[Bug c++/49867] [C++0x] ICE on lambda inside switch with case labels in the lambda

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49867 --- Comment #2 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-07-30 06:22:09 UTC --- Author: jason Date: Sat Jul 30 06:22:06 2011 New Revision: 176958 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=176958 Log: PR c++/49867 *

[Bug c++/49867] [C++0x] ICE on lambda inside switch with case labels in the lambda

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49867 Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|

[Bug target/49909] FSF gcc 4.6.1 fails to bootstrap on Core Solo/Core Duo

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49909 --- Comment #5 from Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org 2011-07-30 07:51:29 UTC --- If you want to build x86-64 multilib natively you must use a capable host. Otherwise force cross compilation.

[Bug target/23621] gcj-dbtool aborts on m68k-linux

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23621 Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug bootstrap/49907] [4.5/4.6/4.7 Regression] lto-plugin -Wall in stage1

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49907 Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW

[Bug target/49909] FSF gcc 4.6.1 fails to bootstrap on Core Solo/Core Duo

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49909 Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug fortran/48876] ICE when initializing character variable with zero-length string

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48876 Thomas Koenig tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug libstdc++/49870] regex_match vs. ^

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49870 --- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-07-30 11:38:01 UTC --- See PR 47724

Re: code won't compile on new version of gcc

Re http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/2011-07/msg02349.html This mailing list is for automatically generated emails from Bugzilla, mails sent to it directly may get missed or ignored. You should send questions about using GCC to the gcc-help list. Bugs should be reported to Bugzilla, not by email.

[Bug c++/49896] undefined reference to static const integral member whose address is not used, for some values of the constant

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49896 --- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-07-30 12:09:28 UTC --- The initializer results in integer overflow which is undefined behaviour, so if G++ accepts it but requires the variable to be defined then that is a

[Bug tree-optimization/49094] ARM aligned(1) attribute is sometimes dropped

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49094 --- Comment #10 from Søren Holm sgh at sgh dot dk 2011-07-30 12:10:57 UTC --- Created attachment 24869 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24869 Another testcase that fails. Even with current 4.6 With static on line 33 the code

[Bug tree-optimization/49094] ARM aligned(1) attribute is sometimes dropped

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49094 Søren Holm sgh at sgh dot dk changed: What|Removed |Added CC||sgh at sgh dot dk ---

[Bug tree-optimization/49094] ARM aligned(1) attribute is sometimes dropped

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49094 --- Comment #12 from Søren Holm sgh at sgh dot dk 2011-07-30 12:30:25 UTC --- Oh... I just realized that the failing case does not fail because of the first ldr-instruction. It fails becasue of something else. Maybe you guys have a better eye for

[Bug middle-end/43513] The stack pointer is adjusted twice

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43513 --- Comment #6 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-07-30 12:37:50 UTC --- Author: vries Date: Sat Jul 30 12:37:47 2011 New Revision: 176959 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=176959 Log: 2011-07-30 Tom de Vries

[Bug tree-optimization/49094] ARM aligned(1) attribute is sometimes dropped

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49094 --- Comment #13 from Søren Holm sgh at sgh dot dk 2011-07-30 12:37:41 UTC --- gcc 4.4.6 generates the following code with the static keyword unsigned int aostk_font_strwidth(const struct aostk_font* font, const char* str) { 0: e5d02004

[Bug target/49909] FSF gcc 4.6.1 fails to bootstrap on Core Solo/Core Duo

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49909 --- Comment #7 from Jack Howarth howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu 2011-07-30 14:06:08 UTC --- How would I perform a cross-compilation in this situation? I considered that option but isn't cross-compilation designed for the situation when neither

[Bug target/49909] FSF gcc 4.6.1 fails to bootstrap on Core Solo/Core Duo

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49909 --- Comment #8 from Jack Howarth howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu 2011-07-30 14:22:07 UTC --- Also, while I don't have a Core Solo or Core Duo machine to test this on, I would expect this issue to exist on other i386-*-* targets. The default

[Bug tree-optimization/49911] New: vrp2 + -fstrict-enums incorrectly remove predicate

