http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52041
--- Comment #13 from Iain Sandoe iains at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-01-30 20:31:11
UTC ---
OK. I've been using the command lines from my build log, with modification to
the path to account for the stage2/stage3 ... so like
in stage2-gcc/
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52041
--- Comment #14 from Iain Sandoe iains at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-01-30 20:34:08
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #13)
OK. I've been using the command lines from my build log, with modification to
the path to account for the stage2/stage3 ... so like
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52039
--- Comment #4 from Denis Excoffier g...@denis-excoffier.org 2012-01-30
20:54:37 UTC ---
Compared with PR52041, i also have a cltq (or cdqe) missing, but it is missing
in stage2
and present in stage3. After all, i'm perhaps a duplicate of
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52059
Bug #: 52059
Summary: [4.7 Regression] ICE in gfc_conv_variable
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52059
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
Known to
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52041
--- Comment #15 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-01-30
21:07:57 UTC ---
Can you please mail me (or upload somewhere) all the RTL logs from
compilation with -fcompare-debug and -fdump-tree-optimized (both the non-gk and
gk dumps)?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52060
Bug #: 52060
Summary: Incorrect mask/and (ARM bic) instruction generated
for shifted expression parameter, triggered by -O2
-finline-functions
Classification: Unclassified
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52032
--- Comment #4 from Joseph Garvin joseph.h.garvin at gmail dot com 2012-01-30
21:13:37 UTC ---
That's why I put the severity as enhancement :)
I thought of a better example.
templatebool force_inline
void
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52041
--- Comment #16 from Iain Sandoe iains at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-01-30 21:24:07
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #15)
Can you please mail me (or upload somewhere) all the RTL logs from
compilation with -fcompare-debug and -fdump-tree-optimized (both
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51148
Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||accepts-invalid
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48501
--- Comment #2 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-01-30 21:31:45 UTC ---
Author: uros
Date: Mon Jan 30 21:31:38 2012
New Revision: 183741
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=183741
Log:
PR go/48501
* lib/go.exp
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2995
--- Comment #6 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-01-30
21:35:54 UTC ---
The original wrong code part of this bug report has been fixed but there was
some discussion on the list and decided we should Deprecate them:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51312
Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||rejects-valid
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42149
Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52012
--- Comment #5 from Paul Thomas pault at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-01-30 22:01:33
UTC ---
Created attachment 26520
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26520
a draft patch for the pr
This bootstraps and regtests OK. I'll clean it up
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52041
--- Comment #17 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-01-30
22:12:24 UTC ---
Created attachment 26521
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26521
X449
The cross-compiler under valgrind actually shows some errors, I'm
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52041
--- Comment #18 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-01-30
22:13:44 UTC ---
Created attachment 26522
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26522
X450
And ipa-prop doesn't seem to initialize ao.volatile_p. I think it is
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52039
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51974
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-01-30
22:15:25 UTC ---
Please try
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52041#c17
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52041#c18
patches.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51500
--- Comment #15 from Kai Tietz ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-01-30 22:21:16
UTC ---
So this should be better then:
#define FFI_INIT_TRAMPOLINE_THISCALL(TRAMP,FUN,CTX,SIZE) \
{ unsigned char *__tramp = (unsigned char*)(TRAMP); \
unsigned int
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52012
--- Comment #6 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-01-30
22:24:21 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #5)
Created attachment 26520 [details]
a draft patch for the pr
This bootstraps and regtests OK. I'll clean it up and prepare the
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52056
--- Comment #1 from gccbug at jamasaru dot com 2012-01-30 22:34:37 UTC ---
While not relevant to gcc itself, it is interesting that clang also has trouble
with consistently identifying this optimization, but in an opposite way to GCC.
For clang,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52060
--- Comment #1 from Stephen Warren swarren at nvidia dot com 2012-01-30
22:47:27 UTC ---
gcc-linaro 2012.01 has the same issue, although the code it generated was a
little different.
gcc-4.7 snapshot 20120128 appears to have the same issue.
(I
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52059
Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51500
--- Comment #16 from Uros Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com 2012-01-30 23:04:54
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #15)
#define FFI_INIT_TRAMPOLINE_THISCALL(TRAMP,FUN,CTX,SIZE) \
{ unsigned char *__tramp = (unsigned char*)(TRAMP); \
unsigned int
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52060
--- Comment #2 from Stephen Warren swarren at nvidia dot com 2012-01-30
23:16:11 UTC ---
gcc-4.5.3 appears unaffected.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52039
--- Comment #6 from Denis Excoffier g...@denis-excoffier.org 2012-01-30
23:16:52 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #5)
Please try
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52041#c17
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52041#c18
patches.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52056
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||irar at gcc dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52062
Bug #: 52062
Summary: [4.6.2 regression] public generic name, specific
functions of private types
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.2
Status:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52059
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-01-30
23:33:11 UTC ---
Then plplot (see https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=785433 ) is buggy.
