http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49905
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-08-04
07:40:29 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Thu Aug 4 07:40:24 2011
New Revision: 177316
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=177316
Log:
PR middle-end/49905
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49638
--- Comment #9 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-08-04 07:41:43 UTC ---
Hi Mikael,
4.5.7.3 (type-bound procedure overriding) has:
• Either both shall be subroutines or both shall be functions having the same
result characteristics (12.3.3).
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49923
--- Comment #7 from Søren Holm sgh at sgh dot dk 2011-08-04 08:00:14 UTC ---
It works on the target too. From my perspective your patch fixes this issue.
Thank you very much Martin.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49638
--- Comment #10 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-08-04
08:09:26 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #9)
+ if (strcmp (e1-symtree-n.sym-name, e1-symtree-n.sym-name) != 0)
That can be done quicker as:
if (e1-symtree-n.sym-name
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47880
--- Comment #1 from Arnaud Charlet charlet at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-08-04
08:32:58 UTC ---
Author: charlet
Date: Thu Aug 4 08:32:54 2011
New Revision: 177332
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=177332
Log:
2011-08-04 Thomas
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47880
Arnaud Charlet charlet at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49971
Manuel López-Ibáñez manu at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18501
Manuel López-Ibáñez manu at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||cernekee at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49951
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49968
--- Comment #4 from Ulrich Weigand uweigand at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-08-04
09:10:44 UTC ---
Tests have completed now; the patch fixes all regressions introduced by the
original commit, and introduced no new ones. Looks good to me.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49772
--- Comment #4 from rguenther at suse dot de rguenther at suse dot de
2011-08-04 09:20:21 UTC ---
On Wed, 3 Aug 2011, hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49772
--- Comment #3 from Jan Hubicka hubicka
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49413
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49970
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49969
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49972
Summary: Invalid .gcc_except_table with
-freorder-blocks-and-partition
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49972
--- Comment #1 from Alan Modra amodra at gmail dot com 2011-08-04 10:08:58
UTC ---
Created attachment 24913
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24913
faulty assembly
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49944
--- Comment #5 from Ludovic Brenta ludo...@ludovic-brenta.org 2011-08-04
10:21:20 UTC ---
OK, here is another patch which changes GCC to use s-taprop-posix.ad[bs] on
GNU/kFreeBSD. The changes in s-osinte-kfreebsd-gnu.ads are more extensive than
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49973
Summary: Column numbers count special characters as multiple
columns
Product: gcc
Version: 4.5.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49973
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49972
--- Comment #2 from Alan Modra amodra at gmail dot com 2011-08-04 10:34:27
UTC ---
Entries in the call-site table for start of the instructions for the current
call site, and the pointer to the landing pad for this sequence of
instructions, are
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49973
--- Comment #2 from Timothy Liang timothy003 at msn dot com 2011-08-04
10:36:53 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
Depends on how the column numbers are defined. I think gcc uses bytes from
the
beginning of the line, then 12 is correct (and
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49973
--- Comment #3 from Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org 2011-08-04 10:55:13
UTC ---
Why 10? /* 中 */ has 12 characters (and 14 bytes as utf8).
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48841
--- Comment #8 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ro at CeBiTec dot
Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2011-08-04 10:55:04 UTC ---
Okay... did the plain configure and make and no relative path, and watching my
4.6.1 make -k check - I'll be summiting the
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48841
--- Comment #9 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ro at CeBiTec dot
Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2011-08-04 10:56:24 UTC ---
Please ignore last comment 6. With 4.6.1:
=== libgomp Summary ===
# of expected passes2586
# of
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49638
--- Comment #11 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-08-04 10:59:18 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #10)
(In reply to comment #9)
+ if (strcmp (e1-symtree-n.sym-name, e1-symtree-n.sym-name) != 0)
That can be done quicker as:
if
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49973
--- Comment #4 from Timothy Liang timothy003 at msn dot com 2011-08-04
11:03:32 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #3)
Why 10? /* 中 */ has 12 characters (and 14 bytes as utf8).
The four spaces is supposed to be a tab. Also, the column number
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49638
--- Comment #12 from Mikael Morin mikael at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-08-04
11:14:36 UTC ---
If we are willing to do some simple expression comparisons, here is what I
think should be supported (most common cases):
- constants: this is the minimum
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49638
--- Comment #13 from Mikael Morin mikael at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-08-04
11:16:41 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #11)
(In reply to comment #10)
(In reply to comment #9)
+ if (strcmp (e1-symtree-n.sym-name, e1-symtree-n.sym-name) !=
0)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48220
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49901
--- Comment #3 from Iain Sandoe iains at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-08-04 12:10:36
UTC ---
Created attachment 24914
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24914
fix PR49901
The output from the tests is a little misleading.