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49911 Summary: vrp2 + -fstrict-enums incorrectly remove predicate Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: tree-optimization

[Bug c++/49896] undefined reference to static const integral member whose address is not used, for some values of the constant

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49896 --- Comment #6 from Harald van Dijk harald at gigawatt dot nl 2011-07-30 14:59:09 UTC --- The initializer results in integer overflow which is undefined behaviour No, it doesn't result in integer overflow. 0x8000 is a constant of type

[Bug fortran/49638] [OOP] length parameter is ignored when overriding type bound character functions with constant length.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49638 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/49638] [OOP] length parameter is ignored when overriding type bound character functions with constant length.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49638 --- Comment #2 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-07-30 16:23:25 UTC --- Note: In resolve.c there is 'check_typebound_override' which should take care of these kind of things. It already rejects overriding procedures with different result types,

[Bug c++/49912] New: ICE from -freorder-blocks-and-partition : verify_flow_info failed

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49912 Summary: ICE from -freorder-blocks-and-partition : verify_flow_info failed Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug c++/49913] New: ICE from -O2 -fgraphite-identity : extract_range_from_binary_expr, at tree-vrp.c:2318

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49913 Summary: ICE from -O2 -fgraphite-identity : extract_range_from_binary_expr, at tree-vrp.c:2318 Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c++/49912] ICE from -freorder-blocks-and-partition : verify_flow_info failed

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49912 --- Comment #1 from Bake Timmons b3timmons at speedymail dot org 2011-07-30 16:49:14 UTC --- Sorry, forgot command line that led to the ICE: gcc -v -B. -r -nostdlib -Wall -O -freorder-blocks-and-partition elf.ii

[Bug c++/49913] ICE from -O2 -fgraphite-identity : extract_range_from_binary_expr, at tree-vrp.c:2318

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49913 --- Comment #1 from Bake Timmons b3timmons at speedymail dot org 2011-07-30 16:50:55 UTC --- Sorry, forgot command line that led to the ICE: gcc -v -B. -r -nostdlib -c -Wno-invalid-offsetof -Wall -O2 -fgraphite-identity jsclone.ii

[Bug tree-optimization/49094] ARM aligned(1) attribute is sometimes dropped

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49094 --- Comment #14 from Martin Jambor jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-07-30 17:15:12 UTC --- (In reply to comment #11) tst2.c also fails with an alignment related problem. I'm unsue if this should be reported in another bug. It it fails with a

[Bug other/49914] New: call to abs(long long) in gcc/fold-const.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49914 Summary: call to abs(long long) in gcc/fold-const.c Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: other AssignedTo:

[Bug fortran/48876] ICE when initializing character variable with zero-length string

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48876 --- Comment #4 from Thomas Koenig tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-07-30 18:17:57 UTC --- Author: tkoenig Date: Sat Jul 30 18:17:55 2011 New Revision: 176961 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=176961 Log: 2011-07-30 Thomas

[Bug other/49914] call to abs(long long) in gcc/fold-const.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49914 --- Comment #1 from Marc Glisse marc.glisse at normalesup dot org 2011-07-30 18:29:06 UTC --- Also occurs at gcc/tree-ssa-loop-prefetch.c:797 and in many places in gcc/tree-ssa-math-opts.c.

[Bug c/49915] New: Function call with 2-D arrays and -O2 (or strict-aliasing and inlining) gives random results

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49915 Summary: Function call with 2-D arrays and -O2 (or strict-aliasing and inlining) gives random results Product: gcc Version: 4.1.2 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c/49915] Function call with 2-D arrays and -O2 (or strict-aliasing and inlining) gives random results

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49915 Mikael Pettersson mikpe at it dot uu.se changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mikpe at it dot

[Bug c/49915] Function call with 2-D arrays and -O2 (or strict-aliasing and inlining) gives random results

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49915 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug tree-optimization/49916] New: matrix-reorg optimization segmentation fault

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49916 Summary: matrix-reorg optimization segmentation fault Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: tree-optimization

[Bug c++/49917] New: g++.dg/init/for1.C wrong?

