49313 --- Comment #1 from Georg-Johann Lay gjl at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-06-07 17:41:15 UTC --- Created attachment 24460 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24460 Patch for ffs part. This patch forwards to the standard C library

[Bug tree-optimization/49316] New: ICE in in function_and_variable_visibility, at ipa.c:926 with g++.dg/tls/diag-1.C

2011-06-07 Thread ro at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49316 Summary: ICE in in function_and_variable_visibility, at ipa.c:926 with g++.dg/tls/diag-1.C Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c++/49317] New: g++.dg/abi/local1.C FAILs on Tru64 UNIX

2011-06-07 Thread ro at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49317 Summary: g++.dg/abi/local1.C FAILs on Tru64 UNIX Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++ AssignedTo:

[Bug middle-end/49318] New: [4.7 Regression] 177.mesa in SPEC CPU 2000 failed to build

2011-06-07 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49318 Summary: [4.7 Regression] 177.mesa in SPEC CPU 2000 failed to build Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug middle-end/49319] New: [4.7 regression] g++.dg/abi/thunk5.C FAILs on Tru64 UNIX

2011-06-07 Thread ro at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49319 Summary: [4.7 regression] g++.dg/abi/thunk5.C FAILs on Tru64 UNIX Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug middle-end/49319] [4.7 regression] g++.dg/abi/thunk5.C FAILs on Tru64 UNIX

2011-06-07 Thread ro at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49319 --- Comment #1 from Rainer Orth ro at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-06-07 17:53:17 UTC --- Created attachment 24461 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24461 assembler output

[Bug target/49257] -mfpmath=sse generates x87 instructions on 32 bits OS

2011-06-07 Thread rth at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49257 --- Comment #13 from Richard Henderson rth at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-06-07 18:40:48 UTC --- I apologize. The error you're seeing here is the sort that's handled by the second #if section in libgcc's __floatdisf. In particular, /* Protect

[Bug lto/49302] [4.7 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/lto/20110201-1 c_lto_20110201-1_0.o-c_lto_20110201-1_0.o

2011-06-07 Thread wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49302 --- Comment #8 from William J. Schmidt wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-06-07 20:25:20 UTC --- Because the compile uses -O0 and the link uses -O2 -ffast-math, we have a mismatch of expectations. With -O0 and no -ffast-math, builtin cabs isn't

[Bug middle-end/49318] [4.7 Regression] 177.mesa in SPEC CPU 2000 failed to build

2011-06-07 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49318 H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||irar at gcc dot

[Bug tree-optimization/49320] New: gcc.dg/vect/vect-strided-u8-i8-gap4-unknown.c FAILs with random flags

2011-06-07 Thread zsojka at seznam dot cz
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49320 Summary: gcc.dg/vect/vect-strided-u8-i8-gap4-unknown.c FAILs with random flags Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug c++/49321] New: Incorrect Optimization O2 and O3 on Shift Operation for 64 bit Integers

2011-06-07 Thread bbli08 at yahoo dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49321 Summary: Incorrect Optimization O2 and O3 on Shift Operation for 64 bit Integers Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug c++/49321] Incorrect Optimization O2 and O3 on Shift Operation for 64 bit Integers

2011-06-07 Thread bbli08 at yahoo dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49321 --- Comment #1 from bbli08 at yahoo dot com 2011-06-07 21:01:52 UTC --- Created attachment 24463 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24463 Added attachment for the last commitment

[Bug c++/48421] [4.7 Regression] ICE in build_new_method_call

2011-06-07 Thread jason at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48421 Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jason at gcc dot

[Bug c++/49321] Incorrect Optimization O2 and O3 on Shift Operation for 64 bit Integers

2011-06-07 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49321 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug middle-end/49318] [4.7 Regression] 177.mesa in SPEC CPU 2000 failed to build

2011-06-07 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49318 --- Comment #2 from H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com 2011-06-07 21:42:18 UTC --- LTO isn't needed: [hjl@gnu-16 0002]$ /export/gnu/import/svn/gcc-test-spec-lto/usr/bin/gcc -DSPEC_CPU2000_LP64 -O3 -funroll-loops -ffast-math get.c

[Bug lto/49256] [4.7 Regression] 403.gcc in SPEC CPU 2006 went to an infinite loop

2011-06-07 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49256 H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug c++/44175] [C++0x] decltype sometimes cannot recurse

2011-06-07 Thread jason at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44175 --- Comment #7 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-06-07 21:54:13 UTC --- Author: jason Date: Tue Jun 7 21:54:07 2011 New Revision: 174772 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=174772 Log: PR c++/48969 PR

[Bug c++/48969] ICE with -std=c++0x

2011-06-07 Thread jason at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48969 --- Comment #8 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-06-07 21:54:12 UTC --- Author: jason Date: Tue Jun 7 21:54:07 2011 New Revision: 174772 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=174772 Log: PR c++/48969 PR

[Bug debug/49312] Make DW_AT_name contain only simple name, no template-id

2011-06-07 Thread dodji at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49312 --- Comment #2 from Dodji Seketeli dodji at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-06-07 22:11:40 UTC --- Created attachment 24464 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24464 Candidate patch I am currently testing this candidate patch.

[Bug debug/49130] discrepancies between DW_AT_name and demangler

2011-06-07 Thread dodji at seketeli dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49130 --- Comment #9 from dodji at seketeli dot org dodji at seketeli dot org 2011-06-07 22:21:43 UTC --- After the discussions we've had elsewhere, I think DW_AT_name should contain only the simple template name (with no template arguments) when it

[Bug debug/49130] discrepancies between DW_AT_name and demangler

2011-06-07 Thread dodji at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49130 --- Comment #10 from Dodji Seketeli dodji at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-06-07 22:26:23 UTC --- (In reply to comment #1) I think it would be nicer if there were a DW_AT_mangled_name we could use instead because it's shorter. This also would avoid

[Bug lto/49277] [4.7 Regression] 456.hmmer in SPEC CPU 2006 failed to build

2011-06-07 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49277 --- Comment #8 from H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com 2011-06-07 22:29:21 UTC --- It may be a pilot error.

[Bug other/36328] system headers not found if exec_prefix != prefix

2011-06-07 Thread wilson at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36328 Jim Wilson wilson at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||wilson at gcc dot

[Bug c++/48421] [4.7 Regression] ICE in build_new_method_call

2011-06-07 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48421 Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||paolo.carlini at

[Bug target/49257] -mfpmath=sse generates x87 instructions on 32 bits OS

2011-06-07 Thread rth at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49257 Richard Henderson rth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #24453|0 |1 is

[Bug c++/48421] [4.7 Regression] ICE in build_new_method_call

2011-06-07 Thread paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48421 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug target/49307] [4.5/4.6/4.7 Regression] ICE in spill_failure, at reload1.c:2113

2011-06-07 Thread kkojima at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49307 Kazumoto Kojima kkojima at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|

[Bug c++/49311] Missing static const symbol with -O0

2011-06-07 Thread manu at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49311 Manuel López-Ibáñez manu at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||manu at gcc

[Bug libstdc++/49322] New: [4.7 Regression] Many libstdc++ testsuite failures

2011-06-07 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49322 Summary: [4.7 Regression] Many libstdc++ testsuite failures Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: libstdc++

[Bug libstdc++/49322] [4.7 Regression] Many libstdc++ testsuite failures

2011-06-07 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49322 H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jason at redhat dot

  1   2   >