http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50764
--- Comment #10 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-10-30 07:39:36 UTC ---
Tentative patch at http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-10/msg02767.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50917
Bug #: 50917
Summary: [4.7 Regression] Mozilla build fails because of C++11
user-defined literals
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50878
--- Comment #9 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-10-30 08:21:52 UTC ---
Posted fix: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-10/msg02782.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50918
Bug #: 50918
Summary: Unoptimal code for vec-shift by scalar for integer
(byte, short, long long) operands
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50917
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50916
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50915
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50912
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.7.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50911
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.7.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50908
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||vries at gcc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50917
Markus Trippelsdorf markus at trippelsdorf dot de changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|rejects-valid |
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50908
vries at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50904
--- Comment #2 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-10-30
09:40:38 UTC ---
I don't see why RTL invariant motion should move the one variant but not
the other. Of course this also shows that we should, after loop unrolling
on the
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50904
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50902
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|middle-end
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50919
Bug #: 50919
Summary: [OOP] Don't use vtable for NON_OVERRIDABLE TBP
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: missed-optimization
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50881
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50881
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org |
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50917
--- Comment #2 from Markus Trippelsdorf markus at trippelsdorf dot de
2011-10-30 10:20:42 UTC ---
Another example (happened later in Mozilla build, after putting
a space between libxulMOZ_DLL_SUFFIX):
struct SECMODModule *nssMod =
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50916
Aurelien Jarno aurelien at aurel32 dot net changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||aurelien at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50848
--- Comment #3 from Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com 2011-10-30
10:30:35 UTC ---
With -fpermissive ICEs for me, however:
50848.C: In member function ‘void BT::f()’:
50848.C:2:53: warning: there are no arguments to ‘u’ that depend on
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50875
--- Comment #9 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-10-30 10:30:11 UTC ---
Author: uros
Date: Sun Oct 30 10:30:06 2011
New Revision: 180676
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=180676
Log:
PR target/50875
* config/i386/sse.md
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50916
Arkadiusz Miskiewicz ar...@pld-linux.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50916
Pawel Sikora pluto at agmk dot net changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pluto at agmk dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43328
Alexandre Pereira Nunes alexandre.nunes at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50904
--- Comment #4 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr 2011-10-30
11:24:57 UTC ---
It would be nice if somebody could reduce this to a more managable testcase.
I have posted a reduced test in
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50904
--- Comment #5 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr 2011-10-30
11:34:15 UTC ---
Created attachment 25666
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25666
Further reduced test for induct.f90
The reduced test contains a
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50875
Uros Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46328
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50917
--- Comment #3 from Markus Trippelsdorf markus at trippelsdorf dot de
2011-10-30 12:22:30 UTC ---
The problem in comment 2 is fixed by:
replacing:
#define SECMOD_MAKE_NSS_FLAGS(fips,slot) \
Flags=internal,criticalfips
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50920
Bug #: 50920
Summary: add a -std=c++11 option to the driver
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50749
--- Comment #5 from Oleg Endo oleg.e...@t-online.de 2011-10-30 12:36:51 UTC
---
(In reply to comment #4)
I'm a bit curious to see what happens if they are changed
to non-zero for SI/DImode.
..not much actually. I've tried defining both as
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50823
--- Comment #8 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr 2011-10-30
12:41:34 UTC ---
I get the same ICE when compiling the polyhedron test aermod.f90:
[macbook] lin/test% gfc aermod.f90 -O3 --param max-inline-insns-auto=198
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50694
--- Comment #9 from Oleg Endo oleg.e...@t-online.de 2011-10-30 12:45:30 UTC
---
(In reply to comment #8)
(In reply to comment #7)
This problem doesn't require the theoretical/mathematical
completeness. There are many inappropriate
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50921
Bug #: 50921
Summary: GCC cannot find dependent conversion-function-id even
if there's a using declaration for it
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50749
--- Comment #6 from Oleg Endo oleg.e...@t-online.de 2011-10-30 13:53:51 UTC
---
(In reply to comment #1)
GCC makes usual mem accesses into those with post_inc/pre_dec at
auto_inc_dec pass. I guess that auto_inc_dec pass can't find
post_inc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50921
--- Comment #1 from Johannes Schaub schaub.johannes at googlemail dot com
2011-10-30 13:54:21 UTC ---
Someone notified me that you can substantially reduce this to the following
templatetypename T
struct Base {
operator int();
};
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50602
Steven Bosscher steven at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||steven at gcc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50913
--- Comment #2 from Ruben Van Boxem vanboxem.ruben at gmail dot com
2011-10-30 15:20:43 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
What was the ICE?
