[Bug c/48418] [4.5/4.6/4.7 Regression] Bit shift operator =

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48418 Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2 ---

[Bug tree-optimization/50183] ICE in verify_ssa for 416.gamess when optimizing using profile data

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50183 Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||spop at gcc

[Bug tree-optimization/50178] [4.6 regression] ICE with gfortran -O3, not with gfortran -02

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50178 Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Component|middle-end

[Bug fortran/50163] [4.3/4.4/4.5/4.6/4.7 Regression] ICE: initialization expression

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50163 --- Comment #4 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-08-25 08:29:36 UTC --- Author: burnus Date: Thu Aug 25 08:29:29 2011 New Revision: 178054 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=178054 Log: 2011-08-25 Tobias Burnus

[Bug middle-end/45262] [4.2/4.3 Regression] Optimization results in wrong result on expression x31||(-x)31

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45262 Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug target/50182] Performance degradation from gcc 4.1 (x86_64)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50182 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot

[Bug c++/50184] New: Segmentation fault. Copy Constructor.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50184 Bug #: 50184 Summary: Segmentation fault. Copy Constructor. Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.4.4 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority:

[Bug c++/50184] Segmentation fault. Copy Constructor.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50184 --- Comment #1 from Eugene EugeneSm at yandex dot ru 2011-08-25 09:01:52 UTC --- gcc version 4.4.4 20100726 (Red Hat 4.4.4-13) (GCC) Build of configuration Debug for project Test make all Building file: ../src/Test.cpp Invoking: GCC

[Bug fortran/50050] [4.6/4.7 Regression] Internal compiler error free_expr0 at expr.c:3709 via gfc_done_2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50050 Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pmason at

[Bug fortran/50174] [4.7 Regression] ICE on derived type allocation

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50174 Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug target/50164] [IRA, 4.7 Regression] Performance degradation due to increased memory instructions count

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50164 --- Comment #2 from Ilya Enkovich enkovich.gnu at gmail dot com 2011-08-25 09:31:29 UTC --- (In reply to comment #1) Yesterday I sent a patch http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-08/msg01954.html which most probably solved the problem.

[Bug testsuite/50185] New: [4.7 Regression] FAIL: gcc.target/i386/avx2-vmovmskb-2.c scan-assembler vmovmskb on x86_64-apple-darwin10

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50185 Bug #: 50185 Summary: [4.7 Regression] FAIL: gcc.target/i386/avx2-vmovmskb-2.c scan-assembler vmovmskb on x86_64-apple-darwin10 Classification: Unclassified Product:

[Bug c++/50184] Segmentation fault. Copy Constructor.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50184 Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||wrong-code

[Bug c/50186] New: junk at end of line: `1

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50186 Bug #: 50186 Summary: junk at end of line: `1 Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.6.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: blocker Priority: P3

[Bug c/50179] wrong set but not used warning

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50179 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last

[Bug c/50179] [4.6/4.7 Regression] wrong set but not used warning

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50179 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.6.2

[Bug c/50186] junk at end of line: `1

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50186 --- Comment #1 from SK santoshkumar.a at gmail dot com 2011-08-25 10:33:22 UTC --- Created attachment 25099 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25099 build errors build errors

[Bug c++/50184] Segmentation fault. Copy Constructor.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50184 --- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-08-25 10:48:59 UTC --- -fno-elide-constructors prevents the segfault something goes wrong copying the return value of func() into the CData base class of B

[Bug c/50154] attribute printf and scanf should imply attribute nonnull

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50154 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug c/50186] junk at end of line: `1

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50186 --- Comment #3 from SK santoshkumar.a at gmail dot com 2011-08-25 11:53:59 UTC --- Created attachment 25101 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25101 do_mounts_rd.s assembly file

[Bug c/50186] junk at end of line: `1

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50186 --- Comment #2 from SK santoshkumar.a at gmail dot com 2011-08-25 11:53:17 UTC --- Created attachment 25100 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25100 intermidate file intermidate file do_mounts_rd.i

[Bug c/50186] junk at end of line: `1

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50186 --- Comment #4 from SK santoshkumar.a at gmail dot com 2011-08-25 11:59:11 UTC --- Created attachment 25102 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25102 cross compile script cross compile script

