http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50603
--- Comment #7 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-10-07 06:43:24 UTC ---
Author: uros
Date: Fri Oct 7 06:43:17 2011
New Revision: 179646
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=179646
Log:
PR target/50603
* config/i386/i386.c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50641
--- Comment #3 from Daniel Krügler daniel.kruegler at googlemail dot com
2011-10-07 06:46:56 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #2)
This looks like not-a-bug to me.
This refers to the traits implementation. I believe that the core language
should
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50641
--- Comment #4 from Andy Lutomirski luto at mit dot edu 2011-10-07 06:57:01
UTC ---
The problem I encountered that inspired this was:
#include type_traits
#include map
struct From
{
};
struct To
{
To(const From ) {}
To(const To ) = delete;
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50641
--- Comment #5 from Daniel Krügler daniel.kruegler at googlemail dot com
2011-10-07 07:13:50 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #4)
N3242 says that From needs to be
convertible to To, but I'm not at all convinced that convertible means the
same
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50649
Bug #: 50649
Summary: REGRESSION: ICE in vect_is_simple_use_1, at
tree-vect-stmts.c:5689 after rev 179607
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49801
Paolo Bonzini bonzini at gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bonzini at gnu dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50596
--- Comment #13 from vincenzo Innocente vincenzo.innocente at cern dot ch
2011-10-07 07:35:40 UTC ---
is not PR50649 caused by your changes?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50650
Bug #: 50650
Summary: [4.7 Regression] ICE in vect_is_simple_use_1, at
tree-vect-stmts.c:5689
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50650
--- Comment #1 from Markus Trippelsdorf markus at trippelsdorf dot de
2011-10-07 07:47:35 UTC ---
Created attachment 25436
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25436
testcase
Ahoj!
Cilvēk, esi taču kaut ko dzirdējis par slepeno Mis Seksīgās līnijas konkursa
atlasi? Pat, ja neesi, nekas!
Tu vari būt absolūti drošs, ka sāncenses bija seksīgas un uzbudinošiem
apaļumiem īstajās vietās!
Ja patiešām gribi viņas satikt un paspaidīt..
dodies turp:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50651
Bug #: 50651
Summary: GNAT rejects matching parameter in generic
instantiation as non-matching
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.5.3
Status:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49279
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||4.6.2, 4.7.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50642
Georg-Johann Lay gjl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||documentation
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50636
--- Comment #8 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-10-07
08:25:37 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #4)
Right now alloc_page will (usually) allocate in GGC_QUIRE_SIZE * G.pagesize
chunks, but release_pages will munmap individual
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50637
--- Comment #1 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-10-07
08:28:53 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Fri Oct 7 08:28:48 2011
New Revision: 179648
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=179648
Log:
2011-10-07 Richard
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50637
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50638
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.7.0
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50652
Bug #: 50652
Summary: [avr] Incorrect data start value for atmega164a
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50640
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50646
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44463
--- Comment #13 from Jan Hubicka hubicka at ucw dot cz 2011-10-07 08:39:06
UTC ---
Honza, I think that is fixed now, correct?
I should probably drop my workarounds but haven't yet
Yes, this one should be fixed with alias rewrite. Please let
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50650
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.7.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50650
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50649
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50653
Bug #: 50653
Summary: At build phase there are demanded two files named
hpp but there are only files named hp
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50125
--- Comment #2 from Rainer Orth ro at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-10-07 09:02:21 UTC
---
Author: ro
Date: Fri Oct 7 09:02:13 2011
New Revision: 179649
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=179649
Log:
Don't XFAIL gcc.dg/uninit-B.c etc.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50125
Rainer Orth ro at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50650
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50654
Bug #: 50654
Summary: Many Go tests fail on emutls targets
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50653
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-10-07
09:26:01 UTC ---
The archive is fine:
tar tzf gcc-g++-4.6.1.tar.gz | grep '\.hp$'
Either your download is corrupt (check its MD5 sum) or you need to use GNU tar
to extract
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50654
Rainer Orth ro at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.7.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50650
--- Comment #4 from vincenzo Innocente vincenzo.innocente at cern dot ch
2011-10-07 09:30:46 UTC ---
ok in my tests
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50641
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50653
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50636
--- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-10-07
10:01:32 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #2)
Perhaps on Linux, at least with recentish kernel, we could change
release_pages
into keeping the pages in the G.free_pages chain,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50596
--- Comment #14 from vincenzo Innocente vincenzo.innocente at cern dot ch
2011-10-07 10:15:03 UTC ---
signed char k[1024];
void foo6() {
for (int i=0; i!=N; ++i)
k[i] = (a[i]b[i] ? -1 : 0) (c[i]d[i] ? -1 : 0);
}
requires -fno-tree-pre to
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50655
Bug #: 50655
Summary: Many of the new VIS2/VIS3 tests FAIL on Solaris
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50596
--- Comment #15 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-10-07
10:31:13 UTC ---
float a[1024], b[1024], c[1024], d[1024];
int j[1024];
void
f1 (void)
{
int i;
for (i = 0; i 1024; ++i)
{
unsigned int x = a[i] b[i] ? -1 :
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50557
--- Comment #6 from Igor Zamyatin izamyatin at gmail dot com 2011-10-07
10:33:33 UTC ---
Indeed, overall register pressure is not increased. Even before IRA dumps show
that register pressure is actually kept on the same level.