Sorry about that:
/home/ruben/mingw-w64/toolchain/src/gcc/libgfortran/generated/spread_i1.c: In
function
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50922
Bug #: 50922
Summary: infinite loop when optimized
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.4.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50602
--- Comment #9 from Andi Kleen andi-gcc at firstfloor dot org 2011-10-30
15:53:10 UTC ---
Sorry made a mistake and i supplied the wrong command line
With this
gcc47 -O2 -m32-freg-struct-return io_apic.i -flto -c
gcc47 -O2 -flto io_apic.o
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49934
Andi Kleen andi-gcc at firstfloor dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||andi-gcc at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49677
Andi Kleen andi-gcc at firstfloor dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||andi-gcc at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50922
xunxun xunxun1982 at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||xunxun1982 at gmail
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50922
--- Comment #2 from Mikael Pettersson mikpe at it dot uu.se 2011-10-30
17:03:10 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #0)
int main(void)
{
long x=0;
unsigned long c;
for(c=0;c2147483648UL;c++)
{
lcdSendData(x++);
}
You're causing
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50598
John David Anglin danglin at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||danglin at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50923
Bug #: 50923
Summary: [4.4/4.5/4.6/4.7 Regression] No warning if function
return value is not set
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50924
Bug #: 50924
Summary: Attempt to allocate negative amount of memory.
Possible integer overflow
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.4.3
Status:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50924
fwi at inducks dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||fwi at inducks dot org
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50924
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50925
Bug #: 50925
Summary: avr ICE at spill_failure, at reload1.c:2118
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50922
Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50925
--- Comment #1 from Joel Sherrill joel at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-10-30 19:42:50
UTC ---
gcc (GCC) 4.7.0 20111029 (experimental)
Newlib up to date at same time
Cut and pasted from log with multiple jobs in parallel. The actual command
line for
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50925
--- Comment #2 from Joel Sherrill joel at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-10-30 19:43:24
UTC ---
Created attachment 25667
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25667
Preprocessed output
Preprocessed code.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50802
--- Comment #5 from John David Anglin danglin at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-10-30
19:59:27 UTC ---
Created attachment 25668
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25668
vrp dumps
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50926
Bug #: 50926
Summary: Output to 'fort.6 file instead of console
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: minor
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50708
--- Comment #5 from Mikael Pettersson mikpe at it dot uu.se 2011-10-30
20:35:03 UTC ---
The regression started with r158372:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2010-04/msg00478.html
Here's what seems to have happened:
1. Anatoly Sokolov suggested to
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26567
Serge Belyshev belyshev at depni dot sinp.msu.ru changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50926
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50927
Bug #: 50927
Summary: lm32 ICE seg fauit compiling libgcc2
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50927
--- Comment #1 from Joel Sherrill joel at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-10-30 21:02:27
UTC ---
Created attachment 25669
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25669
Preprocessed source code
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50928
Bug #: 50928
Summary: ICE building RTEMS
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50928
--- Comment #1 from Joel Sherrill joel at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-10-30 21:09:56
UTC ---
Created attachment 25670
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25670
Preprocessed source code
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50924
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50923
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.4.7
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50573
--- Comment #7 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-10-30 21:59:27 UTC ---
Author: kargl
Date: Sun Oct 30 21:59:24 2011
New Revision: 180686
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=180686
Log:
2011-10-30 Steven G. Kargl
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50753
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50573
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50753
--- Comment #5 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-10-30 22:09:50 UTC ---
Dang. I transposed numbers in the PR in the ChangeLog. Here's
the commit message with the correct PR number.
Author: kargl
Date: Sun Oct 30 21:59:24 2011
New Revision:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39351
Jorn Wolfgang Rennecke amylaar at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50749
--- Comment #7 from Kazumoto Kojima kkojima at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-10-30
23:36:27 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #6)
I wonder whether there might be something in the target code that suggests the
early optimizers to do that? I've tried playing
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50878
Joel Sherrill joel at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|arm-linux-gnueabi |arm-linux-gnueabi
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46328
--- Comment #4 from Damian Rouson damian at rouson dot net 2011-10-31
02:06:36 UTC ---
Thanks for the update. The same error occurs when a defined assignment is
added:
$ cat abstract_field_expression.F90
module field_module
implicit none
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49682
Matt Turner mattst88 at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50888
--- Comment #4 from Christian Joensson christian.joensson at gmail dot com
2011-10-31 05:29:38 UTC ---
Recent bootstrap/build on i686/linux
libtool: link: /usr/local/src/trunk/objdir/./gcc/gcj
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50929
Bug #: 50929
Summary: [C++0x] Wrong function selected for overload with
template and rvalue reference
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
76 matches
Mail list logo