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49917 Summary: g++.dg/init/for1.C wrong? Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++ AssignedTo: unassig...@gcc.gnu.org

[Bug c++/49917] g++.dg/init/for1.C wrong?

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49917 --- Comment #1 from Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com 2011-07-30 20:06:34 UTC --- Looks like the test should a dg-do run (not implicitly a dg-do compile!) and then changed to assign if i != 2, right? Then I believe it would work as a

[Bug libstdc++/1773] __cplusplus defined to 1, should be 199711L

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1773 --- Comment #90 from Marc Glisse marc.glisse at normalesup dot org 2011-07-30 20:19:42 UTC --- How does one go about reporting a bug in solaris? In Solaris 11, with -std=c++** (as opposed to gnu++**), __cplusplus=199711L and without -m64 or

[Bug testsuite/49917] g++.dg/init/for1.C wrong?

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49917 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW

[Bug testsuite/49917] g++.dg/init/for1.C wrong?

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49917 --- Comment #3 from Marc Glisse marc.glisse at normalesup dot org 2011-07-30 20:25:19 UTC --- (In reply to comment #1) Looks like the test should a dg-do run (not implicitly a dg-do compile!) Aha! It never crossed my mind... then changed to

[Bug testsuite/49917] g++.dg/init/for1.C wrong?

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49917 --- Comment #4 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org paolo at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-07-30 20:29:32 UTC --- Author: paolo Date: Sat Jul 30 20:29:29 2011 New Revision: 176962 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=176962 Log: 2011-07-30 Paolo

[Bug testsuite/49917] g++.dg/init/for1.C wrong?

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49917 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug fortran/49918] New: Spurious -Wconvert warnings when using a BOZ data statement

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49918 Summary: Spurious -Wconvert warnings when using a BOZ data statement Product: gcc Version: 4.5.2 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: minor Priority: P3

[Bug libstdc++/1773] __cplusplus defined to 1, should be 199711L

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1773 --- Comment #91 from Marc Glisse marc.glisse at normalesup dot org 2011-07-30 21:02:20 UTC --- solaris also provides the pow(*,int) overloads (see DR550). Should these be fixincluded out? On the other hand, solaris doesn't provide the cos(int)

[Bug libstdc++/1773] __cplusplus defined to 1, should be 199711L

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1773 --- Comment #92 from Marc Glisse marc.glisse at normalesup dot org 2011-07-30 21:08:20 UTC --- Created attachment 24874 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24874 for Solaris 11 Still some bugs. And I didn't include the patch to

[Bug fortran/49918] Spurious -Wconvert warnings when using a BOZ data statement

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49918 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug libstdc++/1773] __cplusplus defined to 1, should be 199711L

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1773 --- Comment #93 from Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com 2011-07-30 21:15:30 UTC --- If we can converge, with Rainer' help too, to something working at least on current Solaris (besides Linux), I'm pretty sure we'll be able to deliver it

[Bug fortran/48876] ICE when initializing character variable with zero-length string

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48876 --- Comment #5 from Thomas Koenig tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-07-30 21:33:14 UTC --- Author: tkoenig Date: Sat Jul 30 21:33:11 2011 New Revision: 176963 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=176963 Log: 2011-07-30 Thomas

[Bug bootstrap/49681] 4.6.1 cross-build fails in libquadmath/libiberty

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49681 Igor Pashev pashev.igor at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pashev.igor at

[Bug fortran/48876] ICE when initializing character variable with zero-length string

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48876 Thomas Koenig tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug fortran/47659] -Wconversion[-extra] should emit warning for constant expressions

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47659 Thomas Koenig tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last

[Bug libstdc++/1773] __cplusplus defined to 1, should be 199711L

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1773 --- Comment #94 from Marc Glisse marc.glisse at normalesup dot org 2011-07-30 23:16:55 UTC --- (In reply to comment #92) Created attachment 24874 [details] for Solaris 11 If I manually fixinclude the getc problem and the pow declarations, the

[Bug c++/49919] New: problem with building gcc 4.6.1 on Mac OS X Lion

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49919 Summary: problem with building gcc 4.6.1 on Mac OS X Lion Product: gcc Version: 4.6.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++ AssignedTo: