http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51476
Dodji Seketeli dodji at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51476
--- Comment #3 from Dodji Seketeli dodji at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-12-14
08:46:27 UTC ---
Author: dodji
Date: Wed Dec 14 08:46:13 2011
New Revision: 182324
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=182324
Log:
PR c++/51476 - ICE on
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51529
--- Comment #3 from paul.richard.thomas at gmail dot com paul.richard.thomas
at gmail dot com 2011-12-14 08:55:08 UTC ---
Dear Tobias,
However, I do now understand why one needs for SOURCE= to memset the source to
NULL - at least as long _copy
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51475
Dodji Seketeli dodji at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51548
--- Comment #1 from niva at niisi dot msk.ru 2011-12-14 09:20:37 UTC ---
I have reworked c_parse_error in gcc-4.1.2 using c-common.c from gcc-3.4.6 as a
sample. I have also used gcc/po/exgettext from gcc-4.5.1 in order to put
messages passed from
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51540
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51254
--- Comment #6 from rguenther at suse dot de rguenther at suse dot de
2011-12-14 09:38:51 UTC ---
On Wed, 14 Dec 2011, duyuehai at gmail dot com wrote:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51254
--- Comment #5 from Yuehai Du duyuehai
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51475
--- Comment #6 from Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com 2011-12-14
09:42:42 UTC ---
Right, error-recovery. The problem is, in release-mode the category can easily
change. I'm also not 100% sure that all the PRs are properly cat in
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18248
Manuel López-Ibáñez manu at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||niva at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51548
Manuel López-Ibáñez manu at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51550
Bug #: 51550
Summary: ICE in gfc_get_derived_type, at
fortran/trans-types.c:2401
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50931
--- Comment #2 from Georg-Johann Lay gjl at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-12-14
10:01:04 UTC ---
Author: gjl
Date: Wed Dec 14 10:00:56 2011
New Revision: 182328
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=182328
Log:
libgcc/
PR target/50931
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51540
Christopher Yeleighton giecrilj at stegny dot 2a.pl changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51550
--- Comment #1 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr 2011-12-14
10:26:05 UTC ---
I think it is a duplicate of pr47545, pr48654, pr49050, pr51075, and pr51393
(note that only pr48654 is marked as a duplicate of pr47545; if there is
-__cxa_atexit --disable-nls
--disable-libmudflap
Thread model: posix
gcc version 4.7.0 20111214 (experimental) [trunk revision 182322] (GCC)
Thus reopening...
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51523
--- Comment #5 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-12-14
10:36:15 UTC ---
This looks more like a linker bug which doesn't seem to account for the
contents of the .exp file. It works properly on linux targets with providing a
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51540
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51549
Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51540
--- Comment #7 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-12-14
11:02:39 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #5)
My code does not contain complex numbers but the algorithm is documented to
use
an operator that uses complex numbers.
That's
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51540
Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51540
--- Comment #9 from Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com 2011-12-14
11:17:44 UTC ---
Thanks for the docs, Jon.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51529
--- Comment #4 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-12-14
11:18:21 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #3)
The memset came about for similar reasons with class objects with
allocatable components. I had missed this wrinkle with the
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51521
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51547
Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||rejects-valid
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51151
Andreas Krebbel krebbel at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||krebbel at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51151
--- Comment #4 from Andreas Krebbel krebbel at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-12-14
12:02:47 UTC ---
libgomp/testsuite/libgomp.c++/for-2.C: In function 'void f7(int, int, int)':^M
libgomp/testsuite/libgomp.c++/for-2.C:87:3: error: invalid increment
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51532
--- Comment #4 from Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org 2011-12-14 12:11:34
UTC ---
Created attachment 26079
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26079
Patch
Please try the attached patch.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51532
Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51497
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51151
--- Comment #5 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr 2011-12-14
13:05:35 UTC ---
r182175 fixed one failure on s390x but introduced a couple of new fails:
FAIL: libgomp.c/atomic-2.c execution test
---
FAIL: libgomp.c++/for-2.C
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48508
--- Comment #12 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-12-14
14:33:27 UTC ---
Even more reduced, fails with
./g++ -B. -g -O -r -nostdlib 1.ii 2.ii -flto -finline-small-functions
lto1: internal compiler error: in output_die, at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51517
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51534
Richard Earnshaw rearnsha at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48508
--- Comment #13 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-12-14
15:00:23 UTC ---
Even more reduced:
void __attribute__((externally_visible))
foo (int i)
{
}
-
static void
bar (void)
{
extern void foo (int);
foo (0);
}
int
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51517
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51551
Bug #: 51551
Summary: tree-loop-optimize chews all memory
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: memory-hog
Severity:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51551
--- Comment #1 from Georg-Johann Lay gjl at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-12-14
15:21:45 UTC ---
Created attachment 26083
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26083
Compiler output with -v
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48508
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51497
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51497
--- Comment #8 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-12-14
15:31:31 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Wed Dec 14 15:31:24 2011
New Revision: 182336
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=182336
Log:
2011-12-14 Richard
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51497
--- Comment #10 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
2011-12-14 15:36:19 UTC ---
Created attachment 26080
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26080
patch candidate
...
The patch fixes this pr without any visible
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51532
--- Comment #5 from Joel Sherrill joel at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-12-14 15:38:43
UTC ---
This patch allows m68k-rtems4.11 to complete building the compiler and newlib
with C and C++.
