[Bug bootstrap/52674] [4.7 regression] profiledbootstrap-lean fails on Debian/SPARC with segfault during intl/configure

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52674 Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.7.1

[Bug tree-optimization/52677] [4.8 Regression] ICE: in build_vector_from_val, at tree.c:1386 with -O -ftree-vectorize

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52677 Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED

[Bug tree-optimization/52678] internal compiler error: in vect_update_ivs_after_vectorizer, at tree-vect-loop-manip.c:1842

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52678 Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED

[Bug c++/52683] New: assignment operator not detected

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52683 Bug #: 52683 Summary: assignment operator not detected Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.6.3 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug c++/52683] assignment operator not detected

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52683 --- Comment #1 from Petr Ovtchenkov abominable-snowman at yandex dot ru 2012-03-23 07:37:57 UTC --- Created attachment 26965 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26965 test case test case. -std=gnu++0x required.

[Bug c++/49152] Unhelpful diagnostic for iterator dereference

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49152 --- Comment #20 from Ralph Loader suckfish at ihug dot co.nz 2012-03-23 07:54:51 UTC --- Re comment 12 - as someone who regularly needs to understand gcc diagnostics, I disagree completely. Understanding a failure to look something up, the

[Bug c/52682] [patch] gcc-4.7.0/gcc/c-family/c-lex.c doesn't compile with old C compilers

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52682 --- Comment #1 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-03-23 08:19:19 UTC --- Author: rguenth Date: Fri Mar 23 08:19:08 2012 New Revision: 185726 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=185726 Log: 2012-03-23 William

[Bug c/52682] [patch] gcc-4.7.0/gcc/c-family/c-lex.c doesn't compile with old C compilers

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52682 Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug tree-optimization/52677] [4.8 Regression] ICE: in build_vector_from_val, at tree.c:1386 with -O -ftree-vectorize

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52677 Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug tree-optimization/52638] [4.8 Regression] ice in build_vector_from_val

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52638 Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||zsojka at

[Bug tree-optimization/52638] [4.8 Regression] ice in build_vector_from_val

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52638 --- Comment #5 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-03-23 08:33:03 UTC --- Author: rguenth Date: Fri Mar 23 08:32:47 2012 New Revision: 185727 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=185727 Log: 2012-03-23 Richard

[Bug target/52684] New: glibc long double math tests fail on sparc 64-bit

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52684 Bug #: 52684 Summary: glibc long double math tests fail on sparc 64-bit Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug target/52684] glibc long double math tests fail on sparc 64-bit

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52684 davem at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/52678] internal compiler error: in vect_update_ivs_after_vectorizer, at tree-vect-loop-manip.c:1842

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52678 --- Comment #2 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-03-23 09:06:32 UTC --- I can reproduce the ICE, it's one of the more fragile areas of the vectorizer... Reduced testcase, ICEs at -O -ftree-vectorize -ffixed-form:

[Bug tree-optimization/52678] internal compiler error: in vect_update_ivs_after_vectorizer, at tree-vect-loop-manip.c:1842

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52678 --- Comment #3 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-03-23 09:29:07 UTC --- The issue is that for an induction variable i in long i; for (i = 0; i 15; i = (int) i + 1) ; we know its evolution if we know the number of

[Bug bootstrap/52623] 4.7.0-RC-20120314: bootstrap failure on AIX due to multilib and using C++ in post-stage1

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52623 --- Comment #11 from Michael Haubenwallner michael.haubenwallner at salomon dot at 2012-03-23 09:31:41 UTC --- Unless IBM does, I don't want to change any default here, nor force anyone to use -brtl. What I'm after is: Give package managers

[Bug tree-optimization/52678] internal compiler error: in vect_update_ivs_after_vectorizer, at tree-vect-loop-manip.c:1842

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52678 --- Comment #4 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-03-23 10:19:53 UTC --- Created attachment 26966 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26966 patch No, in fact, generating the _prologue_ loop adjusts the original

[Bug bootstrap/52623] 4.7.0-RC-20120314: bootstrap failure on AIX due to multilib and using C++ in post-stage1

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52623 --- Comment #12 from Michael Haubenwallner michael.haubenwallner at salomon dot at 2012-03-23 10:29:15 UTC --- (In reply to comment #11) Give package managers another choice how to build the packages, out of: A: libNAME.a(libNAME.so.1)

