http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52073
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-02-02
08:09:43 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Thu Feb 2 08:09:37 2012
New Revision: 183829
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=183829
Log:
PR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47037
--- Comment #9 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-02-02
08:12:54 UTC ---
Does this work now?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52093
Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47836
Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51231
Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31830
Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52093
Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||burnus at gcc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52091
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52092
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32605
Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47992
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-02-02
08:33:32 UTC ---
This works for me on the trunk.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52073
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52079
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48188
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-02-02
08:34:57 UTC ---
This works for me on the trunk. maybe fixed by:
2012-01-19 Vladimir Makarov vmaka...@redhat.com
PR rtl-optimization/40761
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52087
Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||burnus at gcc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52079
--- Comment #6 from Matthias Klose doko at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-02-02
08:30:34 UTC ---
builds with this patch; testsuite still running
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47258
Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36927
Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47379
Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46943
Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48514
Kai Tietz ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49800
Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|segfault with |[4.7
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51994
--- Comment #34 from rguenther at suse dot de rguenther at suse dot de
2012-02-02 08:56:04 UTC ---
On Wed, 1 Feb 2012, ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51994
--- Comment #32 from Eric Botcazou
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49800
--- Comment #2 from Andreas Krebbel krebbel at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-02-02
08:58:57 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
Does this still fail?
Still fails with r183790.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52091
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-02-02
09:00:36 UTC ---
Started with http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=178728
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52086
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-02-02
09:05:03 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Thu Feb 2 09:04:57 2012
New Revision: 183830
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=183830
Log:
PR target/52086
*
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52086
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52093
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52092
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-02-02
09:20:03 UTC ---
Started with http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=183296
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52094
Bug #: 52094
Summary: g++ yields different behaviour for postfix increment
and decrement operators with fundamental types vs.
classes
Classification: Unclassified
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52094
Dico dicomj23 at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|g++ yields different|internal compiler error:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52094
Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52094
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-02-02
10:25:54 UTC ---
If the nested class is declared in an enclosing namespace scope (as required)
but still with the nested-name-qualifier of the derived type, G++ accepts it:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52094
--- Comment #4 from Dico dicomj23 at gmail dot com 2012-02-02 10:34:41 UTC ---
I agree, but they don't perform a segmentation fault
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52088
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|lto |
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52094
--- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-02-02
10:43:33 UTC ---
Why do you think I confirmed the bug and changed its status to NEW?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52081
--- Comment #2 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-02-02 10:46:42 UTC ---
submitted patch: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2012-02/msg00078.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17729
Iain Sandoe iains at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #26539|0 |1
is
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48514
--- Comment #2 from Kai Tietz ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-02-02 10:51:56
UTC ---
well, the underlying issue is here the wrong assumption of the meaning of _DLL
macro for Windows targets. This macro gets defined, if shared (means DLL)
version
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50308
--- Comment #3 from Iain Sandoe iains at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-02-02 10:54:44
UTC ---
Created attachment 26551
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26551
test-case
see PR17729 for an updated patch that also passes for this PR.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50308
--- Comment #4 from Iain Sandoe iains at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-02-02 10:59:40
UTC ---
Comment on attachment 26551
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26551
test-case
// The original reported fault...
A (x); // { dg-bogus .A. is
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52080
Petr Tesarik gcc-bugs at tesarici dot cz changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||gcc-bugs at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52080
--- Comment #10 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-02-02
11:08:56 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #9)
OK, my minimal test case removed the volatile keyword by mistake.
