http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51103
--- Comment #5 from Richard Lewis richalewis at gmail dot com 2011-11-12
08:33:13 UTC ---
I see... so suddenly from this year, building from a directory 1 level deeper
than the source distribution is unsupported even though this has been working
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51078
--- Comment #14 from Grygoriy Fuchedzhy grygoriy.fuchedzhy at gmail dot com
2011-11-12 10:09:52 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #13)
I would say, the next step, is analyzing why: std::count seems a very simple
algorithm, no aliasing issues for
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51078
--- Comment #15 from Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com 2011-11-12
11:12:36 UTC ---
Actually, patches do not belong to Bugzilla at all thus this issue should have
been posted and discussed only on the mailing list. In any case, we are
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51078
--- Comment #16 from Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com 2011-11-12
12:11:48 UTC ---
By the way, without having investigated at all what the optimizers are actually
doing, in mainline, on an i7-980X I have here at hand I don't see the
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51078
--- Comment #17 from Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com 2011-11-12
12:14:06 UTC ---
Created attachment 25804
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25804
Some numbers: i7-980X, mainline, -Ofast -funroll-loops, -march=native
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50628
--- Comment #10 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
2011-11-12 12:21:27 UTC ---
On x86_64-apple-darwin10 the test was failing for both -m32 and -m64 up to
revision 181046. From revision 181258 it fails only with -m64.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51105
Bug #: 51105
Summary: [4.7 Regression] FAIL:
gcc.c-torture/execute/920501-1.c compilation, -O2
-flto -flto-partition=none
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51078
--- Comment #18 from Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com 2011-11-12
12:32:22 UTC ---
Created attachment 25805
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25805
Same, without -funroll-loops
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51078
--- Comment #19 from Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com 2011-11-12
12:34:51 UTC ---
All in all - again, without having analyzed in any detail the optimization
passes - I come to the conclusion that -funroll-loops is doing its job
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51093
--- Comment #4 from Mikael Pettersson mikpe at it dot uu.se 2011-11-12
13:12:05 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #0)
I've downloaded gcc 4.4.3 tar-ball package.
Configured and build as follows for host-x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu:
./configure
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50822
--- Comment #11 from Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-11-12
13:19:59 UTC ---
Author: hubicka
Date: Sat Nov 12 13:19:55 2011
New Revision: 181311
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=181311
Log:
PR bootstrap/50822
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51106
Bug #: 51106
Summary: [4.5 regression] ICE in move_insn, at
haifa-sched.c:2314
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.5.3
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51103
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||janus at gcc dot gnu.org
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47997
Iain Sandoe iains at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47997
--- Comment #28 from Iain Sandoe iains at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-11-12 14:05:03
UTC ---
Author: iains
Date: Sat Nov 12 14:04:58 2011
New Revision: 181314
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=181314
Log:
gcc/objc:
Backport from
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49248
Maciej Bliziński maciej at opencsw dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||maciej at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45233
--- Comment #11 from Iain Sandoe iains at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-11-12 14:12:31
UTC ---
Author: iains
Date: Sat Nov 12 14:12:26 2011
New Revision: 181315
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=181315
Log:
gcc:
PR target/45233
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45233
Iain Sandoe iains at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45233
--- Comment #12 from Iain Sandoe iains at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-11-12 14:14:46
UTC ---
Author: iains
Date: Sat Nov 12 14:14:43 2011
New Revision: 181316
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=181316
Log:
gcc:
PR target/45233
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51059
--- Comment #9 from Iain Sandoe iains at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-11-12 14:30:52
UTC ---
Author: iains
Date: Sat Nov 12 14:30:45 2011
New Revision: 181317
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=181317
Log:
gcc/testsuite:
PR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51059
Iain Sandoe iains at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51103
--- Comment #7 from Richard Lewis richalewis at gmail dot com 2011-11-12
14:51:32 UTC ---
Created attachment 25807
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25807
libgfortran build log
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51083
--- Comment #13 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-11-12
15:57:07 UTC ---
Author: redi
Date: Sat Nov 12 15:57:03 2011
New Revision: 181321
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=181321
Log:
PR libstdc++/51083
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51083
Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50904
Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51103
--- Comment #8 from Steve Kargl sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu
2011-11-12 16:52:37 UTC ---
On Sat, Nov 12, 2011 at 02:51:32PM +, richalewis at gmail dot com wrote:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51103
--- Comment #7
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51103
--- Comment #9 from Richard Lewis richalewis at gmail dot com 2011-11-12
17:22:42 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #8)
On Sat, Nov 12, 2011 at 02:51:32PM +, richalewis at gmail dot com wrote:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51103
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51103
--- Comment #10 from Richard Lewis richalewis at gmail dot com 2011-11-12
17:25:05 UTC ---
Created attachment 25808
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25808
gcc-4.6.2/x86_64-apple-darwin11.2.0/libgfortran/config.log
Builds to
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51103
--- Comment #11 from Steve Kargl sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu
2011-11-12 17:29:38 UTC ---
On Sat, Nov 12, 2011 at 05:22:42PM +, richalewis at gmail dot com wrote:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51103
--- Comment #9
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51103
--- Comment #12 from Richard Lewis richalewis at gmail dot com 2011-11-12
17:53:39 UTC ---
This is what I originally did:
1. tar xvjf gcc-4.6.2.tar.bz
2. mkdir build
3. ../gcc-4.6.2/configure
4. make -j 8
Doesn't matter where I build it from,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51107
Bug #: 51107
Summary: [C++11] Accepts invalid literal operator with void
argument list.
