http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53316
Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ebotcazou at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53319
Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|c |other
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53310
--- Comment #3 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-05-11
08:15:05 UTC ---
Author: burnus
Date: Fri May 11 08:14:56 2012
New Revision: 187395
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=187395
Log:
2012-05-11 Tobias Burnus
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53305
--- Comment #3 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org paolo at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-05-11 08:22:39 UTC ---
Author: paolo
Date: Fri May 11 08:22:16 2012
New Revision: 187396
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=187396
Log:
/cp
2012-05-11
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53305
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53319
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||x86_64-*-*,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45586
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kargl at gcc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53318
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45375
--- Comment #124 from Jan Hubicka hubicka at ucw dot cz 2012-05-11 08:34:17
UTC ---
Just for comparison, clang with -O4 runs only single threaded and does
everything in memory (no streaming out). It uses 3.5GB of memory (peak) and
takes 19
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53317
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53316
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53300
--- Comment #11 from Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-05-11
08:40:25 UTC ---
Author: hubicka
Date: Fri May 11 08:40:15 2012
New Revision: 187397
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=187397
Log:
PR bootstrap/53300
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45375
--- Comment #125 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-05-11
08:44:51 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #122)
oprofile shows:
139188 15.6963 lto1 lto1
uniquify_nodes
66390 7.4868 lto1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45375
--- Comment #126 from Markus Trippelsdorf markus at trippelsdorf dot de
2012-05-11 08:46:39 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #124)
Just for comparison, clang with -O4 runs only single threaded and does
everything in memory (no streaming out). It
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53312
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53316
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-05-11
08:52:51 UTC ---
A big question for -Odebug is e.g. if we should enable var-tracking for it or
not. While it is time consuming, it should improve the debug experience, there
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45375
--- Comment #127 from Mike Hommey mh+gcc at glandium dot org 2012-05-11
08:52:24 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #126)
(In reply to comment #124)
Just for comparison, clang with -O4 runs only single threaded and does
everything in memory (no
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53316
--- Comment #7 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-05-11
08:56:41 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #6)
A big question for -Odebug is e.g. if we should enable var-tracking for it or
not. While it is time consuming, it should
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53316
--- Comment #8 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-05-11
08:58:23 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #7)
(In reply to comment #6)
A big question for -Odebug is e.g. if we should enable var-tracking for it
or
not. While it is
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45375
--- Comment #128 from Jan Hubicka hubicka at ucw dot cz 2012-05-11 08:52:50
UTC ---
Well - the obvious possibly slow part of uniquify nodes is that it walks
all fields of record/union types. So - do you have a more detailed profile
of
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53125
Steven Bosscher steven at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||alias
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53320
Bug #: 53320
Summary: -fcheck=pointer should diagnose pointer-assignment of
a noncontiguous tgt to a CONTIGUOUS ptr
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53125
--- Comment #8 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-05-11
09:33:19 UTC ---
The alias stmt walking time is because of the redundant store removal code
and because of PR52054 it has to re-do the walks (there are 7200 stores in
the
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52054
--- Comment #3 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-05-11
09:34:40 UTC ---
PR53125 has a testcase where we spend time in redundant store removal in
eliminate() which does vn_reference_lookup with VN_WALK (which it should not
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53315
--- Comment #6 from Uros Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com 2012-05-11 09:41:15
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #5)
Created attachment 27370 [details]
A patch
Patch looks OK to me, but please let Andi play with this a bit, so we are sure
we won't
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53291
Uros Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53315
Uros Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||patch
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53161
Igor Zamyatin izamyatin at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||izamyatin at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53161
--- Comment #7 from Igor Zamyatin izamyatin at gmail dot com 2012-05-11
10:07:07 UTC ---
Error message for x86 compilation
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53300
--- Comment #12 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ro at CeBiTec dot
Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2012-05-11 10:08:11 UTC ---
--- Comment #5 from Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-05-10
17:59:46 UTC ---
[...]
Does the following hack avoid
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53297
birender.singh at hotmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53275
--- Comment #7 from Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com 2012-05-11
11:05:51 UTC ---
*** Bug 53297 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53297
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53297
--- Comment #6 from Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com 2012-05-11
11:14:25 UTC ---
Incidentally, also note that the 4.4.x series is not maintained anymore, thus
it doesn't make much sense to file reports against it and older release
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53321
Bug #: 53321
Summary: [4.8 Regression] LTO bootstrap failed with
bootstrap-profiled
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53321
H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hubicka at gcc dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53295
--- Comment #2 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-05-11
12:03:19 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Fri May 11 12:03:10 2012
New Revision: 187402
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=187402
Log:
2012-05-11 Richard
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53295
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53063
--- Comment #1 from Manuel López-Ibáñez manu at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-05-11
12:24:00 UTC ---
Author: manu
Date: Fri May 11 12:23:50 2012
New Revision: 187403
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=187403
Log:
2012-05-11 Manuel
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53322
Bug #: 53322
Summary: Wunused-local-typedefs is not enabled by Wall or
Wunused
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53322
Manuel López-Ibáñez manu at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dodji at gcc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53311
chesstr at hotmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #27368|0 |1
is obsolete|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53323
Bug #: 53323
Summary: Compiler bomb with indefinite array of controlled
objects and storage pools
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53209
--- Comment #11 from Alexandre Oliva aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-05-11
13:27:15 UTC ---
Author: aoliva
Date: Fri May 11 13:27:03 2012
New Revision: 187404
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=187404
Log:
PR c++/53209
* pt.c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53209
Alexandre Oliva aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53297
--- Comment #7 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-05-11
13:32:52 UTC ---
You haven't even provided the command that produces the error. Noone can
suggest a solution if you don't properly describe the problem.