[Bug c/50186] junk at end of line: `1

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50186 --- Comment #5 from SK santoshkumar.a at gmail dot com 2011-08-25 12:02:09 UTC --- at line 665 in do_mounts_rd.s mfcr 27,1 is a wrong instruction generated. As per Power ISA™ Version 2.05 mfcr take only one argument i.e mfcr RT. Let me know if i

[Bug c/50186] junk at end of line: `1

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50186 --- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-08-25 12:05:46 UTC --- That seems like your gcc is assuming -mmfcrf for your CPU, yet your assembler can't assemble it (or is assembling for a CPU which doesn't have the mfcrf insn).

[Bug c/50186] junk at end of line: `1

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50186 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot

[Bug c/50186] junk at end of line: `1

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50186 --- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-08-25 12:10:26 UTC --- And 476 CPU according to rs6000-cpus.def should support that: RS6000_CPU (476, PROCESSOR_PPC476, POWERPC_BASE_MASK | MASK_SOFT_FLOAT |

[Bug inline-asm/50187] New: Interrupt handler attribute for x86/x86_64

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50187 Bug #: 50187 Summary: Interrupt handler attribute for x86/x86_64 Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: enhancement

[Bug target/50176] [4.7 Regression] 4.7 generates spill-fill dealing with char-int conversion

/gcc_4_6_2_prefix/ Thread model: posix gcc version 4.6.2 20110825 (prerelease) (GCC) everything is fine, no that spill-fill generated

[Bug tree-optimization/50183] ICE in verify_ssa for 416.gamess when optimizing using profile data

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50183 --- Comment #3 from William J. Schmidt wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-08-25 13:39:54 UTC --- Thanks. -floop-interchange is required to cause the problem, and graphite_transforms was in the stack at the time of the verify failure. I believe

[Bug go/50166] ICE in go1: SEGV on Solaris 10/x86

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50166 --- Comment #2 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2011-08-25 13:40:57 UTC --- I've just checked that it still occurs with current mainline. I'm running a reghunt to identify the culprit. Rainer

[Bug target/50176] [4.7 Regression] 4.7 generates spill-fill dealing with char-int conversion

=/export/users/izamyati/gcc_4_6_2_prefix/ Thread model: posix gcc version 4.6.2 20110825 (prerelease) (GCC) everything is fine, no that spill-fill generated Can we find which checkin caused this?

[Bug target/50164] [IRA, 4.7 Regression] Performance degradation due to increased memory instructions count

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50164 --- Comment #3 from H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com 2011-08-25 13:58:28 UTC --- (In reply to comment #2) (In reply to comment #1) Yesterday I sent a patch http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-08/msg01954.html which most probably

[Bug fortran/45859] [Coarray, F2008, IR] Rejects valid actuals to coarray dummies

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45859 --- Comment #4 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-08-25 14:28:03 UTC --- (In reply to comment #0) is supposed to be valid according the following IR. A modified program which uses call sub (x(10:)) is unambiguously valid.

[Bug c/50186] junk at end of line: `1

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50186 --- Comment #9 from SK santoshkumar.a at gmail dot com 2011-08-25 15:01:26 UTC --- Just for checking i changed the instruction in .s file from mfcr 27,1 to mfcr 27 and used the assembler to generate the binary there was no error reported. Now i

[Bug target/50182] Performance degradation from gcc 4.1 (x86_64)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50182 --- Comment #5 from Oleg Smolsky oleg.smolsky at gmail dot com 2011-08-25 15:19:57 UTC --- Created attachment 25103 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25103 The same test preprocessed with g++ 4.1

[Bug rtl-optimization/48575] RTL vector patterns are limited to 26 elements

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48575 H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug target/50182] Performance degradation from gcc 4.1 (x86_64)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50182 --- Comment #6 from Oleg Smolsky oleg.smolsky at gmail dot com 2011-08-25 15:25:49 UTC --- Oh, the settings and things were discussed the mail thread... Here is the digest: I have compiled and run a set of C++ benchmarks on a CentOS4/64 box

