[Bug c++/53220] [4.7/4.8 Regression] g++ mis-compiles compound literals

2012-05-22 Thread jason at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53220 --- Comment #12 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-05-22 17:41:45 UTC --- I checked the behavior of clang and icc with the following testcase: extern C int printf (const char *,...); struct A { int i; ~A() { printf (~A()\n); }

[Bug c++/53455] g++ builds segfault in boost::python

2012-05-22 Thread j.wielicki at sotecware dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53455 --- Comment #2 from Jonas Wielicki j.wielicki at sotecware dot net 2012-05-22 17:42:36 UTC --- Created attachment 27478 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27478 -save-temps output for crashtest.cpp (my small test program) again

[Bug c++/53220] [4.7/4.8 Regression] g++ mis-compiles compound literals

2012-05-22 Thread ppluzhnikov at google dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53220 --- Comment #13 from Paul Pluzhnikov ppluzhnikov at google dot com 2012-05-22 17:49:24 UTC --- (In reply to comment #12) So yes, what remains for this bug is to complain about undefined behavior due to accessing the value of an object after

[Bug c++/53220] [4.7/4.8 Regression] g++ mis-compiles compound literals

2012-05-22 Thread ppluzhnikov at google dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53220 --- Comment #13 from Paul Pluzhnikov ppluzhnikov at google dot com 2012-05-22 17:49:24 UTC --- (In reply to comment #12) So yes, what remains for this bug is to complain about undefined behavior due to accessing the value of an object after

[Bug tree-optimization/53438] [4.7/4.8 Regression] Bitfield store replaced with full-byte store

2012-05-22 Thread wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53438 --- Comment #8 from William J. Schmidt wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-05-22 18:04:21 UTC --- Richard, the patch looks good. It fixed the reduced test case, solves the customer problem, and bootstraps on powerpc64-linux with no regressions.

[Bug regression/53442] llvm 2.9 tblgen executable possibly miscompiled with gcc 4.7.0

2012-05-22 Thread ncahill_alt at yahoo dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53442 --- Comment #5 from ncahill_alt at yahoo dot com 2012-05-22 18:22:09 UTC --- By comparing the linker commands, I've found that replacing crtbegin.o and crtend.o is sufficient to fix the problem. I've built parts of gcc with -flto and I suspect

[Bug c++/53455] g++ builds segfault in boost::python

2012-05-22 Thread s_gccbugzilla at nedprod dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53455 Niall Douglas s_gccbugzilla at nedprod dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Bug c++/53446] Template function incorrectly rejected when convertible argument is provided for a parameter

2012-05-22 Thread blelbach at cct dot lsu.edu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53446 Bryce Lelbach (wash) blelbach at cct dot lsu.edu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/52072] Several non-deduced contexts not recognized

2012-05-22 Thread blelbach at cct dot lsu.edu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52072 Bryce Lelbach (wash) blelbach at cct dot lsu.edu changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Bug c++/53380] .ehframe could be smaller

2012-05-22 Thread msharov at users dot sourceforge.net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53380 --- Comment #5 from msharov at users dot sourceforge.net 2012-05-22 18:53:32 UTC --- (In reply to comment #4) Adding default handling if there is no FDE is an ABI change, so can't be done on existing architectures (except those that have that

[Bug fortran/53456] New: Add time support for VxWorks

2012-05-22 Thread rbmj at verizon dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53456 Bug #: 53456 Summary: Add time support for VxWorks Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug fortran/53456] Add time support for VxWorks

2012-05-22 Thread rbmj at verizon dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53456 --- Comment #1 from rbmj at verizon dot net 2012-05-22 19:04:03 UTC --- Created attachment 27479 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27479 Patch against trunk

[Bug c++/53455] g++ builds segfault in boost::python

2012-05-22 Thread rene.kuettner at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53455 René Küttner rene.kuettner at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Bug regression/53442] llvm 2.9 tblgen executable possibly miscompiled with gcc 4.7.0

