http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52816
Bug #: 52816
Summary: Access to private members inside decltype in the
signature of a member template causes access control
error
Classification: Unclassified
Product:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44141
--- Comment #15 from Venkataramanan venkataramanan.kumar at amd dot com
2012-04-01 07:55:24 UTC ---
Hi Uros,
I had a look at reload pass.
I have an RTL sequence that look like this.
(insn 32 31 33 2 (set (subreg:V4SF (reg:V2DF 284) 0) ==
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52817
Bug #: 52817
Summary: g++ do not call a method with same name on some
platforms(see small example source attached)
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.5.5
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52813
Uros Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
also with today's
4.8.0 20120401).
However, using the stock gcc, (aka gcc-4.7.0-1.fc17.x86_64),
there is no problem.
Using valgrind the problem does not arise.
Same story when using gdb directly, so below I let
it generate a core file and ran gdb on that.
It suggests that alloc.c's mark_object
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52818
Bug #: 52818
Summary: printf format %lf is erroneously rejected by C++11
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: trivial
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49152
--- Comment #26 from Manuel López-Ibáñez manu at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-04-01
11:24:14 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #24)
Personally, I don't believe Gaby is open to other solutions outside the
full-fledged caret diagnostics context, thus for the
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52818
--- Comment #1 from Kerrek SB joedoefawnbuck at googlemail dot com 2012-04-01
12:09:34 UTC ---
Correction: The warnings do NOT appear (correctly so) for C99 and C11.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52819
Bug #: 52819
Summary: ICE: tree check: expected tree that contains 'decl
minimal' structure, have 'nop_expr' in decl_linkage,
at cp/tree.c:3136
Classification: Unclassified
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52817
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-04-01
12:37:00 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #0)
void Wsafile::readdata(int NumFiles, va_list args) {
long * RWop;
printf(readdata 2 called \n);
RWop =
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52817
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-04-01
12:43:56 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
(In reply to comment #0)
void Wsafile::readdata(int NumFiles, va_list args) {
long * RWop;
printf(readdata 2 called
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52817
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-04-01
12:46:58 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
Stop using unsafe casts between incompatible types.
That is the least of the worries here.
The real issue is how is va_list
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49152
--- Comment #27 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-04-01
12:55:34 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #26)
because if you want nice diagnostics, why don't just use
Clang?
Because G++ gives much better diagnostics for template argument
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52820
Bug #: 52820
Summary: [4.8 Regression] ICE in create_preheader, at
cfgloopmanip.c:1363
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52817
Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52817
--- Comment #5 from bernd_afa nospamname at web dot de 2012-04-01 13:22:22
UTC ---
Created attachment 27057
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27057
preproc file
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49152
--- Comment #28 from Manuel López-Ibáñez manu at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-04-01
13:23:01 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #27)
(In reply to comment #26)
because if you want nice diagnostics, why don't just use
Clang?
Because G++ gives much better
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52817
--- Comment #6 from bernd_afa nospamname at web dot de 2012-04-01 13:26:40
UTC ---
Not a bug. An ellipses conversion sequence is worse than a standard conversion
sequence, thus readdata(int,void*) is preferred over readdata(int,...) when the
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52817
--- Comment #7 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-04-01
13:33:25 UTC ---
there is a C++ game called dunelegacy which work on other GCC architecture ok
Yes so the ABI for the 68k says va_list is a void* which is a valid choice as
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9050
Johannes Schaub schaub.johannes at googlemail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9050
--- Comment #14 from Johannes Schaub schaub.johannes at googlemail dot com
2012-04-01 14:14:46 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #13)
Jason, does http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/cwg_active.html#1435
not render the explicit specialization
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52817
--- Comment #8 from bernd_afa nospamname at web dot de 2012-04-01 14:16:15
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #7)
there is a C++ game called dunelegacy which work on other GCC architecture ok
Yes so the ABI for the 68k says va_list is a void* which
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52817
--- Comment #9 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-04-01
14:31:37 UTC ---
maybe change va_list to mainstraim behavior in the amigaos or AROS compiler
build let more C++ programs get working without changes.
You cannot change
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52810
Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52813
Josh Haberman jhaberman at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52820
--- Comment #1 from Markus Trippelsdorf markus at trippelsdorf dot de
2012-04-01 16:04:29 UTC ---
Most likely a dup of PR52808.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52808
Markus Trippelsdorf markus at trippelsdorf dot de changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||markus
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52817
--- Comment #10 from bernd_afa nospamname at web dot de 2012-04-01 16:12:28
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #9)
You cannot change va_list without changing the ABI and that is not going to
fly
anywhere.
