http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53372
Bug #: 53372
Summary: [avr] Section attribute ignored with address space
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: wrong-code
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53372
Georg-Johann Lay gjl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P5
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53362
--- Comment #5 from Uros Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com 2012-05-16 06:13:53
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #4)
Is this enough for you to work with?
No, please follow the instructions in [1]. Also, since this is a runtime
problem, we will need
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53083
--- Comment #8 from Uros Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com 2012-05-16 06:30:58
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #6)
I've tried to take the source-file in question (miarc.c) and make something
self-contained, but I was unable to make it work due to
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53083
--- Comment #9 from Uros Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com 2012-05-16 06:33:35
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #8)
I've tried to take the source-file in question (miarc.c) and make something
self-contained, but I was unable to make it work due to
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53083
--- Comment #10 from Uros Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com 2012-05-16 06:36:27
UTC ---
Youo can start from [1], you have a failing output there, just provide some
reference input to failing function.
[1]
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53364
--- Comment #4 from Marc Glisse glisse at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-05-16 07:11:35
UTC ---
Looking at -fdump-tree-all, 081t.phicprop1 is still the same for -O1 and -O2,
but O82t.dse1 is missing the memory writes for -O2.
--enable-plugins --prefix=/afs/mpa/data/martin/ugcc
--with-libelf=/afs/mpa/data/martin/numlibs64 --enable-languages=c++,fortran
--enable-target=all --enable-checking=release --enable-build-with-cxx
Thread model: posix
gcc version 4.8.0 20120516 (experimental) [trunk revision
a756f44:a2ddc2d
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53369
--- Comment #4 from Rahul Ramachandran rahulnitk2004 at gmail dot com
2012-05-16 09:09:07 UTC ---
So basically char value -128 is represented in integer as
---1000 and +128 as 1000. So taking the
compliment will
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53339
--- Comment #21 from Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com 2012-05-16
09:11:06 UTC ---
Jon, I totally agree with everything you found the time to explain, thanks! In
my opinion should even be a FAQ or something!
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53366
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52989
Ramana Radhakrishnan ramana at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ramana at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50147
--- Comment #2 from Dmitry Gorbachev d.g.gorbachev at gmail dot com
2012-05-16 10:04:55 UTC ---
Created attachment 27418
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27418
Bt from GCC 4.7.1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53374
Bug #: 53374
Summary: x86_64 bootstrap failed with AVX turned on
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53373
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50147
Dmitry Gorbachev d.g.gorbachev at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53364
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53359
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.8.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53364
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53373
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||evstupac at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53374
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7263
--- Comment #42 from Dodji Seketeli dodji at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-05-16
10:51:20 UTC ---
Author: dodji
Date: Wed May 16 10:51:15 2012
New Revision: 187587
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=187587
Log:
PR preprocessor/7263 -
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53363
--- Comment #2 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ro at CeBiTec dot
Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2012-05-16 10:51:33 UTC ---
--- Comment #1 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-05-15
19:09:37 UTC ---
Yes, the test should only run in
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53363
--- Comment #4 from Rainer Orth ro at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-05-16 10:53:01 UTC
---
Created attachment 27420
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27420
32-bit thunk1.s -dA on i386-apple-darwin11.3.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53363
--- Comment #3 from Rainer Orth ro at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-05-16 10:52:26 UTC
---
Created attachment 27419
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27419
32-bit thunk1.s -dA on i386-pc-solaris2.10 configured to use gas
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53364
--- Comment #7 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-05-16
11:07:46 UTC ---
This is aliasing_component_refs_p returning that *D.2309_15 does not
alias MEM[(struct A *)D.2249].m_x (This is *(struct B *)D.2249 vs.
*(struct A
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53375
Bug #: 53375
Summary: [AVR] Internal compiler error when O1 or Os are active
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.5.3
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53375
--- Comment #1 from Rui Araújo ruka.araujo at gmail dot com 2012-05-16
11:24:50 UTC ---
When running:
avr-gcc -v -save-temps -Wall -g3 -Os -fpack-struct -fshort-enums -std=gnu99
-funsigned-char -funsigned-bitfields -gdwarf-2 -mmcu=atmega8
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53366
H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53376
Bug #: 53376
Summary: Unrecognizable compare insn generated by movsicc in
arm backend.
