http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52181
Bug #: 52181
Summary: [4.7 Regression] merge_decls doesn't handle
DECL_USER_ALIGN properly
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52181
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51798
--- Comment #26 from Benjamin Kosnik bkoz at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-02-09
08:45:10 UTC ---
Created attachment 26620
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26620
complete transition to __atomic, modulo config
... and for config, plan
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52181
--- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-02-09
09:07:20 UTC ---
Created attachment 26621
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26621
gcc47-pr52181.patch
Untested fix. The testcase shows that the C++ FE has a
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51798
--- Comment #27 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-02-09
09:16:11 UTC ---
Nice. Now that we have an atomic load we can also do:
--- a/libstdc++-v3/include/bits/shared_ptr_base.h
+++ b/libstdc++-v3/include/bits/shared_ptr_base.h
-std=c99
-pedantic
stdin:1:34: warning: ISO C99 doesn’t support unnamed structs/unions
[-pedantic]
FAIL: gcc (GCC) 4.6.3 20120209 (prerelease)
FAIL: gcc (GCC) 4.7.0 20120209 (experimental)
plus
FAIL: gcc (GCC) 4.4.7 20120209 (prerelease)
FAIL: gcc (GCC) 4.5.4 20120209 (prerelease)
print
stdin:1:34
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52168
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51867
--- Comment #4 from amker at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-02-09 09:37:43 UTC ---
Author: amker
Date: Thu Feb 9 09:37:37 2012
New Revision: 184037
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=184037
Log:
PR target/51867
* builtins.c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52183
Bug #: 52183
Summary: Redeclaration of __this in lambda inside template
member function when calling static class function
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51106
--- Comment #9 from Andrey Belevantsev abel at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-02-09
10:10:41 UTC ---
Author: abel
Date: Thu Feb 9 10:10:36 2012
New Revision: 184038
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=184038
Log:
2012-02-09 Andrey
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51106
--- Comment #10 from Andrey Belevantsev abel at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-02-09
10:17:59 UTC ---
Author: abel
Date: Thu Feb 9 10:17:55 2012
New Revision: 184040
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=184040
Log:
2012-02-09 Andrey
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51106
Andrey Belevantsev abel at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52183
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48483
--- Comment #17 from Manuel López-Ibáñez manu at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-02-09
11:35:27 UTC ---
Clang++ 3.0 warns with -Wuninitialized
/tmp/webcompile/_15338_0.cc:7:5: warning: variable 'a' is uninitialized when
used within its own initialization
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52165
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-02-09
11:41:29 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Thu Feb 9 11:41:25 2012
New Revision: 184042
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=184042
Log:
PR debug/52165
*
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32380
--- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-02-09
12:13:25 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Thu Feb 9 12:13:18 2012
New Revision: 184043
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=184043
Log:
PR fortran/32380
*
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52168
--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-02-09
12:19:38 UTC ---
NetBSD PR http://gnats.netbsd.org/cgi-bin/query-pr-single.pl?number=45955
My analysis of the problem was incorrect and it looks as though a fix would be
to
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52168
--- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-02-09
12:24:14 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #4)
netbsd does too (but I can't test that until later today)
or rather, it doesn't ignore the newline, but it does produce the
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52175
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.7.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52177
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52165
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48814
--- Comment #10 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-02-09
13:03:25 UTC ---
For
extern void abort (void);
struct S { int i; };
struct S arr[32];
volatile int count = 0;
struct S __attribute__((noinline))
incr (void)
{
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52140
--- Comment #6 from Peter Bergner bergner at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-02-09
14:46:07 UTC ---
Author: bergner
Date: Thu Feb 9 14:46:02 2012
New Revision: 184045
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=184045
Log:
gcc/
PR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52140
--- Comment #7 from Peter Bergner bergner at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-02-09
14:56:03 UTC ---
Author: bergner
Date: Thu Feb 9 14:55:57 2012
New Revision: 184046
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=184046
Log:
Backport from
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52140
--- Comment #8 from Peter Bergner bergner at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-02-09
14:59:51 UTC ---
Author: bergner
Date: Thu Feb 9 14:59:46 2012
New Revision: 184047
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=184047
Log:
Backport from
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52140
Peter Bergner bergner at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52179
--- Comment #6 from Jack Howarth howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu 2012-02-09
15:05:50 UTC ---
All of these crashes appear in the section in the GC_mark_from subroutine of
mark.c commented as...
/* Try to prefetch the next pointer to be
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52140
Peter Bergner bergner at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.7.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52140
Peter Bergner bergner at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|CLOSED
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51752
--- Comment #3 from Aldy Hernandez aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-02-09
16:23:57 UTC ---
Created attachment 26622
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26622
proposed (untested) patch
This is a first stab at the problem. It is
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52184
Bug #: 52184
Summary: Wrong object initialization in
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.5.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: major
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52185
Bug #: 52185
Summary: Const member function may change the object for which
the function is called.