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51103
--- Comment #13 from Steve Kargl sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu
2011-11-12 17:58:18 UTC ---
On Sat, Nov 12, 2011 at 05:53:39PM +, richalewis at gmail dot com wrote:
This is what I originally did:
1. tar xvjf gcc-4.6.2.tar.bz
2.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51108
Bug #: 51108
Summary: g++ segfault
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: minor
Priority: P3
Component: c++
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51107
--- Comment #1 from Ed Smith-Rowland 3dw4rd at verizon dot net 2011-11-12
19:10:38 UTC ---
As I was testing a patch that turned out to be totally bogus, it looked like
maybe processing_template_decl is false when processing a template
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51109
Bug #: 51109
Summary: bdver1 scheduler state machine too large
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51107
--- Comment #2 from Jason Merrill jason at redhat dot com 2011-11-12 20:54:02
UTC ---
On 11/12/2011 02:10 PM, 3dw4rd at verizon dot net wrote:
But is there a test for when you're looking at a template specialization?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51110
Bug #: 51110
Summary: Intel pentium G9650 (core i5) identified as core i7
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5
Bug #: 5
Summary: Optimization bug with array
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51094
--- Comment #12 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-11-12
21:40:03 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Sat Nov 12 21:39:59 2011
New Revision: 181326
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=181326
Log:
PR bootstrap/51094
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51094
--- Comment #13 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-11-12
21:40:10 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Sat Nov 12 21:40:07 2011
New Revision: 181327
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=181327
Log:
PR bootstrap/51094
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51094
--- Comment #14 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-11-12
21:44:17 UTC ---
As you can see, I applied the stpcpy patch and the change to define/use
STRING_ASM_OP. I don't have a strong opinion about which way to go with the
macro
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38312
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50642
--- Comment #6 from Jon Grant jg at jguk dot org 2011-11-12 22:15:36 UTC ---
Could this be followed up with the proposed change implemented?
pre.smallexample { font-size:normal }
Thanks, Jon
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38312
--- Comment #6 from Steve Kargl sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu
2011-11-12 22:41:06 UTC ---
On Sat, Nov 12, 2011 at 10:03:49PM +, kargl at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
--- Comment #5 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-11-12 22:03:49 UTC
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51112
Bug #: 51112
Summary: [4.7 Regression] LTO bootstrap failed with
bootstrap-profiled
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51113
Bug #: 51113
Summary: [4.7 regression] rev. 181105 causes Firefox
profiledbuild failure
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51114
Bug #: 51114
Summary: Got compiler error when creating a private subtype
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.4.3
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51051
Hans-Peter Nilsson hp at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51103
Francois-Xavier Coudert fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51060
--- Comment #3 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-11-13
00:44:43 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Sun Nov 13 00:44:39 2011
New Revision: 181332
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=181332
Log:
PR c++/51060
*
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51060
Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51115
Bug #: 51115
Summary: -Wstrict-prototypes is rejected for C++ (ok) but
accepted for Ada (meaningless)
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.5.2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51095
Gerald Pfeifer gerald at pfeifer dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19563
Gerald Pfeifer gerald at pfeifer dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51116
Bug #: 51116
Summary: [4.7 Regression] configure: error: cannot compute
suffix of object files: cannot compile
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51116
--- Comment #1 from John David Anglin danglin at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-11-13
04:19:34 UTC ---
Forgot to say, this was introduced in revision 181279.
-bash-3.2$ ./xgcc -B./ -v
Reading specs from ./specs
COLLECT_GCC=./xgcc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51116
--- Comment #2 from John David Anglin danglin at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-11-13
04:22:16 UTC ---
Created attachment 25812
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25812
Assembler file
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51116
--- Comment #3 from pinskia at gmail dot com pinskia at gmail dot com
2011-11-13 04:32:06 UTC ---
According to another email mips is broken the same way.
Sent from my Palm Pre on ATamp;T
On Nov 12, 2011 20:18, danglin at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=986
--- Comment #32 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-11-13
05:09:43 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Sun Nov 13 05:09:36 2011
New Revision: 181334
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=181334
Log:
PR c++/986
* call.c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51116
jimis jimis at gmx dot net changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50372
Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49084
Kai Tietz ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ktietz at gcc dot
62 matches
Mail list logo
