[Bug fortran/34657] program-unit MY_SUB imports symbol MY_SUB

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34657 Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug tree-optimization/49773] New: use of class data members prevent vectorization

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49773 Summary: use of class data members prevent vectorization Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: tree-optimization

[Bug fortran/49708] [4.5/4.6/4.7 Regression] ICE with allocate and no dimensions

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49708 --- Comment #5 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-07-18 07:33:07 UTC --- Janus, what's the status? (In reply to comment #4) I just verified that this patch is free of testsuite regressions. The patch is OK with a test case,

[Bug middle-end/49675] [4.6/4.7 Regression] ICE (segfault) with -finstrument-functions

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49675 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last

[Bug tree-optimization/49140] [4.6 regression] wrong code with -O2 and -O3, not with -O3 -no-inline

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49140 Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING

[Bug lto/46798] [4.6 Regression] invalid conversion in gimple call; verify_stmts failed

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46798 Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||4.7.0

[Bug middle-end/49545] [4.6 Regression] New C++ test failures

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49545 Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||4.7.0

[Bug c/35634] [4.4/4.5/4.6/4.7 Regression] operand of pre-/postin-/decrement not promoted

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35634 --- Comment #31 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-07-18 08:16:58 UTC --- Well, I'd still go for comment#14 ... we could teach VRP to shorten the operations again, if possible, to avoid the optimization regressions.

[Bug target/49742] [4.7 Regression] ICE for gcc.dg/vect/O3-pr39675-2.c on ARM

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49742 --- Comment #5 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-07-18 08:24:40 UTC --- This must be an artifact of the load-/store-lanes stuff. It looks like they play foul with aliasing. It might also be that predictive commoning simply

[Bug tree-optimization/49772] [4.7 Regression] ICE: in ipa_pta_execute, at tree-ssa-structalias.c:6790 with -fipa-pta

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49772 Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last

[Bug tree-optimization/49770] [4.7 Regression] wrong code with -fno-tree-forwprop

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49770 Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug tree-optimization/49771] [4.7 Regression] wrong code with -ftree-vectorize

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49771 Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rsandifo at

[Bug other/49767] __mulsc3 runs into infinite recursion if GCC is compiled with -O0 option

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49767 Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug c/49768] [4.6/4.7 Regression] C99 style union initializations does not work as expected with optimizations

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49768 --- Comment #5 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-07-18 08:47:01 UTC --- I suppose fold produces some BIT_FIELD_REF here, giving up probably is easiest for now.

[Bug middle-end/49774] New: [meta-bug] restrict qualification aliasing issues

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49774 Summary: [meta-bug] restrict qualification aliasing issues Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: middle-end

[Bug tree-optimization/49761] restrict keyword ignored if in structure

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49761 Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last

[Bug tree-optimization/49760] vectorization inhibited if indices are references

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49760 Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW

[Bug testsuite/49757] FAIL: gcc.target/tic6x/*.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49757 Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug other/49775] New: [4.6.1 Regression on AVR] ICE in based_loc_descr

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49775 Summary: [4.6.1 Regression on AVR] ICE in based_loc_descr Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: other

[Bug other/49775] [4.6.1 Regression on AVR] ICE in based_loc_descr

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49775 --- Comment #1 from Anitha Boyapati anitha.boyapati at atmel dot com 2011-07-18 09:01:36 UTC --- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17906 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35432

[Bug other/49752] [4.7 Regression] Non-existing struct `tree_type' in fold_checksum_tree in fold-const.c, can't build with `--enable-checking=fold'

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49752 Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||build

[Bug target/47744] [x32] ICE: in reload_cse_simplify_operands, at postreload.c:403

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47744 --- Comment #28 from Uros Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com 2011-07-18 09:08:39 UTC --- Here is my latest proposed patch: --cut here-- Index: i386.c === --- i386.c(revision

[Bug tree-optimization/49749] Reassociation rank algorithm does not include all non-NULL operands

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49749 Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last

[Bug c++/49756] g++ ICE

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49756 Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last