[Bug middle-end/50083] [4.7 regression] All 32-bit fortran tests fail on 32-bit Solaris

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50083 --- Comment #6 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2011-08-25 15:29:38 UTC --- I can now also reproduce the failure on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu: cc1 -quiet -O2 -m32 iround.i -muclibc With the default

[Bug tree-optimization/46009] ?: vectorized, very similar if is not

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46009 H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug tree-optimization/50188] New: Optimizer doesn't take into account, that longjmp could lead to loops, which causes illegal code transformations.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50188 Bug #: 50188 Summary: Optimizer doesn't take into account, that longjmp could lead to loops, which causes illegal code transformations. Classification: Unclassified

[Bug target/50182] Performance degradation from gcc 4.1 (x86_64)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50182 --- Comment #7 from H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com 2011-08-25 15:58:08 UTC --- (In reply to comment #6) The processor is Intel quad core something: processor: 0 vendor_id: GenuineIntel cpu family: 6 model: 15

[Bug target/50182] Performance degradation from gcc 4.1 (x86_64)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50182 --- Comment #8 from davidxl xinliangli at gmail dot com 2011-08-25 16:17:10 UTC --- gcc46 and gcc47 difference can be reproduced using -O2 -m64. David

[Bug target/50182] Performance degradation from gcc 4.1 (x86_64)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50182 --- Comment #9 from Oleg Smolsky oleg.smolsky at gmail dot com 2011-08-25 16:26:05 UTC --- AFAIK it's a production processor, a couple of years old. From x86info: Family: 6 Model: 15 Stepping: 4 Type: 0 Brand: 0 CPU Model: Core 2 Duo E6600

[Bug middle-end/50083] [4.7 regression] All 32-bit fortran tests fail on 32-bit Solaris

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50083 Uros Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |ASSIGNED ---

[Bug tree-optimization/50188] Optimizer doesn't take into account, that longjmp could lead to loops, which causes illegal code transformations.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50188 H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last

[Bug c++/50189] New: Wrong code error in -O2 compile, target independent

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50189 Bug #: 50189 Summary: Wrong code error in -O2 compile, target independent Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: major

[Bug c++/50189] Wrong code error in -O2 compile, target independent

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50189 --- Comment #1 from Paul Koning pkoning at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-08-25 17:19:23 UTC --- Created attachment 25106 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25106 gcc -v output (configure options etc.

[Bug c++/50189] Wrong code error in -O2 compile, target independent

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50189 Paul Koning pkoning at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2 --- Comment

[Bug rtl-optimization/50190] New: linkpk bench of polyhedron fails during validation with gcc trunk when it is compiled with -Ofast on amd64.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50190 Bug #: 50190 Summary: linkpk bench of polyhedron fails during validation with gcc trunk when it is compiled with -Ofast on amd64. Classification: Unclassified Product:

[Bug c++/50157] [C++0x] Non-silent SFINAE in new expression with explicit conversion

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50157 --- Comment #2 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-08-25 18:22:49 UTC --- Author: jason Date: Thu Aug 25 18:22:46 2011 New Revision: 178081 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=178081 Log: PR c++/50157 *

[Bug c++/50157] [C++0x] Non-silent SFINAE in new expression with explicit conversion

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50157 --- Comment #1 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-08-25 18:22:36 UTC --- Author: jason Date: Thu Aug 25 18:22:33 2011 New Revision: 178080 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=178080 Log: PR c++/50157 *

[Bug rtl-optimization/50191] New: Strange debug insn produced for TOC compiling 416.gamess with profile-generate

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50191 Bug #: 50191 Summary: Strange debug insn produced for TOC compiling 416.gamess with profile-generate Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status:

[Bug middle-end/50083] [4.7 regression] All 32-bit fortran tests fail on 32-bit Solaris

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50083 --- Comment #8 from Uros Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com 2011-08-25 18:30:54 UTC --- Too many trees to see the forest case ;) We also have to protect conversion of round, rint and nearbyint with TARGET_C99. Obvious patch (also includes

[Bug c++/50189] [4.5 Regression] Wrong code error in -O2 compile, target independent

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50189 Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||wrong-code

[Bug tree-optimization/50188] Optimizer doesn't take into account, that longjmp could lead to loops, which causes illegal code transformations.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50188 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-08-25 18:33:44 UTC --- IIRC the variables need to be marked as volatile if you want them to be correct over setjmp/longjmp.

