[Bug libstdc++/53270] Error when bootstrapping gcc on hppa2.0-unknown-linux-gcc

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53270 jimis jimis at gmx dot net changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #27335|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug libstdc++/53270] Error when bootstrapping gcc on hppa2.0-unknown-linux-gcc

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53270 --- Comment #6 from jimis jimis at gmx dot net 2012-05-08 06:38:08 UTC --- Created attachment 27339 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27339 preprocessed source

[Bug libstdc++/53270] Error when bootstrapping gcc on hppa2.0-unknown-linux-gcc

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53270 --- Comment #7 from jimis jimis at gmx dot net 2012-05-08 06:38:45 UTC --- Parallel compilation confused me, the error is for guard.cc, see the attached log plus the preprocessed source.

[Bug target/53271] powerpc-eabispe build fails with ice on unwind-dw2.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53271 --- Comment #1 from Alan Modra amodra at gmail dot com 2012-05-08 06:43:15 UTC --- Created attachment 27340 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27340 proposed patch

[Bug c++/53226] memory consumption for heavy template instantiations increased massively

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53226 --- Comment #5 from Mario Baumann mario-baumann at web dot de 2012-05-08 06:48:38 UTC --- I've finished the bi-section - revision 187053 caused the problem. I'm trying to produce a testcase ...

[Bug c++/53274] New: /*struct*/ S (__cdecl * f)(); fails to compile

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53274 Bug #: 53274 Summary: /*struct*/ S (__cdecl * f)(); fails to compile Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c/53275] New: GCC-4.4.4 gives error: ld: fatal: Symbol referencing errors. No output written to sparc_SunOS

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53275 Bug #: 53275 Summary: GCC-4.4.4 gives error: ld: fatal: Symbol referencing errors. No output written to sparc_SunOS Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.4.4

[Bug c++/53226] memory consumption for heavy template instantiations increased massively

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53226 --- Comment #6 from Mario Baumann mario-baumann at web dot de 2012-05-08 07:54:22 UTC --- Created attachment 27341 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27341 c++ source Added testcase (needs include files from boost -

[Bug libstdc++/53263] priority_queue is very slow if -D_GLIBCXX_DEBUG is used

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53263 --- Comment #8 from Pawel Sikora pluto at agmk dot net 2012-05-08 07:54:18 UTC --- (In reply to comment #7) Good, good, thanks Francois, anybody willing to benchmark the more limited change? changing __glibcxx_check_heap_*pred* reduces timings

[Bug target/53276] New: DWARF-2 line information truncated for MIPS16 thunks

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53276 Bug #: 53276 Summary: DWARF-2 line information truncated for MIPS16 thunks Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c/53277] New: Warning using -Wconversion and -Ox in gcc 4.5, 4.6 and 4.7 but not in previous releases

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53277 Bug #: 53277 Summary: Warning using -Wconversion and -Ox in gcc 4.5, 4.6 and 4.7 but not in previous releases Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0

[Bug bootstrap/53278] New: [4.8 regression] internal compiler error: in df_uses_record, at df-scan.c:3179 when compiling libgcc2.c __mulvdi3 on armv5tel-linux

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53278 Bug #: 53278 Summary: [4.8 regression] internal compiler error: in df_uses_record, at df-scan.c:3179 when compiling libgcc2.c __mulvdi3 on armv5tel-linux Classification:

[Bug c/53275] GCC-4.4.4 gives error: ld: fatal: Symbol referencing errors. No output written to sparc_SunOS

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53275 Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug middle-end/49363] [feature request] multiple target attribute (and runtime dispatching based on cpuid)

-vectorize -fPIC' CXXFLAGS='-O2 -fPIC -ftree-vectorize -fvisibility-inlines-hidden -march=native' -enable-libitm -disable-multilib CC=gcc CXX=g++ --enable-languages=c,c++,fortran,lto --no-create --no-recursion Thread model: posix gcc version 4.8.0 20120508 (experimental) [trunk revision 187276] (GCC

[Bug bootstrap/53278] [4.8 regression] internal compiler error: in df_uses_record, at df-scan.c:3179 when compiling libgcc2.c __mulvdi3 on armv5tel-linux

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53278 Richard Earnshaw rearnsha at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last

[Bug bootstrap/53279] New: [4.8 regression] error: 'convert_tree_comp_to_rtx' defined but not used [-Werror=unused-function] breaks m68k-linux bootstrap