These tests
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49901
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49686
--- Comment #6 from Kazumoto Kojima kkojima at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-08-04
12:18:09 UTC ---
It seems that the problem comes back on trunk revision 177305
for SH. There are many EH test failures which went away with
-fno-delayed-branch and the
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49973
Manuel López-Ibáñez manu at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||manu at gcc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49974
Summary: missing warning for indirectly returning reference to
local/temporary
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: diagnostic
Severity:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49957
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49957
--- Comment #5 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-08-04
12:22:47 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Thu Aug 4 12:22:42 2011
New Revision: 177368
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=177368
Log:
2011-08-04 Richard
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49974
Manuel López-Ibáñez manu at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||manu at gcc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38644
--- Comment #37 from Sebastian Huber sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de
2011-08-04 12:30:29 UTC ---
Is this problem also related to this bug (GCC 4.6.1 20110627) with comments
inside:
objdump -d -C
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49974
Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |enhancement
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49974
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=986
--- Comment #31 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-08-04
13:01:31 UTC ---
A similar case I've just added to a comment of PR 49974
struct Y {
Y(int local) : ref(local) { }
int ref;
};
The reference is dangling as soon as the
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49966
--- Comment #3 from Iain Sandoe iains at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-08-04 13:09:05
UTC ---
NOT seen on:
i686-darwin9 @r177287 xcode 3.1.4
x86_64-darwin10 @177314 xcode 3.2.5
x86_64-darwin10 @177355 xcdoe 3.2.6
is this still affecting darwin11?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49975
Summary: warn on malformed __attribute((...))__
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: minor
Priority: P3
Component: c
AssignedTo:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49975
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49686
--- Comment #7 from Hans-Peter Nilsson hp at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-08-04
13:30:48 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #6)
It seems that the problem comes back on trunk revision 177305
for SH.
At a glance that may have happened for cris-elf too, worked
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49976
Summary: Cross (Linux-AIX) GCC crashes with Segmentation fault
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: major
Priority: P3
Component: c++
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49975
--- Comment #2 from David Sveningsson ext at sidvind dot com 2011-08-04
13:33:21 UTC ---
Might be valid, but confusing. If whitespace were required after )) it would
make more sense as it is clear that a global is created.
As the documentation
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49976
--- Comment #1 from Vasily basil at list dot ru 2011-08-04 13:37:27 UTC ---
Created attachment 24915
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24915
compressed preprocessed file
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49768
--- Comment #10 from Valtteri Rahkonen vrahkone at gmail dot com 2011-08-04
13:44:38 UTC ---
I tested latest gcc 4.6.1 from Debian unstable containing the patch and it
seems to work. I'm not going to dare to mark this as verified though because I
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49975
--- Comment #3 from Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org 2011-08-04 13:45:13
UTC ---
It doesn't make sense to require whitespace after a paren, that will likely
break a lot of programs.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49975
--- Comment #4 from David Sveningsson ext at sidvind dot com 2011-08-04
13:48:55 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #3)
It doesn't make sense to require whitespace after a paren, that will likely
break a lot of programs.
In this quite specific case?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49975
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49868
--- Comment #1 from Georg-Johann Lay gjl at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-08-04
13:51:28 UTC ---
Created attachment 24916
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24916
Draft work on AS against r177314
This is just an update of my local work on
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49975
--- Comment #6 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-08-04
13:56:46 UTC ---
Google codesearch shows __attribute is used widely in the android kernel and
many other places.
Whitespace is not significant in C, it would be strange for
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49686
--- Comment #8 from Kazumoto Kojima kkojima at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-08-04
13:57:14 UTC ---
Thanks for checking cris-elf. I'd like to open a new PR.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49977
Summary: [4.7 Regression] CFI notes are missed for delayed slot
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: wrong-code
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49806
--- Comment #6 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-08-04
14:11:35 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Thu Aug 4 14:11:30 2011
New Revision: 177392
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=177392
Log:
2011-08-04 Richard
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1773
Marc Glisse marc.glisse at normalesup dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #24874|0 |1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49973
--- Comment #6 from joseph at codesourcery dot com joseph at codesourcery dot
com 2011-08-04 14:38:16 UTC ---
The GCS says column numbers should start from 1 at the beginning of the
line ... Calculate column numbers assuming that space and all
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1773
--- Comment #108 from Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
2011-08-04 14:40:21 UTC ---
Excellent. Can we sort out separately with C++ front-end people like Jason this
mangling (and demangling too, I suppose) issue? If I understand
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49948
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org |jakub at gcc dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49712
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49638
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49973
Manuel López-Ibáñez manu at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1773
--- Comment #109 from Marc Glisse marc.glisse at normalesup dot org
2011-08-04 15:21:36 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #108)
Excellent. Can we sort out separately with C++ front-end people like Jason
this
mangling (and demangling too, I suppose)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1773
--- Comment #110 from Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
2011-08-04 15:29:58 UTC ---
Yes. There are independent pieces:
*fixincludes
*libstdc++
*mangling
and libcpp is the big red button that can only be pressed at the end. None
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1773
--- Comment #111 from Marc Glisse marc.glisse at normalesup dot org
2011-08-04 15:38:52 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #110)
Ah, no. It is something we only need if we want to keep binary compatibility
between __cplusplus=1 and
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49968
--- Comment #5 from Richard Henderson rth at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-08-04
15:39:43 UTC ---
Author: rth
Date: Thu Aug 4 15:39:40 2011
New Revision: 177404
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=177404
Log:
PR middle-end/49968
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49964
--- Comment #9 from Richard Henderson rth at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-08-04
15:47:50 UTC ---
Author: rth
Date: Thu Aug 4 15:47:42 2011
New Revision: 177408
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=177408
Log:
PR target/49964
*
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49084
--- Comment #6 from Anh Vo anhvofrcaus at gmail dot com 2011-08-04 16:01:59
UTC ---
The configuration --enable-languages=ada --without-build-config
--disable-werror was used.