[Bug tree-optimization/50188] Optimizer doesn't take into account, that longjmp could lead to loops, which causes illegal code transformations.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50188 Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug testsuite/50185] [4.7 Regression] Bad AVX2 tests

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50185 H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last

[Bug c++/50157] [C++0x] Non-silent SFINAE in new expression with explicit conversion

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50157 Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug debug/50132] [4.7 Regression] ICE: in maybe_record_trace_start, at dwarf2cfi.c:2234 with -fno-asynchronous-unwind-tables and long double

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50132 --- Comment #3 from Richard Henderson rth at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-08-25 18:57:53 UTC --- Author: rth Date: Thu Aug 25 18:57:48 2011 New Revision: 178084 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=178084 Log: PR 50132 PR 49864 *

[Bug debug/49864] ICE: in maybe_record_trace_start, at dwarf2cfi.c:2439

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49864 --- Comment #10 from Richard Henderson rth at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-08-25 18:57:53 UTC --- Author: rth Date: Thu Aug 25 18:57:48 2011 New Revision: 178084 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=178084 Log: PR 50132 PR 49864 *

[Bug fortran/50050] [4.6/4.7 Regression] Internal compiler error free_expr0 at expr.c:3709 via gfc_done_2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50050 --- Comment #11 from Mikael Morin mikael at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-08-25 19:10:11 UTC --- Author: mikael Date: Thu Aug 25 19:10:06 2011 New Revision: 178086 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=178086 Log: 2011-08-25 Mikael Morin

[Bug c++/48582] Template non-type arguments doesn't accept null pointer constant value

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48582 --- Comment #1 from Takaya Saito gintensubaru at gmail dot com 2011-08-25 20:09:49 UTC --- Current C++0x draft 14.3.2/5 says 0 is not a valid template-argument for a non-type template-parameter of pointer type. So, `f0();' is ill-formed, as

[Bug tree-optimization/50188] Optimizer doesn't take into account, that longjmp could lead to loops, which causes illegal code transformations.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50188 --- Comment #4 from Michael Zolotukhin michael.v.zolotukhin at gmail dot com 2011-08-25 20:21:10 UTC --- If I understand standard correctly, in this case behavior isn't undefined. Am I right? If so, then if behavior of optimized code (loop is

[Bug libfortran/50192] New: Wrong character comparision with wide strings

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50192 Bug #: 50192 Summary: Wrong character comparision with wide strings Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: wrong-code

[Bug tree-optimization/50183] ICE in verify_ssa for 416.gamess when optimizing using profile data

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50183 --- Comment #4 from William J. Schmidt wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-08-25 21:02:02 UTC --- Here's the backtrace from the failure. (gdb) bt #0 internal_error (gmsgid=0x10e73c80 verify_ssa failed) at

[Bug target/50182] Performance degradation from gcc 4.1 (x86_64)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50182 --- Comment #10 from Oleg Smolsky oleg.smolsky at gmail dot com 2011-08-25 22:08:49 UTC --- BTW, the uint16_t test also got slower for the same very reason. Here is the inner-most loop generated by g++4.6: text:00400DA0 loc_400DA0:

[Bug target/50193] New: ARM: ICE on a | (b negative-constant)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50193 Bug #: 50193 Summary: ARM: ICE on a | (b negative-constant) Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority:

[Bug fortran/36313] [F2003] {MIN,MAX}{LOC,VAL} should accept character arguments

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36313 Thomas Koenig tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot |tkoenig at gcc

[Bug target/50182] Performance degradation from gcc 4.1 (x86_64)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50182 --- Comment #11 from Oleg Smolsky oleg.smolsky at gmail dot com 2011-08-26 00:48:02 UTC --- Also, I have just built the same suite with GCC version 4.7 that came from ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/4.7-20110820/gcc-4.7-20110820.tar.bz2 and