http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49541
--- Comment #16 from Rainer Orth 2011-07-18 12:09:22
UTC ---
Author: ro
Date: Mon Jul 18 12:09:18 2011
New Revision: 176393
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=176393
Log:
PR target/49541
* testsuite/lib/libgomp.exp (li
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49776
Summary: [C++0x]ICE in build_data_member_initialization, at
cp/semantics.c:5499
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49770
--- Comment #4 from Richard Guenther 2011-07-18
10:46:28 UTC ---
Ok, it's sth I worried about when doing the patch. Namely:
/* Make sure to use a valueized reference ... */
if (!ao_ref_init_from_vn_reference (&r, vr1.set, vr1.type,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49140
--- Comment #7 from Matthias Klose 2011-07-18 10:19:28
UTC ---
the pari tests still fail
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49029
Anitha Boyapati changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||anitha.boyapati at atmel
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49760
--- Comment #4 from vincenzo Innocente
2011-07-18 10:07:10 UTC ---
Fair enough.
I think I can persuade developers to use only local variables as induction
variable.
More difficult will be to make them to copy also all other variables stored in
me
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49769
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
URL||http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-p
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49760
--- Comment #3 from rguenther at suse dot de
2011-07-18 09:44:23 UTC ---
On Mon, 18 Jul 2011, vincenzo.innocente at cern dot ch wrote:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49760
>
> --- Comment #2 from vincenzo Innocente
> 2011-07-18
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49760
--- Comment #2 from vincenzo Innocente
2011-07-18 09:39:49 UTC ---
Thanks for the detailed explanation.
In the real life code, "out" is filled calling "foo" multiple times (a sort of
nested loop), "k" was used to track the current size of it.
It
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49756
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49749
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47744
--- Comment #28 from Uros Bizjak 2011-07-18 09:08:39
UTC ---
Here is my latest proposed patch:
--cut here--
Index: i386.c
===
--- i386.c(revision 176386)
+++ i386.c(working
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49752
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||build
Target Milestone|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49775
--- Comment #1 from Anitha Boyapati
2011-07-18 09:01:36 UTC ---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17906
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35432
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49775
Summary: [4.6.1 Regression on AVR] ICE in based_loc_descr
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: other
AssignedTo:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49757
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49760
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Keywords|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49761
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49774
Summary: [meta-bug] restrict qualification aliasing issues
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: middle-end
Assigne
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49768
--- Comment #5 from Richard Guenther 2011-07-18
08:47:01 UTC ---
I suppose fold produces some BIT_FIELD_REF here, giving up probably is
easiest for now.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49767
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49771
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
Target M
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49770
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|unassigned
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49772
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49742
--- Comment #5 from Richard Guenther 2011-07-18
08:24:40 UTC ---
This must be an artifact of the load-/store-lanes stuff. It looks like they
play foul with aliasing. It might also be that predictive commoning simply
does not know how to re-mate
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35634
--- Comment #31 from Richard Guenther 2011-07-18
08:16:58 UTC ---
Well, I'd still go for comment#14 ... we could teach VRP to shorten the
operations again, if possible, to avoid the optimization regressions.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49545
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||4.7.0
Target Milestone|4.7.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46798
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||4.7.0
Summary|[4.6/4.7 Regr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49140
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49675
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49708
--- Comment #5 from Tobias Burnus 2011-07-18
07:33:07 UTC ---
Janus, what's the status?
(In reply to comment #4)
> I just verified that this patch is free of testsuite regressions.
The patch is OK with a test case, ChangeLog - and CCing it to
f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49773
Summary: use of class data members prevent vectorization
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tree-optimization
As
101 - 132 of 132 matches
Mail list logo