Looks like it is
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50575
--- Comment #3 from Rainer Orth ro at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-10-07 11:33:02 UTC
---
Author: ro
Date: Fri Oct 7 11:32:59 2011
New Revision: 179651
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=179651
Log:
Disable ABI warnings for
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50492
--- Comment #6 from Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-10-07
11:43:08 UTC ---
Author: ebotcazou
Date: Fri Oct 7 11:43:03 2011
New Revision: 179652
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=179652
Log:
PR lto/50492
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50650
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-10-07
11:48:07 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Oct 7 11:48:03 2011
New Revision: 179653
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=179653
Log:
PR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50492
Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50575
Rainer Orth ro at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50633
--- Comment #11 from Bernd Schmidt bernds at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-10-07
12:10:11 UTC ---
I see none of these failures in the x86_64 test run with my last patch applied.
Can you confirm that it's fixed?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49484
vijay vijay910 at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||vijay910 at gmail dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50633
--- Comment #12 from Bernd Schmidt bernds at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-10-07
12:20:57 UTC ---
Sorry, commit didn't go through earlier - it's in now.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50650
Markus Trippelsdorf markus at trippelsdorf dot de changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50527
--- Comment #9 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-10-07 12:49:54 UTC ---
Author: vries
Date: Fri Oct 7 12:49:49 2011
New Revision: 179655
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=179655
Log:
2011-10-07 Tom de Vries
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50527
--- Comment #10 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-10-07 12:50:00 UTC ---
Author: vries
Date: Fri Oct 7 12:49:56 2011
New Revision: 179656
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=179656
Log:
2011-10-07 Tom de Vries
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49049
--- Comment #9 from Bernd Schmidt bernds at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-10-07
12:56:55 UTC ---
Author: bernds
Date: Fri Oct 7 12:56:52 2011
New Revision: 179657
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=179657
Log:
PR target/49049
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49049
Bernd Schmidt bernds at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50527
vries at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50625
--- Comment #5 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-10-07 14:40:21 UTC ---
Author: janus
Date: Fri Oct 7 14:40:14 2011
New Revision: 179660
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=179660
Log:
2011-10-07 Janus Weil ja...@gcc.gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50302
--- Comment #4 from Andi Kleen andi-gcc at firstfloor dot org 2011-10-07
14:40:02 UTC ---
Sorry yes my mistake.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50625
--- Comment #6 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-10-07 14:42:15 UTC ---
Fixed on trunk with r179660.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50636
--- Comment #10 from Andi Kleen andi-gcc at firstfloor dot org 2011-10-07
14:44:10 UTC ---
To track the pattern you can simply use strace or ftrace (I did ftrace)
I checked the kernel code now and if the madvise is big enough it won't
split up
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50656
Bug #: 50656
Summary: Several Go tests with unrecognized test line
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50335
--- Comment #2 from Gregory Maxwell gmaxwell at gmail dot com 2011-10-07
14:52:37 UTC ---
Still failing in r179659.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50335
--- Comment #3 from Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com 2011-10-07
14:57:11 UTC ---
No miracles, eh?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50655
--- Comment #1 from David S. Miller davem at davemloft dot net 2011-10-07
15:01:55 UTC ---
Please try to figure out why the configure test is not detecting VIS3
instruction capabilities in your assembler. That's why the VIS3 tests are
failing.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50655
--- Comment #2 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ro at CeBiTec dot
Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2011-10-07 15:16:16 UTC ---
--- Comment #1 from David S. Miller davem at davemloft dot net 2011-10-07
15:01:55 UTC ---
Please try to figure out why the
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49868
Georg-Johann Lay gjl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #24916|0 |1
is
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49868
--- Comment #3 from Georg-Johann Lay gjl at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-10-07
15:24:32 UTC ---
Created attachment 25439
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25439
2/2: r179594: AVR part of implementation
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49868
Georg-Johann Lay gjl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||patch
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50335
--- Comment #4 from Gregory Maxwell gmaxwell at gmail dot com 2011-10-07
15:29:42 UTC ---
Ha, indeed. Well, I don't want it to be forgotten just because its become old
and potentially inapplicable.