[Bug middle-end/52649] internal compiler error: in predict_paths_for_bb, at predict.c:1812

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52649 Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #26939|0 |1 is

[Bug middle-end/48600] [4.6 Regression] ICE when using cold attribute

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48600 Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||deepu.sarmatian

[Bug middle-end/52649] internal compiler error: in predict_paths_for_bb, at predict.c:1812

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52649 Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug libstdc++/52540] std::use_facet throws bad_cast when compiled with _GLIBCXX_DEBUG

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52540 --- Comment #17 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org paolo at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-03-23 11:01:01 UTC --- Author: paolo Date: Fri Mar 23 11:00:54 2012 New Revision: 185733 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=185733 Log: 2012-03-23

[Bug libstdc++/52604] mt allocator crashes on multi-threaded

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52604 --- Comment #6 from Laurent Aflonsi laurent.alfonsi at st dot com 2012-03-23 11:06:57 UTC --- Sorry for the late answer (sickness). Well, In fact there are 2 things in the atexit list : 1) The destruction of the list_type global variable.

[Bug libstdc++/52540] std::use_facet throws bad_cast when compiled with _GLIBCXX_DEBUG

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52540 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug c++/52685] [4.7/4.8 Regression] ICE in copy_binfo

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52685 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.7.1

[Bug target/25967] Add attribute naked for x86

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25967 Bryan O'Donoghue bryan.odonoghue at linux dot intel.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Bug c++/52685] New: [4.7/4.8 Regression] ICE in copy_binfo

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52685 Bug #: 52685 Summary: [4.7/4.8 Regression] ICE in copy_binfo Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority:

[Bug tree-optimization/52678] [4.7 Regression] internal compiler error: in vect_update_ivs_after_vectorizer, at tree-vect-loop-manip.c:1842

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52678 Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||4.6.3

[Bug tree-optimization/52678] [4.7 Regression] internal compiler error: in vect_update_ivs_after_vectorizer, at tree-vect-loop-manip.c:1842

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52678 --- Comment #6 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-03-23 11:34:37 UTC --- Author: rguenth Date: Fri Mar 23 11:34:32 2012 New Revision: 185734 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=185734 Log: 2012-03-23 Richard

[Bug libstdc++/52681] [C++11] Using std::thread without -pthread crashes without warning

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52681 Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|minor |enhancement ---

[Bug c++/52683] assignment operator not detected

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52683 --- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-03-23 12:43:15 UTC --- (In reply to comment #0) Assignment operator not detected via declval() for POD types. W::operator= is an overloaded function, operator=(const W) and

[Bug c++/52680] std::this_thread::sleep_for #ifdef'd out by _GLIBCXX_USE_NANOSLEEP

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52680 --- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-03-23 12:45:48 UTC --- Don't define that manually, you should configure gcc with --enable-libstdccxx-time instead. We need to revisit the configure tests for nanosleep and

[Bug libstdc++/52681] [C++11] Using std::thread without -pthread crashes without warning

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52681 --- Comment #2 from Matt Kline mkline at cs dot wisc.edu 2012-03-23 13:16:23 UTC --- Would it be possible to at least make the exception that is being thrown more descriptive? I had guessed that some kind of compile-time warning might be

[Bug c++/52680] std::this_thread::sleep_for #ifdef'd out by _GLIBCXX_USE_NANOSLEEP

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52680 --- Comment #2 from Matt Kline mkline at cs dot wisc.edu 2012-03-23 13:19:44 UTC --- Thanks for shedding some light on this. Is there a reason that --enable-libstdccxx-time isn't shown on http://gcc.gnu.org/install/configure.html?

[Bug libstdc++/52681] [C++11] Using std::thread without -pthread crashes without warning

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52681 --- Comment #3 from Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com 2012-03-23 13:29:38 UTC --- Probably, something in the docs could be also useful.

