http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52376
--- Comment #2 from Markus Trippelsdorf markus at trippelsdorf dot de
2012-02-25 08:06:02 UTC ---
Created attachment 26750
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26750
unreduced testcase
% c++ -O2 -fprofile-use -c -fPIC
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52376
Markus Trippelsdorf markus at trippelsdorf dot de changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52378
Mark Summerfield list at qtrac dot plus.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52378
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-02-25
09:09:34 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #2)
PPS Thanks also for mentioning flex: maybe it should be moved to the
Tools/packages necessary for building GCC section (currently
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52372
rsand...@gcc.gnu.org rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52379
Bug #: 52379
Summary: When inheriting a class X from another namespace,
inside the class X will always refer to that one.
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52379
--- Comment #1 from Boris von Zuckerberg yose at jormy dot com 2012-02-25
11:02:45 UTC ---
Created attachment 26751
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26751
This is the example of the problem in action.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52380
Bug #: 52380
Summary: [C++11] Number of variadic template arguments wrongly
interpreted in class template
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52375
--- Comment #4 from Mikael Pettersson mikpe at it dot uu.se 2012-02-25
11:51:39 UTC ---
The reduced test case doesn't ICE gcc-4.7 for me. The original one does.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52001
--- Comment #5 from Alexandre Oliva aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-02-25
12:09:33 UTC ---
Author: aoliva
Date: Sat Feb 25 12:09:27 2012
New Revision: 184571
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=184571
Log:
PR debug/52001
*
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52001
--- Comment #6 from Alexandre Oliva aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-02-25
12:09:48 UTC ---
Author: aoliva
Date: Sat Feb 25 12:09:41 2012
New Revision: 184572
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=184572
Log:
PR debug/52001
* alias.c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52375
--- Comment #5 from Steven Bosscher steven at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-02-25
12:29:08 UTC ---
The unreduced test case fails for me with options:
-march=armv7-a -mfloat-abi=softfp -mfpu=neon -O -ftree-vectorize
The compiler is trunk r184372,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52381
Bug #: 52381
Summary: asm goto output operands
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52379
Daniel Krügler daniel.kruegler at googlemail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52377
Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52379
Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52375
--- Comment #6 from Bernhard Rosenkränzer Bernhard.Rosenkranzer at linaro dot
org 2012-02-25 14:08:03 UTC ---
Reduced test case fails for me with 184223 (so does the unreduced one):
[bero@localhost ~]$
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52366
--- Comment #2 from trashyankes at wp dot pl 2012-02-25 14:46:33 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
dup of PR 52315 ?
after long thoughts, its indeed, dup of PR 52315.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29910
--- Comment #2 from Massimiliano Ghilardi massimiliano.ghilardi at gmail dot
com 2012-02-25 16:42:52 UTC ---
I checked again several g++ x86 versions against this old bug. The result is:
g++ version 4.2.4 : SEGFAULT
g++ version 4.4.6 : OK
g++
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52382
Bug #: 52382
Summary: Atomic builtins documentation, page not found
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52382
Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|c |web
--- Comment
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52382
Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||amacleod at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52375
--- Comment #7 from Mikael Pettersson mikpe at it dot uu.se 2012-02-25
18:56:44 UTC ---
If I bisect trunk configured as a cross to arm-linux-gnueabi, then the ICE
starts with r181014:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2011-11/msg00300.html
I still
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47914
--- Comment #2 from Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org 2012-02-25 19:18:11
UTC ---
Try building aranym with --enable-fpe=mpfr.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52201
--- Comment #5 from John David Anglin danglin at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-02-25
19:36:17 UTC ---
Author: danglin
Date: Sat Feb 25 19:36:11 2012
New Revision: 184576
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=184576
Log:
PR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52201
John David Anglin danglin at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52382
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-02-25
20:01:09 UTC ---
Note the wiki can be changed by anyone even without write access to GCC.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29910
Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52383
Bug #: 52383
Summary: gcc-4.6 regression: miscompiles Perl on m68k
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: major
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52383
Thorsten Glaser tg at mirbsd dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52384
Bug #: 52384
Summary: PR16923 execution test fails
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37516
--- Comment #6 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-02-26
00:49:54 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #5)
I think def scanning is ok, but all SSA names should be valueized via
a hook first.
I wrote up something quickly (but I want to
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52385
Bug #: 52385
Summary: [C++0x][constexpr] Segfault in constexpr
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: critical
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52384
--- Comment #1 from Jack Howarth howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu 2012-02-26
01:55:38 UTC ---
Seems to be caused by some commit after r174664 but by r175063.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52384
--- Comment #2 from Jack Howarth howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu 2012-02-26
02:16:09 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
Seems to be caused by some commit after r174664 but by r175063.
The only java related commits in this range are...
r174747 |
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48097
--- Comment #9 from Jack Howarth howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu 2012-02-26
02:49:28 UTC ---
Interestingly I see these failures in the i386-unknown-freebsd10.0 test
results...
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2012-02/msg02475.html
as well
36 matches
Mail list logo