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40821
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53370
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53359
--- Comment #2 from Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-05-16
12:34:29 UTC ---
Can you, please get me -fdump-ipa-cgraph and the assembly file? The testcase
seems to work normally and those constants are supposed to be optimized out.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52641
--- Comment #6 from Georg-Johann Lay gjl at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-05-16
12:46:41 UTC ---
Author: gjl
Date: Wed May 16 12:46:36 2012
New Revision: 187588
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=187588
Log:
PR testsuite/52641
*
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7263
Dodji Seketeli dodji at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53364
--- Comment #8 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-05-16
13:08:38 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Wed May 16 13:08:33 2012
New Revision: 187589
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=187589
Log:
2012-05-16 Richard
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53364
--- Comment #9 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-05-16
13:11:08 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Wed May 16 13:11:01 2012
New Revision: 187590
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=187590
Log:
2012-05-16 Richard
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53364
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53371
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53359
--- Comment #4 from Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org 2012-05-16 13:25:18
UTC ---
Created attachment 27423
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27423
pass41-frag.cxx.000i.cgraph
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53377
Bug #: 53377
Summary: Thread Cancellation causing aborts due to improper
handling of abi::__forced_unwind
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53377
--- Comment #1 from Mike Dalpee mikedalpee at enginsol dot com 2012-05-16
13:38:57 UTC ---
Created attachment 27424
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27424
Cancelling thread in function with throw() specification causes abort
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53377
--- Comment #2 from Mike Dalpee mikedalpee at enginsol dot com 2012-05-16
13:40:38 UTC ---
Created attachment 27425
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27425
Cancelling a thread while in an exception handler causes abort
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53377
--- Comment #3 from Mike Dalpee mikedalpee at enginsol dot com 2012-05-16
13:43:33 UTC ---
Please refer to this thread in gcc-help for a lot more information:
GCC 4.6.2 C++ thread cancellation issue
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53217
--- Comment #5 from William J. Schmidt wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-05-16
14:39:40 UTC ---
Author: wschmidt
Date: Wed May 16 14:39:32 2012
New Revision: 187595
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=187595
Log:
gcc:
2012-05-16
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53217
William J. Schmidt wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53355
--- Comment #4 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-05-16
14:46:33 UTC ---
One major remaining issue is that the entry checks for the versioned loops
all base on the number of iterations of said loop instead of on the
feature (in
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53239
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53316
--- Comment #10 from David Stone david at doublewise dot net 2012-05-16
15:57:13 UTC ---
I did some research to see how often each optimization level is actually used.
Looking solely at the most followed C and C++ repositories on github, I
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53376
Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53334
Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ramana at gcc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53378
Bug #: 53378
Summary: gcc/regs.h hides system header regs.h on vxWorks
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53378
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-05-16
16:22:33 UTC ---
This is another one of these target headers including GCC headers which should
not be done.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53378
--- Comment #2 from rbmj at verizon dot net 2012-05-16 16:33:36 UTC ---
No it is not. regs.h is a system header on VxWorks. I can see a big:
/* regs.h - CPU registers */
/* Copyright 1984-2003 Wind River Systems, Inc. */
At the top of
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53366
Uros Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53379
Bug #: 53379
Summary: [4.7 Regression] No backtrace generated for array
bounds violation
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53366
--- Comment #4 from Uros Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com 2012-05-16 17:15:58
UTC ---
foo (struct U * restrict p1, const complex double * restrict x)
{
vector(4) double vect_var_.41;
vector(4) double vect_var_.40;
vector(4) double
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53366
--- Comment #5 from Uros Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com 2012-05-16 17:25:50
UTC ---
This testcase fails with -O3 with plain SSE vectorization:
--cut here--
struct S { float v[3]; };
struct T { struct S r, i; };
struct U { struct T j[2]; };
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52727
--- Comment #17 from Richard Henderson rth at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-05-16
17:49:48 UTC ---
Author: rth
Date: Wed May 16 17:49:38 2012
New Revision: 187603
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=187603
Log:
PR debug/52727
*
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53380
Bug #: 53380
Summary: .ehframe could be smaller
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52727
Richard Henderson rth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53377
Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
--prefix=/home/dave/opt/gnu/gcc/gcc-4.8.0
--with-local-prefix=/home/dave/opt/gnu --enable-threads=posix
--enable-__cxa_atexit --build=hppa-linux-gnu --enable-clocale=gnu
--enable-java-gc=boehm --enable-languages=c,c++,objc,fortran,obj-c++,java,lto
Thread model: posix
gcc version 4.8.0 20120516
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53379
--- Comment #1 from Harald Anlauf anlauf at gmx dot de 2012-05-16 20:30:13
UTC ---
Solution: the function gfortran_runtime_error_at() should
call the abort. One might adjust this dependent on options.backtrace
if the core dump is not desired.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53350
--- Comment #6 from Ryan Thompson rct+gcc at thompsonclan dot org 2012-05-16
20:30:29 UTC ---
The problem does not happen with g++ version 4.6.3 as provided in Ubuntu 12.04.
