http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50799
--- Comment #8 from Alexandre Oliva aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-10-20
21:45:42 UTC ---
Err, that doesn't seem to tell what errors you're getting from gdb. I know
older GDB might cause tests to be skipped, but that's not the case here. I'm
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50694
--- Comment #8 from Kazumoto Kojima kkojima at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-10-20
22:40:27 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #7)
This problem doesn't require the theoretical/mathematical
completeness. There are many inappropriate combinations
of options
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50799
--- Comment #9 from H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com 2011-10-20 22:41:19
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #6)
What kind of error are you getting from gdb 7.3? Since 7.2 is getting the
correct info, that's the bug report that ought to be
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50799
--- Comment #10 from Alexandre Oliva aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-10-20
22:52:54 UTC ---
Yep. That, or some other difference in the compiler's assembly output, that I
asked for in comment 1.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50811
--- Comment #1 from Ville Voutilainen ville.voutilainen at gmail dot com
2011-10-20 23:26:57 UTC ---
Oh my.
struct C
{
int x;
};
int main()
{
struct C final {};
int y = final.x;
}
says
error: ‘final’ was not declared
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50811
--- Comment #2 from Ville Voutilainen ville.voutilainen at gmail dot com
2011-10-20 23:34:06 UTC ---
It thus looks like it gets parsed as a class definition instead of a variable
definition.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50811
--- Comment #3 from Ville Voutilainen ville.voutilainen at gmail dot com
2011-10-20 23:48:15 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #2)
It thus looks like it gets parsed as a class definition instead of a variable
definition.
..which is actually
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50815
Bug #: 50815
Summary: ICE on assignment to non-allocated deferred length
character when -fbounds-check
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45385
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50196
--- Comment #6 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-10-21
00:15:23 UTC ---
Created attachment 25564
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25564
patch for configure
could you test the patch at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50815
--- Comment #1 from A. Rohou rohou at brandeis dot edu 2011-10-21 00:19:10
UTC ---
I have come up with an even simpler reproducer:
$ cat test2.f90
subroutine test(string)
character(len=:), allocatable :: string
allocate(character(len=3) ::
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50814
--- Comment #1 from Kazumoto Kojima kkojima at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-10-21
00:24:36 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #0)
It is also not clear to me why SH2A seems to require different handling for
dynamic shifts than SH3 or SH4...
Will be slightly
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50811
--- Comment #4 from Ville Voutilainen ville.voutilainen at gmail dot com
2011-10-21 00:40:58 UTC ---
Patch in
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-10/msg01914.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50740
--- Comment #1 from H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com 2011-10-21 01:09:46
UTC ---
Created attachment 25565
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25565
A patch
Kirill, can you take care of it?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50709
--- Comment #6 from gfunck at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-10-21 02:23:30 UTC ---
Author: gfunck
Date: Fri Oct 21 02:23:26 2011
New Revision: 180285
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=180285
Log:
Merge trunk version 180276 into
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50709
Serge Belyshev belyshev at depni dot sinp.msu.ru changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50816
Bug #: 50816
Summary: [4.6.1] Discriminators are emitted in DWARF 2 format
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: major
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50816
--- Comment #1 from Anitha Boyapati anitha.boyapati at atmel dot com
2011-10-21 03:17:20 UTC ---
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2011-10/msg00348.html
The fix in trunk should be backported to gcc-4_6-branch.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50816
Anitha Boyapati anitha.boyapati at atmel dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||AVR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50754
Joost VandeVondele Joost.VandeVondele at pci dot uzh.ch changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
101 - 120 of 120 matches
Mail list logo
