[Bug other/50610] G++ 4.4.3: Incorrect code at -O2 (-fwrapv, SafeInt, c++ templates, template class files)

2011-10-03 Thread noloader at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50610 --- Comment #2 from Jeffrey Walton 2011-10-04 05:24:20 UTC --- For this problem, the work around was: try { const T* base = ptr; base += SafeInt(cnt); } catch(const SafeIntException&) { throw InvalidArgumentExceptio

[Bug other/50610] G++ 4.4.3: Incorrect code at -O2 (-fwrapv, SafeInt, c++ templates, template class files)

2011-10-03 Thread noloader at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50610 --- Comment #1 from Jeffrey Walton 2011-10-04 04:07:17 UTC --- My bad: jeffrey@studio:~/Desktop/safeint-opt-test$ gcc --version gcc (Ubuntu 4.4.3-4ubuntu5) 4.4.3 Copyright (C) 2009 Free Software Foundation, Inc. This is free software; see the so

[Bug other/50610] New: G++ 4.4.3: Incorrect code at -O2 (-fwrapv, SafeInt, c++ templates, template class files)

2011-10-03 Thread noloader at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50610 Bug #: 50610 Summary: G++ 4.4.3: Incorrect code at -O2 (-fwrapv, SafeInt, c++ templates, template class files) Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.4.3

[Bug middle-end/50609] [4.7 Regression] FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/pr23135.c compilation, -O2 -flto (ICE)

2011-10-03 Thread hp at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50609 Hans-Peter Nilsson changed: What|Removed |Added Target||cris-axis-elf Status|UNC

[Bug middle-end/50609] [4.7 Regression] FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/pr23135.c compilation, -O2 -flto (ICE)

2011-10-03 Thread hp at gcc dot gnu.org
pr23135.x6 -auxbase-strip /tmp/ccJhtPAy.lto.o -O2 -w -version -flto-partition=none -fresolution=pr23135.res pr23135.o -o pr23135.s GNU GIMPLE (GCC) version 4.7.0 20111003 (experimental) [trunk revision 179480] (cris-elf) compiled by GNU C version 4.4.3 20100127 (Red Hat 4.4.3-4), GMP version

[Bug middle-end/50609] [4.7 Regression] FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/pr23135.c compilation, -O2 -flto (ICE)

2011-10-03 Thread hp at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50609 --- Comment #1 from Hans-Peter Nilsson 2011-10-04 00:22:11 UTC --- Last known working revision:first known failing 179447:179464, and 179462 is the only related change in that range, so it's confirmed that's the revision exposing or causing this

[Bug middle-end/50607] [4.7 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/bconstp-3.c

2011-10-03 Thread hp at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50607 --- Comment #4 from Hans-Peter Nilsson 2011-10-04 00:04:54 UTC --- (In reply to comment #3) > On x86 linux the testcase does not cause segfaults, so may be you could > investigate via gdb which function cause segfault on cris-elf. I cloned this

[Bug middle-end/50609] New: [4.7 Regression] FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/pr23135.c compilation, -O2 -flto (ICE)

2011-10-03 Thread hp at gcc dot gnu.org
35.s GNU GIMPLE (GCC) version 4.7.0 20111003 (experimental) [trunk revision 179480] (cris-elf) compiled by GNU C version 4.4.3 20100127 (Red Hat 4.4.3-4), GMP version 4.3.0, MPFR version 2.4.1, MPC version 0.8 GGC heuristics: --param ggc-min-expand=30 --param ggc-min-heapsize=4096 GNU GIMPL

[Bug c++/50608] cannot apply 'offsetof' to a non constant address

2011-10-03 Thread dberger at oubliette dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50608 Dan Berger changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla

[Bug c++/50608] New: cannot apply 'offsetof' to a non constant address

2011-10-03 Thread dberger at oubliette dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50608 Bug #: 50608 Summary: cannot apply 'offsetof' to a non constant address Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.6.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug middle-end/50607] [4.7 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/bconstp-3.c