[Bug tree-optimization/49760] vectorization inhibited if indices are references

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49760 --- Comment #2 from vincenzo Innocente vincenzo.innocente at cern dot ch 2011-07-18 09:39:49 UTC --- Thanks for the detailed explanation. In the real life code, out is filled calling foo multiple times (a sort of nested loop), k was used to

[Bug tree-optimization/49760] vectorization inhibited if indices are references

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49760 --- Comment #3 from rguenther at suse dot de rguenther at suse dot de 2011-07-18 09:44:23 UTC --- On Mon, 18 Jul 2011, vincenzo.innocente at cern dot ch wrote: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49760 --- Comment #2 from vincenzo

[Bug bootstrap/49769] [4.7 regression] configuration mismatch -- extra parts

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49769 Rainer Orth ro at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added URL|

[Bug tree-optimization/49760] vectorization inhibited if indices are references

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49760 --- Comment #4 from vincenzo Innocente vincenzo.innocente at cern dot ch 2011-07-18 10:07:10 UTC --- Fair enough. I think I can persuade developers to use only local variables as induction variable. More difficult will be to make them to copy

[Bug middle-end/49029] [4.6/4.7 Regression] ICE in simplify_subreg, at simplify-rtx.c:5266

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49029 Anitha Boyapati anitha.boyapati at atmel dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Bug tree-optimization/49140] [4.6 regression] wrong code with -O2 and -O3, not with -O3 -no-inline

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49140 --- Comment #7 from Matthias Klose doko at ubuntu dot com 2011-07-18 10:19:28 UTC --- the pari tests still fail

[Bug tree-optimization/49770] [4.7 Regression] wrong code with -fno-tree-forwprop

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49770 --- Comment #4 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-07-18 10:46:28 UTC --- Ok, it's sth I worried about when doing the patch. Namely: /* Make sure to use a valueized reference ... */ if

[Bug c++/49776] New: [C++0x]ICE in build_data_member_initialization, at cp/semantics.c:5499

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49776 Summary: [C++0x]ICE in build_data_member_initialization, at cp/semantics.c:5499 Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug target/49541] [4.6/4.7 regression] TLS support partially broken in 64-bit mode

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49541 --- Comment #16 from Rainer Orth ro at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-07-18 12:09:22 UTC --- Author: ro Date: Mon Jul 18 12:09:18 2011 New Revision: 176393 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=176393 Log: PR target/49541 *

[Bug target/49541] [4.6/4.7 regression] TLS support partially broken in 64-bit mode

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49541 --- Comment #17 from Rainer Orth ro at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-07-18 12:10:39 UTC --- Author: ro Date: Mon Jul 18 12:10:34 2011 New Revision: 176394 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=176394 Log: PR target/49541 *

[Bug target/49541] [4.6/4.7 regression] TLS support partially broken in 64-bit mode

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49541 Rainer Orth ro at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug tree-optimization/49768] [4.6/4.7 Regression] C99 style union initializations does not work as expected with optimizations

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49768 --- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-07-18 12:47:36 UTC --- Created attachment 24787 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24787 gcc47-pr49768.patch The easier fix attached. The more complicated would

[Bug target/47744] [x32] ICE: in reload_cse_simplify_operands, at postreload.c:403

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47744 --- Comment #29 from H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com 2011-07-18 13:55:05 UTC --- (In reply to comment #28) Here is my latest proposed patch: --cut here-- Index: i386.c ===

[Bug target/47744] [x32] ICE: in reload_cse_simplify_operands, at postreload.c:403

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47744 --- Comment #30 from Uros Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com 2011-07-18 14:00:43 UTC --- (In reply to comment #29) This patch increases bootstrap time from On which target?