2012-05-22 Thread ncahill_alt at yahoo dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53442 ncahill_alt at yahoo dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED

[Bug c++/53455] boost::python segfault

2012-05-22 Thread s_gccbugzilla at nedprod dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53455 --- Comment #5 from Niall Douglas s_gccbugzilla at nedprod dot com 2012-05-22 19:51:04 UTC --- Link to the c++-sig discussion thread: http://mail.python.org/pipermail/cplusplus-sig/2012-May/016581.html For the purposes of assigning tags, this

[Bug libstdc++/53457] New: Accommodate non-compliant ioctl() on VxWorks

2012-05-22 Thread rbmj at verizon dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53457 Bug #: 53457 Summary: Accommodate non-compliant ioctl() on VxWorks Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug libstdc++/53457] Accommodate non-compliant ioctl() on VxWorks

2012-05-22 Thread paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53457 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC|rbmj at verizon dot net | ---

[Bug libstdc++/53457] Accommodate non-compliant ioctl() on VxWorks

2012-05-22 Thread rbmj at verizon dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53457 rbmj at verizon dot net changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rbmj at verizon dot net ---

[Bug gcov-profile/53406] Unit Record not present in header files or in GCOV output

2012-05-22 Thread myron.walker at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53406 --- Comment #6 from Myron Walker myron.walker at gmail dot com 2012-05-22 21:57:02 UTC --- Not according to the docs in the comments. note: unit function-graph* unit: header int32:checksum string:source function-graph:

[Bug c++/53439] g++ generates buggy code with optimisation flags

2012-05-22 Thread doko at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53439 Matthias Klose doko at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||doko at gcc dot

[Bug debug/53453] darwin linker expects both AT_name and AT_comp_dir debug notes

2012-05-22 Thread howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53453 --- Comment #4 from Jack Howarth howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu 2012-05-22 23:10:03 UTC --- (In reply to comment #3) There is no point to emit DW_AT_comp_dir if all filenames in the file/directory table referenced by DW_AT_stmt_list are

[Bug debug/53453] darwin linker expects both AT_name and AT_comp_dir debug notes

2012-05-22 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53453 --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-05-22 23:32:34 UTC --- gcc hasn't changed the emitted DWARF in this case for more than 12 years.

[Bug other/53231] libatomic/tas_n.c:100:10: error: 'ret' undeclared (first use in this function)

2012-05-22 Thread danglin at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53231 --- Comment #2 from John David Anglin danglin at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-05-22 23:54:36 UTC --- Author: danglin Date: Tue May 22 23:54:32 2012 New Revision: 187783 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=187783 Log: PR other/53231

[Bug other/53231] libatomic/tas_n.c:100:10: error: 'ret' undeclared (first use in this function)

2012-05-22 Thread danglin at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53231 John David Anglin danglin at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug target/53440] [arm] generic thunk code fails for method which uses '...'

2012-05-22 Thread rmansfield at qnx dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53440 --- Comment #4 from Ryan Mansfield rmansfield at qnx dot com 2012-05-23 00:12:59 UTC --- (In reply to comment #3) (In reply to comment #2) Someone needs to implement the thunk functionality for arm. The ARM port does have MI thunk support.

[Bug c++/29185] inconsistent warning: deleting array

2012-05-22 Thread paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29185 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug bootstrap/52700] lib* configure fails on --enable-symvers=gnu-versioned-namespace.

2012-05-22 Thread bkoz at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52700 --- Comment #8 from Benjamin Kosnik bkoz at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-05-23 01:31:29 UTC --- I tried it with --enable-languages=all ?

[Bug bootstrap/53188] [4.8 Regression] libatomic error: Please use exactly Autoconf 2.64 instead of 2.69

2012-05-22 Thread hp at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53188 Hans-Peter Nilsson hp at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||hp at gcc dot

<    1   2