Other people use GCC
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53209
--- Comment #12 from Alexandre Oliva aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-05-11
13:52:00 UTC ---
Fixed
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53209
Alexandre Oliva aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52537
--- Comment #5 from Thomas Koenig tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-05-11
13:56:16 UTC ---
Author: tkoenig
Date: Fri May 11 13:56:06 2012
New Revision: 187406
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=187406
Log:
2012-05-11 Thomas
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53209
--- Comment #14 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-05-11
14:16:00 UTC ---
What about the branch?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51055
--- Comment #4 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-05-11
14:31:26 UTC ---
See http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2012-05/msg00054.html
The problem is that the character length is used for reallocation before it is
set.
The following
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53324
Bug #: 53324
Summary: Crash when mixing _GLIBCXX_DEBUG and
non-_GLIBCXX_DEBUG std::deque
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53325
Bug #: 53325
Summary: arm-rtems switch default target to EABI
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.4
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53325
--- Comment #1 from Joel Sherrill joel at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-05-11 14:54:08
UTC ---
Created attachment 27374
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27374
GCC Patch for 4.6
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53325
--- Comment #2 from Joel Sherrill joel at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-05-11 14:54:35
UTC ---
Created attachment 27375
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27375
GCC Patch for 4.7
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53325
--- Comment #3 from Joel Sherrill joel at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-05-11 14:55:02
UTC ---
Created attachment 27376
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27376
GCC Patch for 4.8
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53300
--- Comment #13 from David Edelsohn dje at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-05-11
15:07:46 UTC ---
Created attachment 27377
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27377
Pre-processed source for libcpp/line-map.c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53300
--- Comment #15 from David Edelsohn dje at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-05-11
15:09:09 UTC ---
Created attachment 27379
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27379
Wrong assembly output for line-map.c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53300
--- Comment #14 from David Edelsohn dje at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-05-11
15:08:29 UTC ---
Created attachment 27378
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27378
Correct assembly output for line-map.c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53300
--- Comment #16 from David Edelsohn dje at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-05-11
15:11:59 UTC ---
The mis-compiled file is libcpp/line-map.c. I have attached the pre-processed
output for line-map.c on AIX. I also have attached assembly files showing the
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53300
--- Comment #17 from David Edelsohn dje at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-05-11
15:44:44 UTC ---
A minimal testcase:
enum lc_reason
{
LC_ENTER = 0,
LC_LEAVE,
LC_RENAME,
LC_RENAME_VERBATIM,
LC_ENTER_MACRO
};
const char *
foo (enum lc_reason
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53321
--- Comment #2 from Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-05-11
15:48:32 UTC ---
I fixed identically looking ICE seen on Mozilla build yesterday. Hopefully the
boostrap is fixed now, too.
Honza
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53316
--- Comment #9 from David Stone david at doublewise dot net 2012-05-11
15:48:53 UTC ---
I suppose this is a much better way to phrase the suggestion as a starting
point. First get -Odebug and then see where we go from there.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53321
--- Comment #3 from H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com 2012-05-11 15:52:38
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #2)
I fixed identically looking ICE seen on Mozilla build yesterday. Hopefully the
boostrap is fixed now, too.
It still fails with the
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52887
--- Comment #6 from Daniel Richard G. skunk at iskunk dot org 2012-05-11
17:05:57 UTC ---
With the new build, I now see one missing symbol instead of two. (Not sure why
the earlier hacked build went through):
gmake[3]: Entering directory
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53324
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-05-11
17:09:26 UTC ---
Even if it wasn't assignable your program would crash, C++ name mangling
doesn't include the return type so the symbol _ZN2XX5getmeEv defined in x.o
reolves
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53326
Bug #: 53326
Summary: -finit-integer, -finit-real and INTENT(OUT)
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53324
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-05-11
17:20:13 UTC ---
N.B. this is basically the same scenario as if you compiled x.C, then changed
XX::getme to return a std::list instead of std::deque, then compiled y.C -- it
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53326
--- Comment #1 from Arnaud Desitter arnaud02 at users dot sourceforge.net
2012-05-11 17:31:12 UTC ---
Consider:
cat UIN15-int.f
!! check whether uninitialised variables are detected
!! for INTENT(OUT) arrays
program uin
integer x(10)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49797
--- Comment #5 from Matt Hargett matt at use dot net 2012-05-11 17:58:27 UTC
---
It's not an IRIX-specific thing AFAICS, but rather that newer versions of
cloog/ppl renamed the macro to avoid conflicts on IRIX. 4.6 still checks for
the old macro
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53315
--- Comment #8 from Andi Kleen andi-gcc at firstfloor dot org 2012-05-11
18:02:43 UTC ---
I tested HJs fix on the test case and also on a more complex program and it all
works as expected. Please commit.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53321
--- Comment #4 from Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-05-11
18:25:06 UTC ---
was comitted as revision 187382. I am trying profiledbootstrap now.