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53279 Bug #: 53279 Summary: [4.8 regression] error: 'convert_tree_comp_to_rtx' defined but not used [-Werror=unused-function] breaks m68k-linux bootstrap Classification: Unclassified

[Bug libstdc++/53263] priority_queue is very slow if -D_GLIBCXX_DEBUG is used

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53263 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC|paolo.carlini at oracle dot |

[Bug bootstrap/53279] [4.8 regression] error: 'convert_tree_comp_to_rtx' defined but not used [-Werror=unused-function] breaks m68k-linux bootstrap

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53279 --- Comment #1 from Mikael Pettersson mikpe at it dot uu.se 2012-05-08 09:56:01 UTC --- I believe the get_def_for_expr_class and convert_tree_comp_to_rtx functions should be #ifdef HAVE_conditional_move.

[Bug bootstrap/53278] [4.8 regression] internal compiler error: in df_uses_record, at df-scan.c:3179 when compiling libgcc2.c __mulvdi3 on armv5tel-linux

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53278 Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.8.0

[Bug bootstrap/53279] [4.8 regression] error: 'convert_tree_comp_to_rtx' defined but not used [-Werror=unused-function] breaks m68k-linux bootstrap

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53279 Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pinskia at

[Bug c++/53226] memory consumption for heavy template instantiations increased massively

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53226 Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |UNCONFIRMED

[Bug lto/48724] Lto build of mozilla dies at lto-wrapper: error trying to exec 'make -j1': execvp: No such file or directory

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48724 Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|NEW Last

[Bug target/53268] [4.8 Regression] [SH] libstdc++-dg/conformance.exp failures

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53268 Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.8.0

[Bug middle-end/53262] ICE compiling busybox 1.19.3 with gcc 4.7.0

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53262 Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug target/44141] Redundant loads and stores generated for AMD bdver1 target

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44141 Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Component|rtl-optimization|target ---

[Bug bootstrap/53280] New: s390 bootstrap failure since r186977

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53280 Bug #: 53280 Summary: s390 bootstrap failure since r186977 Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug bootstrap/53280] [4.8 Regression] s390 bootstrap failure since r186977

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53280 Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||dodji at gcc

[Bug target/44141] Redundant loads and stores generated for AMD bdver1 target

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44141 --- Comment #18 from Uros Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com 2012-05-08 10:32:33 UTC --- (In reply to comment #17) Which makes this a target bug then. Uros? Following the explanation in comment #16, I'd say so. Please note that we already

[Bug rtl-optimization/53180] [4.8 Regression] Revision 186378 generates incorrect code for cpu2006 416.gamess

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53180 --- Comment #1 from Bernd Schmidt bernds at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-05-08 10:35:21 UTC --- Created attachment 27344 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27344 Candidate patch I think I have a theory of what's going wrong. Can you test

[Bug c++/53226] memory consumption for heavy template instantiations increased massively

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53226 Michael Matz matz at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last

[Bug c++/53226] memory consumption for heavy template instantiations increased massively

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53226 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot

[Bug c++/53226] memory consumption for heavy template instantiations increased massively

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53226 --- Comment #10 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-05-08 12:09:05 UTC --- (In reply to comment #9) Ugh, remove_prop_source_from_use can remove stmts while prev iterator points to them. This has been buggy before, but

[Bug c++/53226] memory consumption for heavy template instantiations increased massively

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53226 --- Comment #11 from Michael Matz matz at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-05-08 12:12:20 UTC --- (In reply to comment #9) I guess instead of using prev/prev_initialized, the loop could gimple_set_uid (stmt, 0) the stmts it is about to process and

[Bug c++/53226] memory consumption for heavy template instantiations increased massively

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53226 --- Comment #12 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-05-08 12:12:42 UTC --- One way would be to have a queue of propagation sources to be removed and delay the removal until after we have processed the function (the basic

[Bug c++/53226] memory consumption for heavy template instantiations increased massively

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53226 --- Comment #13 from Michael Matz matz at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-05-08 13:19:42 UTC --- (In reply to comment #10) The other way is to try to get away without immediately removing propagated source stmts - the obvious downside is that transforms

[Bug c++/53281] New: poor error message for calling a non-const method from a const object

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53281 Bug #: 53281 Summary: poor error message for calling a non-const method from a const object Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.6.3 Status:

[Bug c++/53281] poor error message for calling a non-const method from a const object

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53281 --- Comment #1 from Rui Maciel rui.maciel at gmail dot com 2012-05-08 13:27:24 UTC --- The same suggestion applies to the cases where a non-const method is called from a const method, such as in the example below: code class Foo { void

[Bug c++/50359] poor error message for an undeclared identifier in constructor

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50359 --- Comment #2 from Rui Maciel rui.maciel at gmail dot com 2012-05-08 13:33:57 UTC --- This issue is still present in g++ 4.6.3.