Anyway, it ICEs even with the same bounds.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51483
--- Comment #8 from Mikael Pettersson mikpe at it dot uu.se 2012-01-30
23:56:33 UTC ---
Created attachment 26524
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26524
pass both precision and storage size to Register_Float_Type
Patch I'm
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51906
--- Comment #24 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-01-31
00:01:41 UTC ---
That debug session still doesn't make much sense, are you debugging an
optimised executable? I don't need a more detailed trace, just one that
actually
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51906
--- Comment #25 from Jack Howarth howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu 2012-01-31
01:03:33 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #24)
Here is a trace for
libstdc++-v3/testsuite/30_threads/recursive_mutex/try_lock/1.cc compiled at
-O0 with...
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51906
--- Comment #26 from Jack Howarth howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu 2012-01-31
01:05:15 UTC ---
Created attachment 26525
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26525
preprocessed source from FSF gcc 4.7 for pthread test code
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51906
--- Comment #27 from Jack Howarth howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu 2012-01-31
01:07:40 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #24)
I've attached the preprocessed source from FSF gcc 4.7 on darwin11 for your
proposed pthread test program, as pthread_test.i
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51906
--- Comment #28 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-01-31
01:15:00 UTC ---
You need to use g++ (not gcc) to compile C++ code, and you need to use
-std=c++0x to compile C++11 code. GCC 4.2 doesn't support -std=c++0x so
there's no
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51906
--- Comment #29 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-01-31
01:18:37 UTC ---
It might be easier if I to get access to a darwin system, which I should have
in a few days so I can test it myself.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51906
--- Comment #30 from Jack Howarth howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu 2012-01-31
02:25:31 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #29)
It might be easier if I to get access to a darwin system, which I should have
in a few days so I can test it myself.
Okay,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52063
Bug #: 52063
Summary: internal compiler error: in gfc_conv_variable, at
fortran/trans-expr.c:1080
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52063
--- Comment #1 from Aravind aravindvijayan224185 at gmail dot com 2012-01-31
03:35:48 UTC ---
Created attachment 26527
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26527
plf95demolib.mod
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52063
--- Comment #2 from Aravind aravindvijayan224185 at gmail dot com 2012-01-31
03:36:41 UTC ---
Created attachment 26528
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26528
plplot.mod
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52063
--- Comment #3 from Aravind aravindvijayan224185 at gmail dot com 2012-01-31
03:37:18 UTC ---
Compiles fine with 4.6.2-1.fc16
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52063
--- Comment #4 from Aravind aravindvijayan224185 at gmail dot com 2012-01-31
03:38:01 UTC ---
Narrowed down to:
program x09f95
use plf95demolib
integer, parameter :: nptsx=35, xdim=99
real(kind=8) :: xg1(xdim), distort
xg1 = foo
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52063
--- Comment #5 from Aravind aravindvijayan224185 at gmail dot com 2012-01-31
03:39:00 UTC ---
Created attachment 26529
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26529
plf95demolib.f90
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52063
--- Comment #6 from Aravind aravindvijayan224185 at gmail dot com 2012-01-31
03:40:30 UTC ---
Created attachment 26530
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26530
the full build log.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52059
Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52063
Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52063
--- Comment #8 from Aravind aravindvijayan224185 at gmail dot com 2012-01-31
03:45:10 UTC ---
Oh i am sorry
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40963
--- Comment #5 from Andrew Baldwin andrew.t.baldwin at me dot com 2012-01-31
04:53:40 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #4)
I encountered the same bug in gfortran 4.7.0 20110329 and 4.5.2.
Are there any updates on this bug?
I did not encounted
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51974
--- Comment #4 from Nenad Vukicevic nenad at intrepid dot com 2012-01-31
05:34:54 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #3)
Please try
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52041#c17
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52041#c18
patches.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52062
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52062
--- Comment #2 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-01-31 06:16:17 UTC ---
On 4.7.0, I get
laptop:kargl[203] gfc4x -o z foo.f90
laptop:kargl[204] ./z
rhubarb is character kind = 1 len = 7
666.0 is real kind = 4
I get the same results
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52018
--- Comment #2 from Daniel Krügler daniel.kruegler at googlemail dot com
2012-01-31 07:33:25 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
A simple workaround is to introduce a local typename-specifier:
typedef class string c_t;
h(c_t(42));
or use a
101 - 153 of 153 matches
Mail list logo