You just need to take better into account
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52808
--- Comment #5 from Markus Trippelsdorf markus at trippelsdorf dot de
2012-04-01 16:14:15 UTC ---
*** Bug 52820 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52820
Markus Trippelsdorf markus at trippelsdorf dot de changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52821
Bug #: 52821
Summary: [4.8 Regression] 191.fma3d in SPEC CPU 2000 failed to
build with LTO
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52805
--- Comment #2 from Iain Sandoe iains at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-04-01 17:28:47
UTC ---
I suspect you might have altered the priority of class discovery methods
inadvertently.
e.g. AFAICT, although darwin defines JCR_SECTION_NAME, there is no crt
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52818
Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52822
Bug #: 52822
Summary: [C++11] stable_partition destroys sequence due to
inappropriate self-move-assignment
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52813
--- Comment #3 from Uros Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com 2012-04-01 18:58:27
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #2)
I don't expect the compiler to analyze the asm string. I expect the compiler
to respect my clobber list.
I told GCC that I would
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52813
--- Comment #4 from Josh Haberman jhaberman at gmail dot com 2012-04-01
19:23:14 UTC ---
I understand that GCC may not be able to save/restore %rsp like it does other
registers. But if that's the case, GCC should throw an error if the user puts
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49152
Marc Glisse marc.glisse at normalesup dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52823
Bug #: 52823
Summary: [4.8 Regression] FAIL: gnat.dg/renaming5.adb
scan-tree-dump-times optimized goto 2
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52822
--- Comment #1 from Jeffrey Yasskin jyasskin at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-04-01
20:41:43 UTC ---
Running the 4.6 testsuite with -std=c++0x as the default was unsuccessful, in
that it found only one error in an execution test, which was already known,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52822
Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52824
Bug #: 52824
Summary: [C++11] expanding variadic template arguments into
non-variadic template
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52822
--- Comment #3 from Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com 2012-04-01
21:50:42 UTC ---
Lately, in 4.6 too, in the occasion of a similar issue, we also added a check
for self-move assignment to __gnu_test::rvalstruct. Evidently, the small
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52591
--- Comment #11 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-04-01
22:04:59 UTC ---
Author: redi
Date: Sun Apr 1 22:04:54 2012
New Revision: 186057
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=186057
Log:
PR libstdc++/52591
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52822
--- Comment #4 from Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com 2012-04-01
22:09:45 UTC ---
PS: then shall we just do the assignment only when __result1 != __first, or
algorithmically we can do better? In case we can also imagine having the
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52591
--- Comment #12 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-04-01
22:12:29 UTC ---
fixed on the trunk so far
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52805
--- Comment #3 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr 2012-04-01
22:30:33 UTC ---
Nice working patch! Though I doubt it'll work for linux;-) (both i686 and
x86_64).
=== libjava Summary for unix/-m64 ===
# of expected passes
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52823
Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52797
David Edelsohn dje at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dje at gcc dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52825
Bug #: 52825
Summary: incorrect message for incompatible pointer type with
typedeffed structs
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52826
Bug #: 52826
Summary: Implement core/1170
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50043
--- Comment #9 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org paolo at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-04-02 00:13:35 UTC ---
Author: paolo
Date: Mon Apr 2 00:13:30 2012
New Revision: 186058
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=186058
Log:
/cp
2012-04-01
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50043
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52827
Bug #: 52827
Summary: -mx32 is not recognized
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52827
Jan Engelhardt jengelh at medozas dot de changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hjl.tools at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52827
Jan Engelhardt jengelh at medozas dot de changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|-mx32 is not recognized |Document
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52827
Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52822
--- Comment #5 from Jeffrey Yasskin jyasskin at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-04-02
02:15:24 UTC ---
Created attachment 27058
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27058
Fix by skipping past true-predicate values
Here's an algorithmic fix
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52828
Bug #: 52828
Summary: powerpc -m32 -Os writes register saves below stack
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52829
Bug #: 52829
Summary: gcc releases up to 4.6.2 triggers ICE when compiling
Gambit Scheme at -O2 on ppc64
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52829
--- Comment #1 from Michel Alexandre Salim salimma at fedoraproject dot org
2012-04-02 04:10:22 UTC ---
Created attachment 27060
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27060
Preprocessed source file that triggers ICE
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49152
--- Comment #30 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-04-02
05:16:05 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #26)
The caret is not a solution to this problem, because what Gabriel wants is to
not reconstruct expressions ONLY when the caret is
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9050
Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to fail||
--- Comment #15
62 matches
Mail list logo
