http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50413
--- Comment #14 from Ira Rosen irar at il dot ibm.com 2011-09-20 06:23:54 UTC
---
The basic block that got vectorized on these platforms is in main(). I am going
to remove it and leave only shift(), since the main purpose of the test is to
check
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50461
Bug #: 50461
Summary: mpfr.h found in mpfr-3.1.0/src instead of mpfr-3.0.1/.
as previously
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.1
Status:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50374
--- Comment #6 from Ira Rosen irar at il dot ibm.com 2011-09-20 08:27:08 UTC
---
Thanks for working on this!
It looks like the problem is with the way the stmts are marked. We don't insert
pattern stmts now, so the things are more tricky. I'll
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49443
--- Comment #6 from jye2 at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-09-20 09:01:06 UTC ---
Author: jye2
Date: Tue Sep 20 09:00:58 2011
New Revision: 179003
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=179003
Log:
2011-09-20 Jiangning Liu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50460
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50462
Bug #: 50462
Summary: Particularly painful error message
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: minor
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50386
Ramana Radhakrishnan ramana at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ramana at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47023
florian.rathgeber at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||florian.rathgeber at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50454
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50374
--- Comment #7 from Ira Rosen irar at il dot ibm.com 2011-09-20 11:45:53 UTC
---
Created attachment 25322
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25322
fix
Here is the fix (it's a diff relative to your patch).
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50374
--- Comment #8 from Ira Rosen irar at il dot ibm.com 2011-09-20 11:47:00 UTC
---
Created attachment 25323
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25323
complete patch including my fix
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50374
--- Comment #9 from vincenzo Innocente vincenzo.innocente at cern dot ch
2011-09-20 12:05:01 UTC ---
does not compile to me
../.././gcc/tree-vect-loop.c: In function 'vect_is_simple_reduction_1':
../.././gcc/tree-vect-loop.c:2237:35: warning:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50374
Ira Rosen irar at il dot ibm.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #25322|0 |1
is obsolete|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50374
Ira Rosen irar at il dot ibm.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #25323|0 |1
is obsolete|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50463
Bug #: 50463
Summary: -ftree-dse leeds to wrong code with gfortran
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: critical
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50463
--- Comment #1 from manz at intes dot de 2011-09-20 12:29:47 UTC ---
Created attachment 25326
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25326
Fortran testcase code a.f, b.f and c.f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47011
--- Comment #2 from Mat Hostetter mat at lcs dot mit.edu 2011-09-20 12:31:56
UTC ---
Created attachment 25327
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25327
bug showing ICE with -O, incorrect code without optimization
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47011
--- Comment #3 from Mat Hostetter mat at lcs dot mit.edu 2011-09-20 12:32:47
UTC ---
I am seeing the same crash with gcc 4.4.[3456], on x86_64. It works on 4.6.1.
I encountered this crash when simply upgrading to the latest boost (1.47.0),
which
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50463
Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50463
--- Comment #3 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr 2011-09-20
13:18:35 UTC ---
r165415 is OK
r165758 gives a wrong code.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50460
H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rguenth at gcc dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50374
--- Comment #12 from vincenzo Innocente vincenzo.innocente at cern dot ch
2011-09-20 13:46:16 UTC ---
I'm getting these errors
../.././gcc/optabs.c: In function 'optab_d* optab_for_tree_code(tree_code,
const_tree, optab_subtype)':
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50386
--- Comment #3 from dave.anglin at bell dot net 2011-09-20 13:46:04 UTC ---
On 9/20/2011 6:49 AM, ramana at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
Do you have some date before when trunk managed bootstraps successfully ?
This is my last successful build:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50462
--- Comment #1 from Manuel López-Ibáñez manu at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-09-20
13:59:47 UTC ---
Clang does only marginally better because of its selective typedef unwrapping
and avoiding printing back expressions, but then it goes and prints all
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50374
--- Comment #13 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-09-20
14:01:55 UTC ---
Ira, thanks for your help, I'll continue working on this now.
