http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48906
--- Comment #30 from Thomas Henlich thenlich at users dot sourceforge.net
2011-06-07 06:56:13 UTC ---
Created attachment 24454
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24454
Patch for scale factor. PUBLIC DOMAIN
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48906
--- Comment #31 from Thomas Henlich thenlich at users dot sourceforge.net
2011-06-07 06:56:54 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #30)
Created attachment 24454 [details]
Patch for scale factor. PUBLIC DOMAIN
A had a go at this. Feel free to improve.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49308
Summary: [4.7 Regression] segfault in rest_of_handle_ud_dce ()
at gcc/gcc/dce.c:518
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49308
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||aoliva at gcc dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49308
--- Comment #2 from Joost VandeVondele Joost.VandeVondele at pci dot uzh.ch
2011-06-07 07:12:14 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=174699
then. What does:
p *defs
p *defs-ref
say?
strangely
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49308
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-06-07
07:16:50 UTC ---
So
p (*use_rec)-base.chain
p (*use_rec)-base.chain-ref
p *(*use_rec)-base.chain-ref
p (*use_rec)-base.chain-next
p (*use_rec)-base.chain-next-ref
p
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49309
Summary: [4.6/4.7 Regression] ICE with -fmudflap: verify_stmts
failed: type mismatch in pointer plus expression
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49309
Volker Reichelt reichelt at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.6.1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49169
rsand...@gcc.gnu.org rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49308
--- Comment #4 from Joost VandeVondele Joost.VandeVondele at pci dot uzh.ch
2011-06-07 07:33:29 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #3)
So
p (*use_rec)-base.chain
?
Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
rest_of_handle_ud_dce () at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49308
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-06-07
07:35:40 UTC ---
Your gdb is very old.
Then
rm dce.o; make CFLAGS=-g -O0 cc1 cc1plus f951
and retry.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49308
--- Comment #6 from Joost VandeVondele Joost.VandeVondele at pci dot uzh.ch
2011-06-07 07:45:53 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #5)
Your gdb is very old.
Then
rm dce.o; make CFLAGS=-g -O0 cc1 cc1plus f951
and retry.
upgraded gdb instead (7.2).
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49282
--- Comment #5 from Andi Kleen andi-gcc at firstfloor dot org 2011-06-07
08:15:35 UTC ---
It seems GCOV is not the only cause. I just got the malloc corruption
again when building for 32bit (instead of 64bit), but still with gcov disabled.
So
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49308
--- Comment #7 from Joost VandeVondele Joost.VandeVondele at pci dot uzh.ch
2011-06-07 08:27:13 UTC ---
reduced testcase:
gfortran-trunk -c -O2 -funroll-loops -g bug.f90
bug.f90: In function ‘calculate_first_density_matrix’:
bug.f90:29:0:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49306
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-06-07
08:31:46 UTC ---
http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/FAQ#configure_suffix
Read the docs for --with-gmp, if linking dynamically you need to reconfigure
your dynamic linker to look in
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49257
--- Comment #11 from Uros Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com 2011-06-07 08:38:45
UTC ---
Patched gcc fails following testcase:
--cut here--
#include stdio.h
float
__attribute__((noinline))
ll2f (long long i)
{
return i;
}
long long
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49293
--- Comment #5 from Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com 2011-06-07
08:46:17 UTC ---
I guess I'm going to commit my patchlet, in case issues remain should be just
matter of tweaking a few chars in the strings, patch preapproved.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49293
--- Comment #6 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org paolo at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-06-07 08:50:08 UTC ---
Author: paolo
Date: Tue Jun 7 08:50:04 2011
New Revision: 174737
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=174737
Log:
2011-06-07 Paolo
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49293
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49277
--- Comment #5 from rguenther at suse dot de rguenther at suse dot de
2011-06-07 09:00:06 UTC ---
On Mon, 6 Jun 2011, hjl.tools at gmail dot com wrote:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49277
H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49308
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49278
--- Comment #4 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-06-07
09:17:05 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #3)
(In reply to comment #2)
The following aborts. Note sure if it is conforming.