[Bug c++/52680] std::this_thread::sleep_for #ifdef'd out by _GLIBCXX_USE_NANOSLEEP

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52680 --- Comment #3 from Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com 2012-03-23 13:34:31 UTC --- Should be in the *library* configure docs, no? Anyway, looking forward, now that glibc is maintained in a slightly different way we should probably

[Bug c++/52683] assignment operator not detected

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52683 --- Comment #3 from Petr Ovtchenkov abominable-snowman at yandex dot ru 2012-03-23 13:54:23 UTC --- W::operator= is an overloaded function, operator=(const W) and operator=(W) decltype cannot work, because an overload set is not a type I'm

[Bug middle-end/48600] [4.6 Regression] ICE when using cold attribute

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48600 Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug middle-end/48600] [4.6 Regression] ICE when using cold attribute

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48600 --- Comment #20 from Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-03-23 14:22:35 UTC --- Author: hubicka Date: Fri Mar 23 14:22:24 2012 New Revision: 185739 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=185739 Log: Backport from

[Bug tree-optimization/42906] [4.5 Regression] Empty loop not removed

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42906 Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|NEW Known

[Bug bootstrap/52674] [4.7 regression] segfault during profiled LTO bootstrap

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52674 Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING

[Bug tree-optimization/52686] New: SLP crashes with WIDEN_LSHIFT_EXPR

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52686 Bug #: 52686 Summary: SLP crashes with WIDEN_LSHIFT_EXPR Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug tree-optimization/52686] SLP crashes with WIDEN_LSHIFT_EXPR

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52686 --- Comment #2 from Ulrich Weigand uweigand at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-03-23 15:42:00 UTC --- Created attachment 26968 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26968 Handle WIDEN_LSHIFT_EXPR in vect_get_smallest_scalar_type The attached

[Bug tree-optimization/52686] SLP crashes with WIDEN_LSHIFT_EXPR

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52686 Ulrich Weigand uweigand at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED

[Bug middle-end/23830] inline optimization possibility - reorder compilation step

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23830 Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||hubicka at gcc

[Bug target/50310] [4.7 Regression] ICE: in gen_vcondv2div2df, at config/i386/sse.md:1435 with -O -ftree-vectorize and __builtin_isunordered()

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50310 --- Comment #22 from Michael Meissner meissner at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-03-23 16:16:46 UTC --- Author: meissner Date: Fri Mar 23 16:16:38 2012 New Revision: 185743 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=185743 Log: 2012-03-23

[Bug tree-optimization/52633] [4.7 Regression] Compiler ICE in vect_is_simple_use_1 (ARM)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52633 Ulrich Weigand uweigand at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED

[Bug bootstrap/52623] 4.7.0-RC-20120314: bootstrap failure on AIX due to multilib and using C++ in post-stage1

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52623 --- Comment #13 from Michael Haubenwallner michael.haubenwallner at salomon dot at 2012-03-23 16:39:53 UTC --- Hmm, err, A and B aren't created at the same time by libtool. Instead, this table really should include static-only libs too:

[Bug c++/52672] internal compiler error: in cxx_eval_indirect_ref, at cp/semantics.c:6766

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52672 --- Comment #2 from Meador Inge meadori at codesourcery dot com 2012-03-23 16:44:06 UTC --- Even smaller repro: constexpr unsigned long a = *((int*)(*((int*)0x0)));

[Bug lto/52687] New: [LTO] undefined vtable in dynamic library

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52687 Bug #: 52687 Summary: [LTO] undefined vtable in dynamic library Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c++/52688] New: static local variable can accessed from local class of function template

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52688 Bug #: 52688 Summary: static local variable can accessed from local class of function template Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.6.1 Status:

[Bug libstdc++/52689] New: static linking with libstdc++ fails

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52689 Bug #: 52689 Summary: static linking with libstdc++ fails Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: major Priority: P3

[Bug libstdc++/52689] static linking with libstdc++ fails

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52689 Markus Trippelsdorf markus at trippelsdorf dot de changed: What|Removed |Added CC||markus

[Bug c++/52688] static local variable can accessed from local class of function template

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52688 giulianodammando at libero dot it changed: What|Removed |Added CC||giulianodammando at

[Bug c++/50043] [C++0x] Implement core/1123

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50043 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW

[Bug java/52690] New: ICE after bootstrap comparison in libjava

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52690 Bug #: 52690 Summary: ICE after bootstrap comparison in libjava Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: major

[Bug c/52691] New: va_start to builtin_next_arg optimization lost

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52691 Bug #: 52691 Summary: va_start to builtin_next_arg optimization lost Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: tree-ssa Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug middle-end/52690] ICE after bootstrap comparison in libjava

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52690 Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||build

[Bug c++/50043] [C++0x] Implement core/1123

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50043 --- Comment #7 from Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com 2012-03-23 18:17:56 UTC --- This doesn't compile, for example: struct B { ~B(); }; B::~B() { }

[Bug c++/52683] assignment operator not detected

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52683 Daniel Krügler daniel.kruegler at googlemail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Bug target/49740] [4.7 Regression] powerpc native bootstrap with -O3 produces Bootstrap comparison failure!