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52184
--- Comment #1 from Kamil kamil.holubicki at gmail dot com 2012-02-09
16:44:01 UTC ---
Created attachment 26623
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26623
Short example demonstrating problem
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51752
--- Comment #4 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-02-09
16:43:40 UTC ---
But isn't with
__transaction_atomic
{
for (i = 0; i 10; i++)
if (x[i])
x[i] += data;
}
and
__transaction_atomic {
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52185
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-02-09
16:44:20 UTC ---
Comeau C++ does not error out either.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52184
--- Comment #2 from Kamil kamil.holubicki at gmail dot com 2012-02-09
16:46:55 UTC ---
Base virtual class object is corrupted when explicitly called auto generated
constructor from derived class inititalization list.
Attached file demonstrates
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51929
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52184
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-02-09
16:55:12 UTC ---
4.7 prints 8, agreeing with other compilers
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51929
--- Comment #4 from Zdenek Sojka zsojka at seznam dot cz 2012-02-09 16:55:28
UTC ---
Yes, I marked this PR as a regression after adding the second testcase, along
with modifying the summary.
The way it behaves in 4.6 is described in the Tested
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48483
--- Comment #18 from Lisp2D lisp2d at lisp2d dot net 2012-02-09 16:59:19 UTC
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48483#c2
shows that function calling of object before constructor is bad idea and must
be strongly forbidden.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52185
Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52176
--- Comment #1 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-02-09
17:02:36 UTC ---
gfortran generates the following code (original dump). I think, it's
if ((real(kind=4)[0:] * restrict) __result-data == 0B) goto L.17;
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48483
--- Comment #19 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-02-09
17:04:06 UTC ---
Everyone knows it's a bad idea, and everyone agrees there should be a warning.
Stop going on about it.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52186
Bug #: 52186
Summary: array out of bounds error when accessing last byte of
a struct via char ptr
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.5.2
Status:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52186
--- Comment #1 from Alex Tomlinson alex at aivor dot com 2012-02-09 17:10:31
UTC ---
Created attachment 26625
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26625
output of -save-temps
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52186
--- Comment #2 from Alex Tomlinson alex at aivor dot com 2012-02-09 17:11:03
UTC ---
Created attachment 26626
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26626
output of -save-temps
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52185
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-02-09
17:11:40 UTC ---
[class.this] says, In a const member function, the object for which the
function is called is accessed through a const access path;
That doesn't mean the
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52186
--- Comment #3 from Alex Tomlinson alex at aivor dot com 2012-02-09 17:12:39
UTC ---
Created attachment 26627
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26627
stdout/stderr of gcc with -v -save-temps
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51360
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-02-09
17:15:39 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Thu Feb 9 17:15:29 2012
New Revision: 184049
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=184049
Log:
Backported from mainline
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48306
--- Comment #10 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-02-09
17:16:27 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Thu Feb 9 17:16:19 2012
New Revision: 184050
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=184050
Log:
Backported from
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51669
--- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-02-09
17:17:48 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Thu Feb 9 17:17:36 2012
New Revision: 184051
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=184051
Log:
Backported from mainline
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51695
--- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-02-09
17:18:51 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Thu Feb 9 17:18:42 2012
New Revision: 184052
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=184052
Log:
Backported from mainline
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52162
--- Comment #1 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-02-09
17:17:03 UTC ---
a = b
The problem is that the LHS is REAL(4) while the RHS is REAL(8). Thus, the
expression is not variable A = variable B but
variable A =
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44777
--- Comment #12 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-02-09
17:20:31 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Thu Feb 9 17:20:09 2012
New Revision: 184053
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=184053
Log:
Backported from
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51517
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-02-09
17:13:57 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Thu Feb 9 17:13:50 2012
New Revision: 184048
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=184048
Log:
Backported from mainline
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51768
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-02-09
17:21:45 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Thu Feb 9 17:21:15 2012
New Revision: 184054
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=184054
Log:
Backported from mainline
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51767
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-02-09
17:23:23 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Thu Feb 9 17:23:13 2012
New Revision: 184055
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=184055
Log:
Backported from mainline
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52186
--- Comment #4 from Alex Tomlinson alex at aivor dot com 2012-02-09 17:23:37
UTC ---
Reported to work with gcc 4.6.1:
$ gcc -v
Using built-in specs.