Now it causes gcc to fail when configuration
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49978
Summary: make pdf error on OS X
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: other
AssignedTo: unassig...@gcc.gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49978
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-08-04
16:48:06 UTC ---
that looks like a problem with the sed command used by texi2pdf, not a problem
with gcc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49591
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49978
--- Comment #2 from hal at oz dot net 2011-08-04 16:58:30 UTC ---
It's the same version of sed that's been there for two years (date is may
2009), and make pdf used to work with it. Maybe something in the script
changed in a way that exposed a
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49979
Summary: FAIL: gcc.dg/20030711-1.c execution test
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: testsuite
AssignedTo:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49978
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-08-04
17:22:41 UTC ---
That sed command comes from texi2pdf not gcc's makefile, so it must be a change
in texi2pdf
Try:
echo foo | sed s/\(^\|.* \)@documenten/bar/
In GNU's
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49961
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49979
--- Comment #1 from John David Anglin danglin at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-08-04
17:30:29 UTC ---
I think this is a HP-UX 11.00 libc bug exposed by the following change:
2011-07-25 Rainer Orth r...@cebitec.uni-bielefeld.de
*
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49978
--- Comment #4 from hal at oz dot net 2011-08-04 17:35:34 UTC ---
Here's what it looks like:
$ echo foo | sed s/\(^\|.* \)@documenten/bar/
foo
$ pgm='s/^ *@documentencoding *\([^ ][^ ]*\) *$/\1/
t found
d
:found
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49978
--- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-08-04
17:41:40 UTC ---
maybe you'll need to look in texi2pdf to see exactly what it's doing, but
whatever it is, it's not something gcc is doing
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49978
--- Comment #6 from hal at oz dot net 2011-08-04 17:44:42 UTC ---
Well, ok, but who is responsible for that? And it still remains the case that
make pdf doesn't work.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49961
--- Comment #4 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-08-04 17:46:35 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #3)
http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?view=revisionrevision=160622
The patch looks very simple and it may be feasible to backport it to 4.5.
I just
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49967
Steve Ellcey sje at cup dot hp.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sje at cup dot hp.com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49962
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||janus at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49962
--- Comment #5 from wangmianzhi wangmianzhi1 at linuxmail dot org 2011-08-04
18:07:07 UTC ---
On 2011年08月04日 13:59, janus at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49962
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49977
John David Anglin danglin at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|sh4-unknown-linux-gnu,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49772
--- Comment #5 from Jan Hubicka hubicka at ucw dot cz 2011-08-04 18:32:27 UTC
---
What happens is that in expand_call_inline we fail the inlining via
an error, but at this point of course the edge points to the inline
clone and that stays so.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49901
Iain Sandoe iains at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49956
Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49901
Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dominiq
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49781
--- Comment #16 from Uros Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com 2011-08-04 18:49:32
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #14)
/export/build/gnu/gcc-x32-test/release/usr/gcc-4.7.0-x32/bin/gcc -mx32
-std=gnu99 -fgnu89-inline -O2-S testcase.c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49781
Uros Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #24899|0 |1
is
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49911
--- Comment #10 from Rafael Avila de Espindola rafael.espindola at gmail dot
com 2011-08-04 18:59:20 UTC ---
Created attachment 24919
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24919
test patch
I ported
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49977
Richard Henderson rth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49964
Richard Henderson rth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49968
Richard Henderson rth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45375
--- Comment #107 from Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-08-04
19:16:29 UTC ---
Now my build dies on what appears to be configure confussion:
/abuild/jh/mozilla-central2/mozilla-central/ipc/chromium/src/base/file_util_linux.cc:43:17:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45375
--- Comment #108 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-08-04
19:22:50 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #107)
Now my build dies on what appears to be configure confussion:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45375
--- Comment #109 from Markus Trippelsdorf markus at trippelsdorf dot de
2011-08-04 19:25:09 UTC ---
Yep. See: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?view=revisionrevision=176335
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.gcc.devel/121989
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49591
--- Comment #2 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-08-04
19:36:03 UTC ---
I think I found the place where this example came from, though at that point it
probably was not yet on the server:
1 - 100 of 127 matches
Mail list logo