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49740 Douglas Mencken dougmencken at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|CLOSED

[Bug c++/52683] assignment operator not detected

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52683 Petr Ovtchenkov abominable-snowman at yandex dot ru changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/52683] assignment operator not detected

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52683 --- Comment #6 from Daniel Krügler daniel.kruegler at googlemail dot com 2012-03-23 19:41:03 UTC --- (In reply to comment #4) static_assert( is_assignableint,int::value, not assignable ); // pass This works because this corresponds to

[Bug middle-end/52690] ICE after bootstrap comparison in libjava

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52690 --- Comment #2 from David Fang fang at csl dot cornell.edu 2012-03-23 19:58:55 UTC --- Created attachment 26969 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26969 preprocessed source generated by:

[Bug libstdc++/52689] static linking with libstdc++ fails

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52689 --- Comment #2 from Jens Maurer jens.maurer at gmx dot net 2012-03-23 20:13:11 UTC --- $ find /usr/lib -name libstdc++.a /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/4.6/32/libstdc++.a /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/4.6/libstdc++.a

[Bug libstdc++/52689] static linking with libstdc++ fails

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52689 --- Comment #3 from Jens Maurer jens.maurer at gmx dot net 2012-03-23 20:14:33 UTC --- In case it matters, here's the configure info etc: $ g++ -v Using built-in specs. COLLECT_GCC=g++

[Bug c++/52672] internal compiler error: in cxx_eval_indirect_ref, at cp/semantics.c:6766

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52672 --- Comment #3 from Meador Inge meadori at codesourcery dot com 2012-03-23 20:21:06 UTC --- Testing a patch now.

[Bug bootstrap/52674] [4.7 regression] segfault during profiled LTO bootstrap

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52674 --- Comment #2 from Matt Hargett matt at use dot net 2012-03-23 20:26:44 UTC --- I was doing profiledbootstrap with the bootstrap-lto config on x64 just fine until about 6 weeks ago. The speedup in the resulting binary was notable, and was very

[Bug tree-optimization/46076] [4.6 regression] constant propagation and compile-time math no longer happening versus 4.4 and 4.5

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46076 --- Comment #32 from Matt Hargett matt at use dot net 2012-03-23 20:30:17 UTC --- Richard, if nothing's come to mind by now for the 4.6 branch, can this be closed? I'd like to see it fixed, of course, but so long as it still works in 4.7.0 and

[Bug target/52692] New: [avr]: Add support for avr-specific built-ins + LTO

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52692 Bug #: 52692 Summary: [avr]: Add support for avr-specific built-ins + LTO Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug target/52692] [avr]: Add support for avr-specific built-ins + LTO

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52692 Georg-Johann Lay gjl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4

[Bug middle-end/52693] New: Wrong code with SRA and arrays

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52693 Bug #: 52693 Summary: Wrong code with SRA and arrays Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug middle-end/52693] Wrong code with SRA and arrays

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52693 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-03-23 20:51:40 UTC --- Created attachment 26970 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26970 Testcase

[Bug middle-end/52693] Wrong code with SRA and arrays

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52693 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-03-23 20:55:42 UTC --- The correct output should be 120 which is what happens at -O0.

[Bug libstdc++/52689] static linking with libstdc++ fails

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52689 --- Comment #4 from Markus Trippelsdorf markus at trippelsdorf dot de 2012-03-23 21:18:19 UTC --- Please run: $ nm /usr/local/lib/gcc/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/4.7.0/../../../../lib64/libstdc++.a | grep GLIBCXX_3.4.14 and paste the output here.

[Bug libitm/52695] New: libitm/config/x86/cacheline.h: '__m64' does not name a type

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52695 Bug #: 52695 Summary: libitm/config/x86/cacheline.h: '__m64' does not name a type Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug libgcj/52694] [4.8 regression] bootstrap failure: libjava/java/io/natVMConsole.cc:35:20: error: 'IUCL C' was not declared in this scope

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52694 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-03-23 21:23:41 UTC --- This part of the code is not part of classpath so changed the components.