[Bug target/47744] [x32] ICE: in reload_cse_simplify_operands, at postreload.c:403

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47744 --- Comment #31 from H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com 2011-07-18 14:04:13 UTC --- (In reply to comment #30) (In reply to comment #29) This patch increases bootstrap time from On which target? I used --enable-clocale=gnu

[Bug tree-optimization/49773] use of class data members prevent vectorization

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49773 --- Comment #1 from vincenzo Innocente vincenzo.innocente at cern dot ch 2011-07-18 14:11:11 UTC --- I just upgraded to c++ -v Using built-in specs. COLLECT_GCC=c++

[Bug tree-optimization/49771] [4.7 Regression] wrong code with -ftree-vectorize

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49771 --- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-07-18 14:12:49 UTC --- That commit looks bogus, the change it made is: # ivtmp.37_45 = PHI ivtmp.37_43(6), ivtmp.37_46(2) vect_pa.7_44 = (vector(4) int *) ivtmp.37_45; -

[Bug c++/49756] g++ ICE

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49756 Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug libmudflap/49550] Many libmudflap tests fail on Solaris 11/x86

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49550 Rainer Orth ro at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug c++/49756] g++ ICE

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49756 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot

[Bug boehm-gc/49381] Unresolved symbols in libgcjgc.a when linking gctest

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49381 --- Comment #1 from Rainer Orth ro at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-07-18 14:30:23 UTC --- Author: ro Date: Mon Jul 18 14:30:14 2011 New Revision: 176401 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=176401 Log: PR boehm-gc/49381 Backport

[Bug c++/49777] New: for c++ code, without -g option, cannot generate PIC *.so library.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49777 Summary: for c++ code, without -g option, cannot generate PIC *.so library. Product: gcc Version: 4.5.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug middle-end/49545] [4.6 Regression] New C++ test failures

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49545 --- Comment #10 from Ulrich Weigand uweigand at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-07-18 14:35:44 UTC --- (In reply to comment #9) Can you check what patch caused it on the 4.6 branch? It is this one: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2011-07/msg00431.html

[Bug boehm-gc/49381] Unresolved symbols in libgcjgc.a when linking gctest

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49381 Rainer Orth ro at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug target/47744] [x32] ICE: in reload_cse_simplify_operands, at postreload.c:403

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47744 --- Comment #32 from H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com 2011-07-18 14:54:31 UTC --- (In reply to comment #31) But I was running SPEC CPU at the same time. I will re-time it. Is isn't too bad: 5182.95user 396.13system 15:32.41elapsed 598%CPU

[Bug tree-optimization/49170] [4.7 regression] Several libstdc++ tests fail to link on Solaris 8/9: cexp missing

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49170 Rainer Orth ro at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug c++/49756] g++ ICE

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49756 --- Comment #4 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-07-18 15:22:11 UTC --- For this testcase, even 30MB isn't enough, but 40MiB is, so I think I'll round up to 64MB. I think it's probably best to raise the limit in both places to

[Bug go/48223] gob/check fails on Solaris 2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48223 Rainer Orth ro at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug driver/46944] gcc should accept -fuse-linker-plugin only if linker handles -plugin

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46944 Rainer Orth ro at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug target/46023] gcc.dg/vect/pr43430-2.c FAILs on Solaris 8 and 9/x86

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46023 Rainer Orth ro at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug tree-optimization/46021] 3 tree-ssa tests XPASS almost everywhere

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46021 Rainer Orth ro at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug tree-optimization/49771] [4.7 Regression] wrong code with -ftree-vectorize

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49771 Ira Rosen irar at il dot ibm.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||irar at il dot ibm.com

[Bug libstdc++/48430] std::hash partial specialization for std::unique_ptr and std::shared_ptr are using unary_function

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48430 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW

[Bug driver/45508] Does adding configure-options for specs-hardcoding make sense?