I test GCC development periodically on all the
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49752
--- Comment #2 from Richard Henderson rth at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-10-07
15:35:56 UTC ---
Author: rth
Date: Fri Oct 7 15:35:49 2011
New Revision: 179663
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=179663
Log:
PR 49752
*
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49752
Richard Henderson rth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34888
Richard Henderson rth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50644
--- Comment #2 from Michael Matz matz at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-10-07 15:45:44
UTC ---
Try to find out what var is. The segfault should also happen with an
unoptimized cc1 so that you can see the value of var.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35860
Georg-Johann Lay gjl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50657
Bug #: 50657
Summary: [4.7 Regression] FAIL: gfortran.dg/select_type_12.f03
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50640
Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hjl.tools
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50657
Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50633
H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50644
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50642
--- Comment #4 from Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org 2011-10-07 16:33:46
UTC ---
A @smallexample is supposed to be smaller than an @example.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50644
--- Comment #4 from Michael Matz matz at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-10-07 16:34:49
UTC ---
The fortran segfault is tracked as PR50640.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50638
Rainer Orth ro at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ro at gcc dot gnu.org
4.7.0 20111007 (experimental) (i686-pc-cygwin)
compiled by GNU C version 4.7.0 20111006 (experimental), GMP version
5.0.0, MPFR version 3.0.1-p4, MPC version 0.8.1
GGC heuristics: --param ggc-min-expand=30 --param ggc-min-heapsize=4096
ignoring nonexistent directory /usr/i686-pc-cygwin/sys
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50640
--- Comment #3 from Michael Matz matz at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-10-07 16:45:55
UTC ---
Hmm, this is not as trivial as PR50638. fortran frontend generates this
static variable local to MAIN:
static struct __vtype_MAIN___T1 __vtab_MAIN___T1 =
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50655
--- Comment #3 from David S. Miller davem at davemloft dot net 2011-10-07
16:45:52 UTC ---
Thanks, I'll add the necessary register directives and work on making the
testcases conditional on assembler support.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50640
--- Comment #4 from Michael Matz matz at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-10-07 16:50:10
UTC ---
Or another solution: should the fortran frontend perhaps put all these
variables not in MAINs scope (where they aren't referenced anyway), but
rather into file
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50655
--- Comment #4 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ro at CeBiTec dot
Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2011-10-07 16:51:36 UTC ---
--- Comment #3 from David S. Miller davem at davemloft dot net 2011-10-07
16:45:52 UTC ---
Thanks, I'll add the necessary
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50638
Michael Matz matz at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50640
Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||janus at gcc dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50638
--- Comment #6 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ro at CeBiTec dot
Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2011-10-07 16:58:40 UTC ---
--- Comment #5 from Michael Matz matz at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-10-07
16:53:59 UTC ---
Mine. See also
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50638
--- Comment #7 from Michael Matz matz at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-10-07 17:00:59
UTC ---
Hmm, I can't build go due to:
../../../gcc/libgo/runtime/sigqueue.goc:79:1: internal compiler error: in
maybe_record_trace_start, at dwarf2cfi.c:2243
but that
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50638
--- Comment #8 from Michael Matz matz at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-10-07 17:02:00
UTC ---
Okay, so it's really the emutlv_v variables. That should be fixed by the
patch at gcc-patches.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50638
--- Comment #9 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ro at CeBiTec dot
Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2011-10-07 17:03:31 UTC ---
--- Comment #7 from Michael Matz matz at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-10-07
17:00:59 UTC ---
Hmm, I can't build go due to:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50638
--- Comment #10 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ro at CeBiTec dot
Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2011-10-07 17:05:11 UTC ---
--- Comment #8 from Michael Matz matz at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-10-07
17:02:00 UTC ---
Okay, so it's really the emutlv_v
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50642
--- Comment #5 from Georg-Johann Lay gjl at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-10-07
17:17:30 UTC ---
Legibility first. There is no need to be more catholic than the pope ;-)
/local/gcc-4.7 --enable-
languages=c,c++,fortran --disable-multilib
Thread model: posix
gcc version 4.7.0 20111007 (experimental) (GCC)
$ gfortran -c test.F90 -o test.o
f951: internal compiler error: in replace_symbol, at fortran/expr.c:4155
Please submit a full bug report,
with preprocessed source
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50655
--- Comment #5 from davem at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-10-07 17:23:53 UTC ---
Author: davem
Date: Fri Oct 7 17:23:47 2011
New Revision: 179667
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=179667
Log:
Fix VIS3 assembler check and conditionalize
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50660
Bug #: 50660
Summary: gcc repeats warnings twice
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.5.3
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: trivial
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50660
Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50660
Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40210
--- Comment #9 from Pawel Sikora pluto at agmk dot net 2011-10-07 18:22:25
UTC ---
Created attachment 25442
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25442
testcase
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50659
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||janus at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40210
--- Comment #10 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-10-07
18:29:07 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #9)
Created attachment 25442 [details]
testcase
I think those are hard to optimize really since those are inline-asm really.
And
1 - 100 of 129 matches
Mail list logo