Hence, it seems to be valid, but I wouldn't mind
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49304
Alexander Monakov amonakov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49303
--- Comment #2 from Alexander Monakov amonakov at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-06-07
09:28:30 UTC ---
*** Bug 49304 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49303
Alexander Monakov amonakov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49308
--- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-06-07
09:44:03 UTC ---
Created attachment 24455
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24455
gcc47-pr49308.patch
Untested fix.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49299
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-06-07
09:48:57 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Tue Jun 7 09:48:53 2011
New Revision: 174738
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=174738
Log:
PR gcov-profile/49299
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49299
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-06-07
09:53:20 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Tue Jun 7 09:53:17 2011
New Revision: 174739
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=174739
Log:
PR gcov-profile/49299
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49299
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49310
Summary: [4.7 Regression] Compile time hog
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: middle-end
AssignedTo:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49130
--- Comment #8 from Dodji Seketeli dodji at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-06-07
11:12:55 UTC ---
Author: dodji
Date: Tue Jun 7 11:12:50 2011
New Revision: 174742
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=174742
Log:
Fix PR debug/49130
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49297
--- Comment #2 from Shekhar shekhar88 at chem dot iitb.ac.in 2011-06-07
11:35:12 UTC ---
We are glad that you answered for our problem. Thanks for your help. But
we have new version of gcc. It is gcc 4.6. Even after this, we are not
able to
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49302
--- Comment #2 from William J. Schmidt wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-06-07
11:51:56 UTC ---
I'll have a look. With -ffast-math, cabs is converted to
sqrt(pow(rpart,2.0),pow(ipart,2.0)). Not sure yet why the pow calls aren't
converted back to
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49302
--- Comment #3 from William J. Schmidt wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-06-07
12:08:17 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #2)
I'll have a look. With -ffast-math, cabs is converted to
sqrt(pow(rpart,2.0),pow(ipart,2.0)). Not sure yet why the pow
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49310
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.7.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49308
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.7.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49302
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49307
Ryan Mansfield rmansfield at qnx dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|ICE in spill_failure, at|[4.5/4.6/4.7
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49191
Ramana Radhakrishnan ramana at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ramana at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49191
--- Comment #5 from Ramana Radhakrishnan ramana at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-06-07
13:13:59 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #4)
And arm-linux-gnueabi.
Though on ARM I would expect this to pass once we can support unaligned
memcpy's for certain
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49302
William J. Schmidt wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bergner
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49257
--- Comment #12 from Uros Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com 2011-06-07 13:16:37
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #11)
A bit has been lost...
... due to additional cvtsd2ss conversion.
Any help would be appreciated here.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49302
--- Comment #6 from William J. Schmidt wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-06-07
13:23:06 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #5)
Please ignore that. It leaked in when I was trying to CC somebody.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49302
--- Comment #7 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-06-07
13:47:00 UTC ---
The original failure only occured with -O0 compile and -O2 -ffast-math link.
The linker-plugin use was already a workaround for the -O0 link by collect2,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49305
Kazumoto Kojima kkojima at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49297
--- Comment #3 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-06-07
14:04:59 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #2)
we have new version of gcc. It is gcc 4.6.
Are you sure? I am asking because the error message:
| fmm_aux_qlm_builder.f90:154:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49305
--- Comment #2 from Kazumoto Kojima kkojima at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-06-07
14:05:50 UTC ---
Created attachment 24457
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24457
A reduced testcase
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49311
Summary: Missing static const symbol with -O0
Product: gcc
Version: 4.3.4
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
AssignedTo:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49311
--- Comment #1 from Hartmut Schirmer hartmut.schirmer at arcormail dot de
2011-06-07 14:11:17 UTC ---
Created attachment 24458
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24458
Small test case
Note bar() doesn't fail
Simple changes like
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49311
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49297
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49277
--- Comment #6 from H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com 2011-06-07 15:01:48
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #5)
On Mon, 6 Jun 2011, hjl.tools at gmail dot com wrote:
Can you bisect the set of object files (adding -r -nostdlib to the link)
and
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48780
--- Comment #5 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-06-07
15:09:34 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Tue Jun 7 15:09:29 2011
New Revision: 174751
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=174751
Log:
PR c++/48780
*
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49310
Joost VandeVondele Joost.VandeVondele at pci dot uzh.ch changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[4.7 Regression] Compile
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46728
--- Comment #12 from William J. Schmidt wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-06-07 15:12:07 UTC ---
Author: wschmidt
Date: Tue Jun 7 15:12:04 2011
New Revision: 174752
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=174752
Log:
2011-06-07 Bill
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48780
--- Comment #6 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-06-07
15:12:18 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Tue Jun 7 15:12:15 2011
New Revision: 174753
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=174753
Log:
PR c++/48780
*
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49277
--- Comment #7 from rguenther at suse dot de rguenther at suse dot de
2011-06-07 15:20:37 UTC ---
On Tue, 7 Jun 2011, hjl.tools at gmail dot com wrote:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49277
--- Comment #6 from H.J. Lu hjl.tools
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46728
--- Comment #13 from William J. Schmidt wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-06-07 15:24:29 UTC ---
Work is complete on the planned changes. Note there is an open regression
PR49302 that has yet to be addressed.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47858
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #24422|0 |1
is
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49311
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-06-07
15:57:43 UTC ---
This is a dup of
PR 10483
PR 13795
PR 13332
PR 13259
PR 44673
PR 42101
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48532
Dodji Seketeli dodji at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48497
--- Comment #2 from Rainer Orth ro at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-06-07 16:43:33 UTC
---
Author: ro
Date: Tue Jun 7 16:43:29 2011
New Revision: 174759
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=174759
Log:
gcc:
PR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48497
Rainer Orth ro at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49312
Summary: Make DW_AT_name contain only simple name, no
template-id
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49312
Dodji Seketeli dodji at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48906
--- Comment #32 from Jerry DeLisle jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-06-07
17:06:03 UTC ---
I managed to get pr20755.f fixed last night with only a minor change and I
found a problem elsewhere for fmt_g0_6.f08 which I am still working on. I will
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49313
Summary: Inefficient libgcc implementations for avr
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: missed-optimization
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49314
Summary: md5test, shatest output FAILs on Tru64 UNIX
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: libgcj
AssignedTo:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48007
--- Comment #4 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org hjl at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-06-07
17:33:08 UTC ---
Author: hjl
Date: Tue Jun 7 17:33:05 2011
New Revision: 174760
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=174760
Log:
Support
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49315
Summary: Throw_2 SEGVs on Tru64 UNIX
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: libgcj
AssignedTo:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49313
--- Comment #1 from Georg-Johann Lay gjl at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-06-07
17:41:15 UTC ---
Created attachment 24460
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24460
Patch for ffs part.