[Bug c/50476] Warn of pointer set to object whose lifetime is limited

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50476 --- Comment #1 from Rui Maciel rui.maciel at gmail dot com 2012-05-08 13:35:33 UTC --- This issue is still present in gcc 4.6.3.

[Bug lto/53282] New: lto and visibility-inlines-hidden makes wrongly hidden symbols and in a way that depends on the order of the input compilation units

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53282 Bug #: 53282 Summary: lto and visibility-inlines-hidden makes wrongly hidden symbols and in a way that depends on the order of the input compilation units Classification:

[Bug lto/53282] lto and visibility-inlines-hidden makes wrongly hidden symbols and in a way that depends on the order of the input compilation units

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53282 --- Comment #1 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-05-08 13:51:34 UTC --- This has nothing to do with -fvisbility-inlines-hidden (well, that might be necessary to trigger it). LTO brings symbols local to ship them to multiple

[Bug target/53283] New: [4.8 Regression] Many failures on x86_64-apple-darwin10 after revision 186789

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53283 Bug #: 53283 Summary: [4.8 Regression] Many failures on x86_64-apple-darwin10 after revision 186789 Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: unknown

[Bug lto/53282] lto and visibility-inlines-hidden makes wrongly hidden symbols and in a way that depends on the order of the input compilation units

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53282 --- Comment #2 from vincenzo Innocente vincenzo.innocente at cern dot ch 2012-05-08 14:01:27 UTC --- understood why it is related to the order of the input files. Still that particular symbol shall not be hidden. I've a library with 307 of those

[Bug target/53283] [4.8 Regression] Many failures on x86_64-apple-darwin10 after revision 186789

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53283 Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.8.0

[Bug rtl-optimization/53278] [4.8 regression] internal compiler error: in df_uses_record, at df-scan.c:3179 when compiling libgcc2.c __mulvdi3 on armv5tel-linux

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53278 Ramana Radhakrishnan ramana at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ramana at

[Bug bootstrap/44959] [4.5 Regression] bootstrap failed at Comparing stages 2 and 3

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44959 --- Comment #18 from Hin-Tak Leung htl10 at users dot sourceforge.net 2012-05-08 14:05:56 UTC --- Created attachment 27346 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27346 one set of those checksum files. tar.gz'ed I think this one is

[Bug bootstrap/44959] [4.5 Regression] bootstrap failed at Comparing stages 2 and 3

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44959 --- Comment #19 from Hin-Tak Leung htl10 at users dot sourceforge.net 2012-05-08 14:07:03 UTC --- Created attachment 27347 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27347 another set of those checksum files. tar.gz'ed I think this one

[Bug bootstrap/44959] [4.5 Regression] bootstrap failed at Comparing stages 2 and 3

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44959 --- Comment #20 from Hin-Tak Leung htl10 at users dot sourceforge.net 2012-05-08 14:08:17 UTC --- Created attachment 27348 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27348 3rd set of those checksum files. tar.gz'ed This one is from 4.6.2

[Bug bootstrap/44959] [4.5 Regression] bootstrap failed at Comparing stages 2 and 3

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44959 --- Comment #21 from Hin-Tak Leung htl10 at users dot sourceforge.net 2012-05-08 14:15:52 UTC --- There are two curious things: 1. why does the 2nd stage drops to only about 600 byte. (I assume 20-30k is normal). 2. I did have a success with

[Bug c++/53209] [4.7/4.8 Regression] tree check ICE: expected tree_vec, have error_mark in comp_template_args_with_info, at cp/pt.c:7038

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53209 H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||krebbel at gcc dot

[Bug bootstrap/53280] [4.8 Regression] s390 bootstrap failure since r186977

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53280 H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug rtl-optimization/53278] [4.8 regression] internal compiler error: in df_uses_record, at df-scan.c:3179 when compiling libgcc2.c __mulvdi3 on armv5tel-linux

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53278 --- Comment #3 from Ramana Radhakrishnan ramana at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-05-08 14:56:18 UTC --- The patch below appears to trigger the issue but there's a fundamental question as to why lower-subreg generates concatns when the documentation