2011-10-03 Thread artyom.shinkaroff at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50607 --- Comment #3 from Artem Shinkarov 2011-10-03 23:32:47 UTC --- (In reply to comment #1) > For cris-elf too (unsurprisingly as the error seems universal), plus I'm > seeing > a: > > FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/pr23135.c compilation, -O2 -flto

[Bug middle-end/50607] [4.7 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/bconstp-3.c

2011-10-03 Thread artyom.shinkaroff at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50607 --- Comment #2 from Artem Shinkarov 2011-10-03 23:17:22 UTC --- That seems to be the changes caused by the patch I have committed. However, may be this is a test-case that needs adjustment. I'll have to consult with Joseph. He asked to change t

[Bug middle-end/50607] New: [4.7 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/bconstp-3.c

2011-10-03 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50607 Bug #: 50607 Summary: [4.7 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/bconstp-3.c Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority

[Bug middle-end/50607] [4.7 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/bconstp-3.c

2011-10-03 Thread hp at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50607 --- Comment #1 from Hans-Peter Nilsson 2011-10-03 23:09:44 UTC --- For cris-elf too (unsurprisingly as the error seems universal), plus I'm seeing a: FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/pr23135.c compilation, -O2 -flto (internal compiler error) gcc.l

[Bug target/50603] [x32] Unnecessary lea

2011-10-03 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50603 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |UNCONFIRMED Ever Confirmed|1

[Bug c/50606] New: gcc fails to detect obvious use of NULL pointer

2011-10-03 Thread dcb314 at hotmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50606 Bug #: 50606 Summary: gcc fails to detect obvious use of NULL pointer Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: enhancement

[Bug c++/50605] New: ice in ipa_get_jf_pass_through_result with -O3

2011-10-03 Thread dcb314 at hotmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50605 Bug #: 50605 Summary: ice in ipa_get_jf_pass_through_result with -O3 Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal P

[Bug c++/50357] verify_cgraph_node failed with -O2

2011-10-03 Thread dcb314 at hotmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50357 dcb changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug c++/50357] verify_cgraph_node failed with -O2

2011-10-03 Thread dcb314 at hotmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50357 --- Comment #1 from dcb 2011-10-03 20:23:46 UTC --- Seems fixed in gcc snapshot 20111001

[Bug fortran/35831] [F95] Shape mismatch check missing for dummy procedure argument

2011-10-03 Thread janus at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35831 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|una

[Bug other/50283] [4.7 Regression] FAIL: g++.dg/eh/simd-1.C execution test

2011-10-03 Thread danglin at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50283 --- Comment #3 from John David Anglin 2011-10-03 19:43:40 UTC --- Created attachment 25405 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25405 .final dump

[Bug target/50588] gcc produce bad inlined code with -march=athlon -O2

2011-10-03 Thread mikpe at it dot uu.se
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50588 --- Comment #13 from Mikael Pettersson 2011-10-03 19:27:21 UTC --- Created attachment 25404 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25404 reduced preprocessed test case With this reduced test case I'm seeing gcc-4.6 ifcvt hoisting tr

[Bug middle-end/50604] [4.7 Regression] verify_gimple failed: type mismatch in binary expression

2011-10-03 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50604 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.7.0 Summary|[4.7.0] verify_g

[Bug c/50604] New: verify_gimple failed: type mismatch in binary expression

2011-10-03 Thread dimhen at gmail dot com
nker-build-id --enable-languages=c,c++,lto --enable-plugin --with-tune=generic --enable-version-specific-runtime-libs Thread model: posix gcc version 4.7.0 20111003 (experimental) [trunk revision 179472] (GCC)

[Bug target/50603] [x32] Unnecessary lea

2011-10-03 Thread ubizjak at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50603 Uros Bizjak changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/49967] The -static-libstdc++ does not work on HP-UX (IA64 B.11.23, probably others)