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45508 Rainer Orth ro at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last

[Bug libstdc++/48430] std::hash partial specialization for std::unique_ptr and std::shared_ptr are using unary_function

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48430 --- Comment #3 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org paolo at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-07-18 16:07:34 UTC --- Author: paolo Date: Mon Jul 18 16:07:24 2011 New Revision: 176405 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=176405 Log: 2011-07-18 Paolo

[Bug libstdc++/48430] std::hash partial specialization for std::unique_ptr and std::shared_ptr are using unary_function

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48430 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug bootstrap/44642] bootstrap fails to build libgcc when gold is built (at least on Solaris_x86)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44642 Rainer Orth ro at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ro at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug debug/44171] gcc -gdwarf-2 -dA unconditionally emits .ascii

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44171 Rainer Orth ro at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug libgomp/44093] Linking libgomp.so fails on Solaris 9/x86 with Sun as: relocations remain

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44093 Rainer Orth ro at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug target/43324] core dump on throw

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43324 Rainer Orth ro at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug target/42753] _Complex_I is reported as undeclared. Code builds with Sun compiler.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42753 Rainer Orth ro at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug debug/42278] [4.4 Regression] incorrect dwarf data gcc-4.4.2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42278 Rainer Orth ro at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Known

[Bug libstdc++/49778] New: Can't take pointer to std::make_pair in c++0x

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49778 Summary: Can't take pointer to std::make_pair in c++0x Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: libstdc++ AssignedTo:

[Bug target/41810] Cannot build gcc: gthr-default.h:466: error: '__mutex' was not declared in this scope

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41810 Rainer Orth ro at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug target/40483] gcc 4.x needs to utilize better COMDAT mechanism under Solaris

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40483 Rainer Orth ro at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug driver/40227] Solaris standard link libraries missing /lib

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40227 Rainer Orth ro at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug target/40183] g++.dg/tls/static-1.C, execution abort

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40183 Rainer Orth ro at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug bootstrap/39810] [melt] - revision 146327 - compiler-probe.c:106: undefined reference to `unlikely'

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39810 Rainer Orth ro at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug tree-optimization/49452] [4.7 regression] comp-goto-2.c regresses in testing

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49452 --- Comment #17 from Ramana Radhakrishnan ramana at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-07-18 16:35:22 UTC --- (In reply to comment #16) (In reply to comment #15) The machine-dependent reorg pass does something unexpected: (insn 30 18 14 3 (set

[Bug testsuite/39215] Running Testsuite with Multilib Flags exposes many errors in Testsuite (and gcc)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39215 Rainer Orth ro at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug target/39186] Configury incorrect for 64-bit Targets on Solaris

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39186 Rainer Orth ro at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug bootstrap/39150] Configure scripts have no 64-Bit Solaris defined (only i386-solaris*).

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39150 --- Comment #24 from Rainer Orth ro at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-07-18 16:36:37 UTC --- *** Bug 39186 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug tree-optimization/49452] [4.7 regression] comp-goto-2.c regresses in testing

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49452 --- Comment #16 from Ramana Radhakrishnan ramana at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-07-18 16:31:12 UTC --- (In reply to comment #15) The machine-dependent reorg pass does something unexpected: (insn 30 18 14 3 (set (reg/f:SI 11 fp) (plus:SI

[Bug bootstrap/49769] [4.7 regression] configuration mismatch -- extra parts

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49769 --- Comment #4 from Rainer Orth ro at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-07-18 16:42:00 UTC --- Author: ro Date: Mon Jul 18 16:41:55 2011 New Revision: 176406 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=176406 Log: PR bootstrap/49769 *

[Bug bootstrap/49769] [4.7 regression] configuration mismatch -- extra parts

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49769 Rainer Orth ro at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug bootstrap/39111] gcc 4.4.0 20090204 - Configury from GNU linker to Operating System's Linker broke (reverse works OK)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39111 Rainer Orth ro at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug target/47744] [x32] ICE: in reload_cse_simplify_operands, at postreload.c:403

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47744 --- Comment #33 from Uros Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com 2011-07-18 16:52:59 UTC --- (In reply to comment #32) Is isn't too bad: 5182.95user 396.13system 15:32.41elapsed 598%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata 362556maxresident)k My check on unloaded

[Bug bootstrap/39024] static libelf needs to be built PIC

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39024 Rainer Orth ro at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug target/47744] [x32] ICE: in reload_cse_simplify_operands, at postreload.c:403