The real code in BTRFS has the volatile for the lock value
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50077
Iain Sandoe iains at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|x86_64-apple-darwin10
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51765
--- Comment #3 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-02-02
11:46:10 UTC ---
+FAIL: g++.dg/cpp0x/variadic-init.C (internal compiler error)
-FAIL: g++.dg/tm/pr45940-3.C -std=gnu++98 (internal compiler error)
-FAIL:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52091
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52080
--- Comment #11 from Petr Tesarik gcc-bugs at tesarici dot cz 2012-02-02
12:39:25 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #10)
IA64 uses
.mmi
ld8.acq r14 = [r32]
;;
nop 0
dep r14 = r15, r14, 32, 1
;;
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52092
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-02-02
13:14:37 UTC ---
Created attachment 26552
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26552
gcc47-pr52092.patch
Untested fix.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52091
Ira Rosen irar at il dot ibm.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||irar at il dot ibm.com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51998
--- Comment #8 from Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-02-02
13:29:34 UTC ---
Author: hubicka
Date: Thu Feb 2 13:29:31 2012
New Revision: 183836
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=183836
Log:
PR middle-end/51998
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51998
Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21386
Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19541
--- Comment #22 from Andrew Church achurch+gcc at achurch dot org 2012-02-02
13:38:49 UTC ---
Created attachment 26553
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26553
Remove deprecation warning for -I- (gcc-4.6.2)
Patch against
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52091
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-02-02
13:41:01 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #5)
I think we should fail to vectorize D.2030_19 = prephitmp.17_21 65535, or
any
other non-phi/not vect_double_reduction_def stmt
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52088
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50499
Peter Bergner bergner at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36043
Peter Bergner bergner at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||vries at gcc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50499
Peter Bergner bergner at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|CLOSED
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52091
--- Comment #7 from Ira Rosen irar at il dot ibm.com 2012-02-02 15:16:18 UTC
---
(In reply to comment #6)
(In reply to comment #5)
I think we should fail to vectorize D.2030_19 = prephitmp.17_21 65535, or
any
other non-phi/not
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48071
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48071
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36043
Peter Bergner bergner at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bergner at gcc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50077
--- Comment #3 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr 2012-02-02
16:06:05 UTC ---
clang seems to support -mcmodel=large - at least at 3.1 - so any necessary
ld64/dyld support is available.
The test compiles (using -c) with
Apple
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52095
Bug #: 52095
Summary: [4.7 regression] ICE compiling gcc.dg/sms-7.c: SEGV in
fprintf
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52096
Bug #: 52096
Summary: -dumpmachine does not respect -m32
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.4.3
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: minor
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52096
Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52096
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-02-02
16:30:59 UTC ---
Also the dumpmachine does not work for things like x32 where just the ABI
changes.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27238
Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46119
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-02-02
17:26:40 UTC ---
This works for me on the trunk
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45410
Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45364
Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45356
Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31279
Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38264
Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38537
Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47379
--- Comment #5 from H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com 2012-02-02 18:11:24
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #4)
Can you try after:
2011-12-19 Richard Sandiford rdsandif...@googlemail.com
PR rtl-optimization/42839
* fwprop.c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34285
Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49800
--- Comment #3 from Vladimir Makarov vmakarov at redhat dot com 2012-02-02
18:33:34 UTC ---
I am working on it.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35696
--- Comment #6 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-02-02
18:37:07 UTC ---
The testcase in comment #1 works for me with 4.3 and 4.4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48512
Kai Tietz ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36294
Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38518
Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51522
--- Comment #5 from Janne Blomqvist jb at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-02-02 19:08:19
UTC ---
Sorry, I'm unable to reproduce the ICE with today's trunk. I tried to testcase
in comment #4 with and without the fixes from #3 as well as the original
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26326
John David Anglin danglin at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2012-02-02
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49800
--- Comment #4 from Vladimir Makarov vmakarov at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-02-02
19:45:09 UTC ---
Author: vmakarov
Date: Thu Feb 2 19:45:04 2012
New Revision: 183843
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=183843
Log:
2012-02-02
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50045
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-02-02
19:45:56 UTC ---
Created attachment 26555
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26555
small testcase (p.class)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50045
Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|i686-pc-mingw32 |
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39885
Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52068
--- Comment #1 from Benjamin Kosnik bkoz at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-02-02
19:59:04 UTC ---
Author: bkoz
Date: Thu Feb 2 19:58:59 2012
New Revision: 183846
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=183846
Log:
2012-02-02 Benjamin Kosnik
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52097
Bug #: 52097
Summary: ICE: in get_bit_range, at expr.c:4535 with -O -flto
-fexceptions -fnon-call-exceptions --param
allow-store-data-races=0
Classification: Unclassified
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49800
Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52068
Benjamin Kosnik bkoz at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46082
Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44567
Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46999
Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39161
Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39161
Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43258
Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |minor
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38414
Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51967
Benjamin Kosnik bkoz at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bkoz at gcc dot
1 - 100 of 148 matches
Mail list logo