I haven't tried other languages, built RTEMS itself, or run
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51523
--- Comment #6 from Dmitry Gorbachev d.g.gorbachev at gmail dot com
2011-12-14 15:45:29 UTC ---
Filed a linker bug http://sourceware.org/PR13497.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48508
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hubicka at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51406
--- Comment #5 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-12-14
16:03:45 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Wed Dec 14 16:03:37 2011
New Revision: 182340
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=182340
Log:
PR c++/51406
PR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51161
--- Comment #2 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-12-14
16:03:16 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Wed Dec 14 16:03:07 2011
New Revision: 182339
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=182339
Log:
PR c++/51406
PR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51406
--- Comment #4 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-12-14
16:03:16 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Wed Dec 14 16:03:07 2011
New Revision: 182339
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=182339
Log:
PR c++/51406
PR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51161
--- Comment #3 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-12-14
16:03:44 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Wed Dec 14 16:03:37 2011
New Revision: 182340
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=182340
Log:
PR c++/51406
PR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51406
Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51161
Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51551
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51248
Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51463
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51471
vries at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rsandifo at redhat dot com
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51471
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51475
--- Comment #7 from Dodji Seketeli dodji at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-12-14
18:18:56 UTC ---
A candidate patch was sent to
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-12/msg01120.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51003
--- Comment #2 from Joel Sherrill joel at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-12-14 18:26:11
UTC ---
Stuart Henderson sent this in response to my status report to gcc@ mailing
list.
This looks like a known, general issue which Bernd had a fix for, but it
Component: target
AssignedTo: unassig...@gcc.gnu.org
ReportedBy: j...@gcc.gnu.org
Created attachment 26085
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26085
Preprocessed test case
xgcc (GCC) 4.7.0 20111214 (experimental) [trunk revision 182330]
Target: bfin-rtems4.11
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51553
Bug #: 51553
Summary: brace initialization and conversion operators
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51554
Bug #: 51554
Summary: ICE in cp/semantics.c:cxx_eval_indirect_ref with -Wall
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51555
Bug #: 51555
Summary: Thinks System.Address is 64 bits wide when compiling
with -m32
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51471
Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51556
Bug #: 51556
Summary: Bizarre member template protection errors
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51556
--- Comment #1 from Andy Lutomirski luto at mit dot edu 2011-12-14 20:28:28
UTC ---
Created attachment 26087
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26087
Working test
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51471
--- Comment #10 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-12-14
20:28:34 UTC ---
*** Bug 51536 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51536
Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51556
--- Comment #2 from Andy Lutomirski luto at mit dot edu 2011-12-14 20:30:01
UTC ---
Created attachment 26088
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26088
Preprocessed test cases
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51505
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51544
Matt Hargett matt at use dot net changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|uninitialized variable |uninitialized variable
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50148
Matt Hargett matt at use dot net changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||matt at use dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51556
Manuel López-Ibáñez manu at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||manu at gcc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51475
--- Comment #8 from Dodji Seketeli dodji at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-12-14
21:49:57 UTC ---
Author: dodji
Date: Wed Dec 14 21:49:52 2011
New Revision: 182343
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=182343
Log:
PR c++/51475 - ICE with
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51475
Dodji Seketeli dodji at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51557
Bug #: 51557
Summary: [4.7 Regression] ICE: in maybe_record_trace_start, at
dwarf2cfi.c:2244 with custom flags
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51542
Marc Glisse marc.glisse at normalesup dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51554
--- Comment #1 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-12-14
22:26:27 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Wed Dec 14 22:26:24 2011
New Revision: 182346
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=182346
Log:
PR c++/51554
*
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51545
Marc Glisse marc.glisse at normalesup dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51248
--- Comment #2 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-12-14
22:26:16 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Wed Dec 14 22:26:13 2011
New Revision: 182345
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=182345
Log:
PR c++/51248
*
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51558
Bug #: 51558
Summary: Declaration of unspecialized
std::hash_Tp::operator()(_Tp) turns compile-time
errors into link-time errors
Classification: Unclassified
Product:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51554
--- Comment #2 from dnovillo at google dot com dnovillo at google dot com
2011-12-14 22:32:33 UTC ---
Wow, that was quick, thanks!
Diego.
On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 17:26, jason at gcc dot gnu.org
gcc-bugzi...@gcc.gnu.org wrote:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51248
--- Comment #3 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-12-14
22:33:42 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Wed Dec 14 22:33:39 2011
New Revision: 182348
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=182348
Log:
PR c++/51248
*
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51248
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16458
--- Comment #5 from Peter Bergner bergner at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-12-14
22:42:57 UTC ---
Created attachment 26091
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26091
Another partial fix...
Answering Nathan's comment from his patch:
+/*
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51559
Bug #: 51559
Summary: decimal128 operates incorrectly compared to decimal32
and decimal64
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.1
Status:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51554
Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51228
Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51558
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-12-14
22:57:11 UTC ---
Could we put a static_assert in the default operator() definition?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51471
--- Comment #11 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-12-14
22:58:55 UTC ---
This is the patch which I am testing:
Index: genattrtab.c
===
--- genattrtab.c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51473
Dodji Seketeli dodji at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51457
Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44077
Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44077
Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||lloyd at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51050
Georg-Johann Lay gjl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51557
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50286
Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51458
Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51353
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-12-14
23:28:00 UTC ---
I think this should be:
*(((volatile void **)__builtin_frame_address(0))+1) = exc;
GCC thinks it does not alias thing which is why it is removing
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51331
Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||4.1.2
Target
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51279
Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51557
--- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-12-14
23:40:58 UTC ---
Created attachment 26093
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26093
gcc47-pr51557.patch
Untested fix.
1 - 100 of 164 matches
Mail list logo