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47744 --- Comment #34 from H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com 2011-07-18 16:55:35 UTC --- (In reply to comment #33) Please also note, that there is no need for new lea_x32 patterns anymore. My x32 branch has 2011-07-18 Uros Bizjak

[Bug libstdc++/49778] Can't take pointer to std::make_pair in c++0x

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49778 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug libstdc++/43785] [C++0x] std::make_pair vs explicit template arguments

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43785 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Bug inline-asm/38804] libgcj multilib fails if not able to exec non native programs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38804 Rainer Orth ro at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last

[Bug target/38730] gcc 4.4.0 20090104 - make -i check - over 60 FAILs in C compiler

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38730 Rainer Orth ro at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug fortran/49708] [4.5/4.6/4.7 Regression] ICE with allocate and no dimensions

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49708 --- Comment #6 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-07-18 17:08:43 UTC --- (In reply to comment #5) Janus, what's the status? Well, mostly busy with other things mixed with a bit of waiting for comments and/or approval ;) The patch is OK with a

[Bug target/47744] [x32] ICE: in reload_cse_simplify_operands, at postreload.c:403

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47744 --- Comment #35 from Uros Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com 2011-07-18 17:17:55 UTC --- (In reply to comment #34) 2011-07-17 H.J. Lu hongjiu...@intel.com * config/i386/i386.c (ix86_decompose_address): Don't support 32bit address in

[Bug c/49779] New: Wrong code generated for while loop with guard containing continue

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49779 Summary: Wrong code generated for while loop with guard containing continue Product: gcc Version: 4.6.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug target/38239] The function mcount in gmon.o changes register ecx

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38239 Rainer Orth ro at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ro at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug c/49779] Wrong code generated for while loop with guard containing continue

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49779 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-07-18 17:36:38 UTC --- Hmm, statement expressions are an extension to the C language.

[Bug target/36356] gcc-4.2.4 bootstrap failure on Solaris/x86 caused by PR31868 fix

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36356 Rainer Orth ro at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug bootstrap/33100] [4.3/4.4 regression] on bootstrap getting section .eh_frame: bad cie version 0: offset 0x0

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33100 --- Comment #37 from Rainer Orth ro at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-07-18 17:38:13 UTC --- *** Bug 36356 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug c/49779] Wrong code generated for while loop with guard containing continue

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49779 --- Comment #2 from bagnara at cs dot unipr.it 2011-07-18 17:42:39 UTC --- An extension that is still supported by GCC, right? Here is another testcase showing the same phenomenon with `break': int main() { do { while (({ break; 1; })) {

[Bug bootstrap/36330] i386-pc-solaris2.10 configure: error: C compiler cannot create executables

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36330 Rainer Orth ro at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED

[Bug bootstrap/33100] [4.3/4.4 regression] on bootstrap getting section .eh_frame: bad cie version 0: offset 0x0

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33100 --- Comment #38 from Rainer Orth ro at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-07-18 17:45:29 UTC --- *** Bug 36330 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug c/49779] Wrong code generated for while loop with guard containing continue

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49779 --- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-07-18 17:47:49 UTC --- (In reply to comment #2) An extension that is still supported by GCC, right? Yes but the semantics are not well defined in this area IIRC.

[Bug target/47744] [x32] ICE: in reload_cse_simplify_operands, at postreload.c:403

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47744 --- Comment #36 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org hjl at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-07-18 17:49:04 UTC --- Author: hjl Date: Mon Jul 18 17:49:01 2011 New Revision: 176409 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=176409 Log: Remove

[Bug target/47744] [x32] ICE: in reload_cse_simplify_operands, at postreload.c:403

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47744 --- Comment #37 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-07-18 17:51:36 UTC --- Author: uros Date: Mon Jul 18 17:51:33 2011 New Revision: 176413 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=176413 Log: PR target/47744 * config/i386/i386.c

  1   2   >