COLLECT_GCC=gcc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52182
--- Comment #1 from joseph at codesourcery dot com joseph at codesourcery dot
com 2012-02-09 17:23:59 UTC ---
On Thu, 9 Feb 2012, jan.kratochvil at redhat dot com wrote:
But ISO C99 says:
A structure type describes a sequentially allocated
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40778
--- Comment #14 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-02-09
17:24:57 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Thu Feb 9 17:24:47 2012
New Revision: 184056
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=184056
Log:
Backported from
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52162
--- Comment #2 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-02-09
17:27:26 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
As expr2-value.function.isym is set (expr2-value.function.isym-id ==
GFC_ISYM_CONVERSION), the is_alloc_lhs is not set. Hence, the
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52129
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-02-09
17:27:34 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Thu Feb 9 17:27:25 2012
New Revision: 184059
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=184059
Log:
Backported from mainline
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52006
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-02-09
17:26:01 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Thu Feb 9 17:25:47 2012
New Revision: 184057
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=184057
Log:
Backported from mainline
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48071
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-02-09
17:26:41 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Thu Feb 9 17:26:29 2012
New Revision: 184058
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=184058
Log:
Backported from mainline
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52060
--- Comment #12 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-02-09
17:29:52 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Thu Feb 9 17:29:38 2012
New Revision: 184061
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=184061
Log:
Backported from
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52074
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-02-09
17:28:30 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Thu Feb 9 17:28:22 2012
New Revision: 184060
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=184060
Log:
Backported from mainline
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52139
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-02-09
17:30:51 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Thu Feb 9 17:30:39 2012
New Revision: 184062
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=184062
Log:
Backported from mainline
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51752
--- Comment #5 from Richard Henderson rth at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-02-09
17:39:51 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #4)
But isn't with
__transaction_atomic
{
for (i = 0; i 10; i++)
if (x[i])
x[i] += data;
}
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51360
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52182
Jan Kratochvil jan.kratochvil at redhat dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52129
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48071
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52060
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43366
--- Comment #15 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-02-09
17:48:11 UTC ---
Created attachment 26628
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26628
Small patch for the resolve.c. It misses all the real work (trans*.c).
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52187
Bug #: 52187
Summary: armeb-unknown-eabi not recognized as big-endian
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16350
Dan Egnor egnor at ofb dot net changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egnor at ofb dot net
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52184
Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52187
Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|other |target
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52187
--- Comment #2 from Dan Egnor egnor at ofb dot net 2012-02-09 18:06:36 UTC ---
This is sort of the opposite of 49448.
In 49448, the _Linux_ rule is recognizing a _little endian_ target as _big
endian_ because its big-endian glob is too generous.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52188
Bug #: 52188
Summary: [4.7 regression] IPA-CP change broke libstdc++ symbol
versioning on Solaris
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52185
--- Comment #4 from xfg lsoltysiak at gmail dot com 2012-02-09 18:30:34 UTC
---
Ok, I understood. Pointers are also quite good examples, to explain that.
Thanks Jonathan.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52188
--- Comment #1 from Rainer Orth ro at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-02-09 18:31:18 UTC
---
Created attachment 26629
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26629
preprocesed source
compile with
cc1plus -fpreprocessed locale-inst.ii -quiet -O2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52188
Rainer Orth ro at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
Target
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52181
Ulrich Weigand uweigand at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||uweigand at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52188
--- Comment #3 from Rainer Orth ro at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-02-09 18:33:54 UTC
---
Created attachment 26631
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26631
assembler output after patch
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52188
--- Comment #2 from Rainer Orth ro at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-02-09 18:33:03 UTC
---
Created attachment 26630
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26630
asembler output before patch
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51752
--- Comment #6 from torvald at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-02-09 18:40:49 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #4)
But isn't with
__transaction_atomic
{
for (i = 0; i 10; i++)
if (x[i])
x[i] += data;
}
and
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51929
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-02-09
18:43:01 UTC ---
Reduced testcase:
// { dg-do compile }
// { dg-options -O -fno-guess-branch-probability -fipa-cp -fipa-cp-clone
--param=max-inline-insns-single=25 }
struct A
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52189
Bug #: 52189
Summary: [4.7 regression] Relaxed gthreads check breaks Solaris
8/9 symbol versioning
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52190
Bug #: 52190
Summary: question about atomic intrinsics -- test and
documentation vary -- please clarify
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52191
Bug #: 52191
Summary: abi_check should flag additions to released versions
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52192
Bug #: 52192
Summary: GCC_CHECK_TLS doesn't detect native TLS on Solaris 8/9
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52192
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-02-09
20:01:41 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #0)
needs to link with -lthread for __tls_get_addr. -pthread knows about this
and the necessary contortions, and I do have a patch to
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50942
Arnaud Charlet charlet at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51798
Benjamin Kosnik bkoz at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #26620|0 |1
is
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52190
Andrew Macleod amacleod at redhat dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||amacleod at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52168
--- Comment #6 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-02-09
21:31:48 UTC ---
Created attachment 26633
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26633
replace 'c' command with 'i' and 'd'
this passes the tests on gnu/linux and
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48306
--- Comment #11 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-02-09
21:33:15 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Thu Feb 9 21:33:11 2012
New Revision: 184069
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=184069
Log:
Backported from
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44777
--- Comment #13 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-02-09
21:34:25 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Thu Feb 9 21:34:21 2012
New Revision: 184070
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=184070
Log:
Backported from
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51768
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-02-09
21:35:40 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Thu Feb 9 21:35:36 2012
New Revision: 184071
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=184071
Log:
Backported from mainline
1 - 100 of 121 matches
Mail list logo