Honza
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53327
Bug #: 53327
Summary: Invalid ASM being generated
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.4.6
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53327
--- Comment #1 from The Written Word bugzilla-gcc at thewrittenword dot com
2012-05-11 18:30:02 UTC ---
Created attachment 27381
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27381
a.c from -save-temps
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53327
--- Comment #2 from The Written Word bugzilla-gcc at thewrittenword dot com
2012-05-11 18:31:55 UTC ---
Created attachment 27382
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27382
Assembler file from -save-temps
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52887
--- Comment #7 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-05-11
18:34:59 UTC ---
Looks as though it also needs
template class functionbool (__regex::_PatternCursor const);
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8564
michael777 bestvideos2011 at live dot co.uk changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11198
michael777 bestvideos2011 at live dot co.uk changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52537
--- Comment #6 from Thomas Koenig tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-05-11
18:50:27 UTC ---
Author: tkoenig
Date: Fri May 11 18:50:14 2012
New Revision: 187413
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=187413
Log:
2012-05-11 Thomas
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45375
--- Comment #129 from Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-05-11
19:05:19 UTC ---
OK, the slow part of uniuqify_nodes is:
/* Remove us from our main variant list if we are not the
variant leader. */
if
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52537
--- Comment #7 from Thomas Koenig tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-05-11
19:16:08 UTC ---
Does this fix the problem?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37122
--- Comment #6 from Daniel Richard G. skunk at iskunk dot org 2012-05-11
19:16:50 UTC ---
Created attachment 27383
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27383
updated patch for 4.7.0
I got bitten by this recently. Bootstrapping GCC
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53263
--- Comment #11 from François Dumont fdumont at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-05-11
19:21:38 UTC ---
Author: fdumont
Date: Fri May 11 19:21:31 2012
New Revision: 187414
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=187414
Log:
2012-05-11 François
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51564
--- Comment #7 from Matt Hargett matt at use dot net 2012-05-11 20:19:01 UTC
---
Applying the patch does allow DWARF serialization to get further, but now it
dies here:
internal compiler error: in add_AT_specification, at dwarf2out.c:7536
It
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53029
Thomas Koenig tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53029
Manfred Schwarb manfred99 at gmx dot ch changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53328
Bug #: 53328
Summary: [OOP] Ambiguous check for type-bound GENERIC shall
ignore PASSed arguments
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53315
--- Comment #9 from Andi Kleen andi-gcc at firstfloor dot org 2012-05-11
21:35:47 UTC ---
Sorry I was wrong earlier. Retested now fully with a full test case and HJs
patch and i always get aborts
The xbegin gets miscompiled now, the in
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53328
Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||burnus at gcc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53312
--- Comment #2 from philippe.waroquiers at skynet dot be 2012-05-11 22:16:25
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
This looks like PR53214 - unable to verify without a testcase though. Thus,
please try a recent GCC 4.7 snapshot instead. You can
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53310
--- Comment #4 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-05-11
22:32:36 UTC ---
Author: burnus
Date: Fri May 11 22:32:27 2012
New Revision: 187417
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=187417
Log:
2012-05-12 Tobias Burnus
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46820
Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Undefined reference errors |toplevel ASM
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53310
--- Comment #5 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-05-11
22:33:30 UTC ---
Author: burnus
Date: Fri May 11 22:33:21 2012
New Revision: 187418
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=187418
Log:
2012-05-12 Tobias Burnus
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46820
--- Comment #13 from Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-05-11
22:38:23 UTC ---
Updated description to match reality. Here it should really be user defined
alias with weak visibility.
void __f () { /* Do something. */; }
void f ()
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53315
--- Comment #10 from phpbbaid at gmail dot com 2012-05-11 23:02:22 UTC ---
please unsubscribe
-Original Message-
From: andi-gcc at firstfloor dot org
Sent: Friday, May 11, 2012 11:35 PM
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52054
Steven Bosscher steven at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||steven at gcc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53310
--- Comment #6 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-05-11
23:09:35 UTC ---
Author: burnus
Date: Fri May 11 23:09:30 2012
New Revision: 187419
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=187419
Log:
2012-05-12 Tobias Burnus
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53310
Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53289
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48009
Daniel Richard G. skunk at iskunk dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|4.5.2 |4.7.0
---
1 - 100 of 103 matches
Mail list logo