2011-10-03 Thread sje at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49967 --- Comment #2 from Steve Ellcey 2011-10-03 17:57:44 UTC --- Author: sje Date: Mon Oct 3 17:57:40 2011 New Revision: 179472 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=179472 Log: 2011-10-03 Steve Ellcey PR target/49967 *

[Bug target/50603] New: [x32] Unnecessary lea

2011-10-03 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50603 Bug #: 50603 Summary: [x32] Unnecessary lea Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Compon

[Bug lto/50601] [4.7 Regression] New LTO failures

2011-10-03 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50601 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added CC||hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone|-

[Bug tree-optimization/50602] ICE in tree_nrv, at tree-nrv.c:155 during large LTO build

2011-10-03 Thread andi-gcc at firstfloor dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50602 Andi Kleen changed: What|Removed |Added Version|unknown |4.7.0 --- Comment #1 from Andi Kleen 2011-1

[Bug tree-optimization/50602] New: ICE in tree_nrv, at tree-nrv.c:155 during large LTO build

2011-10-03 Thread andi-gcc at firstfloor dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50602 Bug #: 50602 Summary: ICE in tree_nrv, at tree-nrv.c:155 during large LTO build Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug lto/50601] New: [4.7 Regression] New LTO failures

2011-10-03 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50601 Bug #: 50601 Summary: [4.7 Regression] New LTO failures Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug c++/50594] Option -fwhole-program discards replaced new operator for std::string

2011-10-03 Thread z0sh at sogetthis dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50594 --- Comment #13 from Kerrek SB 2011-10-03 16:12:28 UTC --- Very interesting. I understand that making the function static makes the program ill-formed, but it's still somewhat surprising that a compiler flag should turn a perfectly valid program

[Bug c++/39164] [C++0x] defaulted dtor redefinition not caught

2011-10-03 Thread jason at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39164 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug ada/50600] New: "Illegal instruction" when using pragma Profile (Restricted)

2011-10-03 Thread bauhaus at futureapps dot de
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50600 Bug #: 50600 Summary: "Illegal instruction" when using pragma Profile (Restricted) Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug fortran/33814] Failure of gfortran n Mac Mini

2011-10-03 Thread mercergeoinfo at yahoo dot co.uk
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33814 mercergeoinfo at yahoo dot co.uk changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mercergeoinfo at yahoo d

[Bug c++/50594] Option -fwhole-program discards replaced new operator for std::string

2011-10-03 Thread paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50594 --- Comment #12 from Paolo Carlini 2011-10-03 15:12:53 UTC --- Yes, yesterday, a bit sleepy, I also wondered that, but I'm not knowledgeable enough of these mechanisms to say whether it would be otherwise safe.

[Bug c++/50594] Option -fwhole-program discards replaced new operator for std::string

2011-10-03 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50594 --- Comment #11 from Jonathan Wakely 2011-10-03 15:02:37 UTC --- we could add __attribute__((externally_visible)) on the declarations in I don't know what other side effects that would have

[Bug tree-optimization/50599] New: -ftree-vectorize generating incorrect code

2011-10-03 Thread a5970694 at nepwk dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50599 Bug #: 50599 Summary: -ftree-vectorize generating incorrect code Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.5.2 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priorit

[Bug middle-end/50598] New: [4.7 Regression] Undefined symbols: "___emutls_v.*", ... on *-apple-darwin*

2011-10-03 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50598 Bug #: 50598 Summary: [4.7 Regression] Undefined symbols: "___emutls_v.*", ... on *-apple-darwin* Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNC

[Bug c++/50594] Option -fwhole-program discards replaced new operator for std::string

2011-10-03 Thread daniel.kruegler at googlemail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50594 --- Comment #10 from Daniel Krügler 2011-10-03 13:49:01 UTC --- (In reply to comment #8) I agree that given the "make static" contract of -fwhole-program (which I was not aware about) the compiler behaves accordingly. I wonder whether it would b

[Bug c++/50594] Option -fwhole-program discards replaced new operator for std::string

2011-10-03 Thread paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50594 --- Comment #9 from Paolo Carlini 2011-10-03 13:45:03 UTC --- Oh, thanks Jon for testing that. Indeed, as far as I'm concerned, the issue is resolved.