[Bug go/51874] Many libgo testsuite failures on IRIX

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51874 --- Comment #17 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2012-05-08 15:08:13 UTC --- --- Comment #16 from Ian Lance Taylor ian at airs dot com 2012-04-24 16:33:13 UTC --- At some point, can you update this

[Bug go/51874] Many libgo testsuite failures on IRIX

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51874 --- Comment #18 from Rainer Orth ro at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-05-08 15:09:32 UTC --- Created attachment 27349 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27349 Hack to avoid IRIX 6.5 libgo_cv_lib_setcontext_clobbers_tls failure

[Bug libstdc++/53270] Error when bootstrapping gcc on hppa2.0-unknown-linux-gcc

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53270 John David Anglin danglin at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |UNCONFIRMED

[Bug target/53272] wrong condition-codes for strict-low-part destination and small-integer source

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53272 --- Comment #2 from Hans-Peter Nilsson hp at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-05-08 15:20:56 UTC --- Author: hp Date: Tue May 8 15:20:52 2012 New Revision: 187283 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=187283 Log: PR target/53272 *

[Bug target/53272] wrong condition-codes for strict-low-part destination and small-integer source

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53272 --- Comment #3 from Hans-Peter Nilsson hp at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-05-08 15:21:55 UTC --- Author: hp Date: Tue May 8 15:21:50 2012 New Revision: 187284 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=187284 Log: PR target/53272 *

[Bug target/53272] wrong condition-codes for strict-low-part destination and small-integer source

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53272 --- Comment #4 from Hans-Peter Nilsson hp at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-05-08 15:27:08 UTC --- Author: hp Date: Tue May 8 15:27:03 2012 New Revision: 187285 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=187285 Log: PR target/53272 *

[Bug c++/53261] [4.8 Regression] ICE in tree_strip_nop_conversions

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53261 --- Comment #4 from dave.anglin at bell dot net 2012-05-08 15:26:51 UTC --- On 5/7/2012 12:25 PM, manu at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: Could you test on hppa? The patch fixes the compilation error. Actually, I am not sure whether if (!tem ||

[Bug target/53272] wrong condition-codes for strict-low-part destination and small-integer source

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53272 --- Comment #5 from Hans-Peter Nilsson hp at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-05-08 15:28:02 UTC --- Author: hp Date: Tue May 8 15:27:58 2012 New Revision: 187286 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=187286 Log: PR target/53272 *

[Bug target/53272] wrong condition-codes for strict-low-part destination and small-integer source

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53272 Hans-Peter Nilsson hp at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.7.2 ---

[Bug bootstrap/44959] [4.5 Regression] bootstrap failed at Comparing stages 2 and 3

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44959 --- Comment #22 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2012-05-08 15:36:03 UTC --- --- Comment #21 from Hin-Tak Leung htl10 at users dot sourceforge.net 2012-05-08 14:15:52 UTC --- I think there was a

[Bug target/53272] wrong condition-codes for strict-low-part destination and small-integer source

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53272 Hans-Peter Nilsson hp at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug rtl-optimization/53278] [4.8 regression] internal compiler error: in df_uses_record, at df-scan.c:3179 when compiling libgcc2.c __mulvdi3 on armv5tel-linux

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53278 Kenneth Zadeck zadeck at naturalbridge dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||zadeck at

[Bug bootstrap/49797] CLooG use of LANGUAGE_C conflicts with MIPS compilers

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49797 --- Comment #4 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2012-05-08 15:54:15 UTC --- --- Comment #3 from Matt Hargett matt at use dot net 2012-04-23 22:19:35 UTC --- Can you please back port this to 4.6 as

[Bug target/53250] [4.8 Regression] [SH] ICE: in change_address_1, at emit-rtl.c:2018

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53250 --- Comment #7 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-05-08 16:01:59 UTC --- Author: uros Date: Tue May 8 16:01:54 2012 New Revision: 187289 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=187289 Log: PR target/53250 * config/i386/i386.c

[Bug tree-optimization/53185] [4.8 Regression] segmentation fault in vectorizable_load

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53185 --- Comment #5 from Gary Funck gary at intrepid dot com 2012-05-08 16:01:50 UTC --- Ping. Is there an ETA for a fix for this bug? It is preventing us from being able to merge from the GCC trunk. Thanks.