I'm currently using multidelta to reduce the test case on my 11.10
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53314
--- Comment #1 from Joel Sherrill joel at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-05-16 20:38:44
UTC ---
Forgot the ChangeLog entry.
2012-05-16 Joel Sherrill joel.sherr...@oarcorp.com
* config.host (m32r-*-rtems*): Include crtinit.o and crtfinit.o
as
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53381
John David Anglin danglin at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bernds at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53381
--- Comment #2 from Bernd Schmidt bernds at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-05-16
22:30:53 UTC ---
What's it actually trying to access, and failing? Is dest NULL or something?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53381
--- Comment #3 from dave.anglin at bell dot net 2012-05-16 23:01:00 UTC ---
On 16-May-12, at 6:30 PM, bernds at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53381
--- Comment #2 from Bernd Schmidt bernds at gcc dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53382
Bug #: 53382
Summary: incorrect associativity in expressions
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: critical
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53382
Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53350
--- Comment #7 from Ryan Thompson rct+gcc at thompsonclan dot org 2012-05-16
23:07:38 UTC ---
Created attachment 27426
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27426
Test case reduced by multidelta
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53382
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-05-16
23:07:46 UTC ---
See also http://c-faq.com/expr/confused.html .
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53382
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-05-16
23:12:02 UTC ---
Basically C does not specify which order of the two operands of + are evaluated
first so both clang and GCC are correct.
Since the + associativity is
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53381
--- Comment #4 from Bernd Schmidt bernds at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-05-16
23:14:32 UTC ---
Created attachment 27427
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27427
Candidate patch
Ok, seriously weird call insns. If you can fix that in the
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53350
--- Comment #8 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-05-16
23:17:04 UTC ---
Works with:
Using built-in specs.
COLLECT_GCC=/home/apinski/local-gcc/bin/gcc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53376
--- Comment #2 from Richard Earnshaw rearnsha at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-05-16
23:18:34 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #0)
extern int x;
static long long p;
static long long *h1 ;
static long long *h2 ;
void foo (void)
{
int i ;
for(
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53376
--- Comment #3 from Ramana Radhakrishnan ramana at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-05-16
23:23:43 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #2)
(In reply to comment #0)
extern int x;
static long long p;
static long long *h1 ;
static long long *h2 ;
void
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53380
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-05-16
23:49:09 UTC ---
Try -fno-asynchronous-unwind-tables .
Also the ABI for x86_64 requires the unwind tables IIRC.
Also i?86 enables the unwinding tables if frame pointers are
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53220
--- Comment #11 from Paul Pluzhnikov ppluzhnikov at google dot com 2012-05-17
00:02:33 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #10)
C++98 and C++11 define the lifetime of a temporary as lasting until the end of
the full-expression, unless its lifetime is
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53383
Bug #: 53383
Summary: Allow -mpreferred-stack-boundary=3 on x86-64
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: enhancement
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53381
--- Comment #5 from dave.anglin at bell dot net 2012-05-17 00:18:46 UTC ---
On 16-May-12, at 7:14 PM, bernds at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
Ok, seriously weird call insns. If you can fix that in the port,
it'll benefit
from the optimization.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53384
Bug #: 53384
Summary: checksum (comparison) differs wrongly
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.3
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53350
--- Comment #9 from Ryan Thompson rct+gcc at thompsonclan dot org 2012-05-17
00:44:30 UTC ---
The main issue is that it doesn't work in 6.4.1, which is the version provided
in Ubuntu 11.10, which means that anyone running 11.10 won't be able to
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53381
--- Comment #6 from dave.anglin at bell dot net 2012-05-17 01:52:03 UTC ---
On 16-May-12, at 7:14 PM, bernds at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
Ok, seriously weird call insns. If you can fix that in the port,
it'll benefit
from the optimization.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53385
Bug #: 53385
Summary: Error: operand out of range after changes for
LSHIFT_EXPR in vrp.c
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53385
Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|tree-optimization |target
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53385
David Edelsohn dje at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53386
Bug #: 53386
Summary: Bad assembly code produced for m68000
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.4
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: blocker
Priority:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53387
Bug #: 53387
Summary: gcc does not like /* */ comments
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: major
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53387
Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53387
--- Comment #2 from quicksort at orange dot fr 2012-05-17 04:20:32 UTC ---
Hi Andrew,
It' s not related to my code.
Everything works fine when /* */ comments are replaced with // comments.
I am a 55-year old Assembly Language/Apl/C/C++ programmer
92 matches
Mail list logo