To vincenzo, this patch isn't finished, so it is premature to test it.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47023
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47023
--- Comment #4 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-09-20 14:57:00 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #3)
(In reply to comment #2)
I'm seeing this bug even for an explicitly interoperable type (hence I'm not
sure if this is really the same bug - I'm
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47023
--- Comment #5 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr 2011-09-20
15:35:00 UTC ---
r158253 is OK
r162456 gives the error.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50394
--- Comment #16 from Markus Trippelsdorf markus at trippelsdorf dot de
2011-09-20 15:39:41 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #15)
BTW since the exception seems to be thrown from libuno_cppuhelpergcc3.so.3
that sounds like there is some sort of gcc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50464
Bug #: 50464
Summary: Using -Ofast -march=bdver1 results in internal
compiler error: in extract_insn, at recog.c:2109
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50463
--- Comment #4 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr 2011-09-20
16:57:28 UTC ---
This is caused/exposed by revision 165422
Author: rguenth
Date: Wed Oct 13 13:03:31 2010
New Revision: 165422
URL:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50463
--- Comment #5 from manz at intes dot de 2011-09-20 17:11:56 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #2)
I confirm the problem on 4.6.1 and trunk, but the code seems to work as
expected with 4.5.3 and 4.4.6.
It also works if I merge the three files in
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50464
Uros Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||x86
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50465
Bug #: 50465
Summary: [avr] Use insn attribute to depict if and how
instruction lengths have to be adjusted
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50465
Georg-Johann Lay gjl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50464
Uros Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42575
jules at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50442
--- Comment #6 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-09-20
19:25:36 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Tue Sep 20 19:25:32 2011
New Revision: 179015
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=179015
Log:
PR c++/50442
*
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50466
Bug #: 50466
Summary: Compiled code behaves differently with -O2 -fPIC
flag combination
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.3.4
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50466
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-09-20
21:00:55 UTC ---
4.3.x is no longer maintained and had at least one known strict aliasing bug.
Try 4.5.x or 4.6.x.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50467
Bug #: 50467
Summary: Compiler can move stack cleanup before last memory
reference involving the stack
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50467
--- Comment #1 from Michael Meissner meissner at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-09-20
21:04:17 UTC ---
Created attachment 25329
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25329
Code from the libquantum benchmark.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45114
Dodji Seketeli dodji at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50468
Bug #: 50468
Summary: ICE in force_type_die when compiling binutils with
-flto -O[12]
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50394
--- Comment #17 from Jan Hubicka hubicka at ucw dot cz 2011-09-20 22:19:38
UTC ---
I haven't found out exactly what libs are affected yet, because I've copied
them in large chunks.
Hmm, this is quite weird. I am not aware of any really
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50386
--- Comment #4 from Ramana Radhakrishnan ramana at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-09-20
22:32:49 UTC ---
I think this is a bootstrap issue rather than a problem with libgomp . A
reduced testcase of this form fails with the stage2 compiler but is ok with
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50469
Bug #: 50469
Summary: [4.7 Regression] FAIL: gfortran.dg/storage_size_2.f08
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50469
--- Comment #1 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org hjl at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-09-20
22:59:53 UTC ---
Author: hjl
Date: Tue Sep 20 22:59:49 2011
New Revision: 179022
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=179022
Log:
Replace must be be with
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50469
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49488
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49813
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50470
Bug #: 50470
Summary: gcc does not respect -nostdlib with regard to search
paths
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50470
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-09-21
01:20:48 UTC ---
I think this is why GCC created the --with-sysroot option while building GCC
itself. And really -nostdlib is not just for alternate library ecosystem.
It
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50470
--- Comment #2 from Rich Felker bugdal at aerifal dot cx 2011-09-21 01:34:29
UTC ---
The sysroot features may be nice but they're not a substitute for being able to
eliminate the default library search path. For example, when using sysroot,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50467
Alan Modra amodra at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|powerpc64-linux |powerpc-linux,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50471
Bug #: 50471
Summary: Qualified lookup fails to find template function
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50471
--- Comment #1 from Zoltan Glozik zoltan at epochcapital dot com.au
2011-09-21 05:41:57 UTC ---
Created attachment 25330
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25330
bug
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50471
--- Comment #2 from Zoltan Glozik zoltan at epochcapital dot com.au
2011-09-21 05:43:44 UTC ---
Comment on attachment 25330
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25330
bug
#include iostream
namespace NS {
templateclass T
struct A
58 matches
Mail list logo