[Bug libgcj/52694] [4.8 regression] bootstrap failure: libjava/java/io/natVMConsole.cc:35:20: error: 'IUCL C' was not declared in this scope

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52694 Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.8.0

[Bug libitm/52695] libitm/config/x86/cacheline.h: '__m64' does not name a type

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52695 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-03-23 21:25:11 UTC --- What is the target which you are using?

[Bug bootstrap/52674] [4.7 regression] segfault during profiled LTO bootstrap

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52674 --- Comment #3 from Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-03-23 21:30:26 UTC --- I was doing profiledbootstrap with the bootstrap-lto config on x64 just fine until about 6 weeks ago. The speedup in the resulting binary was notable,

[Bug libgcj/52694] [4.8 regression] bootstrap failure: libjava/java/io/natVMConsole.cc:35:20: error: 'IUCL C' was not declared in this scope

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52694 Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW

[Bug libitm/52695] libitm/config/x86/cacheline.h: '__m64' does not name a type

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52695 --- Comment #2 from ncahill_alt at yahoo dot com 2012-03-23 22:23:19 UTC --- Sorry, i686-pc-linux-gnu, I think that is the target. This is the configure command: ../gcc-4.7.0/configure \ --enable-bootstrap \ --disable-libada \

[Bug libgcj/52694] [4.8 regression] bootstrap failure: libjava/java/io/natVMConsole.cc:35:20: error: 'IUCL C' was not declared in this scope

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52694 --- Comment #3 from Gerald Pfeifer gerald at pfeifer dot com 2012-03-23 22:27:22 UTC --- grep -r IUCLC /usr/local/include/ /usr/include | wc -l 0

[Bug regression/52696] New: [4.6 Regression]: g++.dg/tree-ssa/pr44706.C scan-tree-dump-not fnsplit Splitting function

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52696 Bug #: 52696 Summary: [4.6 Regression]: g++.dg/tree-ssa/pr44706.C scan-tree-dump-not fnsplit Splitting function Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.6.4

[Bug middle-end/52693] Wrong code with SRA and arrays

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52693 Martin Jambor jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC|mjambor at suse dot cz |jamborm at gcc

[Bug middle-end/52693] Wrong code with SRA and arrays

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52693 --- Comment #4 from Martin Jambor jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-03-23 22:45:47 UTC --- OTOH, I can confirm that the problematic variable is value, just not SRAing that one makes the testcase to return 120. (In the same function, SRA creates

[Bug c++/50043] [C++0x] Implement core/1123

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50043 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug middle-end/52693] Wrong code with SRA and arrays

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52693 --- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-03-23 23:00:47 UTC --- Wait a minute, value = stack.l[D.4470_102]; With value_77 = MEM[(struct exprList_s *)stack]; value$u_620 = MEM[(struct exprList_s *)stack].u; Where is

[Bug libitm/52695] libitm/config/x86/cacheline.h: '__m64' does not name a type

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52695 --- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-03-23 23:04:28 UTC --- --enable-bootstrap \ Can you try without that?

[Bug libgcj/52694] [4.8 regression] bootstrap failure: libjava/java/io/natVMConsole.cc:35:20: error: 'IUCL C' was not declared in this scope

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52694 Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr changed: What|Removed |Added CC||gandalf

[Bug c++/52697] New: -Wsign-conversion warns for obviously correct code with implicit promotion to int

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52697 Bug #: 52697 Summary: -Wsign-conversion warns for obviously correct code with implicit promotion to int Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.6.2

[Bug middle-end/52693] Wrong code with SRA and arrays

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52693 Martin Jambor jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED

[Bug middle-end/52693] Wrong code with SRA and arrays

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52693 --- Comment #7 from Martin Jambor jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-03-24 00:51:38 UTC --- Created attachment 26971 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26971 Proposed untested fix I'm currently bootstrapping and testing this patch.

[Bug tree-optimization/52631] [4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] VN does not use simplified expression for lookup

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52631 --- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-03-24 03:10:37 UTC --- Ok, I have a patch which only tries to looking up the simplified expression and then if we find it, use it, otherwise use the original expression. I now

[Bug tree-optimization/52631] [4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] VN does not use simplified expression for lookup

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52631 --- Comment #6 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-03-24 03:21:29 UTC --- Here is the simpler patch: Index: tree-ssa-sccvn.c === --- tree-ssa-sccvn.c(revision

[Bug target/52698] New: -maddress-mode=long doesn't work

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52698 Bug #: 52698 Summary: -maddress-mode=long doesn't work Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3