[Bug c/53277] Warning using -Wconversion and -Ox in gcc 4.5, 4.6 and 4.7 but not in previous releases

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53277 Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last

[Bug target/53250] [4.8 Regression] [SH] ICE: in change_address_1, at emit-rtl.c:2018

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53250 --- Comment #8 from Uros Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com 2012-05-08 16:05:40 UTC --- (In reply to comment #7) Author: uros Date: Tue May 8 16:01:54 2012 New Revision: 187289 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=187289 Log:

[Bug rtl-optimization/53176] [4.8 Regression] gcc.dg/lower-subreg-1.c FAILs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53176 --- Comment #23 from Uros Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com 2012-05-08 16:10:07 UTC --- Author: uros Date: Tue May 8 16:01:54 2012 New Revision: 187289 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=187289 Log: PR target/53176 *

[Bug middle-end/53279] [4.8 regression] error: 'convert_tree_comp_to_rtx' defined but not used [-Werror=unused-function] breaks m68k-linux bootstrap

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53279 Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||build

[Bug other/53284] New: Several libatomic tests fail on 32-bit Solaris/x86

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53284 Bug #: 53284 Summary: Several libatomic tests fail on 32-bit Solaris/x86 Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug tree-optimization/53226] [4.8 Regression] Endless loop in forwprop

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53226 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Component|c++ |tree-optimization

[Bug lto/53282] lto and visibility-inlines-hidden makes wrongly hidden symbols and in a way that depends on the order of the input compilation units

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53282 Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||hubicka at gcc

[Bug middle-end/49363] [feature request] multiple target attribute (and runtime dispatching based on cpuid)

-ftree-vectorize -fvisibility-inlines-hidden -march=native' -enable-libitm -disable-multilib CC=gcc CXX=g++ --enable-languages=c,c++,fortran,lto --no-create --no-recursion Thread model: posix gcc version 4.8.0 20120508 (experimental) [trunk revision 187276] (GCC) configured as above ad got

[Bug target/53283] [4.8 Regression] Many failures on x86_64-apple-darwin10 after revision 186789

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53283 Sriraman Tallam tmsriram at google dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||tmsriram at

[Bug bootstrap/53238] Bootstrap failure: error: 'pthread_mutex_timedlock' was not declared in this scope

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53238 --- Comment #8 from Daniel Richard G. skunk at iskunk dot org 2012-05-08 18:18:04 UTC --- I did a non-bootstrap build to speed things up a bit. (The system already has GCC 4.5.2.) First: Your patch needs a couple of ;; sprinkled in there :-)

[Bug rtl-optimization/53278] [4.8 regression] internal compiler error: in df_uses_record, at df-scan.c:3179 when compiling libgcc2.c __mulvdi3 on armv5tel-linux

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53278 rsand...@gcc.gnu.org rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW

[Bug lto/49700] LTO compile time hog

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49700 Joost VandeVondele Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz.ch changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING

[Bug libstdc++/53270] Error when bootstrapping gcc on hppa2.0-unknown-linux-gcc

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53270 Steven Bosscher steven at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last

[Bug rtl-optimization/53180] [4.8 Regression] Revision 186378 generates incorrect code for cpu2006 416.gamess

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53180 Pat Haugen pthaugen at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|4.8.0 |--- --- Comment

[Bug libstdc++/53270] Error when bootstrapping gcc on hppa2.0-unknown-linux-gcc

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53270 --- Comment #10 from Steven Bosscher steven at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-05-08 19:03:01 UTC --- From gcc61: $ /lib/libc-2.7.so GNU C Library stable release version 2.7, by Roland McGrath et al. Copyright (C) 2007 Free Software Foundation, Inc. This

[Bug libstdc++/53270] Error when bootstrapping gcc on hppa2.0-unknown-linux-gcc

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53270 --- Comment #11 from dave.anglin at bell dot net 2012-05-08 19:23:48 UTC --- On 5/8/2012 3:03 PM, steven at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: Is that old a glibc still supported? The following still works except for libitm: dave@selway:/lib /lib/libc.so.6

[Bug libstdc++/53263] priority_queue is very slow if -D_GLIBCXX_DEBUG is used

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53263 --- Comment #10 from François Dumont fdumont at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-05-08 19:31:49 UTC --- Ok, I will submit a patch tomorrow generalizing usage of __gnu_debug::__base in debug macros.