[Bug c++/50594] Option -fwhole-program discards replaced new operator for std::string

2011-10-03 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50594 --- Comment #8 from Jonathan Wakely 2011-10-03 13:43:21 UTC --- [basic.stc.dynamic.allocation] p1 "a program is ill-formed if an allocation function is declared in a namespace scope other than global scope or declared static in global scope." S

[Bug c++/50594] Option -fwhole-program discards replaced new operator for std::string

2011-10-03 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50594 --- Comment #7 from Jonathan Wakely 2011-10-03 13:41:50 UTC --- (In reply to comment #3) > Thank you for the replies. Is this behaviour standard-conforming? The documentation for -fwhole-program says that all functions become static, which I sus

[Bug c++/50594] Option -fwhole-program discards replaced new operator for std::string

2011-10-03 Thread paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50594 --- Comment #6 from Paolo Carlini 2011-10-03 13:22:23 UTC --- I have no idea how this can be made to work with -fwhole-program, but other people know better.

[Bug c++/50594] Option -fwhole-program discards replaced new operator for std::string

2011-10-03 Thread daniel.kruegler at googlemail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50594 Daniel Krügler changed: What|Removed |Added CC||daniel.kruegler at |

[Bug boehm-gc/42304] found a resource leak

2011-10-03 Thread nightstrike at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42304 nightstrike changed: What|Removed |Added CC||nightstrike at gmail dot

[Bug boehm-gc/43682] libgcj don't support Win x64?

2011-10-03 Thread nightstrike at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43682 --- Comment #3 from nightstrike 2011-10-03 13:06:38 UTC --- Who can update the in-tree boehm-gc?

[Bug preprocessor/36819] memleak in split_quote_chain

2011-10-03 Thread nightstrike at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36819 nightstrike changed: What|Removed |Added CC||nightstrike at gmail dot

[Bug target/50588] gcc produce bad inlined code with -march=athlon -O2

2011-10-03 Thread mikpe at it dot uu.se
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50588 --- Comment #12 from Mikael Pettersson 2011-10-03 12:56:10 UTC --- Backporting r179284 to 4.6.1 (trivial except for the third ifcvt.c hunk which required manual application due to a context diff) fixed the test case there too.

[Bug tree-optimization/50587] ICE init_range_entry, at tree-ssa-reassoc.c:1698 caused by recent change

2011-10-03 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50587 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug target/50588] gcc produce bad inlined code with -march=athlon -O2

2011-10-03 Thread mikpe at it dot uu.se
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50588 --- Comment #11 from Mikael Pettersson 2011-10-03 11:46:28 UTC --- The failure seems to have disappeared on trunk starting with r179284: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2011-09/msg00903.html

[Bug c++/39681] Compile error is not descriptive

2011-10-03 Thread paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39681 --- Comment #5 from Paolo Carlini 2011-10-03 11:13:52 UTC --- Like, sorry about my naivete, by adding a cp_parser_skip_to_end_of_statement or something right after the error message?!?

[Bug c++/39681] Compile error is not descriptive

2011-10-03 Thread paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39681 --- Comment #4 from Paolo Carlini 2011-10-03 11:08:39 UTC --- Ok, thanks. Frankly I hadn't noticed the *second* error. The first one seemed good enough to me, and quite similar to what I saw elsewhere modulo type instead of type-specifier. So do

[Bug c/44854] Improve diagnostic for missing member name or ';' in a struct

2011-10-03 Thread manu at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44854 Manuel López-Ibáñez changed: What|Removed |Added CC||manu at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug fortran/50570] [4.6/4.7 Regression] Incorrect error for assignment to intent(in) pointer

2011-10-03 Thread msteghofer at cistib dot upf.edu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50570 msteghofer at cistib dot upf.edu changed: What|Removed |Added CC||msteghofer at cistib dot