This patch forwards to the standard C library
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49316
Summary: ICE in in function_and_variable_visibility, at
ipa.c:926 with g++.dg/tls/diag-1.C
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49317
Summary: g++.dg/abi/local1.C FAILs on Tru64 UNIX
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
AssignedTo:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49318
Summary: [4.7 Regression] 177.mesa in SPEC CPU 2000 failed to
build
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49319
Summary: [4.7 regression] g++.dg/abi/thunk5.C FAILs on Tru64
UNIX
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49319
--- Comment #1 from Rainer Orth ro at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-06-07 17:53:17 UTC
---
Created attachment 24461
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24461
assembler output
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49257
--- Comment #13 from Richard Henderson rth at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-06-07
18:40:48 UTC ---
I apologize. The error you're seeing here is the sort that's
handled by the second #if section in libgcc's __floatdisf.
In particular,
/* Protect
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49302
--- Comment #8 from William J. Schmidt wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-06-07
20:25:20 UTC ---
Because the compile uses -O0 and the link uses -O2 -ffast-math, we have a
mismatch of expectations. With -O0 and no -ffast-math, builtin cabs isn't
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49318
H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||irar at gcc dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49320
Summary: gcc.dg/vect/vect-strided-u8-i8-gap4-unknown.c FAILs
with random flags
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49321
Summary: Incorrect Optimization O2 and O3 on Shift Operation
for 64 bit Integers
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49321
--- Comment #1 from bbli08 at yahoo dot com 2011-06-07 21:01:52 UTC ---
Created attachment 24463
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24463
Added attachment for the last commitment
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48421
Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49321
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49318
--- Comment #2 from H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com 2011-06-07 21:42:18
UTC ---
LTO isn't needed:
[hjl@gnu-16 0002]$ /export/gnu/import/svn/gcc-test-spec-lto/usr/bin/gcc
-DSPEC_CPU2000_LP64 -O3 -funroll-loops -ffast-math get.c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49256
H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44175
--- Comment #7 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-06-07
21:54:13 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Tue Jun 7 21:54:07 2011
New Revision: 174772
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=174772
Log:
PR c++/48969
PR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48969
--- Comment #8 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-06-07
21:54:12 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Tue Jun 7 21:54:07 2011
New Revision: 174772
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=174772
Log:
PR c++/48969
PR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49312
--- Comment #2 from Dodji Seketeli dodji at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-06-07
22:11:40 UTC ---
Created attachment 24464
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24464
Candidate patch
I am currently testing this candidate patch.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49130
--- Comment #9 from dodji at seketeli dot org dodji at seketeli dot org
2011-06-07 22:21:43 UTC ---
After the discussions we've had elsewhere, I think DW_AT_name should
contain only the simple template name (with no template arguments) when
it
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49130
--- Comment #10 from Dodji Seketeli dodji at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-06-07
22:26:23 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
I think it would be nicer if there were a DW_AT_mangled_name we could use
instead because it's shorter. This also would avoid
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49277
--- Comment #8 from H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com 2011-06-07 22:29:21
UTC ---
It may be a pilot error.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36328
Jim Wilson wilson at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||wilson at gcc dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48421
Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||paolo.carlini at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49257
Richard Henderson rth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #24453|0 |1
is
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48421
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49307
Kazumoto Kojima kkojima at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49311
Manuel López-Ibáñez manu at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||manu at gcc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49322
Summary: [4.7 Regression] Many libstdc++ testsuite failures
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: libstdc++
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49322
H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at redhat dot
1 - 100 of 109 matches
Mail list logo