[Bug bootstrap/50342] gcc/configure fails on Mac OS X Lion/Xcode 4.1 with recent GCCs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50342 --- Comment #11 from simon at pushface dot org 2012-05-08 20:01:50 UTC --- (In reply to comment #10) I'm wondering if you could add: # Work around PR50342 BOOT_CFLAGS += -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=0 to config/mh-darwin and fix the issue. If so, I

[Bug bootstrap/44959] [4.5 Regression] bootstrap failed at Comparing stages 2 and 3

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44959 --- Comment #23 from Hin-Tak Leung htl10 at users dot sourceforge.net 2012-05-08 20:48:25 UTC --- (In reply to comment #22) --- Comment #21 from Hin-Tak Leung htl10 at users dot sourceforge.net 2012-05-08 14:15:52 UTC --- I think there

[Bug libstdc++/53270] Error when bootstrapping gcc on hppa2.0-unknown-linux-gcc

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53270 --- Comment #12 from John David Anglin danglin at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-05-08 20:50:01 UTC --- You might try configuring with --disable-libstdcxx-threads. It disables C++11 threads support.

[Bug target/51244] SH Target: Inefficient conditional branch

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51244 --- Comment #38 from Oleg Endo olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-05-08 21:36:35 UTC --- Author: olegendo Date: Tue May 8 21:36:30 2012 New Revision: 187298 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=187298 Log: PR target/51244 *

[Bug rtl-optimization/53278] [4.8 regression] internal compiler error: in df_uses_record, at df-scan.c:3179 when compiling libgcc2.c __mulvdi3 on armv5tel-linux

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53278 --- Comment #6 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-05-08 21:42:09 UTC --- Author: rsandifo Date: Tue May 8 21:42:03 2012 New Revision: 187299 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=187299 Log: gcc/

[Bug rtl-optimization/53278] [4.8 regression] internal compiler error: in df_uses_record, at df-scan.c:3179 when compiling libgcc2.c __mulvdi3 on armv5tel-linux

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53278 rsand...@gcc.gnu.org rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug c++/53261] [4.8 Regression] ICE in tree_strip_nop_conversions

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53261 --- Comment #5 from Manuel López-Ibáñez manu at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-05-08 22:14:43 UTC --- Author: manu Date: Tue May 8 22:14:34 2012 New Revision: 187300 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=187300 Log: 2012-05-09 Manuel

[Bug c++/53261] [4.8 Regression] ICE in tree_strip_nop_conversions

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53261 Manuel López-Ibáñez manu at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug other/53285] New: libibiberty's md5.c builds with warnings with 4.7 and trunk

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53285 Bug #: 53285 Summary: libibiberty's md5.c builds with warnings with 4.7 and trunk Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug driver/53286] New: [mingw] improve CreateProcess: No such file or directory error message

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53286 Bug #: 53286 Summary: [mingw] improve CreateProcess: No such file or directory error message Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status:

[Bug other/53284] Several libatomic tests fail on 32-bit Solaris/x86

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53284 --- Comment #1 from Richard Henderson rth at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-05-08 22:39:35 UTC --- Can you investigate why configure decides that __atomic_compare_exchange_8 is implemented inline? That it isn't inline is obvious from the recursion. Was

[Bug libitm/53008] abort in _ITM_getTMCloneSafe

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53008 --- Comment #3 from Dave Boutcher daveboutcher at gmail dot com 2012-05-08 22:56:23 UTC --- I just submitted a patch for this one (Issue 6201064) (http://codereview.appspot.com/6201064/) Patch included here just for fun: Index: gcc/trans-mem.c

[Bug tree-optimization/53273] test-cases suffer from cross-function optimizations with no way to mark limits

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53273 --- Comment #1 from Hans-Peter Nilsson hp at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-05-08 23:24:15 UTC --- Created attachment 27350 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27350 preprocessed file with just the (previously) miscompiled function This is

[Bug tree-optimization/53273] test-cases suffer from cross-function optimizations with no way to mark limits

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53273 --- Comment #2 from Hans-Peter Nilsson hp at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-05-08 23:41:41 UTC --- Created attachment 27351 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27351 Like i2.i (attachment 27350) but with main and auxiliary functions, and

[Bug tree-optimization/53273] test-cases suffer from cross-function optimizations with no way to mark limits

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53273 Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||hubicka at gcc

[Bug tree-optimization/53273] test-cases suffer from cross-function optimizations with no way to mark limits

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53273 Hans-Peter Nilsson hp at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #27351|application/octet-stream|text/plain

  1   2   >