[Bug fortran/50570] [4.6/4.7 Regression] Incorrect error for assignment to intent(in) pointer

2011-10-03 Thread msteghofer at cistib dot upf.edu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50570 --- Comment #2 from msteghofer at cistib dot upf.edu 2011-10-03 10:15:09 UTC --- Created attachment 25403 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25403 Code to reproduce the behaviour Subroutine POINTER_INTENT_IN_BUG_FAILING contains t

[Bug c++/39681] Compile error is not descriptive

2011-10-03 Thread manu at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39681 --- Comment #3 from Manuel López-Ibáñez 2011-10-03 10:07:49 UTC --- (In reply to comment #2) > Manuel, can I have your opinion about this one? Since you ask, my opinion is that first there should be only 1 error and not two, and bonus points if

[Bug c++/50595] template overload resolution insufficiently sensitive to name dependency?

2011-10-03 Thread paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50595 --- Comment #1 from Paolo Carlini 2011-10-03 10:04:17 UTC --- Without having looked at the code, ICC behaves exactly like GCC.

[Bug other/50597] New: printf_fp.o: relocation R_X86_64_PC32 against `hack_digit.6607' can not be used when making a shared object; recompile with -fPIC

2011-10-03 Thread mustarddream at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50597 Bug #: 50597 Summary: printf_fp.o: relocation R_X86_64_PC32 against `hack_digit.6607' can not be used when making a shared object; recompile with -fPIC Classification: Unclassified

[Bug target/50038] redundant zero extensions

2011-10-03 Thread ubizjak at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50038 --- Comment #4 from Uros Bizjak 2011-10-03 09:19:16 UTC --- (In reply to comment #3) > So assuming this approach (modify implicit-zee pass) is right, we'll have to > enable this pass at least on x86 (32 bit). Is it ok ? > > P. S. > I forgot to m

[Bug tree-optimization/50587] ICE init_range_entry, at tree-ssa-reassoc.c:1698 caused by recent change

2011-10-03 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50587 --- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-10-03 09:06:43 UTC --- Author: jakub Date: Mon Oct 3 09:06:38 2011 New Revision: 179447 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=179447 Log: PR tree-optimization/50587 * tree-ssa-reass

[Bug c++/50593] improve __attribute__((format(printf)))

2011-10-03 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50593 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #1 f

[Bug tree-optimization/50587] ICE init_range_entry, at tree-ssa-reassoc.c:1698 caused by recent change

2011-10-03 Thread markus at trippelsdorf dot de
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50587 --- Comment #3 from Markus Trippelsdorf 2011-10-03 08:44:09 UTC --- (In reply to comment #2) > Created attachment 25402 [details] > gcc47-pr50587.patch > > Does this patch fix it? Yes it fixes both the LTO kernel and Firefox builds. Thanks.

[Bug tree-optimization/50596] Problems in vectorization of condition expression

2011-10-03 Thread vincenzo.innocente at cern dot ch
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50596 --- Comment #1 from vincenzo Innocente 2011-10-03 08:40:53 UTC --- manage to vectorize this int j[1024]; void foo5() { for (int i=0; i!=N; ++i) j[i] = (a[i]

[Bug target/50588] gcc produce bad inlined code with -march=athlon -O2

2011-10-03 Thread mikpe at it dot uu.se
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50588 --- Comment #10 from Mikael Pettersson 2011-10-03 08:35:31 UTC --- (In reply to comment #8) > (In reply to comment #6) > > So which libc was this originally compiled against? Some things in > > traceroute.i make me think it's glibc, but I don't

[Bug tree-optimization/50596] New: Problems in vectorization of condition expression

2011-10-03 Thread vincenzo.innocente at cern dot ch
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50596 Bug #: 50596 Summary: Problems in vectorization of condition expression Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug tree-optimization/50587] ICE init_range_entry, at tree-ssa-reassoc.c:1698 caused by recent change

2011-10-03 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50587 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|