http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32107
Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39831
Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29751
Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #18307|0 |1
is
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51181
--- Comment #5 from Richard Henderson rth at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-11-17
22:52:45 UTC ---
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/libstdc++/2011-11/msg00160.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51011
--- Comment #9 from dave.anglin at bell dot net 2011-11-17 22:56:41 UTC ---
On 11/17/2011 4:49 PM, amacleod at redhat dot com wrote:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51011
--- Comment #8 from Andrew Macleodamacleod at redhat dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51198
Bug #: 51198
Summary: [c++0x] [4.7 Regression] ICE with throw expression
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51198
Volker Reichelt reichelt at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[c++0x] [4.7 Regression]|[c++0x] [4.7
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51198
--- Comment #2 from Volker Reichelt reichelt at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-11-17
23:45:23 UTC ---
And another ICE with 'target_expr':
===
struct A
{
A(int);
};
struct B
{
A a = 0;
};
B b;
===
bug.cc:11:4: internal compiler
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51191
--- Comment #2 from dodji at seketeli dot org dodji at seketeli dot org
2011-11-17 23:48:12 UTC ---
A candidate patch was posted to
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-11/msg01856.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50751
Oleg Endo oleg.e...@t-online.de changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #25684|0 |1
is obsolete|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51181
--- Comment #6 from Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com 2011-11-17
23:59:16 UTC ---
Thanks Richard. I would say, please test.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51145
--- Comment #2 from Dodji Seketeli dodji at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-11-18
00:03:04 UTC ---
Created attachment 25849
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25849
Candidate patch
I am currently testing the attached patch. Note that the
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46980
John David Anglin danglin at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51140
--- Comment #3 from Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com 2011-11-18
00:06:59 UTC ---
I suppose this is a duplicate of PR51181
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50598
--- Comment #26 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-11-18
00:16:48 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #20)
(In reply to comment #19)
FAIL: 30_threads/thread/native_handle/typesizes.cc execution test
This test should be disabled on
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51199
Bug #: 51199
Summary: [C++11][DR 547] gcc forms impossible types derived
from function types with cv-qualifier-seq
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51198
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-11-18
00:26:25 UTC ---
Maybe LTO stream should ignore DECL_INITIAL for FIELD_DECLs.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51134
Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21514
David Fang fang at csl dot cornell.edu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||fang at csl dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51198
Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51181
--- Comment #7 from Richard Henderson rth at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-11-18
01:38:53 UTC ---
Author: rth
Date: Fri Nov 18 01:38:48 2011
New Revision: 181465
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=181465
Log:
PR libstdc++/51181
*
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51182
--- Comment #3 from Matt Hargett matt at use dot net 2011-11-18 01:41:04 UTC
---
Created attachment 25850
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25850
pre-procecessed source that produces better-performing code with two iterations
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51182
--- Comment #4 from Matt Hargett matt at use dot net 2011-11-18 01:43:32 UTC
---
Ah, okay. I read in your email you were looking for evidence of bugs, and the
behaviour looked fishy to me. Regardless, here is a performance improvement
that
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51134
--- Comment #8 from Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-11-18
02:18:32 UTC ---
Author: hubicka
Date: Fri Nov 18 02:18:28 2011
New Revision: 181466
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=181466
Log:
PR bootstrap/51134
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51200
Bug #: 51200
Summary: Wrong code sequence to store restrict volatile
bitfield
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51200
--- Comment #1 from Joey Ye joey.ye at arm dot com 2011-11-18 02:23:17 UTC ---
A patch is available at http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2010-12/msg00217.html
but is pending for about 1 year.
Latest discussion is at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51201
Bug #: 51201
Summary: /bin/bash: gnatls: command not found
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51201
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-11-18
02:47:09 UTC ---
../../git/configure Can you try with an absolute path instead?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51201
--- Comment #2 from Jie Zhang jiez at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-11-18 02:51:35 UTC
---
(In reply to comment #1)
../../git/configure Can you try with an absolute path instead?
Yes. It has the same error. It happens when configured as a cross
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51202
Bug #: 51202
Summary: Whether the “else” sentence is necessary to guarantee
“if” block works correctly in gcc 3.4.4
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 3.4.4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51202
Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||nios2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51187
Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51187
Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51197
--- Comment #3 from Janne Blomqvist jb at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-11-18 06:41:15
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #2)
Well, thanks for pointing out I was not precise enough.
While reducing the problem, I forgot that the difference
lies in where the
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51187
Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Host||sparc-*-*
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51203
Bug #: 51203
Summary: Recursive alias templates not working
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51204
Bug #: 51204
Summary: g++ does not link getaddrinfo with -lxnet on
OpenIndiana
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51205
Bug #: 51205
Summary: -flto discards memset/memcpy when only referenced by
g++ generated code
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.1
Status:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51203
--- Comment #1 from Pubby8 pubby.8 at gmail dot com 2011-11-18 07:53:36 UTC
---
Whoops! I seem to have left out the template qualifier.
template typename t
struct foo {
template int n
using next = typename foot::nextn + 1;
template
101 - 139 of 139 matches
Mail list logo
